Response and tolerance to oral vasodilator up-titration after intravenous vasodilator therapy in advanced decompensated heart failure

The Impact of Glucocorticoid Therapy on Guideline-Directed Medical Treatment Titration in Patients Hospitalized for Heart Failure with Low Blood Pressure: A Retrospective Study

Background

Positive inotropic and renal protective actions of glucocorticoids have been observed clinically. Therefore, glucocorticoids may be used in patients with heart failure and low blood pressure (HF-LBP).

Methods

The medical records of 144 consecutive patients with HF-LBP who received glucocorticoids as an adjunctive treatment to facilitate the up-titration of β-blocker and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor were reviewed.

Results

After four weeks of treatment, the metoprolol and captopril (or equivalent) dosages were progressively and consistently increased from 25 (interquartile range [IQR] = 12.5-75 mg/day) to 100 mg/day (IQR = 50-178.8 mg/day) and from 0 (IQR = 0-25 mg/day) to 12.5 mg/day (IQR = 0-50 mg/day), respectively. There was a remarkable beneficial hemodynamic response to the glucocorticoid treatment signified by an increase in blood pressure and decrease in heart rate. The average heart rate decreased by 6 beat per minute (bpm) (0.5-16 bpm), and the mean arterial blood pressure increased from 74.06 ± 7.81 to 78.85 ± 7.91 mmHg. We also observed an improvement in renal function and an increased diuretic response following glucocorticoid treatment. As a result, the left ventricular ejection fraction increased from 28.92 ± 8.06% to 33.86 ± 8.76%, and the diuretic response increased from 776.7 mL/40 mg furosemide (IQR = 133.8-2000 mL) to 4000 mL/40 mg furosemide on day 28 (IQR = 2200-5925 mL).

Conclusion

The use of glucocorticoid treatment to maintain hemodynamic and renal functional targets when titrating guideline-directed medical treatment in patients with HF-LBP may be safe, effective, and feasible.

Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Sacubitril-Valsartan In Heart Failure Patients Receiving Intravenous Vasodilator and Inotropic Therapy

BACKGROUND

Prior study has demonstrated that transitioning patients in acutely decompensated heart failure with a low cardiac output directly from intravenous (i.v.) vasoactive (ie, vasodilators or inotropes) drugs to sacubitril-valsartan (S/V) can be done safely with tolerance to the 1-month follow-up. Here, we further characterize the hemodynamic impact of S/V after patients have been optimized on vasoactive therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a single-center, retrospective analysis, 25 patients with cardiac index of less than 2.2 L/min/m² were admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit and newly initiated on angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor therapy with the guidance of invasive hemodynamic monitoring. Hemodynamic data were gathered and compared upon cardiac intensive care unit admission, after optimization with i.v. vasoactive therapy, and after S/V initiation and weaning off i.v.

THERAPY

All patients who tolerated S/V (n = 20) were weaned off vasoactive medications before transfer out of cardiac intensive care unit. Patients maintained their significant improvement in cardiac index and reduction in SVR/PVR on transition from i.v. inotropic and vasodilator therapy to oral S/V. There was an increase in pulmonary artery pulsatility index with S/V therapy compared with the i.v. vasoactive phase of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients in the cardiac intensive care unit can be successfully bridged from vasoactive i.v. therapy to oral S/V with sustained improvement in cardiac index garnered from vasoactive agents. We also observed improvement in the pulmonary artery pulsatility index and maintenance of left and right ventricular unloading with S/V. These encouraging findings merit further prospective study.

How to tackle congestion in acute heart failure

Acute heart failure is a common complication of chronic heart failure and is associated with a high risk for subsequent mortality and morbidity. In 90% of case acute heart failure is the resultant of congestion, a manifestation of fluid build-up due to increased filling pressures. As residual congestion at discharge following an acute heart failure episodes is one of the strongest predictors of poor outcome, the goal of therapy should be to resolve congestion completely. Important to comprehend is that increased cardiovascular filling pressures are not solely the resultant of intravascular volume excess but can also be induced by a decreased venous capacitance. This review article focusses on the pathophysiology, diagnoses, and treatment of congestion in acute heart failure. A clear distinction is made between states of volume overload (intravascular volume excess) or volume redistribution (decreased venous capacitance) contributing to congestion in acute heart failure.

Pharmacological approaches to cardio-renal syndrome: a role for the inodilator levosimendan

Pathological interplay between the heart and kidneys—also known as cardio-renal syndrome (CRS)—is frequently encountered in heart failure and is linked to worse prognosis and quality of life. Drug therapies for this complex situation may include nitroprusside or the recombinant B-type natriuretic peptide nesiritide for patients with acute CRS with normal or high blood pressure, and inotropes or inodilators for patients with acute CRS with low blood pressure. Clinical data for a renal-protective action of levosimendan are suggestive, and meta-analysis data obtained in a range of low-output states are consistent with a levosimendan-induced benefit. Evidence of favourable organ-specific effects of levosimendan, including pre-glomerular vasodilation and increased renal artery diameter and renal blood flow, were collected both in preclinical and clinical studies. Larger randomized controlled trials are however needed to confirm the renal effects of levosimendan in various clinical settings.