|
1
|
Christe G, Benaim C, Jolles BM, Favre J. Changes in spinal motor behaviour are associated with reduction in disability in chronic low back pain: A longitudinal cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Eur J Pain 2024. [PMID: 38299715 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.2245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The need to improve spinal motor behaviour in chronic low back pain (CLBP) rehabilitation remains unclear. The objective of this study was to test if changes in spinal motor behaviour were associated with changes in disability after an interdisciplinary rehabilitation program (IRP) in patients with CLBP. METHODS Seventy-one patients with CLBP participating in an IRP were included. Spinal motor behaviour was assessed with biomechanical (lumbar angular amplitude and velocity, erector spinae muscle activity and duration of the task), cognitive-emotional (task-specific fear [PRF]) and pain-related (movement-evoked pain [MEP]) measures during a lifting task before and after the IRP. Disability was measured before and after the IRP, and at 3-month and 1-year follow-ups. RESULTS After adjusting for confounders, changes in disability were significantly associated with MEP changes (β adj. = 0.49, p < 0.001) and PRF changes (β adj. = 0.36, p = 0.008), but not with changes in any of the biomechanical measures. MEP at the end of IRP was also associated with disability at 3 months (β adj. = 0.37, p = 0.001) and 1 year (β adj. = 0.42, p = 0.01). Biomechanical measures at the end of the IRP were not associated with disability, except for the duration of the task that was significantly associated with reduction of disability at 3 months (β non-adj = 0.5, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Pain-related and cognitive-emotional measures of spinal motor behaviour were associated with reduction in disability following an IRP. Future research is needed to further investigate causal relationships between spinal motor behaviour and disability. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT This study supports a multidimensional understanding and analysis of spinal motor behaviour, integrating the cognitive-emotional, pain-related and biomechanical domains. It also supports the consideration of spinal motor behaviour as a potentially important treatment target in chronic low back pain management. Moreover, it suggests that reducing movement-evoked pain and task-specific fear may have more influence on disability than changing lumbar amplitude, lumbar angular velocity or erector muscle activity, which may have important implications for rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Christe
- Department of Physiotherapy, HESAV School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Swiss BioMotion Lab, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Charles Benaim
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Hospital, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Department of Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique Romande de Réadaptation, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Brigitte M Jolles
- Swiss BioMotion Lab, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Microengineering, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Julien Favre
- Swiss BioMotion Lab, Department of Musculoskeletal Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- The Sense Innovation and Research Center, Lausanne, Sion, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Villalba-Meneses F, Guevara C, Velásquez-López PA, Arias-Serrano I, Guerrero-Ligña SA, Valencia-Cevallos CM, Almeida-Galárraga D, Cadena-Morejón C, Marín J, Marín JJ. BackMov: Individualized Motion Capture-Based Test to Assess Low Back Pain Mobility Recovery after Treatment. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 24:913. [PMID: 38339630 PMCID: PMC10857203 DOI: 10.3390/s24030913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a common issue that negatively affects a person's quality of life and imposes substantial healthcare expenses. In this study, we introduce the (Back-pain Movement) BackMov test, using inertial motion capture (MoCap) to assess lumbar movement changes in LBP patients. The test includes flexion-extension, rotation, and lateralization movements focused on the lumbar spine. To validate its reproducibility, we conducted a test-retest involving 37 healthy volunteers, yielding results to build a minimal detectable change (MDC) graph map that would allow us to see if changes in certain variables of LBP patients are significant in relation to their recovery. Subsequently, we evaluated its applicability by having 30 LBP patients perform the movement's test before and after treatment (15 received deep oscillation therapy; 15 underwent conventional therapy) and compared the outcomes with a specialist's evaluations. The test-retest results demonstrated high reproducibility, especially in variables such as range of motion, flexion and extension ranges, as well as velocities of lumbar movements, which stand as the more important variables that are correlated with LBP disability, thus changes in them may be important for patient recovery. Among the 30 patients, the specialist's evaluations were confirmed using a low-back-specific Short Form (SF)-36 Physical Functioning scale, and agreement was observed, in which all patients improved their well-being after both treatments. The results from the specialist analysis coincided with changes exceeding MDC values in the expected variables. In conclusion, the BackMov test offers sensitive variables for tracking mobility recovery from LBP, enabling objective assessments of improvement. This test has the potential to enhance decision-making and personalized patient monitoring in LBP management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fernando Villalba-Meneses
- IDERGO (Research and Development in Ergonomics), I3A (Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón), University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain; (J.M.); (J.J.M.)
