The effect of acute-experimental pain models on offset analgesia

Opposite effects of isometric exercise on pain sensitivity of healthy individuals: the role of pain modulation

Introduction

Exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIHypo) among healthy individuals is well documented; however, the opposite effect of exercise, ie, exercise-induced hyperalgesia (EIHyper), has mainly been described in patients with chronic pain or after intense/painful exercise.

Objectives

We investigated the extent to which EIHypo and/or EIHyper occur among healthy participants and whether these responses are associated with individuals' pain modulation capacity.

Methods

Fifty-seven participants (mean age 29.20 ± 5.21 years) underwent testing of pressure pain threshold as an index of EIHypo/EIHyper: pain adaptation, offset analgesia (OA), and conditioned pain modulation as indices of pain modulation, prior to and immediately postsubmaximal isometric exercise (n = 40) or rest (n = 17, control group). Body awareness and exercise-evoked stress were also evaluated. Test-retest repeatability of the pain modulation indices was performed as well.

Results

Twenty-four participants (60%) exhibited EIHypo, whereas 16 (40%) exhibited EIHyper. Pressure pain threshold did not change in the control group. Baseline (preexercise) OA efficacy predicted EIHypo/EIHyper. Furthermore, OA significantly decreased postexercise in the EIHyper subgroup and slightly increased in the EIHypo subgroup. Exercise-induced hypoalgesia was associated with magnitude of daily exercise while EIHyper was associated with increased exercise-evoked stress and body awareness.

Conclusion

Submaximal isometric exercise can induce opposite effects on pain sensitivity among healthy participants-EIHypo or EIHyper. Descending pain inhibition pathways, and top-down influences over these pathways, seem to be involved in EIHypo/EIHyper effects. As such isometric exercise is often preferred in early stages of rehabilitation, preliminary screening individuals' vulnerability to this exercise is important; OA test may be used for this purpose.

Psychological mechanisms of offset analgesia: The effect of expectancy manipulation

A frequently used paradigm to quantify endogenous pain modulation is offset analgesia, which is defined as a disproportionate large reduction in pain following a small decrease in a heat stimulus. The aim of this study was to determine whether suggestion influences the magnitude of offset analgesia in healthy participants. A total of 97 participants were randomized into three groups (hypoalgesic group, hyperalgesic group, control group). All participants received four heat stimuli (two constant trials and two offset trials) to the ventral, non-dominant forearm while they were asked to rate their perceived pain using a computerized visual analogue scale. In addition, electrodermal activity was measured during each heat stimulus. Participants in both intervention groups were given a visual and verbal suggestion about the expected pain response in an hypoalgesic and hyperalgesic manner. The control group received no suggestion. In all groups, significant offset analgesia was provoked, indicated by reduced pain ratings (p < 0.001) and enhanced electrodermal activity level (p < 0.01). A significant group difference in the magnitude of offset analgesia was found between the three groups (F[2,94] = 4.81, p < 0.05). Participants in the hyperalgesic group perceived significantly more pain than the hypoalgesic group (p = 0.031) and the control group (p < 0.05). However, the electrodermal activity data did not replicate this trend (p > 0.05). The results of this study indicate that suggestion can be effective to reduce but not increase endogenous pain modulation quantified by offset analgesia in healthy participants.

Perceived Pain in Athletes: A Comparison between Endurance Runners and Powerlifters through a Cold Experimental Stimulation and Two Sessions of Various Physical Activation

Few studies in the literature have illustrated cold hypoalgesia induced by strength training. Objectives of this contribution were to compare the ratings of perceived pain in endurance running (n = 22) and powerlifting (n = 22) male athletes and controls (n = 22) at baseline and after two bouts of 40 min aerobic/strength training respectively, using the Cold Pressor Test (CPT) and simultaneously monitoring changes in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and body temperature. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was conducted to examine the effects of training sessions in endurance runners vs. powerlifting athletes vs. controls on the intensity of perceived pain at CPT. A statistically significant two-way interaction between the group and training resulted in p < 0.001, ηp2 = 0.513. A simple main effects analysis showed that as the participants went through the strength training session, pain perception at CPT was significantly lower in powerlifters compared to runners and controls. Considering the physiological parameters, powerlifters reported significantly higher values of BP and HR. This difference was present at baseline but after training as well, and before and after CPT, despite a slight hypotensive effect. The differences reported after CPT at baseline, but very significantly after the strength activation session in the powerlifters, provide interesting insights into the hypoalgesic effect of high-intensity strength training.