Characteristics of immunological memory in mice. II. Resistance of nonrecirculating memory cells to antigen-mediated suppression of the secondary antibody response

Regulation of parasite-specific antibody responses in resistant (C57BL/6) and susceptible (C3H/HE) mice infected with Trypanosoma (trypanozoon) brucei brucei

After infection with 10(3) T. brucei GUTat 3.1, C57BL/6 mice produced antibody responses and controlled the first parasitaemic wave whereas C3H/He mice did not. The inability of C3H/He mice to control parasitaemia resulted from an impaired ability of parasite-induced antibody-containing cells to secrete immunoglobulin. Antibody-containing cells in infected C3H/He mice regained the ability to secrete antibody within 24 h after trypanosome elimination by treatment with Berenil, suggesting that the block in antibody secretion was maintained by living parasites or short-lived components of degenerating parasites. Infected C3H/He mice also had an impaired ability to produce a rabbit erythrocyte-specific antibody response on challenge with rabbit erythrocytes and this response recovered when parasites were eliminated from the blood 24 h before analysis. It was not possible to inhibit secretion of antibody by rabbit erythrocyte-induced plasma cells either by incubating them with serum from infected C3H/He mice or by injecting large numbers of living trypanosomes into C3H/He mice already responding to rabbit erythrocytes. The process leading to failure of parasite and rabbit erythrocyte-induced antibody-containing cells to become high rate antibody-secreting cells was not identified but did not appear to correlate with any obvious change in the intra-cellular morphology of the antibody-containing cells.

Optimal strategies in immunology. II. B memory cell production

After a first encounter with most antigens, the immune system responds to susequent encounters with a faster, more efficient and more strenuous antibody response. The memory of previous antigen contacts is carried by lymphocytes. Expanding on the model developed in Part 1 of this paper, we examine the optimal strategy available to the immune system for B memory cell production. We again find that the strategy should be of the bang-bang variety. The model we consider assumes that antigen triggers a subpopulation of B-lymphocytes. These triggered lymphocytes can proliferate and secrete modest amounts of antibody, or differentiate into non-dividing plasma cells which secrete large amounts of antibody, or differentiate into non-antibody secreting memory cells. Given injections of antigen at two widely spaced times we compute the strategy which minimizes a linear combination of the primary and secondary response times. We find that for all biologically reasonable parameter values the best strategies are ones in which memory cells are produced at the end of the primary response. Exerimental results which bear on the actual strategies employed are discussed.