1
|
Santner V, Riepl HS, Posch F, Wallner M, Rainer PP, Ablasser K, Kolesnik E, Hoeller V, Zach D, Schwegel N, Kreuzer P, Lueger A, Petutschnigg J, Pieske B, Zirlik A, Edelmann F, Verheyen N. Non-eligibility for pivotal HFpEF/HFmrEF outcome trials and mortality in a contemporary heart failure cohort. Eur J Intern Med 2023; 118:73-81. [PMID: 37517939 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.07.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Pivotal outcome trials targeting heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) and mildly-reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) may have excluded patients at highest risk of poor outcomes. We aimed to assess eligibility for HFpEF/HFmrEF outcome trials in an unselected heart failure cohort and its association with all-cause mortality. Among 32.028 patients presenting to a tertiary care center emergency unit for any reason between August 2018 and July 2019, we identified 407 admissions with evident HFpEF and HFmrEF. Eligibility criteria for pivotal trials CHARM-Preserved, I-PRESERVE, TOPCAT, PARAGON-HF, EMPEROR-Preserved and DELIVER were assessed by chart review. The proportions of admissions fulfilling HFpEF/HFmrEF trial eligibility criteria were 88% for CHARM-Preserved, 40% for I-PRESERVE, 35% for TOPCAT, 28% for PARAGON-HF, 51% for EMPEROR-Preserved, and 49% for DELIVER. During a median follow-up of 1.9 years, death-from-any-cause occurred in 121 cases (30%). Twenty-four-month overall survival estimates for non-eligible and eligible admissions were 53% vs. 76% for CHARM-Preserved (HR=2.32, 95% CI: 1.47-3.67, p<0.001), 62% vs. 87% for I-PRESERVE (HR=2.97, 1.85-4.77, p<0.001), 67% vs. 84% for TOPCAT (HR=2.04, 1.29-3.24, p = 0.002), 68% vs. 85% for PARAGONHF (HR=2.28, 1.33-3.90, p = 0.003), 64% vs. 81% for EMPEROR-Preserved (HR=1.90, 1.27-2.84, p = 0.002), and 65% vs. 80% for DELIVER (HR=1.71, 1.14-2.57, p = 0.010). Exclusion criteria independently predicting death were eGFR <20 ml/min/1.73 m2, COPD with home oxygen therapy, and severe valvular heart disease. Conclusively, in a contemporary HFpEF/HFmrEF cohort, non-eligibility for outcome trials predicted for strongly increased mortality. HFpEF/HFmrEF patients at highest mortality risk were likely underrepresented in previous outcome trials and their treatment remains an unmet medical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Viktoria Santner
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Hermann S Riepl
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Florian Posch
- Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Markus Wallner
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Peter P Rainer
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Department of Medicine, St. Johann in Tirol General Hospital, St. Johann in Tirol, Austria; BioTechMed Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Klemens Ablasser
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ewald Kolesnik
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Viktoria Hoeller
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - David Zach
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nora Schwegel
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Philipp Kreuzer
- Emergency Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Andreas Lueger
- Emergency Medicine Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Johannes Petutschnigg
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andreas Zirlik
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Frank Edelmann
- Department of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Partner Site Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicolas Verheyen
- Division of Cardiology, University Heart Center and Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Matsumura K, Ijichi T, Morimoto J, Takabayashi K, Miho M, Ueno K, Yagi E, Takase T, Ueno M, Nakazawa G. Up-Titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan Among Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2023; 28:10742484221146375. [PMID: 36594416 DOI: 10.1177/10742484221146375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
AIMS In recent large trials, sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated favorable effects in patients with HF. However, many patients do not achieve the target dose of treatment. This study investigated the factors linked to up-titration of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS Using a multicenter retrospective database, 204 consecutive patients with HFpEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40%) who were treated with sacubitril/valsartan between October 2020 and March 2022 were analyzed. Up-titration was defined as an increase in dosage above 24/26 mg BID beyond 12 weeks after the initiation of sacubitril/valsartan. RESULTS Among the patients, 55% underwent up-titration, and 8% discontinued the drug. The baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) was higher in patients with up-titration than in those with no up-titration; SBP values similar to that at baseline were observed