1
|
Tsimberidou AM, Baysal MA, Chakraborty A, Andersson BS. Autologous engineered T cell receptor therapy in advanced cancer. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2290356. [PMID: 38114231 PMCID: PMC10732691 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2290356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
To overcome challenges associated with adoptive cell therapy (ACT), we developed a personalized autologous T-cell therapy program. Patients with advanced cancer with HLA-A *02:01 allele and tumor expression of PRAME, MAGEA1, MAGEA4, MAGEA8, NY-ESO-1, COL6A3 exon 6, MXRA5, and/or MMP1 underwent leukapheresis and T-cell product manufacturing. Patients received lymphodepletion, IMA101 infusion and interleukin 2 for 14 days. Of 214 screened patients, 14 were treated (6, IMA101; 8, IMA101 and atezolizumab). The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (G1, n = 6; G2, n = 4) and cytopenia. At 6 weeks, 12 (85.7%) patients had stable disease. Three patients had prolonged disease stabilization for 12.9, 7.3, and 13.7 months, respectively. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.4 months and 9.4 months, respectively. Target-specific T cells expanded to constitute up to 78.7% of CD8+ cells. In conclusion, IMA101 was feasible and well tolerated, leveraging the potential of multi-targeted ACT that warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M. Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mehmet A. Baysal
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Abhijit Chakraborty
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Borje S. Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Valdez BC, Yuan B, Murray D, Ramdial JL, Nieto Y, Popat U, Tang X, Andersson BS. Synergistic cytotoxicity of fludarabine, clofarabine, busulfan, vorinostat and olaparib in AML cells. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1287444. [PMID: 38074694 PMCID: PMC10701888 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1287444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Combinations of nucleoside analog(s) and DNA alkylating agent(s) are used for cancer treatment as components of pre-transplant regimens used in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Their efficacies are enhanced by combining drugs with different mechanisms of action, which also allows a reduction in the individual drug dosages and thus potentially in toxicity to the patient. We hypothesized that addition of SAHA and olaparib, an HDAC- and a PARP-inhibitor, respectively, to the established combination of fludarabine, clofarabine and busulfan would enhance AML cell cytotoxicity. Exposure of the AML cell lines KBM3/Bu2506, MV4-11, MOLM14 and OCI-AML3 to the 5-drug combination resulted in synergistic cytotoxicity with combination indexes < 1. Increased protein acetylation and decreased poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation were observed, as expected. Activation of apoptosis was suggested by cleavage of Caspase 3 and PARP1, DNA fragmentation, increased reactive oxygen species, and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential. The reduction in poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation was independent of caspase activation. Several proteins involved in DNA damage response and repair were downregulated, which may be contributing factors for the observed synergism. The increased phosphorylation of DNAPKcs suggests inhibition of its kinase activity and diminution of its role in DNA repair. A similar synergism was observed in patient-derived cell samples. These findings will be important in designing clinical trials using these drug combinations as pre-transplant conditioning regimens for AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C. Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Bin Yuan
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - David Murray
- Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Jeremy Leon Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Xiaowen Tang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Suzhou, China
| | - Borje S. Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tsimberidou AM, Guenther K, Andersson BS, Mendrzyk R, Alpert A, Wagner C, Nowak A, Aslan K, Satelli A, Richter F, Kuttruff-Coqui S, Schoor O, Fritsche J, Coughlin Z, Mohamed AS, Sieger K, Norris B, Ort R, Beck J, Vo HH, Hoffgaard F, Ruh M, Backert L, Wistuba II, Fuhrmann D, Ibrahim NK, Morris VK, Kee BK, Halperin DM, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Kebriaei P, Shpall EJ, Vining D, Hwu P, Singh H, Reinhardt C, Britten CM, Hilf N, Weinschenk T, Maurer D, Walter S. Feasibility and Safety of Personalized, Multi-Target, Adoptive Cell Therapy (IMA101): First-in-Human Clinical Trial in Patients with Advanced Metastatic Cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 2023; 11:925-945. [PMID: 37172100 PMCID: PMC10330623 DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.cir-22-0444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
IMA101 is an actively personalized, multi-targeted adoptive cell therapy (ACT), whereby autologous T cells are directed against multiple novel defined peptide-HLA (pHLA) cancer targets. HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors expressing ≥1 of 8 predefined targets underwent leukapheresis. Endogenous T cells specific for up to 4 targets were primed and expanded in vitro. Patients received lymphodepletion (fludarabine, cyclophosphamide), followed by T-cell infusion and low-dose IL2 (Cohort 1). Patients in Cohort 2 received atezolizumab for up to 1 year (NCT02876510). Overall, 214 patients were screened, 15 received lymphodepletion (13 women, 2 men; median age, 44 years), and 14 were treated with T-cell products. IMA101 treatment was feasible and well tolerated. The most common adverse events were cytokine release syndrome (Grade 1, n = 6; Grade 2, n = 4) and expected cytopenias. No patient died during the first 100 days after T-cell therapy. No neurotoxicity was observed. No objective responses were noted. Prolonged disease stabilization was noted in three patients lasting for 13.7, 12.9, and 7.3 months. High frequencies of target-specific T cells (up to 78.7% of CD8+ cells) were detected in the blood of treated patients, persisted for >1 year, and were detectable in posttreatment tumor tissue. Individual T-cell receptors (TCR) contained in T-cell products exhibited broad variation in TCR avidity, with the majority being low avidity. High-avidity TCRs were identified in some patients' products. This study demonstrates the feasibility and tolerability of an actively personalized ACT directed to multiple defined pHLA cancer targets. Results warrant further evaluation of multi-target ACT approaches using potent high-avidity TCRs. See related Spotlight by Uslu and June, p. 865.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia M Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Anna Nowak
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Aslan
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Becky Norris
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rita Ort
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jennifer Beck
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Manuel Ruh
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Ignacio I Wistuba
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Nuhad K Ibrahim
- Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Van Karlyle Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | - Bryan K Kee
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Texas
| | | | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Vining
- Department of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patrick Hwu
- Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | | | - Norbert Hilf
