Genotoxicity analysis of two hydroxyfuranones, byproducts of water disinfection, in human cells treated in vitro

Inhibition of nucleotide excision repair and damage response signaling by dibromoacetonitrile: A novel genotoxicity mechanism of a water disinfection byproduct

Dibromoacetonitrile (DBAN) is a carcinogenic disinfection byproduct (DBP) but how it precipitates cancer is unknown. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a versatile repair mechanism for removing bulky DNA lesions to maintain genome stability, and impairment of this process is associated with cancer development. In this study, we found that DBAN inhibited NER and investigated its mechanism with other DNA damage responses. Human keratinocytes HaCaT were treated with DBAN followed by ultraviolet (UV) as a model inducer of DNA damage, pyrimidine dimers, which require NER for the removal. DBAN pretreatment exacerbated UV-cytotoxicity, and inhibited the repair of pyrimidine dimers. DBAN treatment delayed the recruitment of NER proteins, transcription factor IIH (TFIIH) and xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group G (XPG), to DNA damaged sites, and subsequent gap filling process. Moreover, DBAN suppressed the UV-induced double strand breaks (DSBs) formation, as well as phosphorylated histone H2AX (γ-H2AX), a widely used DNA damage marker. Altogether, DBAN could negatively impact the NER process and phosphorylation pathway responding to DNA damage. This study was the first to identify the inhibition of NER and damage response signaling as a genotoxicity mechanism of a class of DBPs and it may serve as a foundation for DBP carcinogenesis.

Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity assays of halobenzoquinones disinfection byproducts using different human cell lines

Recently, halobenzoquinones (HBQs) disinfection byproducts, including 2,6-dichloro-1, 4-benzoquinone (DCBQ), 2,6-dichloro-3-methyl-1, 4-benzoquinone (DCMBQ), 2,3,6-trichloro-1, 4-benzoquinone (TCBQ), and 2,6-dibromobenzoquinone (DBBQ), have been of increasing concern due to their reported ability to induce oxidative damage, and thus genotoxicity. However, data on the risk of genotoxicity due to chromosomal damage by HBQs are still scarce. Here, the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of the four HBQs were assessed using human cell lines (bladder cancer 5637 cells, colon carcinoma Caco-2 cells, and gastric MGC-803 cells). The four HBQs exhibited significant concentration-response relationships in all the three cell lines. Cytotoxicity of DCBQ, DCMBQ, TCBQ, and DBBQ, represented by the 50% concentration of inhibition (IC₅₀ ) values, were 80.8-99.5, 41.0-57.6, 122.1-146.6, and 86.9-93.8 μM, respectively. The lowest effective concentrations for cellular micronuclei induction in the cell lines by DCBQ, DCMBQ, TCBQ, and DBBQ were 50-75, 20-41.5, 87.4-100, and 50 μM, respectively. 5637 and Caco-2 cells were more sensitive to the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of HBQs than MGC-803 cells. These results show that HBQs can induce chromosomal damage; DCMBQ induced the highest cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in all the cell lines, and TCBQ caused the least toxicity.

Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals

The in vitro MultiFlow DNA Damage assay multiplexes p53, γH2AX, phospho-histone H3, and polyploidization biomarkers into 1 flow cytometric analysis (Bryce, S. M., Bernacki, D. T., Bemis, J. C., and Dertinger, S. D. (2016). Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 57, 171-189). The work reported herein evaluated the generalizability of the method, as well as several data analytics strategies, to a range of chemical classes not studied previously. TK6 cells were exposed to each of 103 diverse chemicals, 86 of which were supplied by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and selected based upon responses in genetic damage assays conducted under the Tox21 program. Exposures occurred for 24 h over a range of concentrations, and cell aliquots were removed at 4 and 24 h for analysis. Multiplexed response data were evaluated using 3 machine learning models designed to predict genotoxic mode of action based on data from a training set of 85 previously studied chemicals. Of 54 chemicals with sufficient information to make an a priori call on genotoxic potential, the prediction models' accuracies were 79.6% (random forest), 88.9% (logistic regression), and 90.7% (artificial neural network). A majority vote ensemble of the 3 models provided 92.6% accuracy. Forty-nine NTP chemicals were not adequately tested (maximum concentration did not approach assay's cytotoxicity limit) and/or had insufficient conventional genotoxicity data to allow their genotoxic potential to be defined. For these chemicals MultiFlow data will be useful in future research and hypothesis testing. Collectively, the results suggest the MultiFlow assay and associated data analysis strategies are broadly generalizable, demonstrating high predictability when applied to new chemicals and classes of compounds.

Genotoxic and clastogenic effects of monohaloacetic acid drinking water disinfection by-products in primary human lymphocytes

The haloacetic acids (HAAs) are the second-most prevalent class of drinking water disinfection by-products formed by chemical disinfectants. Previous studies have determined DNA damage and repair of HAA-induced lesions in mammalian and human cell lines; however, little is known of the genomic DNA and chromosome damage induced by these compounds in primary human cells. The aim of this study was to evaluate the genotoxic and clastogenic effects of the monoHAA disinfection by-products in primary human lymphocytes. All monoHAAs were genotoxic in primary human lymphocytes, the rank order of genotoxicity and cytotoxicity was IAA > BAA >> CAA. After 6 h of repair time, only 50% of the DNA damage (maximum decrease in DNA damage) was repaired compared to the control. This demonstrates that primary human lymphocytes are less efficient in repairing the induced damage by monoHAAs than previous studies with mammalian cell lines. In addition, the monoHAAs induced an increase in the chromosome aberration frequency as a measurement of the clastogenic effect of these compounds. These results coupled with genomic technologies in primary human cells and other mammalian non-cancerous cell lines may lead to the identification of biomarkers that may be employed in feedback loops to aid water chemists and engineers in the overall goal of producing safer drinking water.

