A new method for assigning common spot boundaries for multiple gels in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Two-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis Image Analysis

Gel-based proteomics is still quite widespread due to its high-resolution power; the experimental approach is based on differential analysis, where groups of samples (e.g., control vs diseased) are compared to identify panels of potential biomarkers. However, the reliability of the result of the differential analysis is deeply influenced by 2D-PAGE maps image analysis procedures. The analysis of 2D-PAGE images consists of several steps, such as image preprocessing, spot detection and quantitation, image warping and alignment, spot matching. Several approaches are present in literature, and classical or last-generation commercial software packages exploit different algorithms for each step of the analysis. Here, the most widespread approaches and a comparison of the different strategies are presented.

2D-DIGE and Fluorescence Image Analysis

2D-DIGE is still a very widespread technique in proteomics for the identification of panels of biomarkers, allowing to tackle with some important drawback of classical two-dimensional gel-electrophoresis. However, once 2D-gels are obtained, they must undergo a quite articulated multistep image analysis procedure before the final differential analysis via statistical mono- and multivariate methods. Here, the main steps of image analysis software are described and the most recent procedures reported in the literature are briefly presented.

Image Pretreatment Tools II: Normalization Techniques for 2-DE and 2-D DIGE

Gel electrophoresis is usually applied to identify different protein expression profiles in biological samples (e.g., control vs. pathological, control vs. treated). Information about the effect to be investigated (a pathology, a drug, a ripening effect, etc.) is however generally confounded with experimental variability that is quite large in 2-DE and may arise from small variations in the sample preparation, reagents, sample loading, electrophoretic conditions, staining and image acquisition. Obtaining valid quantitative estimates of protein abundances in each map, before the differential analysis, is therefore fundamental to provide robust candidate biomarkers. Normalization procedures are applied to reduce experimental noise and make the images comparable, improving the accuracy of differential analysis. Certainly, they may deeply influence the final results, and to this respect they have to be applied with care. Here, the most widespread normalization procedures are described both for what regards the applications to 2-DE and 2D Difference Gel-electrophoresis (2-D DIGE) maps.

Operator- and software-related post-experimental variability and source of error in 2-DE analysis

In the field of proteomics, several approaches have been developed for separating proteins and analyzing their differential relative abundance. One of the oldest, yet still widely used, is 2-DE. Despite the continuous advance of new methods, which are less demanding from a technical standpoint, 2-DE is still compelling and has a lot of potential for improvement. The overall variability which affects 2-DE includes biological, experimental, and post-experimental (software-related) variance. It is important to highlight how much of the total variability of this technique is due to post-experimental variability, which, so far, has been largely neglected. In this short review, we have focused on this topic and explained that post-experimental variability and source of error can be further divided into those which are software-dependent and those which are operator-dependent. We discuss these issues in detail, offering suggestions for reducing errors that may affect the quality of results, summarizing the advantages and drawbacks of each approach.