1
|
Yuasa N, Harada T, Kagami K, Ishii H, Obokata M. The roles of exercise stress echocardiography for the evaluation of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in the heart failure pandemic era. J Med Ultrason (2001) 2024; 51:437-445. [PMID: 38926301 DOI: 10.1007/s10396-024-01468-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly 70% of all HF and has become the dominant form of HF. The increased prevalence of HFpEF has contributed to a rise in the number of HF patients, known as the "heart failure pandemic". In addition to the fact that HF is a progressive disease and a delayed diagnosis may worsen clinical outcomes, the emergence of disease-modifying treatments such as sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists has made appropriate and timely identification of HFpEF even more important. However, diagnosis of HFpEF remains challenging in patients with a lower degree of congestion. In addition to normal EF, this is related to the fact that left ventricular (LV) filling pressures are often normal at rest but become abnormal during exercise. Exercise stress echocardiography can identify such exercise-induced elevations in LV filling pressures and facilitate the diagnosis of HFpEF. Exercise stress echocardiography may also be useful for risk stratification and assessment of exercise tolerance as well as cardiovascular responses to exercise. Recent attention has focused on dedicated dyspnea clinics to identify early HFpEF among patients with unexplained dyspnea and to investigate the causes of dyspnea. This review discusses the role of exercise stress echocardiography in the diagnosis and evaluation of HFpEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naoki Yuasa
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Tomonari Harada
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Kazuki Kagami
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Hideki Ishii
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
| | - Masaru Obokata
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rist A, Sevre K, Wachtell K, Devereux RB, Aurigemma GP, Smiseth OA, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Pitt B, Burnier M, Kreutz R, Oparil S, Mancia G, Zannad F. The current best drug treatment for hypertensive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Intern Med 2024; 120:3-10. [PMID: 37865559 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 09/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023]
Abstract
More than 90 % of patients developing heart failure (HF) have hypertension. The most frequent concomitant conditions are type-2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease. HF outcome research focuses on decreasing mortality and preventing hospitalization for worsening HF syndrome. All drugs that decrease these HF endpoints lower blood pressure. Current drug treatments for HF are (i) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, (ii) selected beta-blockers, (iii) steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and (iv) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. For various reasons, these drug treatments were first studied in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Subsequently, they have been investigated in HF patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFpEF) of mostly hypertensive etiology, and with modest benefits largely assessed on top of background treatment with the drugs already proven effective in HFrEF. Additionally, diuretics are given on symptomatic indications. Patients with HFpEF may have diastolic dysfunction but also systolic dysfunction visualized by lack of longitudinal shortening. Considering the totality of evidence and the overall need for antihypertensive treatment and/or treatment of hypertensive complications in almost all HF patients, the principal drug treatment of HF appears to be the same regardless of LVEF. Rather than LVEF-guided treatment of HF, treatment of HF should be directed by symptoms (related to the level of fluid retention), signs (tachycardia), severity (NYHA functional class), and concomitant diseases and conditions. All HF patients should be given all the drug classes mentioned above if well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aurora Rist
- Medical School and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kaja Sevre
- Medical School and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristian Wachtell
- Weill-Cornell Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York City, NY, USA
| | | | - Gerard P Aurigemma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan School of Medicine, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Otto A Smiseth
- Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Cardiology, University of Oslo, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sverre E Kjeldsen
- Medical School and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Cardiology, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| | - Stevo Julius
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Bertram Pitt
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michel Burnier
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Service of Nephrology and Hypertension, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, AL, USA
| | | | - Faiez Zannad
