The Biflow: An instrument for transfer-loop mediated, continuous, preparative-scale isoelectric trapping separations

Evolution of the theoretical description of the isoelectric focusing experiment: I. The path from Svensson's steady-state model to the current two-stage model of isoelectric focusing

In 1961, Svensson described isoelectric focusing (IEF), the separation of ampholytic compounds in a stationary, natural pH gradient that was formed by passing current through a sucrose density gradient-stabilized ampholyte mixture in a constant cross-section apparatus, free of mixing. Stable pH gradients were formed as the electrophoretic transport built up a series of isoelectric ampholyte zones-the concentration of which decreased with their distance from the electrodes-and a diffusive flux which balanced the generating electrophoretic flux. When polyacrylamide gel replaced the sucrose density gradient as the stabilizing medium, the spatial and temporal stability of Svensson's pH gradient became lost, igniting a search for the explanation and mitigation of the loss. Over time, through a series of insightful suggestions, the currently held notion emerged that in the modern IEF experiment-where the carrier ampholyte (CA) mixture is placed between the anolyte- and catholyte-containing large-volume electrode vessels (open-system IEF)-a two-stage process operates that comprises a rapid first phase during which a linear pH gradient develops, and a subsequent slow, second stage, during which the pH gradient decays as isotachophoretic processes move the extreme pI CAs into the electrode vessels. Here we trace the development of the two-stage IEF model using quotes from the original publications and point out critical results that the IEF community should have embraced but missed. This manuscript sets the foundation for the companion papers, Parts 2 and 3, in which an alternative model, transient bidirectional isotachophoresis is presented to describe the open-system IEF experiment.

Evolution of the theoretical description of the isoelectric focusing experiment: III. Carrier ampholyte behavior in transient, bidirectional isotachophoresis

In modern isoelectric focusing (IEF) systems, where (i) convective mixing is prevented by gels or small cross-sectional area separation channels, (ii) current densities vary spatially due to the presence of electrode vessels with much larger cross-sectional areas than those of the gels or separation channels, and (iii) electrophoretic and diffusive fluxes do not balance each other, stationary, steady-state pH gradients cannot form (open-system IEF). Open-system IEF is currently described as a two-stage process: A rapid IEF process forms the pH gradient from the carrier ampholytes (CAs) in the first stage, then isotachophoretic processes degrade the pH gradient in the second stage as the extreme pI CAs are moved into the electrode vessels where they become diluted. Based on the ratios of the local effective mobilities and the local conductivities ( μ L eff ( x ) $\mu _{\rm{L}}^{{\rm{eff}}}( x )$ / κ ( x ) $\kappa ( x )$ values) of the anolyte, catholyte, and the CAs, we pointed out in the preceding paper (Vigh G, Gas B, Electrophoresis 2023, 44, x x x) that in open-system IEF, a single process, transient, bidirectional isotachophoresis (tbdITP) operates from the moment current is turned on. In this paper, we demonstrate some of the operational features of the tbdITP model using the new ITP/IEF version of Simul 6.

Concentration and fractionation by isoelectric trapping in a micropreparative-scale multicompartmental electrolyzer having orthogonal pH gradients. Part 1

A multicompartmental electrolyzer called ConFrac has been developed and tested for micropreparative-scale isoelectric trapping separations. ConFrac contains n separate, minimalistic isoelectric trapping core units, each with a separate anode compartment, anodic flow-through compartment, collection compartment, cathodic flow-through compartment and a shared cathode compartment. The collection compartments are all isolated from each other and have volumes of 100 μL each. The liquid held in the collection compartments is stagnant. The respective anodic and cathodic flow-through compartments are hydraulically serially connected to each other by flexible, minimum-length, narrow internal diameter tubes. The respective feed solutions whose volumes are larger and variable are recirculated through the serially connected flow-through compartments. Poly(vinyl alcohol)-based buffering membranes are placed between the anode compartments, anodic flow-through compartments, collection compartments, cathodic flow-through compartments and cathode compartment. The membranes establish two orthogonal pH gradients in ConFrac. The primary pH gradient is parallel with the direction of the recirculating flows and orthogonal to that of the electric field. The secondary pH gradient is parallel with the direction of the electric field and orthogonal to that of the recirculating flows. Since the recirculating liquids are kept in thermostated reservoirs and the residence times in the flow-through compartments are shorter than 2 s, ConFrac can tolerate power loads as high as 2 W without overheating the solutions. The operation and performance of ConFrac has been quantitatively characterized: four 25 μM ampholytic components were isolated from 5 mL of feed solution in 20 min and their concentration increased approximately 50-fold.

Concentration and fractionation by isoelectric trapping in a micropreparative-scale multicompartmental electrolyzer having orthogonal pH gradients. Part 2

A micropreparative-scale multicompartmental electrolyzer called ConFrac has been developed and tested for isoelectric trapping separations. ConFrac can be operated in pass-by-pass mode or recirculating mode, using either asymmetrical feeding (feed enters only the anodic or the cathodic flow-through compartment) or symmetrical feeding (feed enters both the anodic and the cathodic flow-through compartment). Symmetrical feeding results in higher processing rates and is the preferred operation mode. Residence time in the flow-through compartments is set as a compromise between processing rate and temperature rise in the effluent. Ampholytic components have been isolated from 5 to 50 mL volumes of micromolar feed solutions and hundredfold concentrated into 100-μL collection compartments. Samples containing ampholytic analytes in highly conducting salt solutions were readily desalted and fractionated in ConFrac in one operation. pH transients formerly observed in other isoelectric trapping devices were observed in ConFrac as well. The pH transients were caused by the unequal ion transmission rates of the anodic- and cathodic-side buffering membranes.

From micro to macro: conversion of capillary electrophoretic separations of biomolecules and bioparticles to preparative free-flow electrophoresis scale

This invited contribution in the special issue of Electrophoresis published in celebration of the 30th Anniversary of this journal reflects the impact of our milestone paper [Prusík, Z., Kasicka, V., Mudra, P., Stepánek, J., Smékal, O., Hlavácek, J., Electrophoresis 1990, 11, 932-936] in the area of conversion of microscale analytical and micropreparative CE separations of biomolecules and bioparticles into (macro)preparative free-flow electrophoresis (FFE) scale on the basis of a correlation between CE and FFE methods. In addition to the survey of advances in the relatively narrow field of CE-FFE correlation and CE-FFE conversion, a comprehensive review of the recent developments of micropreparative CE and (macro)preparative FFE techniques is also presented and applications of these techniques to micro- and (macro)preparative separations and purifications of biomolecules and bioparticles are demonstrated. The review covers the period since the year of publication of the above paper, i.e. ca. the last 20 years.