- Immatics Biotechnologies GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Andersson BS, Thall PF, Ma J, Valdez BC, Bassett R, Chen J, Ahmed S, Alousi A, Bashir Q, Ciurea S, Gulbis A, Cool R, Kawedia J, Hosing C, Kebriaei P, Kornblau S, Myers A, Oran B, Rezvani K, Shah N, Shpall E, Parmar S, Popat UR, Nieto Y, Champlin RE. A randomized phase III study of pretransplant conditioning for AML/MDS with fludarabine and once daily IV busulfan ± clofarabine in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2022; 57:1295-1303. [PMID: 35610308 PMCID: PMC9352570 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01705-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 04/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Pretransplant conditioning with Fludarabine (Flu)-Busulfan (Bu) is safe, but clofarabine (Clo) has improved antileukemic activity. Hypothesis: Flu+Clo-Bu (FCB) yields superior progression-free survival (PFS) after allogeneic transplantation. We randomized 250 AML/MDS patients aged 3–70, Karnofsky Score ≥80, with matched donors, to FCB (n = 120) or Flu-Bu (n = 130), stratifying complete remission (CR) vs. No CR, (NCR). HCT-CI scores varied, from 0 to 10. All evaluable patients engrafted. Median follow-up was 66 months (interquartile range: 58–80). Three-year relapse incidence (RI), 25% with FCB, vs. 39% with Flu-Bu (p = 0.018), offset by higher non-relapse mortality, 22.6% (95%CI: 16–30.2%) vs. 12.3% (95%CI: 6.5–19%). Three-year PFS was 52% (95%CI: 44–62%) (FCB), vs. 48% (95%CI: 41–58%) (Flu-Bu). FCB benefited CR patients less, NCR patients age ≤ 60 had 3-year 34% RI (95%CI: 19–49%) (FCB) vs. 56% (95%CI: 38–70%) after Flu-Bu (p = 0.037). NCR patients >60 years had 3-year RI 10.0% (FCB), vs. 56.0%, after Flu-Bu (p = 0.003). Bayesian regression analysis including treatment-covariate interactions showed FCB superiority in NCR patients with low HCT-CI (0–2). Serious adverse event profiles were similar for the regimens. Conditioning with FCB did not improve PFS overall, but improved disease control in NCR patients, mandating confirmatory trials. Remission status and HCT-CI should be considered when using FCB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Peter F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Junsheng Ma
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Roland Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Julianne Chen
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amin Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stefan Ciurea
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alison Gulbis
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rita Cool
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jitesh Kawedia
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Steve Kornblau
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alan Myers
- Department of Pharmacy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.,University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Simrit Parmar
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uday R Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Valdez BC, Murray D, Yuan B, Nieto Y, Popat U, Andersson BS. ABT199/venetoclax potentiates the cytotoxicity of alkylating agents and fludarabine in acute myeloid leukemia cells. Oncotarget 2022; 13:319-330. [PMID: 35154579 PMCID: PMC8830224 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The antineoplastic activity of pre-transplant regimens in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a critical factor for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. There is an urgent need to identify novel approaches without jeopardizing patient safety. We hypothesized that combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action would provide better cytotoxicity. We, therefore, determined the synergistic cytotoxicity of various combinations of the alkylating agents busulfan (Bu) and 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4HC), the nucleoside analog fludarabine (Flu) and the BCL2 inhibitor ABT199/venetoclax in AML cells. [Bu+4HC] and [Bu+Flu] inhibited cell proliferation and activated apoptosis; addition of ABT199 to either combinations significantly increased these effects with combination indexes < 1. Apoptosis is suggested by cleavages of PARP1 and CASPASE 3, DNA fragmentation, increased reactive oxygen species, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, and increased pro-apoptotic proteins in the cytoplasm. A similar enhancement of apoptosis was observed in patient-derived cell samples. ABT199/venetocalx upregulated anti-apoptotic MCL1 as a compensatory mechanism but addition of [Bu+4HC] or [Bu+Flu] negated this effect by CASPASE 3-mediated cleavage of MEK1/2 and its substrate MCL1. CASPASE 3 caused cleavage of pro-survival β-CATENIN, which likely contributed to the activation of stress signaling pathways involving SAPK/JNK and AMPK. The observed synergistic cytotoxicity was associated with an inhibition of pro-survival pathways involving STAT1, STAT5 and PI3K. These findings will be useful in designing clinical trials using these drug combinations as pre-transplant conditioning regimens for AML patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - David Murray
- Division/Department of Experimental Oncology, University of Alberta/Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton T6G 1Z2, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bin Yuan
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tsimberidou AM, Van Morris K, Vo HH, Eck S, Lin YF, Rivas JM, Andersson BS. T-cell receptor-based therapy: an innovative therapeutic approach for solid tumors. J Hematol Oncol 2021; 14:102. [PMID: 34193217 PMCID: PMC8243554 DOI: 10.1186/s13045-021-01115-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
T-cell receptor (TCR)-based adoptive therapy employs genetically modified lymphocytes that are directed against specific tumor markers. This therapeutic modality requires a structured and integrated process that involves patient screening (e.g., for HLA-A*02:01 and specific tumor targets), leukapheresis, generation of transduced TCR product, lymphodepletion, and infusion of the TCR-based adoptive therapy. In this review, we summarize the current technology and early clinical development of TCR-based therapy in patients with solid tumors. The challenges of TCR-based therapy include those associated with TCR product manufacturing, patient selection, and preparation with lymphodepletion. Overcoming these challenges, and those posed by the immunosuppressive microenvironment, as well as developing next-generation strategies is essential to improving the efficacy and safety of TCR-based therapies. Optimization of technology to generate TCR product, treatment administration, and patient monitoring for adverse events is needed. The implementation of novel TCR strategies will require expansion of the TCR approach to patients with HLA haplotypes beyond HLA-A*02:01 and the discovery of novel tumor markers that are expressed in more patients and tumor types. Ongoing clinical trials will determine the ultimate role of TCR-based therapy in patients with solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Unit 455, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Karlyle Van Morris
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Henry Hiep Vo
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Unit 455, Phase I Clinical Trials Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Stephen Eck
- MacroGenics, Inc., 9704 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Yu-Feng Lin