DNA damage by genotoxic hydroxyhalofuranones: an in silico approach to MX

MX (3-chloro-4-(dichloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone), a disinfection byproduct present in chlorinated drinking water, is one of the most potent mutagens known. Whereas its genotoxic effects are well documented, the mechanism by which MX exerts such an intense biological effect is still unclear. To gain further insight into both the general reactivity of hydroxyhalofuranones, and especially as regards their genotoxicity, here we report an in silico study of the aqueous reactivity of MX and two less powerful analogues (MXY, in general): (3-chloro-4-(chloromethyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone -CMCF- and 3-chloro-4-(methyl)-5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone -MCF-). The following aspects were investigated: (i) the acid dissociation and isomerization equilibria of MXY, i.e. the species distribution among the possible isomers; (ii) the one-electron reduction potential of MXY; (iii) the guanosine and adenosine alkylation mechanism by MXY, which leads to covalent-DNA adducts; and (iv) the redox properties of the adducts. No significant differences were observed between MCF, CMCF, and MX, with a single exception: the unimolecular carbon-chlorine cleavage of some MX-nucleotide adducts may afford highly oxidative intermediates, which could be able to remove an electron from contiguous nucleotides directly, especially guanosine. This reaction would provide a pathway for the hypothesized ability of some hydroxyhalofuranones to oxidize DNA.

Mutagenic analysis of six disinfection by-products in the Tk gene of mouse lymphoma cells

Drinking water must be disinfected prior to its distribution for human consumption. This water treatment process generates disinfection by-products (DBPs), formed by the interaction of the disinfectant with organic matter, anthropogenic contaminants and inorganic (bromide/iodide) matter naturally present in source water. Due to the potential genotoxic/carcinogenic risk of these DBPs, we have investigated the mutagenic potential of six of such compounds on the thymidine kinase (Tk) gene in the well-validated mouse lymphoma assay (MLA). The MLA quantifies a wide range of genetic alterations affecting the expression of this gene in L5178Y/Tk(+/-)-3.7.2C cells. In this study we selected six emerging DBPs, corresponding to three different chemical classes: halonitromethanes (bromonitromethane and trichloronitromethane), halogenated acetaldehydes (tribromoacetaldehyde and chloral hydrate) and hydroxyfuranones (mucobromic and mucochloric acids), each class including one chlorinated and one brominated form. The results showed that after 4h of treatment, only mucobromic acid increased the frequency of mutant colonies, with a higher proportion of small colonies, which would indicate a clastogenic potential. This is the first study reporting mutagenicity data in mammalian cells for the six selected DBPs.

Reactivity of mucohalic acids in water

One group of disinfection byproducts of increasing interest are the halogenated furanones, which are formed in the chlorination of drinking water. Among these halofuranones is mucochloric acid (MCA, 3,4-dichloro-5-hydroxyfuran-2(5H)-one), and mucobromic acid (MBA, 3,4-dibromo-5-hydroxyfuran-2(5H)-one). Both mucohalic acids (MXA) are direct genotoxins and potential carcinogens, with the capacity to alkylate the DNA bases guanosine, adenosine and cytosine, and they have been measured in concentrations ranging up to 700 ng/l in tap water. MCA and MBA react in basic aqueous medium to form mucoxyhalic acids (4-halo-3,5-hydroxyfuran-2(5H)-one). Since: i) this reaction may represent the first step in the abiotic decomposition of mucohalic acids, ii) mucoxyhalic acids have been proposed as possible intermediates in the reaction of MXA with DNA, a kinetic study of the reaction mechanism is of interest. Here, the following conclusions were drawn: a) At moderately basic pH, the reaction of mucohalic acids with OH(-) to form mucoxyhalic acids is kinetically significant. b) The nucleophilic attack of hydroxide ions on MXA occurs through a combination of two paths: one of them is first-order in hydroxide whereas the other is second-order and are proposed to occur through the deprotonation of the hydrate of MXA. c) The hydration constants of mucohalic acids -0.23 and 0.17 for MCA and MBA respectively - corresponds to the very significant hydrate concentrations. Since hydrates are not electrophilic, these values imply a decrease in the alkylating capacity of mucohalic acids.

Mammalian cell DNA damage and repair kinetics of monohaloacetic acid drinking water disinfection by-products

Haloacetic acids (HAAs) are the second most common class of chlorinated water disinfection by-products (DBPs). The single cell gel electrophoresis genotoxicity assay using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells was modified to include liquid holding recovery time to measure genomic DNA damage and repair kinetics of three monoHAAs: chloroacetic acid (CAA), bromoacetic acid (BAA), and iodoacetic acid (IAA). The rank order of genotoxic potency was IAA > BAA >> CAA from previous research. The concentration of each HAA was chosen to generate approximately the same level of genotoxic damage. No cytotoxicity was expressed during the 24 h liquid holding period. Nuclei from CHO cells treated with BAA showed the lowest rate of DNA repair (t(50) = 296 min) compared to that of CAA or IAA (t(50) = 134 and 84 min, respectively). The different rates of genomic repair expressed by IAA or CAA versus BAA suggest that different distributions of DNA lesions are induced. The use of DNA repair coupled with genomic technologies may lead to the understanding of the biological and genetic mechanisms involved in toxic responses induced by DBPs.