1
|
Bello RJ, Palleiko BA, Kennedy K, Cournoyer L, Larkin AC, Dinh KH, LaFemina J. Interpectoral nerve blocks may lower postoperative narcotic use after mastectomy. Surg Oncol 2024; 53:102055. [PMID: 38394843 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management following mastectomy is a significant challenge often requiring opioids. Nonopioid pain management utilizing nerve blocks has been shown in other fields to reduce postoperative opioid use and may be effective for postoperative pain in mastectomy patients. The primary purpose of this study was to compare postoperative opioid use, measured in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), between mastectomy patients who underwent interpectoral nerve block (IPNB) and a historical control group. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and postoperative pain scores. METHODS This is a single-center, retrospective cohort study. The charts of women who underwent mastectomy for cancer without immediate reconstruction from 10/2017-12/2019 were reviewed. Wilcoxon rank sum test was used for unadjusted analysis and multiple linear regression for adjusted analysis. RESULTS There were 105 patients included in this study, of which 37 (35%) underwent IPNB. In unadjusted analysis, median MME use was significantly lower in patients that received IPNB compared to the control group (IPNB = 5, controls = 17, p = 0.03). Patients that received IPNB had an observed reduction in LOS and postoperative pain, though these results failed to reach statistical significance. There were no IPNB-related complications. CONCLUSIONS IPNB may be an effective strategy to decrease postoperative opioid use in mastectomy patients. Larger, prospective studies are needed to further investigate the effectiveness of IPNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo J Bello
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Surgery, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | - Kara Kennedy
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Surgery, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Lauren Cournoyer
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Surgery, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Anne C Larkin
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Surgery, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Kate H Dinh
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Surgery, Worcester, MA, USA
| | - Jennifer LaFemina
- UMass Chan Medical School, Department of Surgery, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mija D, Kehlet H, Joshi GP. Basic analgesic use in randomised trials assessing local and regional analgesic interventions for mastectomy: a critical appraisal and clinical implications. Br J Anaesth 2023; 131:921-924. [PMID: 37716888 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.08.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Regional analgesia is a core component of an optimal multimodal analgesia technique. Several advanced regional analgesic techniques have been evaluated for mastectomy; however, the optimal choice remains unclear. Many randomised clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating various local/regional analgesic techniques do not include basic analgesics (i.e. paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors, and dexamethasone) which precludes objective evaluation of their efficacy. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the use of basic analgesics in RCTs evaluating efficacy of local and regional analgesic techniques in patients undergoing mastectomy. PubMed was searched to identify relevant articles from January 1, 2010 to May 31, 2023. The key finding of this study is that almost 90% (n=82/92) of the RCTs evaluating local/regional analgesic techniques in patients undergoing mastectomy did not administer well accepted basic analgesics in the comparator groups. Consequently, the conclusions of the RCTs assessing local/regional analgesic techniques for mastectomy should be interpreted with caution. Also, clinical guidelines based on meta-analyses of these RCTs could be inadequate or inappropriate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dan Mija
- Medical Graduate, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section of Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Girish P Joshi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stalls JM, Bovbjerg DH, Somers TJ, Plumb Vilardaga JC, Kimmick GG, McAuliffe PF, Keefe FJ, Posluszny DM, Sullivan MJL, Erkanli A, Reed SD, Sutton L, Owen L, Massa L, Shelby RA. Improving well-being for individuals with persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ: A randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2022; 122:106934. [PMID: 36152791 PMCID: PMC10001426 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
>276,000 Americans will be diagnosed with invasive breast cancer, lobular carcinoma in situ, or ductal carcinoma in situ this year and most will undergo breast surgery as part of their care. Although prognosis is excellent, many patients experience persistent post-surgical pain (PSP), which has no satisfactory pharmacological treatment. The causal contributions of pain-associated psychological factors (e.g., catastrophic thoughts about pain, psychological flexibility, self-efficacy) to the continuing burden of PSP have not yet been determined and may be opportune intervention targets. The randomized trial described here will compare the benefits of three manualized behavioral interventions for individuals with PSP. Participants will receive either: 1) self-guided health education (SGHE); 2) interventionist-guided health education (IGHE); or 3) interventionist-guided pain coping skills training with elements of acceptance and commitment therapy that specially target catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility (CST-PSP). Participants will prospectively complete validated assessments of primary outcomes (PSP severity and interference) at baseline (pre-intervention) and 3-, 6-, and 12-months later. Validated measures of emotional distress and cancer-specific distress will be assessed as secondary outcomes. To test their roles as drivers of PSP, catastrophic thoughts about pain, self-efficacy, and psychological flexibility, will be assessed and statistically analyzed as mediators of hypothesized beneficial effects. The interventions' impacts on pain sensitivity and central sensitization will be investigated to test these physiological pathways as proximal drivers of PSP. To better characterize the patient experience, additional validated measures will be explored for associations with PSP, along with demographic and clinical factors. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04225585, registered January 13, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliann M Stalls
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America.