- Immatics US, Inc., 2201 Holcombe Blvd., Suite 205, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | | | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nieto Y, Gruschkus S, Valdez BC, Jones RB, Anderlini P, Hosing C, Popat U, Qazilbash M, Kebriaei P, Alousi A, Saini N, Srour S, Rezvani K, Ramdial J, Barnett M, Gulbis A, Shigle TL, Ahmed S, Iyer S, Lee H, Nair R, Parmar S, Steiner R, Dabaja B, Pinnix C, Gunther J, Cuglievan B, Mahadeo K, Khazal S, Chuang H, Champlin R, Shpall EJ, Andersson BS. Improved outcomes of high-risk relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma patients after high-dose chemotherapy: a 15-year analysis. Haematologica 2021; 107:899-908. [PMID: 33951890 PMCID: PMC8968895 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.278311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplant (HDC/ASCT) is standard treatment for chemosensitive relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma, although outcomes of high-risk relapse (HRR) patients remain suboptimal. We retrospectively analyzed all HRR classical Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated with HDC/ASCT at our institution between 01/01/2005 and 12/31/2019. HRR criteria included primary refractory disease/relapse within 1 year, extranodal extension, B symptoms, requiring more than one salvage line, or positron emission tomography (PET)-positive disease at ASCT. All patients met the same ASCT eligibility criteria. We treated 501 patients with BEAM (n=146), busulphan/melphalan (BuMel) (n=38), gemcitabine( Gem)/BuMel (n=189) and vorinostat/Gem/BuMel (n=128). The Gem/BuMel and vorinostat/Gem/BuMel cohorts had more HRR criteria and more patients with PET-positive disease at ASCT. Treatment with brentuximab vedotin (BV) or anti-PD1 prior to ASCT, PET-negative disease at ASCT, and maintenance BV increased over time. BEAM and BuMel predominated in earlier years (2005-2007), GemBuMel and BEAM in middle years (2008-2015), and vorinostat/GemBuMel and BEAM in later years (2016-2019). The median follow-up is 50 months (range, 6-186). Outcomes improved over time, with 2-year progressionfree survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS) rates of 58%/82% (2005-2007), 59%/83% (2008-2011), 71%/94% (2012-2015) and 86%/99% (2016- 2019) (P<0.0001). Five-year PFS/OS rates were 72%/87% after vorinostat/ GemBuMel, 55%/75% after GemBuMel, 45%/61% after BEAM, and 39%/57% after BuMel (PFS: P=0.0003; OS: P<0.0001). These differences persisted within the PET-negative and PET-positive subgroups. Prior BV and vorinostat/GemBuMel were independent predictors of more favorable outcome, whereas primary refractory disease, ≥2 salvage lines, bulky relapse, B symptoms and PET-positivity at ASCT correlated independently with unfavorable outcomes. In conclusion, post-HDC/ASCT outcomes of patients with HRR classic Hodgkin lymphoma have improved over the last 15 years. Pre-ASCT BV treatment and optimized synergistic HDC (vorinostat/GemBuMel) were associated with this improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center,YAGO NIETO
| | | | - Benigno C. Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Roy B. Jones
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Paolo Anderlini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Muzaffar Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Amin Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Neeraj Saini
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Samer Srour
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Jeremy Ramdial
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Melissa Barnett
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Alison Gulbis
- Pharmacy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Sairah Ahmed
- Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Swaminathan Iyer
- Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Hun Lee
- Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Ranjit Nair
- Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Simrit Parmar
- Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Raphael Steiner
- Lymphoma and Myeloma, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Bouthaina Dabaja
- Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Chelsea Pinnix
- Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Jillian Gunther
- Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | | | - Kris Mahadeo
- Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Sajad Khazal
- Pediatrics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Hubert Chuang
- Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Elizabeth J. Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| | - Borje S. Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kharya G, Bakane AN, Rauthan AM. Pretransplant myeloid and immune suppression, reduced toxicity conditioning with posttransplant cyclophosphamide: Initial outcomes of novel approach for matched unrelated donor hematopoietic stem cell transplant for hemoglobinopathies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e28909. [PMID: 33470527 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is currently the only curative option for thalassemia major (TM) and sickle cell disease (SCD). We report our experience of using pretransplant immune suppression (PTIS), augmented Johns Hopkins conditioning, and posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) as graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis for matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant in TM/SCD. At a median follow-up of 307.5 days (range 251-395), all patients (three TM, one SCD) are alive and disease free. MUD HSCT with PTIS, augmented Johns Hopkins conditioning, and PTCy as GvHD prophylaxis is a promising way of treating patients with hemoglobinopathies with low regimen-related toxicity (RRT), no risk of graft failure (GF) and minimal GvHD rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaurav Kharya
- Center for Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Atish N Bakane
- Center for Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Archana M Rauthan
- Center for Bone Marrow Transplant and Cellular Therapy, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Solans BP, Chiesa R, Doncheva B, Prunty H, Veys P, Trocóniz IF, Standing JF. Modelling of neutrophil dynamics in children receiving busulfan or treosulfan for haematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:1537-1549. [PMID: 32077123 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 01/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Busulfan and treosulfan are cytotoxic agents used in the conditioning regime prior to paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). These agents cause suppression of myeloid cells leaving patients severely immunocompromised in the early post-HSCT period. The main objectives were: (i) to establish a mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model for the treatment and engraftment effects on neutrophil counts comparing busulfan and treosulfan-based conditioning, and (ii) to explore current dosing schedules with respect to time to HSCT. METHODS Data on 126 patients, 72 receiving busulfan (7 months-18 years, 5.1-47.0 kg) and 54 treosulfan (4 months-17 years, 3.8-35.8 kg), were collected. In total, 8935 neutrophil count observations were recorded during the study period in addition to drug concentrations to develop a mechanistic PKPD model. Absolute neutrophil count profiles were modelled semimechanistically, accounting for transplant effects and differing set points pre- and post-transplant. RESULTS PK were best described by 2-compartment models for both drugs. The Friberg semimechanistic neutropenia model was applied with a linear model for busulfan and a maximum efficacy model for treosulfan describing drug effects at various stages of neutrophil maturation. System parameters were consistent across both drugs. The HSCT was represented by an amount of progenitor cells enhancing the neutrophils' proliferation and maturation compartments. Alemtuzumab was found to enhance the proliferative rate under which the absolute neutrophil count begin to grow after HSCT. CONCLUSION A semimechanistic PKPD model linking exposure to either busulfan or treosulfan to the neutrophil reconstitution dynamics was successfully built. Alemtuzumab coadministration enhanced the neutrophil proliferative rate after HSCT. Treosulfan administration was suggested to be delayed with respect to time to HSCT, leaving less time between the end of the administration and stem cell infusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Belén P Solans
- Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Robert Chiesa
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Bilyana Doncheva
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Helen Prunty
- Department of Chemical Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Paul Veys
- Bone Marrow Transplantation Department, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
