Behavioral disorder in people with an intellectual disability and epilepsy: A report of the Intellectual Disability Task Force of the Neuropsychiatric Commission of ILAE

The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy

AIMS

The aim of this study was to adapt the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in English and Norwegian for use with parents.

METHODS

The research group evaluated all HLQ items and, where relevant, modified them to refocus the attribution of care to that of a child by a parent. Five cognitive interviews with parents were undertaken to gain a detailed depiction of the meanings and processes they used to respond to the HLQ items. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the revised HLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 254 parents of children with epilepsy. Analysis included internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

RESULTS

Some 22 out of 44 items and the names of three domains were modified (e.g. attribution changed from 'me' to 'my child'). Cognitive interviews indicated that parents interpreted the HLQ-Parent items in the way intended. All but three factor loadings were high to acceptable. All nine HLQ scales showed satisfactory to good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.70 to 0.87). When fitting one-factor CFA models, correlated residuals were required for four scales to generate an acceptable fit. One scale, '8. Ability to find good health information', required inclusion of two correlated residuals to generate an acceptable CFA model fit, indicating that further work on this scale is warranted.

CONCLUSIONS

The results from both the adaptation process and the CFA analysis supported the relevance, understanding and theoretical structure of the instrument in a parental context.

Rapid switching from levetiracetam to brivaracetam in pharmaco-resistant epilepsy in people with and without intellectual disabilities: a naturalistic case control study

BACKGROUND

Approximately one quarter of people with an intellectual disability (PwID) have epilepsy of whom nearly three-quarters are pharmaco-resistant. There are higher reported neuropsychiatric side-effects to anti-seizure medication (ASM) in this group. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM with a stronger association with neuropsychiatric symptoms for PwID than other ASMs. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a newer ASM. Recent studies suggest a beneficial effect of swapping people who experience neuropsychiatric events with LEV to BRV. However, there is limited evidence of this for PwID. This evaluation analyses real world outcomes of LEV to BRV swap for PwID compared to those without ID.

METHODS

We performed a multicentre, retrospective review of clinical records. Demographic, clinical characteristics and reported adverse events of patients switched from LEV to BRV (2016-2020) were recorded at 3 months pre and 6- and 12-month post-BRV initiation. Outcomes were compared between PwID and those without and summarised using cross-tabulations and logistic regression models. A Bonferroni correction was applied.

RESULTS

Of 77 participants, 46 had ID and 52% had a past psychiatric illness. 71% participants switched overnight from LEV to BRV. Seizure reduction of > 50% was seen in 40% patients. Psychiatric illness history was predictive of having neuropsychiatric side-effects with LEV but not BRV (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference for any primary outcomes between PwID versus without ID.

CONCLUSIONS

Switching from LEV to BRV appears as well tolerated and efficacious in PwID as those without ID with over 90% still on BRV after 12 months.

Factors associated with acute care service use after epilepsy hospitalisation in people with intellectual disability

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to identify factors associated with unplanned acute hospital readmission and emergency department (ED) presentation after hospitalisation for epilepsy in people with intellectual disability (ID).

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort study using linked administrative datasets. We identified 3293 people with ID aged 5-64 years with a hospitalisation for epilepsy between 2005 and 2014 in New South Wales, Australia. We examined unplanned readmission and ED presentation within 30 or 365 days and associations with demographic, socio-economic and health status variables. Modified Poisson regression with robust estimation was used to model outcomes within 30 days. Negative binomial regression was used to account for the overdispersion of the data and to model 365-day outcome rates.

RESULTS

Around half of the cohort had an unplanned readmission and ED presentation within 365 days of the index hospitalisation. In fully adjusted models, being female, being a young adult and having a longer or acute care index admission, mental and physical comorbidities and a history of incarceration were associated with an elevated risk of readmission or ED presentation. The strongest association was observed between history of self-harm and 365-day readmission (incidence rate ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.41-3.29).

CONCLUSIONS

Socio-demographic, justice and health factors are associated with unplanned readmission and ED presentation risk after hospitalisation for epilepsy in people with ID. Interventions targeting improving continuity of care should be tailored for individuals and their support workers. The findings also emphasise the importance of person-centred multidisciplinary care across different health sectors.

