Effect of eplerenone in percutaneous coronary intervention-treated post-myocardial infarction patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a subanalysis of the EPHESUS trial

Myocardial Revascularization in Heart Failure: A State-of-the-Art Review

Patients with heart failure (HF) and underlying coronary artery disease (CAD) have a substantially higher risk of mortality compared with those with HF from other causes. However, identifying individuals with HF for whom revascularization is likely to improve prognosis is a complex clinical decision. Revascularization is likely beneficial for patients with CAD-predominant symptoms, such as those with acute myocardial infarction or stable ischemic heart disease with refractory angina. However, for patients with HF-predominant symptoms, characterized by dyspnea without acute myocardial infarction or refractory angina, the benefits of revascularization are less clear. This state-of-the-art review summarizes the outcomes, clinical trials, and therapeutic approaches for patients with both CAD and HF, and proposes a therapeutic algorithm to guide the diagnosis and comprehensive workup of these complex patients.

Aldosterone Blockade in Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

A comprehensive evaluation of the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients is lacking.

Objective

To summarize the evidence on the efficacy and safety of MRA in patients admitted for AMI.

Methods

Articles were identified through PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid (Medline1946-2021), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from their inception to December 31, 2020.

Results

15 articles with a total of 11,861 patients were included. MRA reduced the risk of all-cause mortality by 16% (relative ratio (RR): 0.84; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.76, 0.94); P = 0.002) and the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events by 12% (RR: 0.88, 95% CI (0.83, 0.93), P < 0.00001) in post-AMI patients, and further analysis demonstrated that early administration of MRA within 7 days after AMI resulted in a greater reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.72, 95% CI (0.61, 0.85), P < 0.0001). Subgroup analyses showed that post-STEMI patients without left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) treated with MRA had a 36% reduction in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.64, 95% CI (0.46, 0.89), P = 0.007) and a 22% reduction in cardiovascular adverse events (RR: 0.78, 95% CI (0.67, 0.91), P = 0.002). Meanwhile, post-STEMI patients without LVSD treated with MRA get significant improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference (MD): 2.69, 95% CI (2.44, 2.93), P < 0.00001), left ventricular end-systolic index (MD: -4.52 ml/m², 95% CI (-8.21, -0.83), P = 0.02), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (MD: -0.11 cm, 95% CI (-0.22, 0.00), P = 0.05). The corresponding RR were 1.72 (95% CI (1.43, 2.07), P < 0.00001) for considered common adverse events (hyperkalemia, gynecomastia, and renal dysfunction).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that MRA treatment reduces all-cause mortality and cardiovascular adverse events in post-AMI patients, which is more significant in patients after STEMI without LVSD. In addition, MRA treatment may exert beneficial effects on the reversal of cardiac remodeling in patients after STEMI without LVSD.

Reappraisal on pharmacological and mechanical treatments of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a highly frequent disorder with considerable morbidity, hospitalization, and mortality; thus, it invariably places pressure on clinical and public health systems in the modern world. There have been notable advances in the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of HF, and newly developed agents and devices have been widely adopted in clinical practice. Here, this review first summarizes the current emerging therapeutic agents, including pharmacotherapy, device-based therapy, and the treatment of some common comorbidities, to improve the prognosis of HF patients. Then, we discuss and point out the commonalities and areas for improvement in current clinical studies of HF. Finally, we highlight the gaps in HF research. We are looking forward to a bright future with reduced morbidity and mortality from HF.

The Role of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background:

Heart failure (HF) is a worldwide modern epidemic, associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several causes have been identified for the syndrome, most of which share common pathophysiologic pathways, including neurohormonal activation. Central to the latter lies activation of the reninangiotensin- aldosterone system, and its effects on cardiovascular disease progression.

Objectives:

The aim of this review is to summarize the pathophysiology of aldosterone and the effects of its blockage in the failing heart, as well as to provide state-of-the-art evidence, and address future perspectives regarding the use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Method:

Literature was reviewed for studies that assess the pathophysiology of aldosterone in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), and the effects of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in this condition.

Results:

Several major society guidelines have synthesized the available evidence on HFrEF management, and drugs that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system at different levels continue to form the key component of standard of care for these patients. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are an important part of HFrEF pharmacologic treatment, and their use is supported by a high level of evidence studies. This class of drugs demonstrated significant benefits for morbidity and mortality, across the spectrum oh HFrEF, including patients after acute myocardial infarction.

Conclusion:

Current evidence supports the central role of aldosterone in HFrEF progression, and the significant benefits on outcomes with the use of MRAs.

Efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in postmyocardial infarction patients with or without left ventricular dysfunction: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is heated debate about the benefits of using mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in addition to standard therapy in patients admitted for myocardial infarction (MI) with or without left ventricular dysfunction (LVD).

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were scanned by a formal search of electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Ovid, and clinical trials) from their inception to April 2018. A meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 to identify studies reporting the efficacy of MRAs use in post-MI patients with or without LVD.

RESULTS

Thirteen RCTs involving 11,365 individuals were eligible for this study. MRAs treatment reduced all-cause mortality by 16%, cardiovascular death by 16%, and death from heart failure (HF) by 22% in post-MI patients. MRAs use reduced all-cause mortality by 13% and cardiovascular death by 15% in post-MI patients with LVD, but there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in post-MI patients without LVD (relative ratios [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-2.69, P = .76, I = 0%; RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.33-3.09, P = .99, I = 0%). In 6 RCTs involving post-MI patients, MRAs treatment had a significant effect on improving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean difference 3.33, 95% CI 0.91-5.75, P = .007, I = 94%). Patients treated with MRAs did not show a decrease in recurrent MI or repeat revascularization compared with patients treated without MRAs (RR 0.95, 95% CI [0.80-1.12], P = .54, I = 0%; RR 1.09, 95% CI [0.79-1.50], P = .61, I = 0%). However, MRAs treatment significantly increased the incidence of hyperkalemia compared with patients treated without MRAs (RR 2.05, 95% CI [1.60, 2.61], P < .00001, I = 49%).

CONCLUSION

MRAs treatment reduced all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, and death from HF in post-MI patients. MRAs treatment also demonstrated a significant improvement in LVEF. MRAs reduced cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality in patients with LVD. Eplerenone significantly reduced all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death in post-MI patients. However, MRAs failed to show any cardiovascular benefit in post-MI patients without LVD.

Emerging cardiovascular indications of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

Mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonism is a well-established treatment modality for patients with hypertension, heart failure, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) post-myocardial infarction (MI). There are emerging data showing potential benefits of MR antagonists in other cardiovascular conditions. Studies have shown association between MR activation and the development of myocardial fibrosis, coronary artery disease, metabolic syndrome, and cerebrovascular diseases. This review examines the preclinical and clinical data of MR antagonists for novel indications including heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFPEF), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death, valvular heart disease, metabolic syndrome, renal disease, and stroke. MR antagonists are not licensed for these conditions yet; however, emerging data suggest that indication for MR antagonists are likely to broaden; further studies are warranted.