Quantitative in vitro to in vivo extrapolation of genotoxicity data provides protective estimates of in vivo dose

Effect of cell treatment procedures on in vitro genotoxicity assessment

So far, the majority of in vitro toxicological experiments are conducted after an acute 24 h treatment that does not represent a realistic human chemical exposure. Recently, new in vitro approaches have been proposed to study the chemical toxicological effect over several days in order to be more predictive of a representative exposure scenario. In this study, we investigated the genotoxic potential of chemicals (direct or bioactived clastogen, aneugen and apoptotic inducer) with the γH2AX and pH3 biomarkers, in the human liver-derived HepaRP cell line. We used different treatment durations, with or without a three-day recovery stage (release period), before genotoxicity measurement. Data were analysed with the Benchmark Dose approach. We observed that the detection of clastogenic compounds (notably for DNA damaging agents) was more sensitive after three days of repeated treatment compared to one or three treatments over 24 h. In contrast, aneugenic chemicals were detected as genotoxic in a similar manner whether after a 24 h exposure or a three-day repeated treatment. Globally, the release period decreases the genotoxicity measurement substantially. For DNA damaging agents, after high concentration treatments, γH2AX induction was always observed after a three-day release period. In contrast, for DNA topoisomerase inhibitors, no effect could be observed after the release period. In conclusion, in the HepaRP cell line, there are some important differences between a one-day acute and a three-day repeated treatment protocol, indicating that different cell treatment procedures may differentiate chemical genotoxic mechanisms of action more efficiently.

Unlocking the Power of Transcriptomic Biomarkers in Qualitative and Quantitative Genotoxicity Assessment of Chemicals

To modernize genotoxicity assessment and reduce reliance on experimental animals, new approach methodologies (NAMs) that provide human-relevant dose-response data are needed. Two transcriptomic biomarkers, GENOMARK and TGx-DDI, have shown a high classification accuracy for genotoxicity. As these biomarkers were extracted from different training sets, we investigated whether combining the two biomarkers in a human-derived metabolically competent cell line (i.e., HepaRG) provides complementary information for the classification of genotoxic hazard identification and potency ranking. First, the applicability of GENOMARK to TempO-Seq, a high-throughput transcriptomic technology, was evaluated. HepaRG cells were exposed for 72 h to increasing concentrations of 10 chemicals (i.e., eight known in vivo genotoxicants and two in vivo nongenotoxicants). Gene expression data were generated using the TempO-Seq technology. We found a prediction performance of 100%, confirming the applicability of GENOMARK to TempO-Seq. Classification using TGx-DDI was then compared to GENOMARK. For the chemicals identified as genotoxic, benchmark concentration modeling was conducted to perform potency ranking. The high concordance observed for both hazard classification and potency ranking by GENOMARK and TGx-DDI highlights the value of integrating these NAMs in a weight of evidence evaluation of genotoxicity.

Assessment of no-observed-effect-levels for DNA adducts formation by genotoxic carcinogens in fetal turkey livers

For genotoxic carcinogens, covalent binding to DNA is a critical initiating event in tumorigenesis. The present research investigated dose-effect relationships of three genotoxic carcinogens representing different structural classes, 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and quinoline (QUI), to assess the existence of no-observed-effect-levels (NOELs) for the formation of DNA adducts. Carcinogens were administered into the air sac of fertilized turkey eggs over wide dose ranges in three daily injections on days 22 to 24 of incubation. DNA adducts were measured in the fetal turkey livers by the 32P-nucleotide postlabeling (NPL) assay. B[a]P and QUI produced DNA adducts in a dosage-related manner and exhibited NOELs at 0.65 and 0.35 mg/kg bw/day, respectively. In contrast, 2-AAF formed DNA adducts at all tested dosages down to 0.005 mg/kg bw/day. Benchmark dose (BMD) analysis identified the potencies of 2-AAF and QUI to be similar, while B[a]P was the least potent compound. Overall, findings in fetal turkey livers demonstrated that exposure levels to genotoxic compounds that do not result in DNA adducts can exist but are not evident with all carcinogens of this type. The use of mechanistic dose-effect studies for genotoxic endpoints can provide critical information for prioritization of concerns for risk assessment.