- Inserm, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-1433 and F-CRIN INI CRCT, Universite de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Formiga F, Nuñez J, Castillo Moraga MJ, Cobo Marcos M, Egocheaga MI, García-Prieto CF, Trueba-Sáiz A, Matalí Gilarranz A, Fernández Rodriguez JM. Diagnosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a systematic narrative review of the evidence. Heart Fail Rev 2024; 29:179-189. [PMID: 37861854 PMCID: PMC10904432 DOI: 10.1007/s10741-023-10360-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common condition in clinical practice, affecting more than half of patients with HF. HFpEF is associated with morbidity and mortality and with considerable healthcare resource utilization and costs. Therefore, early diagnosis is crucial to facilitate prompt management, particularly initiation of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Although European guidelines define HFpEF as the presence of symptoms with or without signs of HF, left ventricular EF ≥ 50%, and objective evidence of cardiac structural and/or functional abnormalities, together with elevated natriuretic peptide levels, the diagnosis of HFpEF remains challenging. First, there is no clear consensus on how HFpEF should be defined. Furthermore, diagnostic tools, such as natriuretic peptide levels and resting echocardiogram findings, are significantly limited in the diagnosis of HFpEF. As a result, some patients are overdiagnosed (i.e., elderly people with comorbidities that mimic HF), although in other cases, HFpEF is overlooked. In this manuscript, we perform a systematic narrative review of the diagnostic approach to patients with HFpEF. We also propose a comprehensible algorithm that can be easily applied in daily clinical practice and could prove useful for confirming or ruling out a diagnosis of HFpEF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesc Formiga
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Julio Nuñez
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia-España, Valencia, Spain
- Departamento de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, Fundación de Investigación INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Marta Cobo Marcos
- Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda (IDIPHISA), Madrid, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (CIBERCV), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Angel Trueba-Sáiz
- Medical Affairs Department, Eli Lilly and Company España, Alcobendas, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - José María Fernández Rodriguez
- Área Cardiorrenometabólica del Servicio de Medicina Interna del Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sevre K, Rist A, Wachtell K, Devereux RB, Aurigemma GP, Smiseth OA, Kjeldsen SE, Julius S, Pitt B, Burnier M, Kreutz R, Oparil S, Mancia G, Zannad F. What Is the Current Best Drug Treatment for Hypertensive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction? Review of the Totality of Evidence. Am J Hypertens 2024; 37:1-14. [PMID: 37551929 PMCID: PMC10724525 DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpad073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND More than 90% of patients developing heart failure (HF) have an epidemiological background of hypertension. The most frequent concomitant conditions are type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease, all disorders/diseases closely related to hypertension. METHODS HF outcome research focuses on decreasing mortality and preventing hospitalization for worsening HF syndrome. All drugs that decrease these HF endpoints lower blood pressure. Current drug treatments for HF are (i) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, (ii) selected beta-blockers, (iii) steroidal and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and (iv) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. RESULTS For various reasons, these drug treatments were first studied in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, subsequently, they have been investigated and, as we see it, documented as beneficial in HF patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFpEF) and mostly hypertensive etiology, with effect estimates assessed partly on top of background treatment with the drugs already proven effective in HFrEF. Additionally, diuretics are given on symptomatic indications. CONCLUSIONS Considering the totality of evidence and the overall need for antihypertensive treatment and/or treatment of hypertensive complications in almost all HF patients, the principal drug treatment of HF appears to be the same regardless of LVEF. Rather than LVEF-guided treatment of HF, treatment of HF should be directed by symptoms (related to the level of fluid retention), signs (tachycardia), severity (NYHA functional class), and concomitant diseases and conditions. All HF patients should be given all the drug classes mentioned above if well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Sevre
- University of Oslo, Medical School and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Aurora Rist
- University of Oslo, Medical School and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristian Wachtell
- Weill-Cornell Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Richard B Devereux
- Weill-Cornell Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Gerard P Aurigemma
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, UMassChan School of Medicine, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Otto A Smiseth
- University of Oslo, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Cardiology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sverre E Kjeldsen
- University of Oslo, Medical School and Institute of Clinical Medicine, Oslo, Norway
- Departments of Cardiology and Nephrology, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- University of Michigan, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Stevo Julius
- University of Michigan, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Bertram Pitt
- University of Michigan, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michel Burnier
- Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Reinhold Kreutz
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Suzanne Oparil
- University of Alabama at Birmingham, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, Department of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | - Faiez Zannad