| | - Iñaki F Trocóniz
- Pharmacometrics and Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Technology and Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Nutrition, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Joseph F Standing
- Department of Pharmacy, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.,Infection, Immunity, Inflammation Programme, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.,Paediatric Infectious Diseases Group, St George's, University of London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valdez BC, Li Y, Murray D, Liu Y, Nieto Y, Bashir Q, Qazilbash MH, Andersson BS. Panobinostat and venetoclax enhance the cytotoxicity of gemcitabine, busulfan, and melphalan in multiple myeloma cells. Exp Hematol 2020; 81:32-41. [PMID: 31954171 DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Gemcitabine (Gem), busulfan (Bu), and melphalan (Mel) are used for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. To further improve their efficacy, a preclinical study on their synergism with the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (Pano) and the BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax/ABT199 was performed. Multiple myeloma cell lines MM.1R and MC/CAR were exposed to ∼IC20 levels of the drugs. Synergistic cytotoxicity was observed in cells exposed to the five-drug combination as indicated by combination indexes <1, supported by ∼86% inhibition of proliferation and ∼84% annexin V positivity in MM.1R and ∼58% inhibition of proliferation and ∼46% annexin V positivity in MC/CAR cells. Activation of the DNA damage response and apoptosis were suggested by a modest increase in the phosphorylation of ATM and its substrates; significant cleavage of PARP1, caspase 3, and heat shock protein 90; DNA fragmentation; mitochondrial membrane depolarization; and reactive oxygen species production. The five-drug combination significantly decreased the levels of PI3K, AKT, mTOR, RAPTOR, P-P70S6K, and eIF2α, with concomitant increases in P-AMPK and its substrate Tuberin/TSC2, suggesting that the mTOR signaling pathway was compromised. Endoplasmic reticulum stress through activation of the unfolded protein response was also observed as suggested by increases in the levels of calnexin, BiP/GRP78, ERO1-Lα, and protein disulfide isomerase, which may relate to venetoclax-mediated inhibition of BCL2 in the endoplasmic reticulum. This is the first report on the effects of a venetoclax-containing regimen on the unfolded protein response. These results provide a rationale to propose a clinical trial on use of Gem + Bu + Mel + Pano + Venetoclax as part of a conditioning regimen for multiple myeloma patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - David Murray
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, AL T6G1Z2, Canada
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Muzaffar H Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Valdez BC, Tang X, Li Y, Murray D, Liu Y, Popat U, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Epigenetic modification enhances the cytotoxicity of busulfan and4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide in AML cells. Exp Hematol 2018; 67:49-59.e1. [PMID: 30102945 DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2018.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 07/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
The combination of the DNA-alkylating agents busulfan (Bu) and cyclophosphamide is the most commonly used myeloablative pretransplantation conditioning therapy for myeloid leukemias. However, it is associated with significant nonrelapse mortality, which prohibits dose escalation to control relapse. We hypothesized that combining these two drugs with an epigenetic modifier would increase antileukemic efficacy without jeopardizing patient safety. A preclinical study was performed to determine the synergistic cytotoxicity of Bu, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide (4HC), and the hypomethylating agent decitabine (DAC) in human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell lines. Exposure of KBM3/Bu2506 (P53-null) and OCI-AML3 (P53-wild-type) cells to Bu+4HC inhibited cell proliferation by ∼35-39%; addition of DAC increased the inhibition to ∼60-62%. The observed synergistic interactions correlated with DNA damage response activation, increased the production of reactive oxygen species, and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, release of mitochondrial proapoptotic proteins into the cytoplasm, and induction of caspase-dependent programmed cell death. The Bu+4HC+DAC combination further caused chromatin trapping of DNMT1 with a concomitant increase in DNA damage. In contrast, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal tandem duplications (FLT3-ITD)-positive AML cell lines were not sensitized to Bu+4HC by inclusion of DAC; addition of the FLT3 kinase inhibitor sorafenib sensitized the FLT3-ITD-positive MV4-11 and MOLM13 cell lines to the triple drug combination by inhibiting the FLT3 signal transduction pathway. Our results therefore provide a rationale for the development of personalized conditioning therapy for patients with P53-mutated and FLT3-ITD-positive AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Xiaowen Tang
- Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Suzhou, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Murray
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 1Z2
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Minko IG, Rizzo CJ, Lloyd RS. Mutagenic potential of nitrogen mustard-induced formamidopyrimidine DNA adduct: Contribution of the non-canonical α-anomer. J Biol Chem 2017; 292:18790-18799. [PMID: 28972137 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m117.802520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Nitrogen mustards (NMs) are DNA-alkylating compounds that represent the earliest anticancer drugs. However, clinical use of NMs is limited because of their own mutagenic properties. The mechanisms of NM-induced mutagenesis remain unclear. The major product of DNA alkylation by NMs is a cationic NM-N7-dG adduct that can yield the imidazole ring-fragmented lesion, N5-NM-substituted formamidopyrimidine (NM-Fapy-dG). Characterization of this adduct is complicated because it adopts different conformations, including both a canonical β- and an unnatural α-anomeric configuration. Although formation of NM-Fapy-dG in cellular DNA has been demonstrated, its potential role in NM-induced mutagenesis is unknown. Here, we created site-specifically modified single-stranded vectors for replication in primate (COS7) or Escherichia coli cells. In COS7 cells, NM-Fapy-dG caused targeted mutations, predominantly G → T transversions, with overall frequencies of ∼11-12%. These frequencies were ∼2-fold higher than that induced by 8-oxo-dG adduct. Replication in E. coli was essentially error-free. To elucidate the mechanisms of bypass of NM-Fapy-dG, we performed replication assays in vitro with a high-fidelity DNA polymerase, Saccharomyces cerevisiae polymerase (pol) δ. It was found that pol δ could catalyze high-fidelity synthesis past NM-Fapy-dG, but only on a template subpopulation, presumably containing the β-anomeric adduct. Consistent with the low mutagenic potential of the β-anomer in vitro, the mutation frequency was significantly reduced when conditions for vector preparation were modified to favor this configuration. Collectively, these data implicate the α-anomer as a major contributor to NM-Fapy-dG-induced mutagenesis in primate cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina G Minko
- From the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences and
| | - Carmelo J Rizzo
- the Departments of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235
| | - R Stephen Lloyd
- From the Oregon Institute of Occupational Health Sciences and .,the Departments of Molecular and Medical Genetics and Physiology and Pharmacology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239 and
