Phenotype, outcomes and natural history of early-stage non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy

Precision prediction of heart failure events in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and mildly reduced ejection fraction using multi-parametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance

AIMS

To assess whether left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (GLS), derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR), is associated with (i) progressive heart failure (HF), and (ii) sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with mildly reduced ejection fraction (DCMmrEF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of patients with DCM and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40% assessed by CMR, including feature-tracking to assess LV GLS and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Long-term adjudicated follow-up included (i) HF hospitalization, LV assist device implantation or HF death, and (ii) SCD or aborted SCD (aSCD). Of 355 patients with DCMmrEF (median age 54 years [interquartile range 43-64], 216 men [60.8%], median LVEF 49% [46-54]) followed up for a median 7.8 years (5.2-9.4), 32 patients (9%) experienced HF events and 19 (5%) died suddenly or experienced aSCD. LV GLS was associated with HF events in a multivariable model when considered as either a continuous (per % hazard ratio [HR] 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.21, p = 0.045) or dichotomized variable (LV GLS > -15.4%: HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.30-5.94, p = 0.008). LGE presence was not associated with HF events (HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.73-3.01, p = 0.270). Conversely, LV GLS was not associated with SCD/aSCD (per % HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.95-1.22, p = 0.257), whereas LGE presence was (HR 3.58, 95% CI 1.39-9.23, p = 0.008). LVEF was neither associated with HF events nor SCD/aSCD.

CONCLUSION

Multi-parametric CMR has utility for precision prognostic stratification of patients with DCMmrEF. LV GLS stratifies risk of progressive HF, while LGE stratifies SCD risk.

2024 update in heart failure

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

Screening for dilated cardiomyopathy in immediate family members: to whom, how, when (and where)

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined by the presence of left ventricular dilation and systolic dysfunction in the absence of coronary artery disease, valvular disease, congenital heart disease, or altered haemodynamic conditions. Dilated cardiomyopathy can recognize multiple aetiologies, including infectious processes, effect of toxic substances, immunological mechanisms, and genetic causes. In recent years, many genes coding for proteins involved in the structure and function of the cardiomyocytes have been associated with the development of DCM, making the identification of familial forms increasingly frequent. At the same time, an ever-increasing use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging has made it possible to identify early morpho-functional alterations in subjects with initial forms of the disease, or carriers of pathogenic genetic variants. The increasingly in-depth understanding of the genetic and molecular mechanisms operating in DCM has also favoured the development of new therapeutic strategies including drugs with molecular targets and gene therapies. In this panorama, screening of family members of patients affected by DCM represents an important tool for early diagnosis, treatment, and prognostic stratification. In relation to its clinical relevance and its complexity, it is important that family screening and follow-up of identified patients are carried out in units dedicated to the treatment and study of cardiomyopathies.

Current Insights and Novel Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques in the Prognosis of Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has an important emerging role in the evaluation and management of patients with cardiomyopathies, especially in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). It allows a non-invasive characterization of myocardial tissue, thus assisting early diagnosis and precise phenotyping of the different cardiomyopathies, which is an essential step for early and individualized treatment of patients. Using imaging techniques such as late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), standard and advanced quantification as well as quantitative mapping parameters, CMR-based tissue characterization is useful in the differential diagnosis of DCM and risk stratification. The purpose of this article is to review the utility of CMR in the diagnosis and management of idiopathic DCM, as well as risk prediction and prognosis based on standard and emerging CMR contrast and non-contrast techniques. This is consistent with current evidence and guidance moving beyond traditional prognostic markers such as ejection fraction.