Time to push the age limit: Epilepsy surgery in patients 60 years or older

The implications of frailty in older adults with epilepsy

Older adults constitute a large proportion of people with epilepsy (PWE) due to the changing demographics worldwide and epilepsy's natural history. Aging-related pathophysiological changes lower the tolerance and increase our vulnerability to stressors, which manifests as frailty. Frailty is closely associated with adverse health outcomes. This narrative review examines the interplay between frailty and epilepsy, especially in older adults, emphasizing its clinical implications, including its role in managing PWE. Mechanistically, frailty develops through complex interactions among molecular and cellular damage, including genomic instability, mitochondrial dysfunction, and hormonal changes. These contribute to systemic muscle mass, bone density, and organ function decline. The concept of frailty has evolved from a primarily physical syndrome to include social, psychological, and cognitive dimensions. The "phenotypic frailty" model, which focuses on physical performance, and the "deficit accumulation" model, which quantifies health deficits, provide frameworks for understanding and assessing frailty. PWE are potentially more prone to developing frailty due to a higher prevalence of risk factors predisposing to frailty. These include, but are not limited to, polypharmacy, higher comorbidity, low exercise level, social isolation, low vitamin D, and osteoporosis. We lack commercial biomarkers to measure frailty but can diagnose it using self- or healthcare provider-administered frailty scales. Recent attempts to develop a PWE-specific frailty scale are promising. Unlike chronological age, frailty is reversible, so its management using multidisciplinary care teams should be strongly considered. Frailty can affect antiseizure medication (ASM) tolerance secondary to its impact on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. While frailty's effect on seizure control efficacy of ASM is poorly understood, its undoubted association with overall poor outcomes, including epilepsy surgery, behooves us to consider its presence and implication while treating older PWE. Incorporation of frailty measures in future research is essential to improve our understanding of frailty's role in PWE health. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Frailty is the declining state of the human body. People with epilepsy are more prone to it. It should be factored into their management.

Resective surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis in patients over 50 years: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy associated with hippocampal sclerosis (MTLE/HS) is the most common cause of drug-resistant focal seizures and surgical resection is the primary treatment option, with seizure-free rates ranging from 60 to 80%. However, data on postsurgical seizure outcomes in patients ≥ 50 years of age are limited. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of surgery in this age group compared to younger patients.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of data from resective surgeries conducted in patients with MTLE/HS between 1990 and 2022. We focused on patients aged ≥ 50 years and compared the surgical safety and efficacy variables between this group and a control group of patients aged < 50 years through a case-control study.

RESULTS

Among the 450 MTLE/HS patients who underwent surgery during the inclusion period, 61 (13.6%) were aged ≥ 50 years and matched with 183 younger patients, totaling 244 study participants. The two groups had similar characteristics. At the last follow-up (median 5.7 years), Engel I outcomes were achieved in 80.3% of the older patients and 81.4% of the younger patients, with no significant difference (p = 0.85). Postoperative cognitive and psychiatric outcomes did not differ between the groups. Major complication rates were also comparable, at 3.3% in the older group and 2.7% in the younger group (p = 0.83). The extratemporal ictal abnormalities observed on video-EEG were the only variable that demonstrated a significant association with an unfavorable seizure outcome in the older group (OR 9.3, 95% CI [1.8-47.6], p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides grade 3 evidence that resective surgery for MTLE/HS patients aged ≥ 50 years is as effective and safe as it is for younger patients, and thus should be considered as the primary treatment option for drug-resistant cases.

Focused review: Clinico-neuropathological aspects of late onset epilepsies: Pathogenesis

The aim of the present study was to review the current knowledge on the neuropathological spectrum of late onset epilepsies. Several terms including 'neuropathology*' AND 'late onset epilepsy' (LOE) combined with distinct neuropathological diagnostic terms were used to search PubMed until November 15, 2023. We report on the relevance of definitional aspects of LOE with implications for the diagnostic spectrum of epilepsies. The neuropathological spectrum in patients with LOE is described and includes vascular lesions, low-grade neuroepithelial neoplasms and focal cortical dysplasias (FCD). Among the latter, the frequency of the FCD subtypes appears to differ between LOE patients and those with seizure onset at a younger age. Neurodegenerative neuropathological changes in the seizure foci of LOE patients require careful interdisciplinary interpretation with respect to the differential diagnosis of primary neurodegenerative changes or epilepsy-related changes. Innate and adaptive neuroinflammation represents an important cause of LOE with intriguing therapeutic options.