Self-injury as a predominant challenging behavior in epilepsy: A study in a residential facility for profoundly disabled patients

BACKGROUND

The association between challenging behavior (CB) and epilepsy in people with intellectual disability (ID) remains largely controversial.

AIM

To clarify the correlation between CB and epilepsy, we investigated the clinical characteristics of CB in both people with and without epilepsy among individuals with ID hospitalized in our residential facility.

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

A total of 63 individuals with CB was retrospectively investigated using the Behavior Problems Inventory, and the following items were collected from the medical records: sex, age, hospitalization period, etiology and risk factors, level of ID, type of CB, administration of psychotropic drugs, presence or absence of epilepsy and clinical features of epilepsy.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

Almost all individuals with CB showed profound ID. There was no significant difference in the rate of CB between people with and without epilepsy. A type analysis of CB revealed that self-injurious behavior was observed more frequently in epilepsy cases (66.7 %) than in cases without epilepsy (36.4 %) (p =  0.015), and self-injurious behavior was the predominant clinical form in people with epilepsy among the three subgroups of CB (self-injurious, aggressive and self-injurious and aggressive behavior).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The high incidence of self-injurious behavior in epilepsy with profound disabilities may imply the presence of common pathological basis of self-injurious behavior and epilepsy.

The relationship between antiepileptic drug load and challenging behaviors in older adults with intellectual disability and epilepsy

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may affect mood and behavior in people with epilepsy and intellectual disability. A high AED load, derived from AED polytherapy and/or high doses of AEDs, has been suggested to be a risk factor for behavioral side effects. Data were drawn from Wave 3 of the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (IDS-TILDA). The Behavior Problems Inventory Short Form (BPI-S) was used to assess challenging behaviors. AED load was calculated and median AED loads obtained. Non-parametric tests and binary logistic regression were performed to determine the relationship between AED load and challenging behaviors. Of participants with a reported diagnosis of epilepsy who were taking a regular AED and had completed BPI-S (n = 142), 62.7% (n = 89) exhibited challenging behaviors. Challenging behavior was found to be more prevalent in those with more severe levels of intellectual disability (p < 0.001). Aggressive/destructive behavior and stereotyped behavior were significantly more likely in participants living in residential/campus settings. For participants with a severe/profound intellectual disability, a significantly higher median AED load was found for participants exhibiting aggressive/destructive behavior and self-injurious behavior (SIB) compared to participants not exhibiting these behaviors, indicating a high AED load may contribute to some behavioral problems in this population group. However, many factors can influence behavioral outcomes, creating difficulties in determining those that are associated and the nature of the association. Careful monitoring of AED load, together with increased vigilance for breakthrough behavioral issues is essential for dealing with these complex cases. Larger studies are needed to account for the potential confounding factors.

Effects of a specialized inpatient treatment program on epilepsy-related impairments of patients with epilepsy and intellectual disability as rated by relatives and professional caregivers

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to determine the impact of a comprehensive inpatient treatment program for persons with epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID) on the concerns of relatives and caregivers, quality of life (QoL), and global health and clinical aspects, assessed by a questionnaire for relatives and caregivers.

METHODS

We performed an open, controlled pre/post study in inpatients with epilepsy and ID or acquired brain damage treated for at least 14 days in a tertiary referral center for epilepsy. Questionnaires were administered to relatives/professional caregivers shortly before admission and 6 months after discharge for the treatment group (TG). The control group (CG) was recruited from the waiting list; questionnaires were answered at the time of application for treatment and 3-6 months later. The questionnaire was the GEOS-43G, the German version of the Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale (GEOS-35), which was extended by eight additional questions from the GEOS-90. Furthermore, QoL, global health, and clinical aspects were assessed using a short questionnaire. Generalized estimation equations (GEEs) were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eight subjects were evaluable in the TG, and 90 in the CG. Concerns about seizures, injuries/risks, medical treatment, diagnostic issues, and the GEOS-43G total score decreased significantly in the TG in contrast to the CG. For the TG, improvements were also significant for global QoL, global health, efficacy, tolerability of AEDs, and for seizure frequency. Caregivers reported larger improvements compared to relatives.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of the relatives and caregivers in our study indicates that inpatient treatment in a specialized center with a dedicated multi-professional program led to significant improvements regarding the concerns of relatives or caregivers, and in the QoL and related aspects in persons with epilepsy and ID. This shows that specialized inpatient treatment may be helpful for persons with epilepsy and ID.

