Influence of experimental conditions on data variability in the liver comet assay

Further development of CometChip technology to measure DNA damage in vitro and in vivo: Comparison with the 2 gels/slide format of the standard and enzyme-modified comet assay

DNA damage plays a pivotal role in carcinogenesis and other diseases. The comet assay has been used for more than three decades to measure DNA damages. The 1-2 gels/slide format is the most used version of the assay. In 2010, a high throughput 96 macrowell format with a spatially encoded array of microwells patterned in agarose was developed, called the CometChip. The commercial version (CometChip®) has been used for the in vitro standard version of the comet assay (following the manufacturer's protocol), although it has not been compared directly with the 2 gels/slide format. The aim of this work is to developed new protocols to allow use of DNA repair enzymes as well as the analysis of in vivo frozen tissue samples in the CometChip®, to increase the throughput, and to compare its performance with the classic 2 gels/slide format. We adapted the manufacturer's protocol to allow the use of snap frozen tissue samples, using male Wistar rats orally dosed with methyl methanesulfonate (MMS, 200 mg/kg b.w.), and to detect altered nucleobases using DNA repair enzymes, with TK6 cells treated with potassium bromate (KBrO3, 0-4 mM, 3 h) and formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (Fpg) as the enzyme. Regarding the standard version of the comet, we performed thee comparison of the 2 gel/slide and CometChip® format (using the the manufacturer's protocol), using TK6 cells with MMS (100-800 µM, 1 h) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 7.7-122.5 µM, 5 min) as testing compounds. In all cases the CometChip® was performed along with the 2 gels/slide format. Results obtained were comparable and the CometChip® is a good alternative to the 2 gels/slide format when a higher throughput is required.

Enigmatic mechanism of the N-vinylpyrrolidone hepatocarcinogenicity in the rat

N-vinyl pyrrolidone (NVP) is produced up to several thousand tons per year as starting material for the production of polymers to be used in pharmaceutics, cosmetics and food technology. Upon inhalation NVP was carcinogenic in the rat, liver tumor formation is starting already at the rather low concentration of 5 ppm. Hence, differentiation whether NVP is a genotoxic carcinogen (presumed to generally have no dose threshold for the carcinogenic activity) or a non-genotoxic carcinogen (with a potentially definable threshold) is highly important. In the present study, therefore, the existing genotoxicity investigations on NVP (all showing consistently negative results) were extended and complemented with investigations on possible alternative mechanisms, which also all proved negative. All tests were performed in the same species (rat) using the same route of exposure (inhalation) and the same doses of NVP (5, 10 and 20 ppm) as had been used in the positive carcinogenicity test. Specifically, the tests included an ex vivo Comet assay (so far not available) and an ex vivo micronucleus test (in contrast to the already available micronucleus test in mice here in the same species and by the same route of application as in the bioassay which had shown the carcinogenicity), tests on oxidative stress (non-protein-bound sulfhydryls and glutathione recycling test), mechanisms mediated by hepatic receptors, the activation of which had been shown earlier to lead to carcinogenicity in some instances (Ah receptor, CAR, PXR, PPARα). No indications were obtained for any of the investigated mechanisms to be responsible for or to contribute to the observed carcinogenicity of NVP. The most important of these exclusions is genotoxicity. Thus, NVP can rightfully be regarded and treated as a non-genotoxic carcinogen and threshold approaches to the assessment of this chemical are supported. However, the mechanism underlying the carcinogenicity of NVP in rats remains unclear.

Assessment of cellular and molecular metrics for dose selection in an in vivo comet assay: A case study with MDI