Epilepsy surgery in adults older than 50 years: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Despite the general safety and efficacy of epilepsy surgery, there is evidence that epilepsy surgery remains underutilized. Although there are an increasing number of studies reporting epilepsy surgery in older adults, there is no consensus on whether epilepsy surgery is efficacious or safe for this population. Our objective was to systematically assess the efficacy as well as safety of resective surgery in people aged 50 years or older with drug-resistant epilepsy.

METHODS

We considered studies that examine the efficacy and safety of epilepsy surgery in adults aged 50 years and older. Study eligibility was limited to studies carried out after 1990, with a minimum of 10 participants and 6 months of follow-up. We searched the following databases for published studies: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsychInfo, and Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index - Science. The risk of bias of each included study was independently assessed by two reviewers using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) instrument.

RESULTS

Eleven case series and 14 cohort studies met the criteria for inclusion, for a total of 1111 older adults who underwent epilepsy surgery along with 4111 adults younger than 50 years as control groups. The pooled cumulative incidence of older adults achieving seizure freedom after resective surgery was 70.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 65.3-74.7). There was no evident difference in the incidence of seizure freedom among older adults as compared to younger adults (risk ratio [RR] = 1.05, 95% CI = .97-1.14) in cohort studies. The pooled cumulative incidence of perioperative complications in older adults was 26.2% (95% CI = 21.3-31.7). Among them, 7.5% (95% CI = 5.8-9.5) experienced major complications. Older adults were significantly more at risk of experiencing any complication than younger adults (RR = 2.8, 95% CI = 1.5-5.4).

SIGNIFICANCE

Despite important considerations, epilepsy surgery may be considered appropriate among carefully selected individuals older than 50 years.

The case against secondary epileptogenesis

Secondary epileptogenesis is a theory that hypothesizes that uncontrolled seizures in people with epilepsy lead to the development of new sites of seizure onset. This process has often been cited when people experience a new seizure type after a period of poor seizure control. The theory proposes that repeated seizures induce changes in regions of the brain that are regularly recruited into the seizure. These hypothetical changes can then lead to a new, independent seizure onset zone. The concept is based on a number of clinical observations which secondary epileptogenesis could explain. However there are alternative explanations from the clinic as well as from the laboratory that call the process into question. In this review some of the observations that have been used to support the theory will be reviewed, and the many counterarguments will be presented. At this time there is little evidence to support secondary epileptogenesis and much to refute it.

Start Low and Go Slow: The General Principle of Managing Older Adults With Epilepsy Finds Robust Support From Frailty

Association Between Frailty and Antiseizure Medication Tolerability in Older Adults With Epilepsy Vary-O’Neal A, Miranzadeh S, Husein N, Holroyd-Leduc J, Sajobi TT, Wiebe S, Deacon C, Tellez-Zenteno JF, Josephson CB, Keezer MR. Neurology . 2023;100(11):e1135-e1147. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000201701 . PMID: 36535780. Background and Objective: Frailty is an important aspect of biological aging, referring to the increased vulnerability of individuals with frailty to physical and psychological stressors. While older adults with epilepsy are an important and distinct clinical group, there are no data on frailty in this population. We hypothesize that frailty will correlate with the seizure frequency and especially the tolerability of anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in older adults with epilepsy. Methods: We recruited individuals aged 60 years or older with active epilepsy from 4 Canadian hospital centers. We reported the seizure frequency in the 3 months preceding the interview, while ASM tolerability was quantified using the Liverpool Adverse Events Profile (LAEP). We applied 3 measures of frailty: grip strength as a measure of physical frailty, 1 self-reported score (Edmonton frail score [EFS]), and 1 scale completed by a healthcare professional (clinical frailty scale [CFS]). We also administered standardized questionnaires measuring levels of anxiety, depression, functional disability, and quality of life and obtained relevant clinical and demographic data. Results: Forty-three women and 43 men aged 60-93 years were recruited, 87% of whom had focal epilepsy, with an average frequency of 3.4 seizures per month. Multiple linear regression and zero-inflated negative binomial regression models showed that EFS and CFS scores were associated with decreased ASM tolerability, each point increase leading to 1.83 (95% CI: 0.67-4.30) and 2.49 (95% CI: 1.27-2.39) point increases on the LAEP scale, respectively. Neither the EFS and CFS scores nor grip strength were significantly associated with seizure frequency. The EFS was moderately correlated with depression, anxiety, quality of life, and functional disability, demonstrating the best construct validity among the 3 tested measures of frailty. Discussion: The EFS was significantly, both statistically and clinically, associated with ASM tolerability. It also showed multiple advantages in performance while assessing for frailty in older adults with epilepsy, when compared with the 2 other measures of frailty that we tested. Future studies must focus on what role the EFS during epilepsy diagnosis may play in ASM selection among older adults with epilepsy.