The evolution of self-injurious behaviors in people with intellectual disability and epilepsy: A follow-up study

PURPOSE

Longitudinal studies of the evolution of Self-Injurious Behaviors (SIBs) in people with Intellectual Disability (ID) and epilepsy are not common. This study aimed to analyze the evolution (in terms of remission and persistence) and changes in the type, localization, frequency, and intensity of SIBs.

METHODS

SIBs were assessed in a sample of 52 people with ID and epilepsy, and re-evaluated after a seven-year interval, using the "Scale for the Assessment of Self-Injurious Behaviors". The scale was administered to caregivers (parents or health professionals) through a semi-structured interview conducted by a specifically trained psychologist.

RESULTS

The most frequent types of SIBs identified were: self-biting, self-hitting with objects, self-hitting with hand, object-finger in cavities. The main localizations of SIBs were: hands, mouth, head and cheeks. SIBs were found to be maintained after seven years, for type, localization, frequency, and intensity, in 90.4% of the sample. SIB types were stable over time, as were the affected areas. Global SIB frequency and intensity scores were found to be unchanged. Finally, a positive correlation was found between the frequency of SIBs and levels of intellectual disability. SIBs (frequency and intensity) and seizure frequency showed no correlation.

CONCLUSION

Given the negative impact of SIBs on the adaptation and quality of life of people with ID and epilepsy, we believe that further studies on biological, psychological and environmental aspects are needed in order to identify any potential factors that might explain the persistence of SIBs and to find effective interventions to reduce them.

Improving Transitional Services for Adolescents and Young Adults with Epilepsy and Intellectual Disability

The transition from pediatric to adult health care systems is challenging for many adolescents with epilepsy and their families, and those challenges are compounded for adolescents with comorbid intellectual disabilities and epilepsy (ID-E). Many traditional transition pathways to adult care are inadequate, as they fail to address important considerations unique to the ID-E population or are absent entirely. Poor organization of care during critical transition periods increases the risks of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy, suboptimal seizure control, inadequate management of comorbidities, and poor psychological and social outcomes. The literature lacks systematic studies on effective transition programs for this population. The present review provides an overview of the main themes important in care transitions for the ID-E population: (1) precise diagnosis and management of seizures; (2) mental health and medical comorbidities affecting care; (3) accessing behavioral, habilitative, legal, financial, and community resources; and (4) caretaker support. We propose a specific framework which includes targeted recommendations of minimum care standards for youth with ID-E transitioning to adult care.

Epilepsy, anti-seizure medication, intellectual disability and challenging behaviour - Everyone's business, no one's priority

PURPOSE

People with Intellectual Disability (ID) and epilepsy are more likely to experience psychiatric conditions, challenging behaviour (CB), treatment resistance and adverse effects of anti-seizure medications (ASM) than those without. This population receives care from various professionals, depending on local care pathways. This study evaluates the training status, confidence, reported assessment and management practices of different professional groups involved in caring for people with ID, epilepsy and CB.

METHODS

A cross sectional survey using a questionnaire developed by expert consensus which measured self-reported training status, confidence, and approaches to assessment and management of CB in people with ID and epilepsy was distributed to practitioners involved in epilepsy and/or ID.

RESULTS

Of the 83 respondents, the majority had either a psychiatry/ID (n = 39), or Neurology/epileptology background (n = 31). Psychiatry/ID and Neurology/epileptology had similar confidence in assessing CB in ID-epilepsy cases, but Psychiatry/ID exhibited higher self-rated confidence in the management of these cases. While assessing and managing CB, Psychiatry/ID appeared more likely to consider mental health aspects, while Neurology/epileptology typically focused on ASM.

CONCLUSION

Psychiatry/ID and Neurology/epileptology professionals had varying training levels in epilepsy, ID and CB, had differing confidence levels in managing this patient population, and considered different factors when approaching assessment and management. As such, training opportunities in ID should be offered to neurology professionals, and vice versa. Based on the findings, a best practice checklist is presented, which aims to provide clinicians with a structured framework to consider causal explanations for CB in this population.

