The use of benchmark dose uncertainty measurements for robust comparative potency analyses

Multi-endpoint in vitro toxicological assessment of snus and tobacco-free nicotine pouch extracts

'Modern' oral tobacco-free nicotine pouches (NPs) are a nicotine containing product similar in appearance and concept to Swedish snus. A three-step approach was taken to analyse the biological effects of NPs and snus extracts in vitro. ToxTracker was used to screen for biomarkers for oxidative stress, cell stress, protein damage and DNA damage. Cytotoxicity, mutagenicity, and genotoxicity were assessed in the following respective assays: Neutral Red Uptake (NRU), Ames and Mouse Lymphoma Assay (MLA). Targeted analysis of phosphorylation signalling and inflammatory markers under non-toxic conditions was used to investigate any potential signalling pathways or inflammatory response. A reference snus (CRP1.1) and four NPs with various flavours and nicotine strengths were assessed. Test article extracts was generated by incubating one pouch in 20 mL of media (specific to each assay) with the inclusion of the pouch material. NP extracts did not induce any cytotoxicity or mutagenic response, genotoxic response was minimal and limited signalling or inflammatory markers were induced. In contrast, CRP1.1 induced a positive response in four toxicological endpoints in the absence of S9: Srxn1 (oxidative stress), Btg2 (cell stress), Ddit3 (protein damage) and Rtkn (DNA damage), and three endpoints in presence of S9: Srxn1, Ddit3 and Rtkn. CRP1.1 was genotoxic when assessed in MLA and activated signalling pathways involved in proliferation and cellular stress and specifically induced phosphorylation of c-JUN, CREB1, p53, p38 MAPK and to a lesser extent AKT1S1, GSK3α/β, ERK1/2 and RSK1 in a dose-dependent manner. CRP 1.1 extracts resulted in the release of several inflammatory mediators including cytokines IL-1α, IL5, IL6, IL8, IL-1RA, MIF and TNF-β, receptor IL-2RA, and growth factors FGF-basic, VEGF and M-CSF. In conclusion these assays contribute to the weight of evidence assessment of the potential comparative health risks of NPs and snus.

A contextualised e-cigarette testing strategy shows flavourings do not impact lung toxicity in vitro

Vaping has the potential to reduce the individual health risks associated with smoking and e-cigarette flavours have been reported to help smokers' transition from cigarettes. In this manuscript, we provide evidence to support the reduced risk potential of e-cigarette aerosols and flavours by assessing commercially available e-liquids (Vuse ePod - Manufactured by British American Tobacco) in a 2D in vitro screening approach. We also analysed selected flavours using a more physiologically relevant 3D (MucilAir) whole aerosol exposure model, measuring toxicity and functional endpoints such as Trans Epithelial Electrical Resistance, Cilia Beat Frequency and Active Area. To contextualise responses, we have compared e-cigarette aerosol to cigarette smoke (1R6F research cigarette) and calculated the percentage reduction using a point of departure approach. We show that aerosolised flavoured e-liquids, (appropriately stewarded) do not increase the overall measured aerosol toxicity when compared to cigarette smoke. In fact, we demonstrate that the measured in vitro cellular toxicity of flavoured e-cigarette products remains >95% reduced when compared to cigarette smoke toxicity, using point of departure (IC₈₀) approach. These data indicate that the overall product toxicity is not increased in a flavour dependent manner and that flavoured e-cigarette products can potentially play a role in tobacco harm reduction.

The in vitro genotoxicity potency of mixtures of pyrrolizidine alkaloids can be explained by dose addition of the individual mixture components

Plant-based 1,2-unsaturated Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PAs) are responsible for liver genotoxicity/carcinogenicity following metabolic activation, making them a relevant concern for safety assessment. Due to 21st century toxicology approaches, risk of PAs can be better discerned though an understanding of differing toxic potencies, but it is often mixtures of PAs that are found as contaminants in foods, for example, herbal teas and honey, food supplements and herbal medicines. Our study investigated whether genotoxicity potency of PAs dosed individually or in mixtures differed when measured using micronuclei formation in vitro in HepaRG human liver cells, which we and others have shown to be suitable for observing genotoxic potency differences across different PA structural classes. When equipotent concentrations of up to six different PAs representing a wide range of potencies in vitro were tested as mixtures, the observed genotoxic potency aligned favorably with results for single PAs. Similarly, when the BMD confidence intervals of these equipotent mixtures were compared with the confidence intervals of the individual PAs, only minimal variation was observed. These data support a conclusion that for this class of plant impurities, all acting via the same DNA-reactive mode of action, genotoxic potency can be regarded as additive when assessing the risk of mixtures of PAs.