Predictive factors of postoperative outcome in the elderly after resective epilepsy surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficiency of resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in patients over 50 years and determine prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Over the 147 patients over 50 years (54.9±3.8 years [50-69]) coming from 8 specialized French centres for epilepsy surgery, 72.1%, patients were seizure-free and 91.2% had a good outcome 12 months after RES. Seizure freedom was not associated with the age at surgery or duration of epilepsy. In multivariate analysis, seizure freedom was associated with MRI and neuropathological hippocampal sclerosis (HS) (P=0.009 and P=0.028 respectively), PET hypometabolism (P=0.013), temporal epilepsy (P=0.01). On the contrary, the need for intracranial exploration was associated with a poorer prognosis (P=0.001). Postoperative number of antiepileptic drugs was significantly lower in the seizure-free group (P=0.001). Neurological adverse event rate after surgery was 21.1% and 11.7% of patients had neuropsychological adverse effects overall transient.

CONCLUSIONS

RES is effective procedure in the elderly. Even safe it remains at higher risk of complication and population should be carefully selected. Nevertheless, age should not be considered as a limiting factor, especially when good prognostic factors are identified.

Outcome after resective epilepsy surgery in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare complications, seizures, and neuropsychological outcomes after resective epilepsy surgery in patients ≥ 60 years of age who underwent operations to younger and matched controls.

METHODS

Charts of 2243 patients were screened for operated patients in the authors' center between 2000 and 2015. Patients with available postsurgical follow-up data who were operated on at the age of 60 years or older and matched (by gender, histopathology, and side of surgery) controls who were between 20 and 40 years of age at the time of surgery were included. Outcomes regarding postoperative seizure control were scored according to the Engel classification and group comparisons were performed by using chi-square statistics.

RESULTS

Data of 20 older patients were compared to those of 60 younger controls. Postoperative seizure control was favorable in the majority of the elderly patients (Engel classes I and II: 75% at 12 months, 65% at last follow-up), but the proportion of patients with favorable outcome tended to be larger in the control group (Engel classes I and II: 90% at 12 months, p = 0.092; 87% at last follow-up, p = 0.032, chi-square test). The surgical complication rate was higher in the elderly population (65% vs 27%, p = 0.002), but relevant persistent deficits occurred in 2 patients of each group only. Neuropsychological and behavioral assessments displayed considerable preoperative impairment and additional postoperative worsening, particularly of verbal skills, memory (p < 0.05), and mood in the elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall favorable postsurgical outcome regarding seizure control and the moderate risk of disabling persistent neurological deficits in elderly patients supports the view that advanced age should not be a barrier per se for resective epilepsy surgery and underscores the importance of an adequate presurgical evaluation and of referral of elderly patients to presurgical assessment.

Outcomes of epilepsy surgery in the older population: not too old, not too late

OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of epilepsy in the older adult population is increasing. While surgical intervention in younger patients is supported by level I evidence, the safety and efficacy of epilepsy surgery in older individuals is less well established. The aim of this study was to evaluate seizure freedom rates and surgical outcomes in older epilepsy patients.