Psychiatric Comorbidities in People With Epilepsy

Purpose of Review

To review the latest evidence concerning the epidemiology, clinical implications, and management of psychiatric disorders in epilepsy.

Recent Findings

People with epilepsy have a 2-5 times increased risk of developing any psychiatric disorder, and 1 in 3 patients with epilepsy have a lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. Psychiatric comorbidities represent a poor prognostic marker as they have been associated with a poor response to treatment (drugs and surgery), increased morbidity, and mortality. Validated screening instruments are available for mood and anxiety disorders in adults as well as attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children with epilepsy.

Summary

All patients with epilepsy should be routinely screened for psychiatric disorder at the onset and at least once a year. Patients with epilepsy and their relatives should be informed of the risk of mental health problems and the implications.

Treatment of psychiatric comorbidities in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities: Is there a role for the neurologist?

This paper will explore the nature of psychiatric co-morbidities in people with an intellectual disability (ID) who have epilepsy. The complexity of clinical presentations and associated co-morbidities require thorough assessment utilising both neurological and psychiatric skills. The neurologist plays a central role in the management of epilepsy in people with ID and therefore requires basic competencies in the assessment of neuropsychiatric co-morbidities. This is key to liaison with other specialist services to ensure individuals receive holistic person-centred care. This article is part of the Special Issue "Obstacles of Treatment of Psychiatric Comorbidities in Epilepsy".

Pediatric epilepsy surgery patients show normal psychosocial development at long-term follow-up despite dissatisfying family dynamics

Drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy involves unpredictable seizures and long-term medical management. Both factors can alter a child's psychosocial development and the dynamics of the family, to the detriment of patient and family wellbeing. While drug-resistant pediatric epilepsy can be successfully treated by neurosurgery in some cases, the outlook for psychosocial and family functioning after surgery remains unclear. A total of 163 participants across four groups took part in the current study: these were (i) individuals who had undergone surgical treatment of drug-resistant focal seizures approximately five years prior as children, and were now largely adolescents or young adults ('Patients'; n = 23), (ii) their caregivers ('Patient Caregivers'; n = 27), (iii) healthy individuals of similar age and gender to the Patients ('Controls'; n = 53), and (iv) their caregivers ('Control Caregivers'; n = 60). Based on similar software validated in adults, we built an interactive computer program, 'Living with Epilepsy', to evaluate the achievement of age-specific developmental tasks in Patients relative to their peers. The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale measured family dynamics. The findings showed that in the context of seizure freedom, after pediatric epilepsy surgery, Patients are similar to their healthy peers in terms of attaining developmental tasks, with no differences between the Patient and Control groups (P > .05). Family dynamics, however, seemed resistant to postsurgical adaptation, with Patients reporting lower levels of balanced family dynamics (cohesion, flexibility) and higher rates of unbalanced family dynamics (disengagement, chaos, rigidity, enmeshment) relative to Patient Caregivers (P < .001-0.041), and the Controls (P = .011-0.034). Patients also reported reduced family satisfaction compared with that of Patient Caregivers (P = .002), which was associated with polytherapy prior to surgery; that is, more drug-resistant seizures. These findings suggested that childhood-onset epilepsy has a lasting effect on family functioning, even when the child has an optimal medical and psychosocial outcome. These initial findings have significant implications for the provision of pre- to postoperative family support in pediatric epilepsy cases.

Looking beyond lesions for causes of neuropsychological impairment in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) are similar in their epileptology regardless of whether they have a lesion evident on MRI; this study aims to prospectively clarify whether they are also similar in their neuropsychological profiles.

METHODS

Participants comprised 152 adults: 79 patients with TLE and 73 healthy controls. Patients and controls did not differ in age, sex, or education (p > 0.05). Sixty-two percent of patients had an MRI-resolvable lesion (39% with presumed hippocampal sclerosis [HS-TLE], 61% with a lesion other than HS [MRI-positive TLE]); the remaining 38% of patients were lesion-negative. Psychometric measures well established in epilepsy were used.

