Mitraclip therapy in patients with functional mitral regurgitation and missing leaflet coaptation: is it still an exclusion criterion?

Acute heart failure and valvular heart disease: A scientific statement of the Heart Failure Association, the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology

Acute heart failure (AHF) represents a broad spectrum of disease states, resulting from the interaction between an acute precipitant and a patient's underlying cardiac substrate and comorbidities. Valvular heart disease (VHD) is frequently associated with AHF. AHF may result from several precipitants that add an acute haemodynamic stress superimposed on a chronic valvular lesion or may occur as a consequence of a new significant valvular lesion. Regardless of the mechanism, clinical presentation may vary from acute decompensated heart failure to cardiogenic shock. Assessing the severity of VHD as well as the correlation between VHD severity and symptoms may be difficult in patients with AHF because of the rapid variation in loading conditions, concomitant destabilization of the associated comorbidities and the presence of combined valvular lesions. Evidence-based interventions targeting VHD in settings of AHF have yet to be identified, as patients with severe VHD are often excluded from randomized trials in AHF, so results from these trials do not generalize to those with VHD. Furthermore, there are not rigorously conducted randomized controlled trials in the setting of VHD and AHF, most of the data coming from observational studies. Thus, distinct to chronic settings, current guidelines are very elusive when patients with severe VHD present with AHF, and a clear-cut strategy could not be yet defined. Given the paucity of evidence in this subset of AHF patients, the aim of this scientific statement is to describe the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and overall treatment approach for patients with VHD who present with AHF.

Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is the most prevalent valvular heart disease and, when left untreated, results in reduced quality of life, heart failure, and increased mortality. Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has matured considerably as a non-surgical treatment option since its commercial introduction in Europe in 2008. As a result of major device and interventional improvements, as well as the accumulation of experience by the interventional cardiologists, M-TEER has emerged as an important therapeutic strategy for patients with severe and symptomatic MR in the current European and American guidelines. Herein, we provide a comprehensive up-do-date overview of M-TEER. We define preprocedural patient evaluation and highlight key aspects for decision-making. We describe the currently available M-TEER systems and summarise the evidence for M-TEER in both primary mitral regurgitation (PMR) and secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). In addition, we provide recommendations for device selection, intraprocedural imaging and guiding, M-TEER optimisation and management of recurrent MR. Finally, we provide information on major unsolved questions and "grey areas" in M-TEER.

Atrial Fibrillation and Transcatheter Repair of Functional Mitral Regurgitation: Evidence From a Meta-Regression

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of atrial fibrillation (AF) on mortality and efficacy in patients with functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) undergoing MitraClip implantation.

BACKGROUND

AF is a common arrhythmia in patients with severe FMR undergoing transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device. Although AF has been consistently shown to be associated with poor outcomes after mitral valve surgery, the impact of AF on outcomes of MitraClip placement in patients with FMR has not been well studied.

METHODS

Prospective, retrospective registries, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials on MitraClip reporting AF and FMR as one of the variables from inception until January 2019 were included.

RESULTS

Of the initial 1,694 studies, 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. From a total of 5,184 patients, 2,105 patients were identified to have FMR and AF. All-cause 30-day mortality in patients with FMR was 3.7% (95% confidence interval: 2.87 to 4.66) and 1-year mortality was 17.9% (95% confidence interval: 16.01 to 19.71). The meta-regression analysis studying the impact of AF among patients with FMR treated with the MitraClip demonstrated no difference in mortality at 30 days but demonstrated significantly increased mortality at 1 year (95% confidence interval: 0.0006 to 0.0027) (p = 0.004). AF did not influence procedural success.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-regression identifies AF as an independent negative predictor of long-term mortality after MitraClip implantation in patients with FMR. The mechanism of worse outcomes in patients with AF requires further study.

Impact of Mitral Annular Dilation on Edge-to-Edge Therapy With MitraClip-XTR

[Figure: see text].

Anesthesiological Management in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair With MitraClip: Beyond the EVEREST Criteria

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system recently emerged as a viable and less invasive therapeutic option in patients with severe mitral regurgitation deemed to be high-risk surgical candidates. Mitral valve morphology and geometry features are key elements for MitraClip eligibility. In the setting of functional mitral regurgitation, the presence of a leaflet coaptation gap due to advanced left ventricle remodeling can be a potential exclusion criterion for MitraClip therapy. In this article, the authors present a case of successful MitraClip implantation in a patient with severe functional mitral regurgitation and a significant coaptation gap. Periprocedural and intraoperative pharmacological and anesthesiological management were fundamental for successful grasping and procedural success.

Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Using the Edge-to-Edge Clip

Percutaneous intervention for mitral valve (MV) disease has been established as an alternative to open surgical MV repair in patients with prohibitive surgical risk. Multiple percutaneous approaches have been described and are in various stages of development. Edge-to-edge leaflet plication with the MitraClip (Abbott, Menlo Park, CA) is currently the only Food and Drug Administration-approved device specifically for primary or degenerative lesions. Use of the edge-to-edge clip for secondary mitral regurgitation is currently under investigation and may result in expanded indications. Echocardiography has significantly increased our understanding of the anatomy of the MV and provided us with the ability to classify and quantify the associated mitral regurgitation. For percutaneous interventions of the MV, transesophageal echocardiography imaging is used for patient screening, intraprocedural guidance, and confirmation of the result. Optimal outcomes require the echocardiographer and the proceduralist to have a thorough understanding of intra-atrial septal and MV anatomy, as well as an appreciation for the key points and potential pitfalls of each of the procedural steps. With increasing experience, more complex valvular pathology can be successfully percutaneously treated. In addition to two-dimensional echocardiography, advances in three-dimensional echocardiography and fusion imaging will continue to support the refinement of current technologies, the expansion of clinical applications, and the development of novel devices.