- Universite de Lorraine, Inserm, Centre d’Investigations Cliniques-1433 and F-CRIN INI CRCT, Nancy, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bayes-Genis A, Aimo A, Jhund P, Richards M, de Boer RA, Arfsten H, Fabiani I, Lupón J, Anker SD, González A, Castiglione V, Metra M, Mueller C, Núñez J, Rossignol P, Barison A, Butler J, Teerlink J, Filippatos G, Ponikowski P, Vergaro G, Zannad F, Seferovic P, Rosano G, Coats AJS, Emdin M, Januzzi JL. Biomarkers in heart failure clinical trials. A review from the Biomarkers Working Group of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:1767-1777. [PMID: 36073112 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The approval of new heart failure (HF) therapies has slowed over the past two decades in part due to the high costs of conducting large randomized clinical trials that are needed to adequately power major clinical endpoint studies. Several biomarkers have been identified reflecting different elements of HF pathophysiology, with possible applications in diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment monitoring, and even in the design of clinical trials. Biomarkers could potentially be used to refine study inclusion criteria to enable enrolment of patients who are more likely to respond to a therapeutic intervention, despite being at sufficient risk to meet pre-determined study endpoint rates. When there is a close relationship between biomarker levels and clinical endpoints, changes in biomarker levels after a given treatment can act as a surrogate endpoint, potentially reducing the duration and cost of a clinical trial. Natriuretic peptides have been widely used in clinical trials with a variable amount of added value, which such variation being probably due to the absence of a close pathophysiological connection to the study drug. Notable exceptions to this include sacubitril/valsartan and vericiguat. Future studies should seek to adopt unbiased approaches for discovery of true companion diagnostics; with -omics-based tools, biomarkers might be more precisely selected for use in clinical trials to identify responses that closely reflect the biological effects of the drug under investigation. Finally, biomarkers associated with cardiac damage and remodelling, such as cardiac troponin, could be employed as safety endpoints provided that standardization between different assays is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoni Bayes-Genis
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.,CIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alberto Aimo
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.,Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Pardeep Jhund
- Institute of Cardiovascular & Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Rudolf A de Boer
- Department of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henrike Arfsten
- Clinical Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine II, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Iacopo Fabiani
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Josep Lupón
- Institut del Cor, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan D Anker
- Department of Cardiology (CVK), and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapy (BCRT), German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Arantxa González
- CIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.,Program of Cardiovascular Diseases, CIMA Universidad de Navarra and IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology Department, ASST Spedali Civili; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Julio Núñez
- CIBERCV, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain.,Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, INCLIVA, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Andrea Barison
- Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Javed Butler
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS, USA
| | - John Teerlink
- Heart Failure and of the Echocardiography Laboratory, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Giuseppe Vergaro
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.,Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - Faiez Zannad
- Université de Lorraine, Centre d'Investigations Cliniques-Plurithématique 1433, and Inserm U1116 CHRU Nancy, F-CRIN INI-CRCT, Nancy, France
| | - Petar Seferovic
- Department of Cardiology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.,Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia
| | | | | | - Michele Emdin
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy.,Cardiology Division, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, Pisa, Italy
| | - James L Januzzi
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tomasoni D, Adamo M, Metra M. April 2022 at a glance: focus on prevention, acute heart failure and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:593-595. [PMID: 35545950 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Tomasoni
- Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marianna Adamo
- Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Metra
- Cardiology and Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Cardio-Thoracic Department, Civil Hospitals; Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cleland JG, Butler J, Januzzi JL, Pellicori P, McDonagh T. Only people with increased plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides should be included in outcome trials of diabetes, cardiovascular and kidney disease; implications for clinical practice. Eur J Heart Fail 2022; 24:678-680. [PMID: 35297132 DOI: 10.1002/ejhf.2488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John Gf Cleland
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow and Visiting Professor of Cardiology, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Javed Butler
- Department of Medicine, University of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi, USA
| | - James L Januzzi
- Department of Cardiology Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Pierpaolo Pellicori
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|