between the 2 groups at 2 to 4 weeks and at 12 weeks after the commencement of sacubitril/valsartan treatment. The majority of those who discontinued sacubitril/valsartan did so because of hypotension. The multivariable logistic regression model showed that a history of hypertension, history of atrial fibrillation, baseline SBP, and baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were associated with sacubitril/valsartan up-titration. CONCLUSION Approximately half of all patients did not undergo up-titration, and 8% of those with HFpEF discontinued the sacubitril/valsartan therapy. For aggressive up-titration and continuation of sacubitril/valsartan, patients with lower baseline SBP, renal dysfunction, absence of a history of hypertension, and presence of atrial fibrillation may require more careful monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichiro Matsumura
- Department of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Takeshi Ijichi
- Department of Cardiology, Tokai University, Isehara, Japan
| | - Junko Morimoto
- Department of Cardiology, Arida Municipal Hospital, Arida, Japan
| | | | - Mitsunori Miho
- Department of Cardiology, Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ueno
- Department of Cardiology, Yao Municipal Hospital, Yao, Japan
| | - Eijiro Yagi
- Department of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Toru Takase
- Department of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Masafumi Ueno
- Department of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Gaku Nakazawa
- Department of Cardiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chandra A, Polanczyk CA, Claggett BL, Vaduganathan M, Packer M, Lefkowitz MP, Rouleau JL, Liu J, Shi VC, Schwende H, Zile MR, Desai AS, Pfeffer MA, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Lewis EF. Health-related quality of life outcomes in PARAGON-HF. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:2264-2274. [PMID: 36394533 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Heart failure (HF) is associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQL). Patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have similar HRQL impairment as those with reduced ejection fraction. This study describes the impact of sacubitril/valsartan on HRQL in patients with HFpEF enrolled in the PARAGON-HF trial. METHODS AND RESULTS Patients completed the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) at randomization, 4, 8 months, and annually thereafter. Changes in HRQL scores were evaluated using repeated measures models adjusted for treatment, baseline values and region. The pre-specified principal efficacy assessment was at 8 months at which time patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan had borderline higher KCCQ clinical summary score (CSS) with least squares mean (LSM) adjusted difference of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.0, 2.1; p = 0.051). Including all visits up to 36 months, the LSM difference in KCCQ-CSS favoured sacubitril/valsartan with average adjusted difference of 1.1 (95% CI 0.1, 2.0; p = 0.034). Patients treated with sacubitril/valsartan had greater odds of clinically meaningful improvement (≥5-point increase) in KCCQ-CSS (odds ratio 1.31; 95% CI 1.06, 1.61) at 8 months. At 8 months, there was no significant difference in the EQ visual analogue scale between the treatment arms, but sacubitril/valsartan was associated with higher EQ-5D utility score (US-based) with LSM adjusted difference of 0.01 (95% CI 0.00, 0.02; p = 0.019). CONCLUSION Compared with valsartan, sacubitril/valsartan had a borderline benefit on KCCQ-CSS at 8 months in patients with HFpEF. This benefit became more significant when data from all visits up to 36 months were included. This modest overall benefit was also supported by greater odds of patients reporting a clinically meaningful improvement in HRQL with sacubitril/valsartan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alvin Chandra
- Division of Cardiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | | | | | - Milton Packer
- Baylor Heart and Vascular Institute, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Jean L Rouleau
- Institut de Cardiologie de Montreal, Université de Montreal Canada, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Michael R Zile
- RHJ Department of Veterans Administration Medical Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA
| | | | | | - John J V McMurray
- BHF Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Eldrin F Lewis
- Cardiovascular Division, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tomasoni D, Adamo M, Metra M. December 2021 at a glance: focus on medical treatment, valvular heart disease and prognostic models. Eur J Heart Fail 2021; 23:1993-1994. [PMID: 34935252 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.1896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Tomasoni
- Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marianna Adamo
- Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Cardiology, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|