The in vivo comet assay can evaluate the genotoxic potential of a chemical in theoretically any tissue that can be processed to a single cell suspension. This flexibility enables evaluation of point-of-contact tissues using a relevant route of test material administration; however, assessing cytotoxicity is essential for the interpretation of comet results. Histopathological evaluation is routinely utilized to assess cytotoxicity, but temporal- and cell-specific considerations may compromise applicability to the comet assay. In the present study, 1,1'-methylenebis(4-isocyanatobenzene) (4,4'-MDI) was administered to rats for 6 h by nose-only inhalation, and the comet assay was conducted to evaluate genotoxicity in the site-of-contact tissue (bronchoalveolar lavage cells) and distal tissues (liver and glandular stomach). Given the reactive nature of MDI, cellular and molecular metrics at the site-of-contact- including inflammation, macrophage activation, apoptosis/necrosis, and oxidative stress- were used to set appropriate exposure concentrations, in addition to the standard systemic measures of toxicity. In the range-finding study, a concentration of 4 mg/m³ was considered the maximum noninflammatory concentration; hence target concentrations of 2, 5, and 11 mg/m³ were selected for the comet study. In the lung lavage, MDI exposure substantially increased total protein and β-glucuronidase, along with cellular apoptosis. Although MDI did not increase the comet assay response (% tail DNA) in any of the tissues examined, the positive control (ethyl methanesulfonate, EMS) significantly increased % tail DNA in all tissues. In total, these data indicate that appropriate cellular and molecular measurements may facilitate dose selection to discern cellular status in the comet assay.

Statistical analysis of in vivo alkaline comet assay data - Comparison of median and geometric mean as centrality measures

The comet assay is one of the standard tests for evaluating the genotoxic potential of a test item able to detect DNA strand breaks in cells or isolated nuclei from various tissues. The in vivo alkaline comet assay is part of the standard test battery, given in option 2 of the ICH guidance S2 (R1) and a follow-up test in the EFSA framework on genotoxicity testing. The current OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals No. 489 directly affects the statistical analysis of comet data as it suggests using the median per slide and the mean of all medians per animal. However, alternative approaches can be used if scientifically justified. In this work, we demonstrated that the selection of different centrality measures to describe an average value per slide may lead to fundamentally different statistical test results and contradicting interpretations. Our focus was on geometric means and medians per slide for the primary endpoint "tail intensity". We compared both strategies using original and simulated data in different experimental settings incl. a varying number of animals, slides and cells per slide. In general, it turned out that the chosen centrality measure has an immense impact on the final statistical test result.

Gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence for the detection of tissue-specific genotoxicity in vivo

The phosphorylation of histone H2AX in Serine 139 (gamma-H2AX) marks regions of DNA double strand breaks and contributes to the recruitment of DNA repair factors to the site of DNA damage. Gamma-H2AX is used widely as DNA damage marker in vitro, but its use for genotoxicity assessment in vivo has not been extensively investigated. Here, we developed an image analysis system for the precise quantification of the gamma-H2AX signal, which we used to monitor DNA damage in animals treated with known genotoxicants (EMS, ENU and doxorubicin). To compare this new assay to a validated standard procedure for DNA damage quantification, tissues from the same animals were also analyzed in the comet assay. An increase in the levels of gamma-H2AX was observed in most of the tissues from animals treated with doxorubicin and ENU. Interestingly, the lesions induced by doxorubicin were not easily detected by the standard comet assay, while they were clearly identified by gamma-H2AX staining. Conversely, EMS appeared strongly positive in the comet assay but only mildly in the gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence. These observations suggest that the two methods could complement each other for DNA damage analysis, where gamma-H2AX staining allows the detection of tissue-specific effects in situ. Moreover, since gamma-H2AX staining can be performed on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue sections generated during repeated-dose toxicity studies, it does not require any further treatments or extra procedures during dissection, thus optimizing the use of resources and animals. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 60:4-16, 2019. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Inter-laboratory comparison of the in vivo comet assay including three image analysis systems

To compare the extent of potential inter-laboratory variability and the influence of different comet image analysis systems, in vivo comet experiments were conducted using the genotoxicants ethyl methanesulfonate and methyl methanesulfonate. Tissue samples from the same animals were processed and analyzed-including independent slide evaluation by image analysis-in two laboratories with extensive experience in performing the comet assay. The analysis revealed low inter-laboratory experimental variability. Neither the use of different image analysis systems, nor the staining procedure of DNA (propidium iodide vs. SYBR® Gold), considerably impacted the results or sensitivity of the assay. In addition, relatively high stability of the staining intensity of propidium iodide-stained slides was found in slides that were refrigerated for over 3 months. In conclusion, following a thoroughly defined protocol and standardized routine procedures ensures that the comet assay is robust and generates comparable results between different laboratories.