METHODS

The authors' institutional electronic database was queried for patients older than 50 who had undergone epilepsy surgery during 2002-2018. Cases were grouped into 50-59, 60-69, and 70+ years old. Seizure freedom at the last follow-up constituted the primary outcome of interest. The institutional analysis was supplemented by a literature review and meta-analysis (random effects model) of all published studies on this topic as well as by an analysis of complication rates, mortality rates, and cost data from a nationwide administrative database (Vizient Inc., years 2016-2019).

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (n = 16 for 50-59 years, n = 47 for 60-69, and n = 10 for 70+) were treated at the authors' institution. The median age was 63 years, and 66% of the patients were female. At a median follow-up of 24 months, seizure freedom was 73% for the overall cohort, 63% for the 50-59 group, 77% for the 60-69 group, and 70% for the 70+ group. The literature search identified 15 additional retrospective studies (474 cases). Temporal lobectomy was the most commonly performed procedure (73%), and mesial temporal sclerosis was the most common pathology (52%), followed by nonspecific gliosis (19%). The pooled mean follow-up was 39 months (range 6-114.8 months) with a pooled seizure freedom rate of 65% (95% CI 59%-72%). On multivariable meta-regression analysis, an older mean age at surgery (coefficient [coeff] 2.1, 95% CI 1.1-3.1, p < 0.001) and the presence of mesial temporal sclerosis (coeff 0.3, 95% CI 0.1-0.6, p = 0.015) were the most important predictors of seizure freedom. Finally, analysis of the Vizient database revealed mortality rates of 0.5%, 1.1%, and 9.6%; complication rates of 7.1%, 10.1%, and 17.3%; and mean hospital costs of $31,977, $34,586, and $40,153 for patients aged 50-59, 60-69, and 70+ years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

While seizure-free outcomes of epilepsy surgery are excellent, there is an expected increase in morbidity and mortality with increasing age. Findings in this study on the safety and efficacy of epilepsy surgery in the older population may serve as a useful guide during preoperative decision-making and patient counseling.

The Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes of Brain-responsive Neurostimulation (RNS® System) therapy in older adults

Objectives

The gold standard for the management of drug‐resistant focal epilepsy (DRE) is resection of epileptogenic zone. However, some patients may not be candidates for resection. Responsive neurostimulation is approved in patients above 18 years of age for such patients. We aimed to investigate whether RNS outcomes and safety varied based on age.

Methods

We performed a single‐center retrospective cohort study of patients with DRE who were treated with RNS between May 2008 and February 2020. We included patients who had been implanted with RNS for >6 months (N = 55), dividing them into older (N = 11) and younger adults (N = 44) depending on implantation age (≥50 and <50 years, respectively).

Results

Mean age at implantation in older adults was 54.9 ± 3.5 years. Seizure onset age, epilepsy duration, and comorbidities were significantly higher in older adults ( P < .01). Stimulation parameters, treatment duration, and median seizure frequency reduction (76% in older vs 50% in younger adults) were statistically comparable between the two cohorts. Posttreatment, antiseizure medication burden was significantly decreased in older compared with younger adults (P = .048). Postoperative and delayed adverse events among older adults were mild. Compared with three younger adults, none of the older adults required device explantation due to surgical site infection.

Conclusion

Our study suggests that older adults treated with the RNS System achieve seizure outcomes comparable to younger adults with the additional benefit of a significant postimplantation medication reduction. With efficacy and safety similar to younger adults, brain‐responsive neurostimulation was well‐tolerated in older adults.

Outcome of epilepsy surgery in lesional epilepsy: Experiences from a developing country

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to report the postoperative seizure outcome and associated factors in patients with lesional epilepsy, in a low-income setting.

METHODS

This longitudinal prospective study included patients who underwent epilepsy surgery at Kashani Comprehensive Epilepsy Center between 2014 and 2019. Post-surgical outcomes were reported according to the Engel score, and patients were classified into two groups of seizure free (SF) and not-seizure free (NSF).