Interpretation of in vitro concentration-response data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Report from the 2022 IWGT quantitative analysis expert working group meeting

Quantitative risk assessments of chemicals are routinely performed using in vivo data from rodents; however, there is growing recognition that non-animal approaches can be human-relevant alternatives. There is an urgent need to build confidence in non-animal alternatives given the international support to reduce the use of animals in toxicity testing where possible. In order for scientists and risk assessors to prepare for this paradigm shift in toxicity assessment, standardization and consensus on in vitro testing strategies and data interpretation will need to be established. To address this issue, an Expert Working Group (EWG) of the 8th International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing (IWGT) evaluated the utility of quantitative in vitro genotoxicity concentration-response data for risk assessment. The EWG first evaluated available in vitro methodologies and then examined the variability and maximal response of in vitro tests to estimate biologically relevant values for the critical effect sizes considered adverse or unacceptable. Next, the EWG reviewed the approaches and computational models employed to provide human-relevant dose context to in vitro data. Lastly, the EWG evaluated risk assessment applications for which in vitro data are ready for use and applications where further work is required. The EWG concluded that in vitro genotoxicity concentration-response data can be interpreted in a risk assessment context. However, prior to routine use in regulatory settings, further research will be required to address the remaining uncertainties and limitations.

Genotoxicity assessment: opportunities, challenges and perspectives for quantitative evaluations of dose-response data

Genotoxicity data are mainly interpreted in a qualitative way, which typically results in a binary classification of chemical entities. For more than a decade, there has been a discussion about the need for a paradigm shift in this regard. Here, we review current opportunities, challenges and perspectives for a more quantitative approach to genotoxicity assessment. Currently discussed opportunities mainly include the determination of a reference point (e.g., a benchmark dose) from genetic toxicity dose-response data, followed by calculation of a margin of exposure (MOE) or derivation of a health-based guidance value (HBGV). In addition to new opportunities, major challenges emerge with the quantitative interpretation of genotoxicity data. These are mainly rooted in the limited capability of standard in vivo genotoxicity testing methods to detect different types of genetic damage in multiple target tissues and the unknown quantitative relationships between measurable genotoxic effects and the probability of experiencing an adverse health outcome. In addition, with respect to DNA-reactive mutagens, the question arises whether the widely accepted assumption of a non-threshold dose-response relationship is at all compatible with the derivation of a HBGV. Therefore, at present, any quantitative genotoxicity assessment approach remains to be evaluated case-by-case. The quantitative interpretation of in vivo genotoxicity data for prioritization purposes, e.g., in connection with the MOE approach, could be seen as a promising opportunity for routine application. However, additional research is needed to assess whether it is possible to define a genotoxicity-derived MOE that can be considered indicative of a low level of concern. To further advance quantitative genotoxicity assessment, priority should be given to the development of new experimental methods to provide a deeper mechanistic understanding and a more comprehensive basis for the analysis of dose-response relationships.

High-throughput micronucleus assay using three-dimensional HepaRG spheroids for in vitro genotoxicity testing

The in vitro micronucleus (MN) assay is a component of most test batteries used in assessing potential genotoxicity. Our previous study adapted metabolically competent HepaRG cells to the high-throughput (HT) flow-cytometry-based MN assay for genotoxicity assessment (Guo et al. in J Toxicol Environ Health A 83:702-717, 2020b, https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2020.1822972 ). We also demonstrated that, compared to HepaRG cells grown as two-dimensional (2D) cultures, 3D HepaRG spheroids have increased metabolic capacity and improved sensitivity in detecting DNA damage induced by genotoxicants using the comet assay (Seo et al. in ALTEX 39:583-604, 2022, https://doi.org/10.14573/altex.22011212022 ). In the present study, we have compared the performance of the HT flow-cytometry-based MN assay in HepaRG spheroids and 2D HepaRG cells by testing 34 compounds, including 19 genotoxicants or carcinogens and 15 compounds that show different genotoxic responses in vitro and in vivo. 2D HepaRG cells and spheroids were exposed to the test compounds for 24 h, followed by an additional 3- or 6-day incubation with human epidermal growth factor to stimulate cell division. The results demonstrated that HepaRG spheroids showed generally higher sensitivity in detecting several indirect-acting genotoxicants (require metabolic activation) compared to 2D cultures, with 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene and N-nitrosodimethylamine inducing higher % MN formation along with having significantly lower benchmark dose values for MN induction in 3D spheroids. These data suggest that 3D HepaRG spheroids can be adapted to the HT flow-cytometry-based MN assay for genotoxicity testing. Our findings also indicate that integration of the MN and comet assays improved the sensitivity for detecting genotoxicants that require metabolic activation. These results suggest that HepaRG spheroids may contribute to New Approach Methodologies for genotoxicity assessment.