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Valdez BC, Li Y, Murray D, Liu Y, Nieto Y, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. The PARP inhibitor olaparib enhances the cytotoxicity of combined gemcitabine, busulfan and melphalan in lymphoma cells. Leuk Lymphoma 2017; 58:2705-2716. [PMID: 28394191 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2017.1306647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
The combination of gemcitabine (Gem), busulfan (Bu), and melphalan (Mel) is a promising regimen for autologous stem-cell transplantation (SCT) for lymphomas. To further improve the efficacy of [Gem + Bu + Mel], we added poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib (Ola). We hypothesized that Ola would inhibit the repair of damaged DNA caused by [Gem + Bu + Mel]. Exposure of J45.01 and Toledo cell lines to IC10-20 of individual drug inhibited proliferation by 6-16%; [Gem + Bu + Mel] by 20-27%; and [Gem + Bu + Mel + Ola] by 61-67%. The synergistic cytotoxicity of the four-drug combination may be attributed to activation of the DNA-damage response, inhibition of PARP activity and DNA repair, decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, increased production of reactive oxygen species, and activation of the SAPK/JNK stress signaling pathway, all of which may enhance apoptosis. Similar observations were obtained using mononuclear cells isolated from patients with T-cell lymphocytic leukemia. Our results provide a rationale for undertaking clinical trials of this drug combination for lymphoma patients undergoing SCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- a Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Yang Li
- a Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - David Murray
- b Department of Experimental Oncology , Cross Cancer Institute , Edmonton , Canada
| | - Yan Liu
- a Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Yago Nieto
- a Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- a Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Borje S Andersson
- a Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy , The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center , Houston , TX , USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Andersson BS, Thall PF, Valdez BC, Milton DR, Al-Atrash G, Chen J, Gulbis A, Chu D, Martinez C, Parmar S, Popat U, Nieto Y, Kebriaei P, Alousi A, de Lima M, Rondon G, Meng QH, Myers A, Kawedia J, Worth LL, Fernandez-Vina M, Madden T, Shpall EJ, Jones RB, Champlin RE. Fludarabine with pharmacokinetically guided IV busulfan is superior to fixed-dose delivery in pretransplant conditioning of AML/MDS patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2016; 52:580-587. [PMID: 27991894 PMCID: PMC5382042 DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2016.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Revised: 09/28/2016] [Accepted: 09/30/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We hypothesized that IV Busulfan (Bu) dosing could be safely intensified through pharmacokinetic (PK-) dose guidance to minimize the inter-patient variability in systemic exposure (SE) associated with body-sized dosing, and this should improve outcome of AML/MDS patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). To test this hypothesis, we treated 218 patients (median age 50.7 years, male/female 50/50%) with fludarabine (Flu) 40 mg/m2 once daily ×4, each dose followed by IV Bu, randomized to 130 mg/m2 (N=107) or PK-guided to average daily SE, AUC of 6,000 µM-min (N=111), stratified for remission-status, and allo-grafting from HLA-matched donors. Toxicity and graft vs. host disease (GvHD) rates in the groups were similar; the risk of relapse or treatment-related mortality remained higher in the fixed-dose group throughout the 80-month observation period. Further, PK-guidance yielded safer disease-control, leading to improved overall and progression-free survival, most prominently in MDS-patients and in AML-patients not in remission at allo-HSCT. We conclude that AML/MDS patients receiving pretransplant conditioning treatment with our 4-day regimen may benefit significantly from PK-guided Bu-dosing. This could be considered an alternative to fixed dose delivery since it provides the benefit of precise dose delivery to a predetermined SE without increasing risk(s) of serious toxicity and/or GvHD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - B C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D R Milton
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Al-Atrash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Chen
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Gulbis
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - D Chu
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - C Martinez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Parmar
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - U Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - P Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - M de Lima
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Q H Meng
- Division of Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - A Myers
- Division of Pharmacy Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - J Kawedia
- Division of Pharmacy Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - L L Worth
- Division of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - T Madden
- Division of Pharmacy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - E J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R B Jones
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kebriaei P, Bassett R, Lyons G, Valdez B, Ledesma C, Rondon G, Oran B, Ciurea S, Alousi A, Popat U, Patel K, Ahmed S, Olson A, Bashir Q, Shah N, Jones R, Marin D, Rezvani K, Nieto Y, Khouri I, Qazilbash M, Hosing C, Shpall E, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Clofarabine Plus Busulfan is an Effective Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Long-Term Study Results. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 23:285-292. [PMID: 27816651 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2016] [Accepted: 11/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
We investigated the long-term safety and disease control data obtained with i.v. busulfan (Bu) combined with clofarabine (Clo) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). A total of 107 patients, median age 38 years (range, 19 to 64 years) received a matched sibling donor (n = 52) or matched unrelated donor (n = 55) transplant for ALL in first complete remission (n = 62), second complete remission (n = 28), or more advanced disease (n = 17). Nearly one-half of the patients had a high-risk cytogenetic profile as defined by the presence of t(9;22) (n = 34), t(4;11) (n = 4), or complex cytogenetics (n = 7). Clo 40 mg/m2 was given once daily, with each dose followed by pharmacokinetically dosed Bu infused over 3 hours daily for 4 days, followed by hematopoietic cell infusion after 2 days of rest. The Bu dose was based on the drug clearance as determined by a test Bu dose of 32 mg/m2. The target daily area under the curve was 5500 µmol/min for patients aged <60 years and 4000 µmol/min for patients aged >59 years. With a median follow-up of 3.3 years among surviving patients (range, 1 to 5.8 years), the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) for patients undergoing HSCT in first complete remission (CR1), second complete remission (CR2), or more advanced disease was 62%, 34%, and 35%, respectively. The regimen was well tolerated, with nonrelapse mortality (NRM) of 10% at 100 days and 31% at 2 years post-HSCT. The incidence of grade II-IV and III-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) was 35% and 10%, respectively; 18% patients developed extensive chronic GVHD. The 2-year overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing HSCT in CR1, CR2, or more advanced disease was 70%, 57%, and 35%, respectively. Among 11 patients aged >59 years treated with reduced-dose Bu in CR1 (n = 7) or CR2 (n = 4), 4 remain alive and disease-free, with a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 2 to 4.7 years). Only the presence of minimal residual disease at the time of transplantation was associated with significantly worse PFS and OS in multivariate analysis. Our data indicate that the Clo-Bu combination provides effective disease control while maintaining a favorable safety profile. OS and NRM rates compare favorably with those for traditional myeloablative total body irradiation-based conditioning regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| | - Roland Bassett