RESULTS

A total of 148 adult patients, with a mean age of 30.45 ± 9.23 years were included. The SF outcome was reported in 86.5% of patients and antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were reduced or discontinued in 45.9%. The mean follow-up duration was 26.7 ± 14.9 months. Temporal lobe lesions (76.3%) and mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) (56.7%) were the most frequent etiologies. Temporal lesion (Incidence relative risk (IRR): 1.76, 95% CI [1.08-2.87], p = 0.023), prior history of CNS infection (IRR:1.18, 95% CI [1.03-1.35], p = 0.019), use of intra-operative ECoG (IRR:1.73, 95% CI [1.06-2.81], p = 0.028), and absence of IEDs in postoperative EEG (IRR: 1.41, 95% CI [1.18-1.70], p < 0.001) were positive predictors for a favorable outcome.

CONCLUSION

Many patients with drug-resistant lesional epilepsy showed a favorable response to surgery. We believe that resective epilepsy surgery in low-income settings is a major treatment option. The high frequency of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in developing countries is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Hence, strategies to increase access to epilepsy surgery in these settings are urgently needed.

Memory outcomes of temporal lobe surgery in adults aged over 45 years

OBJECTIVE

It is assumed that temporal lobe resection in older people is associated with worse seizure outcomes and potential postsurgical memory decline. We studied postsurgical memory development and surgical efficacy in patients over 45 years of age compared with younger patients.

METHODS

We studied 88 patients (51 male and 37 female) after temporal lobe surgery, which involved hippocampal resection. The patients were evaluated before surgery and in the first (72 patients) and/or third (57 patients) postsurgical year. The Wechsler Memory Scale III test was performed to evaluate the MQ postsurgical development. Engel's classification was used to evaluate the postsurgical seizure outcome.

RESULTS

The presurgical MQ (median 88) in ≥45 years age group was significantly lower than in both younger groups (median MQ = 100 for ≤30 years age group, p = 0.002; median MQ = 107 for 31-44 years age group, p = 0.002). Three years after the surgery, the MQ decreased significantly in ≤30 years age group (p = 0.012), while only non-significant MQ decline was observed in both older groups. We found no significant impact of age on the surgical outcome.

CONCLUSION

Higher age at the time of surgery does not significantly increase the risk for postsurgical memory decline; however, older patients are more likely to have lowered presurgical MQ. We did not find significant differences in the impact of surgery on seizure outcome among the age groups. Epilepsy surgery appears to be a safe and effective method in the age over 45 years even though an earlier surgery should be preferred.

Resective epilepsy surgery in patients aged 50years and older - a retrospective study regarding seizure outcome, memory performance, and psychopathology

PURPOSE

To assess clinical and demographic characteristics in two cohorts of elderly patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, undergoing resective epilepsy surgery (RES). Further, to determine seizure, neuropsychological, and mental health outcomes after RES and evaluate possible influencing factors.

METHODS

Consecutive patients aged ≥50 years with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who underwent curative RES in the Hamburg epilepsy surgery program (2004-2017) were identified. Data were retrospectively analyzed. Seizure outcome was classified according to ILAE and Engel outcome scales in patients with first-time surgeries and with reoperations. Previously reported predictors of the seizure outcome were evaluated using regression analyses. Changes in verbal memory were assessed for patients with complete pre- and postoperative datasets (n=30) using repeated-measures analysis of variance. For evaluation of possible predictors of psychopathologic changes after RES a regression analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Fifty-one elderly patients underwent RES of the temporal lobe, including twelve aged ≥60 years, and five with reoperations. After one year, 65% of the patients with first-time surgeries were seizure free and 91% had a favorable outcome. At last follow-up, 49% were seizure free since surgery. Three reoperated patients had an Engel I outcome. Seizure outcome was not dependent on age at surgery, duration of epilepsy, or other evaluated variables. There was no significant decline in the memory performance after surgery. Significant improvements in mental health were found.