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
- Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Cesar Guevara
- Centro de Investigación en Mecatrónica y Sistemas Interactivos—MIST, Universidad Tecnológica Indoamérica, Quito 170103, Ecuador;
| | - Paolo A. Velásquez-López
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Isaac Arias-Serrano
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Stephanie A. Guerrero-Ligña
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Camila M. Valencia-Cevallos
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Diego Almeida-Galárraga
- School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador; (P.A.V.-L.); (I.A.-S.); (S.A.G.-L.); (C.M.V.-C.); (D.A.-G.)
| | - Carolina Cadena-Morejón
- School of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, Yachay Tech University, Hacienda San José s/n, San Miguel de Urcuquí 100119, Ecuador;
| | - Javier Marín
- IDERGO (Research and Development in Ergonomics), I3A (Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón), University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain; (J.M.); (J.J.M.)
- Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - José J. Marín
- IDERGO (Research and Development in Ergonomics), I3A (Instituto de Investigación en Ingeniería de Aragón), University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain; (J.M.); (J.J.M.)
- Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Zaragoza, C/Mariano Esquillor s/n, 50018 Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Van Wesemael S, Bogaerts K, De Baets L, Goossens N, Vlemincx E, Amerijckx C, Sohail S, Matheve T, Janssens L. The association between pain-related psychological variables and postural control in low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gait Posture 2024; 107:253-268. [PMID: 37925241 DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2023.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alterations in postural control have been found in individuals with low back pain (LBP), particularly during challenging postural tasks. Moreover, higher levels of negative pain-related psychological variables are associated with increased trunk muscle activity, reduced spinal movement, and worse maximal physical performance in individuals with LBP. RESEARCH QUESTION Are pain-related psychological variables associated with postural control during static bipedal standing tasks in individuals with LBP? METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. Pubmed, Web of Science, and PsycINFO were searched until March 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated postural control during static bipedal standing in individuals with LBP by measuring center of pressure (CoP) variables, and reported at least one pain-related psychological variable. Correlation coefficients between pain-related psychological variables and CoP variables were extracted. Study quality was assessed with the "Quality In Prognosis Studies" tool (QUIPS). Random-effect models were used to calculate pooled correlation coefficients for different postural tasks. Sub-analyses were performed for positional or dynamic CoP variables. Certainty of evidence was assessed with an adjusted "Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations" tool (GRADE). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021241739). RESULTS Sixteen studies (n = 723 participants) were included. Pain-related fear (16 studies) and pain catastrophizing (three studies) were the only reported pain-related psychological variables. Both pain-related fear (-0.04 < pooled r < 0.14) and pain catastrophizing (0.28 < pooled r < 0.29) were weakly associated with CoP variables during different postural tasks. For all associations, the certainty of evidence was very low. SIGNIFICANCE Pain-related fear and pain catastrophizing are only weakly associated with postural control during static bipedal standing in individuals with LBP, regardless of postural task difficulty. Certainty of evidence is very low thus it is conceivable that future studies accounting for current study limitations might reveal different findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofie Van Wesemael
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| | - Katleen Bogaerts
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; KU Leuven, Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liesbet De Baets
- Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nina Goossens
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Elke Vlemincx
- KU Leuven, Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Tiensestraat 102, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, Department of Health Sciences, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Charlotte Amerijckx
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Suniya Sohail
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; Foundation University Islamabad, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Defence Avenue, Phase-I, DHA, 44000 Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Thomas Matheve
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium; Ghent University, Spine, Head and Pain Research Unit Ghent, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lotte Janssens
- UHasselt, REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Agoralaan Gebouw A, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|