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Genevieve Lyons
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ben Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Celina Ledesma
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Betul Oran
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stefan Ciurea
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Krina Patel
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda Olson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Qaiser Bashir
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Nina Shah
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roy Jones
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Marin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Katayoun Rezvani
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Issa Khouri
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Muzaffar Qazilbash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Alatrash G, Thall PF, Valdez BC, Fox PS, Ning J, Garber HR, Janbey S, Worth LL, Popat U, Hosing C, Alousi AM, Kebriaei P, Shpall EJ, Jones RB, de Lima M, Rondon G, Chen J, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Long-Term Outcomes after Treatment with Clofarabine ± Fludarabine with Once-Daily Intravenous Busulfan as Pretransplant Conditioning Therapy for Advanced Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2016; 22:1792-1800. [PMID: 27377901 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2016.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Pretransplant conditioning regimens critically determine outcomes in the setting of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The use of nucleoside analogs such as fludarabine (Flu) in combination with i.v. busulfan (Bu) has been shown to be highly effective as a pretransplant conditioning regimen in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Because leukemia relapse remains the leading cause of death after allo-SCT, we studied whether clofarabine (Clo), a nucleoside analog with potent antileukemia activity, can be used to complement Flu. In a preliminary report, we previously showed the safety and efficacy of Clo ± Flu with i.v. Bu in 51 patients with high-risk AML, CML, and MDS. The study has now been completed, and we present long-term follow-up data on the entire 70-patient population, which included 49 (70%), 8 (11%), and 13 (19%) patients with AML, MDS, and CML, respectively. Thirteen patients (19%) were in complete remission, and 41 patients (59%) received matched unrelated donor grafts. Engraftment was achieved in all patients. Sixty-three patients (90%) achieved complete remission. There were no deaths reported at day +30, and the 100-day nonrelapse mortality rate was 4% (n = 3). Thirty-one percent of patients (n = 22) developed grades II to IV acute graft-versus-host disease, and the median overall survival and progression-free survival times were 2.4 years and .9 years, respectively. Our results confirm the safety and overall and progression-free survival advantage of the arms with higher Clo doses and lower Flu doses, which was most prominent in the AML/MDS group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gheath Alatrash
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Peter F Thall
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Patricia S Fox
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Haven R Garber
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Selma Janbey
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Laura L Worth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chitra Hosing
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amin M Alousi
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Partow Kebriaei
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth J Shpall
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Roy B Jones
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Marcos de Lima
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Hematologic Malignancies and Stem Cell Transplant, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gabriela Rondon
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Julianne Chen
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ji J, Valdez BC, Li Y, Liu Y, Teo EC, Nieto Y, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Cladribine, gemcitabine, busulfan, and SAHA combination as a potential pretransplant conditioning regimen for lymphomas: A preclinical study. Exp Hematol 2016; 44:458-65. [PMID: 26976752 DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2016.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an effective treatment for patients with refractory lymphomas. Nucleoside analogs (NAs) and DNA alkylating agents are efficacious in treating hematologic malignancies. To design an efficacious and more economical pretransplant regimen for lymphoma patients, we analyzed the cytotoxicity of cladribine (Clad), gemcitabine (Gem), busulfan (Bu), and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) in lymphoma cell lines. J45.01 and U937 lymphoma cell lines were exposed to drugs, alone or in combination, for 48 hours and analyzed with the MTT and annexin V assays, Western blotting, and flow cytometry. On the basis of the IC5-10 values of the drugs, the Clad+Gem+Bu combination inhibited the proliferation of both cell lines to ∼55%-60%. Addition of SAHA to this combination decreased proliferation further to ∼30%. Exposure to the Clad+Gem+Bu+SAHA combination activated the DNA damage response and ATM-CHK2 pathway; modified histones; decreased mitochondrial membrane potential, which caused leakage of apoptosis-inducing factors; and activated apoptosis. Pretreatment of cells with the pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK blocked the phosphorylation of histone 2AX and cleavage of PARP-1 and caspases. The Clad+Gem+Bu+SAHA combination provides synergistic cytotoxicity in lymphoma cell lines. Our results may be a basis for using this combination as a pretransplant conditioning regimen in a clinical trial for lymphoma patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, replacing the more expensive nucleoside analog clofarabine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Ji
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Esmeralda C Teo
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Yago Nieto
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation & Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Valdez BC, Li Y, Murray D, Ji J, Liu Y, Popat U, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Comparison of the cytotoxicity of cladribine and clofarabine when combined with fludarabine and busulfan in AML cells: Enhancement of cytotoxicity with epigenetic modulators. Exp Hematol 2015; 43:448-61.e2. [PMID: 25704054 DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2014] [Revised: 01/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Clofarabine (Clo), fludarabine (Flu), and busulfan (Bu) combinations are efficacious in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid leukemia. We sought to determine whether the more affordable drug cladribine (Clad) can provide a viable alternative to Clo, with or without panobinostat (Pano) and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (DAC). Both Clad+Flu+Bu and Clo+Flu+Bu combinations showed synergistic cytotoxicity in KBM3/Bu250(6), HL60, and OCI-AML3 cell lines. Cell exposure to these drug combinations resulted in 60%-80% inhibition of proliferation; activation of the ATM pathway; increase in histone modifications; decrease in HDAC3, HDAC4, HDAC5 and SirT7 proteins; decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential; activation of apoptosis and stress signaling pathways; and downregulation of the AKT pathway. These drug combinations activated DNA-damage response and apoptosis in primary cell samples from AML patients. At lower concentrations of Clad/Clo, Flu, and Bu, inclusion of Pano and DAC enhanced cell killing, increased histone modifications and DNA demethylation, and increased the levels of P16/INK4a, P15/INK4b and P21/Waf1/Cip1 proteins. The observed DNA demethylating activity of Clad and Clo may complement DAC activity; increase demethylation of the gene promoters for SFRP1, DKK3, and WIF1; and cause degradation of β-catenin in cells exposed to Clad/Clo+Flu+Bu+DAC+Pano. The overlapping activities of Clad/Clo+Flu+Bu, Pano, and DAC in DNA-damage formation and repair, histone modifications, DNA demethylation, and apoptosis may underlie their synergism. Our results provide a basis for supplanting Clo with Clad and for including epigenetic modifiers in the pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning regimen for myeloid leukemia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David Murray