| | - Dana H Bovbjerg
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Tamara J Somers
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | | | - Gretchen G Kimmick
- Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Priscilla F McAuliffe
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Francis J Keefe
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Donna M Posluszny
- UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Alaattin Erkanli
- Department of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Linda Sutton
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lynda Owen
- Duke Cancer Network, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Lisa Massa
- Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Rebecca A Shelby
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Transition from acute to chronic pain: a misleading concept? Pain 2022; 163:e985-e988. [PMID: 35384919 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
5
|
McGregor RH, Warner FM, Linde LD, Cragg JJ, Osborn JA, Varshney VP, Schwarz SKW, Kramer JLK. Quality of meta-analyses of non-opioid, pharmacological, perioperative interventions for chronic postsurgical pain: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2022; 47:263-269. [DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2021-102981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundIn an attempt to aggregate observations from clinical trials, several meta-analyses have been published examining the effectiveness of systemic, non-opioid, pharmacological interventions to reduce the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain.ObjectiveTo inform the design and reporting of future studies, the purpose of our study was to examine the quality of these meta-analyses.Evidence reviewWe conducted an electronic literature search in Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Published meta-analyses, from the years 2010 to 2020, examining the effect of perioperative, systemic, non-opioid pharmacological treatments on the incidence of chronic postsurgical pain in adult patients were identified. Data extraction focused on methodological details. Meta-analysis quality was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) critical appraisal tool.FindingsOur search yielded 17 published studies conducting 58 meta-analyses for gabapentinoids (gabapentin and pregabalin), ketamine, lidocaine, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and mexiletine. According to AMSTAR 2, 88.2% of studies (or 15/17) were low or critically low in quality. The most common critical element missing was an analysis of publication bias. Trends indicated an improvement in quality over time and association with journal impact factor.ConclusionsWith few individual trials adequately powered to detect treatment effects, meta-analyses play a crucial role in informing the perioperative management of chronic postsurgical pain. In light of this inherent value and despite a number of attempts, high-quality meta-analyses are still needed.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021230941.
Collapse
|
6
|
Forget P. To better appraise (un)certainty in systematic reviews, useful approaches exist. A comment on Moore et al. Eur J Pain 2022; 26:1179-1180. [PMID: 35263488 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrice Forget
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences, Epidemiology Group, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.,Department of Anaesthesia, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Preoperative Paravertebral Block and Chronic Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Trial. Anesthesiology 2021; 135:1091-1103. [PMID: 34618889 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effectiveness of paravertebral block in preventing chronic pain after breast surgery remains controversial. The primary hypothesis of this study was that paravertebral block reduces the incidence of chronic pain 3 months after breast cancer surgery. METHODS In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study, 380 women undergoing partial or complete mastectomy with or without lymph node dissection were randomized to receive preoperative paravertebral block with either 0.35 ml/kg 0.75% ropivacaine (paravertebral group) or saline (control group). Systemic multimodal analgesia was administered in both groups. The primary endpoint was the incidence of chronic pain with a visual analogue scale (VAS) score greater than or equal to 3 out of 10, 3 months after surgery. The secondary outcomes were acute pain, analgesic consumption, nausea and vomiting, chronic pain at 6 and 12 months, neuropathic pain, pain interference, anxiety, and depression. RESULTS Overall, 178 patients received ropivacaine, and 174 received saline. At 3 months, chronic pain was reported in 93 of 178 (52.2%) and 83 of 174 (47.7%) patients in the paravertebral and control groups, respectively (odds ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.79 to 1.82], P = 0.394). At 6 and 12 months, chronic pain occurred in 104 of 178 (58.4%) versus 79 of 174 (45.4%) and 105 of 178 (59.0%) versus 93 of 174 (53.4%) patients in the paravertebral and control groups, respectively. Greater acute postoperative pain was observed in the control group 0 to 2 h (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve at rest, 4.3 ± 2.8 vs. 2.9 ± 2.8 VAS score units × hours, P < 0.001) and when maximal in this interval (3.8 ± 2.1 vs. 2.5 ± 2.5, P < 0.001) but not during any other interval. Postoperative morphine use was 73% less in the paravertebral group (odds ratio, 0.272 [95% CI, 0.171 to 0.429]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Paravertebral block did not reduce the incidence of chronic pain after breast surgery. Paravertebral block did result in less immediate postoperative pain, but there were no other significant differences in postoperative outcomes. EDITOR’S PERSPECTIVE
Collapse
|