Implication of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing MitraClip therapy: results from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry

AIMS

We sought to evaluate the impact of pulmonary hypertension on outcomes following MitraClip therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 643 patients in the TRAnscatheter Mitral valve Interventions (TRAMI) registry were divided into three groups according to echocardiographically graded systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) (Group 1: patients with sPAP of ≤36 mmHg; Group 2: patients with sPAP of 37-50 mmHg; Group 3: patients with sPAP of >50 mmHg) and followed for 1 year. Recent cardiac decompensation, aortic valve disease and tricuspid valve insufficiency were observed more frequently in patients with higher sPAP. Furthermore, logEuroSCORE, Society of Thoracic Surgeons score and age were higher with rising sPAP values. No differences were observed in mitral regurgitation (MR) severity, co-morbidities or clinical findings (New York Heart Association class, 6-min walking distance). Reduction to MR of grade 1 or lower was achieved more often in patients with lower sPAP levels (P = 0.01). In Groups 2 and 3, sPAP was reduced significantly. Major adverse cardiac or cardiovascular events (MACCEs) occurring in hospital (death, myocardial infarction, stroke; <4% in each group), as well as 30-day rates of MACCEs (6.1% in Group 1, 11.9% in Group 2, 12.4% in Group 3) and rehospitalization (18.9% in Group 1, 24.8% in Group 2, 24.8% in Group 3) did not differ significantly. At 1 year, differences in rates of mortality and MACCEs (20.3% in Group 1, 33.1% in Group 2, 34.7% in Group 3; P < 0.01) were significant. Both Groups 2 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.81, P = 0.0122] and 3 (HR 1.85, P = 0.0092) were independently predictive of death. Rehospitalization rates did not differ during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite higher mortality in patients with elevated sPAP, these data suggest the safety, feasibility and benefit of MitraClip therapy even in advanced stages of disease. An early approach might prevent the progress of pulmonary hypertension and improve outcomes.

Long-Term Outcomes After MitraClip Implantation According to the Presence or Absence of EVEREST Inclusion Criteria

Numerous patients are treated with the MitraClip, although they do not fulfill the stringent inclusion criteria of the Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair Study (EVEREST) trials. The outcome of those patients is not well known. Therefore, we compared the long-term outcome after MitraClip treatment between patients who matched (group 1) and did not match (group 2) the EVEREST criteria. One hundred thirty-four consecutive patients were treated from September 2009 to July 2012: 59 patients (44%) in group 1 versus 75 patients (56%) in group 2. Investigated end points were acute procedural success (for group 1 vs 2: 97% vs 95%; p = 0.694), all-cause mortality (28% vs 27%; p = 0.656), reintervention (RI) rate (11% vs 37%; p = 0.010), and improvement in mitral regurgitation (MR) (-1.3 ± 1 vs -1.5 ± 1, p = 0.221) and in New York Heart Association functional class (-0.7 ± 1 vs -0.9 ± 0.8, p = 0.253) during the follow-up of 33 months (27.9 to 38.3). The morphologic extent of a flail leaflet was an independent predictor for RI. In conclusion, although the overall outcome was comparable between both groups, recurrent symptomatic MR with need for RI was higher in group 2, mainly because of complex valve pathologies: especially flail width >15 mm and gap ≥10 mm. Improvements in the interventional strategy are warranted for reducing the need for RI in patients with primary MR.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair: The last chance for symptoms improvement in advanced refractory chronic heart failure?

BACKGROUND

The role of percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) in patients with end-stage heart failure (HF) and functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is unclear.

METHODS

Seventy-five consecutive patients with FMR grade≥3+ and severe HF symptoms despite optimal medical therapy and resynchronization therapy underwent PMVR with the MitraClip system (Abbott, Abbott Park, IL, USA) at 3 centers. Clinical evaluation, echocardiography and pro-BNP measurement were performed at baseline and at 6-month.

RESULTS

Mean age was 67±11years, logistic EuroSCORE=23±18%, left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) 30±9%. In 6 patients (8%) PMVR was performed as a bridge to heart transplant; many patients were dependent from iv diuretics and/or inotropes. Rate of serious adverse in-hospital events was 1.3% (1 patient who died after conversion to cardiac surgery). Sixty-three patients (84%) were discharged with MR≤2+. At 6-month, 4 patients died (5%), 80% had MR≤2+ and 75% were in New York Heart Association class ≤II. Median pro-BNP decreased from 4395pg/ml to 2594pg/ml (p=0.04). There were no significant changes in LV end-diastolic volume (222±75ml vs. 217±79, p=0.19), end-systolic volume (LVESV, 154±66ml vs. 156±69, p=0.54) and LVEF (30±9% vs. 30±12%, p=0.86). Significant reverse remodeling (reduction of LVESV≥10%) was observed in 25%, without apparent association with baseline characteristics. The number of hospitalizations for HF in comparison with the 6months before PMVR were reduced from 1.1±0.8 to 0.3±0.6 (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In extreme risk HF patients with FMR, PMVR improved symptoms and reduced re-hospitalization and pro-BNP levels at 6months, despite the lack of LV reverse remodeling.