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jie Ji
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Uday Popat
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kanakry CG, O'Donnell PV, Furlong T, de Lima MJ, Wei W, Medeot M, Mielcarek M, Champlin RE, Jones RJ, Thall PF, Andersson BS, Luznik L. Multi-institutional study of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide as single-agent graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation using myeloablative busulfan and fludarabine conditioning. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:3497-505. [PMID: 25267759 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2013.54.0625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 208] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The clinical safety and efficacy of intravenous busulfan and fludarabine (IV Bu/Flu) myeloablative conditioning as well as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with high-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) have been demonstrated independently in several single-institutional studies. We hypothesized that combining these two promising approaches in a multi-institutional study of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -matched bone marrow transplantation would provide low rates of severe acute and chronic GVHD, low toxicity, and effective disease control. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety-two adult patients (median age, 49 years; range, 21 to 65 years) with high-risk hematologic malignancies were enrolled at three centers (clinical trial No. NCT00809276). Forty-five patients received related allografts, and 47 received unrelated allografts. GVHD prophylaxis was solely with PTCy at 50 mg/kg/day on post-transplantation days +3 and +4. RESULTS The cumulative incidences of grades 2 to 4 acute, grades 3 to 4 acute, and chronic GVHD were 51%, 15%, and 14%, respectively. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days and 1 year were 9% and 16%, respectively. With a median follow-up period of 2.2 years, the 2-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 62% and 67%, respectively. Donor relatedness did not affect NRM, DFS, or OS. Patients in complete remission (CR) without evidence of minimal residual disease (MRD) had markedly better DFS (80%) and OS (80%) than patients in CR with MRD or with active disease at the time of transplantation (DFS, P = .0005; OS, P = .019). CONCLUSION This multi-institutional study demonstrates that PTCy can be safely and effectively combined with IV Bu/Flu myeloablative conditioning and confirms PTCy's efficacy as single-agent, short-course GVHD prophylaxis for both acute and chronic GVHD after bone marrow transplantation from HLA-matched donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Kanakry
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Paul V O'Donnell
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Terry Furlong
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marcos J de Lima
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wei Wei
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marta Medeot
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Marco Mielcarek
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard E Champlin
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard J Jones
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Peter F Thall
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Borje S Andersson
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Leo Luznik
- Christopher G. Kanakry, Marta Medeot, Richard J. Jones, Leo Luznik, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Paul V. O'Donnell, Terry Furlong, Marco Mielcarek, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Marcos J. de Lima, Wei Wei, Richard E. Champlin, Peter F. Thall, Borje S. Andersson, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Anurathapan U, Pakakasama S, Rujkijyanont P, Sirachainan N, Songdej D, Chuansumrit A, Sirireung S, Charoenkwan P, Jetsrisuparb A, Issaragrisil S, Ungkanont A, Sruamsiri R, Srisala S, Andersson BS, Hongeng S. Pretransplant immunosuppression followed by reduced-toxicity conditioning and stem cell transplantation in high-risk thalassemia: a safe approach to disease control. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19:1259-62. [PMID: 23648235 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2013] [Accepted: 04/23/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Patients with class 3 thalassemia with high-risk features for adverse events after high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) are difficult to treat, tending to either suffer serious toxicity or fail to establish stable graft function. We performed HSCT in 18 such patients age ≥7 years and hepatomegaly using a novel approach with pretransplant immunosuppression followed by a myeloablative reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen (fludarabine and i.v. busulfan [Flu-IV Bu]) and then HSCT. The median patient age was 14 years (range, 10 to 18 years). Before the Flu-IV Bu + antithymocyte globulin conditioning regimen, all patients received 1 to 2 cycles of pretransplant immunosuppression with fludarabine and dexamethasone. Thirteen patients received a related donor graft, and 5 received an unrelated donor graft. An initial prompt engraftment of donor cells with full donor chimerism was observed in all 18 patients, but 2 patients developed secondary mixed chimerism that necessitated withdrawal of immunosuppression to achieve full donor chimerism. Two patients (11%) had acute grade III-IV graft-versus-host disease, and 5 patients had limited chronic graft-versus-host disease. The only treatment-related mortality was from infection, and with a median follow-up of 42 months (range, 4 to 75), the 5-year overall survival and thalassemia-free survival were 89%. We conclude that this novel sequential immunoablative pretransplantation conditioning program is safe and effective for patients with high-risk class 3 thalassemia exhibiting additional comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Usanarat Anurathapan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Valdez BC, Nieto Y, Murray D, Li Y, Wang G, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Epigenetic modifiers enhance the synergistic cytotoxicity of combined nucleoside analog-DNA alkylating agents in lymphoma cell lines. Exp Hematol 2012; 40:800-10. [PMID: 22687754 PMCID: PMC3447105 DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2012.