RESULTS

Relative to controls, all 3 patient subgroups showed significantly impaired autobiographical, verbal, and visual memory (p < 0.05-0.001) and significantly more depression and anxiety (p < 0.05-0.01). Yet, contrary to expectations, the 3 TLE subgroups did not differ in their severity of memory or mood impairment (p > 0.05). Lower Full-Scale IQ predicted memory impairments across all TLE subtypes, with early age at seizure onset a predictor unique to MRI-negative TLE.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-negative TLE is associated with memory and mood dysfunction equivalent to that seen in patients with hippocampal sclerosis and other MRI-resolvable pathologies. As such, neuropsychological impairments in TLE are not contingent on a macroscopic lesion and might be an intrinsic property of the underlying network disease.

The neurology-psychiatry interface in epilepsy

Epilepsy and mental illness have a bidirectional association. Psychiatrists are likely to encounter epilepsy as comorbidity. Seizures may present as mental illness. Equally, the management of psychiatric conditions has the potential to destabilise epilepsy. There is a need for structured epilepsy awareness and training amongst psychiatrists. This paper outlines key considerations around diagnosis, treatment and risk while suggesting practical recommendations.

Awareness, attitudes, skills and training needs of psychiatrists working with adults with intellectual disability in managing epilepsy

PURPOSE

Comorbid epilepsy is found in 22.5% of people with intellectual disability (ID). Responding to the continuing lack of clarity to the role of the ID psychiatrist in the United Kingdom with regards to epilepsy care, the Royal College of Psychiatrists (RCPsych) published the College Report (CR) 203 in May 2017. This proposed a three-tiered model of competency in ID epilepsy care, with minimum acceptable standards described as Bronze and greater expertise as Silver and Gold. This article documents the perceptions of ID psychiatrists as to their skills and training needs, and the perceived impact of CR203 on the profession.

METHODS

An e- questionnaire, matching the standards on CR203 and encouraging comments was designed, reviewed and approved by the RCPsych ID executive faculty. The survey was sent by email to all UK-registered RCPsych ID Faculty members via the RCPsych communications.

RESULTS

Of the expected 332 ID psychiatrists in the UK, 141 responses were received (42.4%). Key findings included that ID psychiatrists as a group have an interest in epilepsy but Bronze standards were frequently unmet, with variation across the UK. There was a noted lack of agreement on role among ID psychiatrists again linked to geographical variation. Regional disparity correlated to population density and proximity to tertiary neurological centres.

CONCLUSION

There are significant implications on training, both pre- and post- accreditation for the ID psychiatry speciality. The CR203 standards appear to be steps in the right direction to help define the role ID psychiatrists have in the delivery of epilepsy care.

Challenging behavior in adults with epilepsy and intellectual disability: An analysis of epilepsy characteristics

PURPOSE

The study aimed to describe the frequency and severity of self-injurious, stereotyped, and aggressive/destructive behavior in adults with both epilepsy and intellectual disability (ID) who reside at a tertiary epilepsy center and to investigate the associations between challenging behavior and epilepsy and ID characteristics.

METHOD

The frequency and severity of self-injurious, (motoric) stereotyped, and aggressive/destructive behavior among 189 patients was assessed using the Behavior Problem Inventory. Comparisons were made with an adult reference population with ID, based on gender, to determine whether the behavior was clinically deviant. Epilepsy characteristics, including age at onset, epilepsy type, seizure types, seizure frequency, and use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), were retrieved from patient files. The level of ID was classified using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - Fifth Edition (DSM-5) and an ID domain discrepancy was allocated if there was a substantial difference between two domains of adaptive behavior within a subject.

RESULTS

Self-injurious behavior was present in 35% of subjects, stereotyped behavior in 60%, and aggressive/destructive behavior in 63%. The behavior exceeded clinical norms in 7%, 18%, and 12%, respectively. Aggression was the behavior evaluated most often as being problematic, despite its reported frequency being the lowest. When adjusting for level of ID and use of psychotropic medication, logistic regression analyses showed that self-injurious behavior was significantly associated with a lower number of AEDs (odds ratio (OR) = 0.4); that stereotyped behavior was significantly associated with a higher number of seizure types (OR = 1.4) and a lower number of AEDs (OR = 0.4); and that aggression was significantly associated with the presence of an ID domain discrepancy (OR = 3.1).

CONCLUSION

Challenging behavior is a serious issue among adults with epilepsy and ID. Although some of the epilepsy and ID characteristics seemed to contribute independently to these types of challenging behavior, the effects of epilepsy-related characteristics are modest when compared with ID.