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2012] [Revised: 05/23/2012] [Accepted: 06/04/2012] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is used for treatment of lymphoma. In an attempt to design an efficacious and safe prehematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning regimen, we investigated the cytotoxicity of the combination of busulfan (B), melphalan (M), and gemcitabine (G) in lymphoma cell lines in the absence or presence of drugs that induce epigenetic changes. Cells were exposed to drugs individually or in combination and analyzed by the MTT proliferation assay, flow cytometry, and Western blotting. We used ~IC(10) drug concentrations (57 μM B, 1 μM M and 0.02 μM G), which individually did not have major effects on cell proliferation. Their combination resulted in 50% inhibition of proliferation. Reduction to almost half concentration (20 μM B, 0.7 μM M and 0.01 μM G) did not have significant effects, but addition of the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (0.6 μM) to this combination resulted in a marked (~65%) growth inhibition. The cytotoxicity of these combinations correlates with the activation of the ataxia telangiectasia mutated-CHK2 pathway, phosphorylation of KRAB-associated protein-1, epigenetic changes such as methylation and acetylation of histone 3, and activation of apoptosis. The relevance of epigenetic changes is further shown by the induction of DNA methyltransferases in tumor cells with low constitutive levels of DNMT3A and DNMT3B. The addition of 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine to (BMG+suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) further enhances cell killing. Overall, BMG combinations are synergistically cytotoxic to lymphoma cells. Epigenetic changes induced by suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid and 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine further enhance the cytotoxicity. This study provides a rationale for an ongoing clinical trial in our institution using (BMG+suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) as pre-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation conditioning for lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Valdez BC, Murray D, Nieto Y, Li Y, Wang G, Champlin RE, Andersson BS. Synergistic cytotoxicity of the DNA alkylating agent busulfan, nucleoside analogs and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid in lymphoma cell lines. Leuk Lymphoma 2011; 53:973-81. [PMID: 22023523 DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2011.634043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a promising treatment for lymphomas. Its success depends on effective pre-transplant conditioning regimens. We previously reported on the efficacy of DNA alkylating agent-nucleoside analog (NA) combinations for conditioning in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We hypothesized that a similar combinatory approach can be used for lymphomas. A combination of busulfan (Bu) with two NAs - clofarabine (Clo), fludarabine (Flu) or gemcitabine (Gem) - resulted in synergistic cytotoxicity in lymphoma cell lines. We demonstrated that the [2 NAs + Bu] combination activates a DNA damage response through the ATM-CHK2 and ATM-CHK1 pathways, leading to cell cycle checkpoint activation and apoptosis. Histone modifications and KAP1 phosphorylation are indicative of chromatin relaxation mediated by the nucleoside analogs, which sequentially increase Bu alkylation. Addition of suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) enhanced chromatin relaxation through increased histone acetylation and further augmented the cytotoxicity of [2 NAs + Bu]. Our results provide a preclinical basis for a clinical trial on using [2 NAs + Bu ± SAHA] combinations as conditioning therapy for patients with chemotherapy-refractory lymphoma undergoing HSCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benigno C Valdez
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX , USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Andersson BS, Valdez BC, de Lima M, Wang X, Thall PF, Worth LL, Popat U, Madden T, Hosing C, Alousi A, Rondon G, Kebriaei P, Shpall EJ, Jones RB, Champlin RE. Clofarabine ± fludarabine with once daily i.v. busulfan as pretransplant conditioning therapy for advanced myeloid leukemia and MDS. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 17:893-900. [PMID: 20946966 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2010] [Accepted: 09/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Although a combination of i.v. busulfan (Bu) and fludarabine (Flu) is a safe, reduced-toxicity conditioning program for acute myelogenous leukemia/myelodysplastic syndromes (AML/MDS), recurrent leukemia posttransplantation remains a problem. To enhance the conditioning regimen's antileukemic effect, we decided to supplant Flu with clofarabine (Clo), and assayed the interactions of these nucleoside analogs alone and in combination with Bu in Bu-resistant human cell lines in vitro. We found pronounced synergy between each nucleoside and the alkylator but even more enhanced cytotoxic synergy when the nucleoside analogs were combined prior to exposing the cells to Bu. We then designed a 4-arm clinical trial in patients with myeloid leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). Patients were adaptively randomized as follows: Arm I-Clo:Flu 10:30 mg/m(2), Arm II-20:20 mg/m(2), Arm III-30:10 mg/m(2), and Arm IV-single-agent Clo at 40 mg/m(2). The nucleoside analog(s) were/was infused over 1 hour once daily for 4 days, followed on each day by Bu, infused over 3 hours to a pharmacokinetically targeted daily area under the curve (AUC) of 6000 μMol-min ± 10%. Fifty-one patients have been enrolled with a minimum follow-up exceeding 100 days. There were 32 males and 19 females, with a median age of 45 years (range: 6-59). Nine patients had chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) (BC: 2, second AP: 3, and tyrosine-kinase inhibitor refractory first chronic phase [CP]: 4). Forty-two patients had AML: 14 were induction failures, 8 in first chemotherapy-refractory relapse, 7 in untreated relapse, 3 in second or subsequent relapse, 4 were in second complete remission (CR), and 3 in second CR without platelet recovery (CRp), 2 were in high-risk CR1. Finally, 1 patient was in first CRp. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was tacrolimus and mini-methorexate (MTX), and those who had an unrelated or 1 antigen-mismatched donor received low-dose rabbit-ATG (Thymoglobulin™). All patients engrafted. Forty-one patients had active leukemia at the time of transplant, and 35 achieved CR (85%). Twenty of the 42 AML patients and 5 of 9 CML patients are alive with a projected median overall survival (OS) of 23 months. Marrow and blood (T cell) chimerism studies at day +100 revealed that both in the lower-dose Clo groups (groups 1+2) and the higher-dose Clo groups (groups 3+4), the patients had a median of 100% donor (T cell)-derived DNA. There has been no secondary graft failure. In the first 100 days, 1 patient died of pneumonia, and 1 of liver GVHD. We conclude that (1) Clo ± Flu with i.v. Bu as pretransplant conditioning is safe in high-risk myeloid leukemia patients; (2) clofarabine is sufficiently immunosuppressive to support allo-SCT in myeloid leukemia; and (3) the median OS of 23 months in this high-risk patient population is encouraging. Additional studies to evaluate the antileukemic efficacy of Clo ± Flu with i.v. Bu as pretransplant conditioning therapy are warranted.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adenine Nucleotides/administration & dosage
- Animals
- Antilymphocyte Serum
- Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage
- Arabinonucleosides/administration & dosage
- Busulfan/administration & dosage
- Cell Line, Tumor
- Clofarabine
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
- Drug Synergism
- Female
- Graft vs Host Disease/mortality
- Graft vs Host Disease/prevention & control
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- Humans
- Immunosuppressive Agents/administration & dosage
- Injections, Intravenous
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/immunology
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/pathology
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage
- Rabbits
- Remission Induction
- Survival Analysis
- Tacrolimus
- Transplantation Conditioning
- Transplantation, Homologous
- Vidarabine/administration & dosage
- Vidarabine/analogs & derivatives
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Borje S Andersson
- Department of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|