CONCLUSION

RES for drug-resistant TLE is safe, effective, and improves mental health also in patients aged ≥ 50 years. Thus, it should be evaluated as the treatment of choice also in this age group.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery: Part I: A scoping review of barriers

One-third of persons with epilepsy have seizures despite appropriate medical therapy. Drug resistant epilepsy (DRE) is associated with neurocognitive and psychological decline, poor quality of life, increased risk of premature death, and greater economic burden. Epilepsy surgery is an effective and safe treatment for a subset of people with DRE but remains one of the most underutilized evidence-based treatments in modern medicine. The reasons for this quality gap are insufficiently understood. In this comprehensive review, we compile known significant barriers to epilepsy surgery, originating from both patient/family-related factors and physician/health system components. Important patient-related factors include individual and epilepsy characteristics which bias towards continued preferential use of poorly effective medications, as well as patient perspectives and misconceptions of surgical risks and benefits. Health system and physician-related barriers include demonstrable knowledge gaps among physicians, inadequate access to comprehensive epilepsy centers, complex presurgical evaluations, insufficient research, and socioeconomic bias when choosing appropriate surgical candidates.

Underutilization of epilepsy surgery: Part II: Strategies to overcome barriers

Interventions focused on utilization of epilepsy surgery can be divided into groups: those that improve patients' access to surgical evaluation and those that facilitate completion of the surgical evaluation and treatment. Educational intervention, technological innovation, and effective coordination and communication can significantly improve patients' access to surgery. Patient and public facing, individualized (analog and/or digital) communication can raise awareness and acceptance of epilepsy surgery. Educational interventions aimed at providers may mitigate knowledge gaps using practical and concise consensus statements and guidelines, while specific training can improve awareness around implicit bias. Innovative technology, such as clinical decision-making toolkits within the electronic medical record (EMR), machine learning techniques, online decision-support tools, nomograms, and scoring algorithms can facilitate timely identification of appropriate candidates for epilepsy surgery with individualized guidance regarding referral appropriateness, postoperative seizure freedom rate, and risks of complication after surgery. There are specific strategies applicable for epilepsy centers' success: building a multidisciplinary setup, maintaining/tracking volume and complexity of cases, collaborating with other centers, improving surgical outcome with reduced complications, utilizing advanced diagnostics tools, and considering minimally invasive surgical techniques. Established centers may use other strategies, such as multi-stage procedures for multifocal epilepsy, advanced functional mapping with tailored surgery for epilepsy involving the eloquent cortex, and generation of fresh hypotheses in cases of surgical failure. Finally, improved access to epilepsy surgery can be accomplished with policy changes (e.g., anti-discrimination policy, exemption in transportation cost, telehealth reimbursement policy, patient-centered epilepsy care models, pay-per-performance models, affordability and access to insurance, and increased funding for research). Every intervention should receive regular evaluation and feedback-driven modification to ensure appropriate utilization of epilepsy surgery.

Quality of life before and after epilepsy surgery: Age is just a number

BACKGROUND

In a rapidly aging population, it is critical to analyze if the quality of life (QOL) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and the change in it after epilepsy surgery is dependent on the age at operation.

METHODS

A prospective registry-based retrospective cohort study including adults with a completed pre- and post-surgery Quality of Life in Epilepsy 10 (QOLIE-10) survey. Multivariable linear regression models analyzed the baseline, postoperative, or change in QOLIE-10 score.

RESULTS

We analyzed 416 patients (51% females) with the mean age of 39.6 (SD = 12.6) years at the time of surgery, including 100 (24%) individuals 50 years or older. The younger and older adults (dichotomized as <50 vs. ≥50 and <60 vs. ≥60) had comparable pre- and post-surgery QOLIE 10 total scores. The change in total and individual QOLIE-10 items score were comparable between the groups as well. Within group improvements in total QOLIE-10 score post-surgery was in younger as well as older groups. The linear regression models showed that age, regardless of parameterization (linear or dichotomized), was not related to pre-surgery, post-surgery, and change in QOLIE-10 score, both before and after adjustment for covariates. The change in QOLIE-10 score did not show correlation with age, whether seizure freedom or relative seizure reduction was used in the model.

CONCLUSION

With QOL, before or after surgery, being independent of a patient's age, our findings suggest that well-selected older adults and the elderly should be offered epilepsy surgery without concern for an inferior improvement in QOL compared to their younger counterparts.

Quality of life in elderly patients after surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy - The impact of seizure outcome, neurological deficits and anxiety

INTRODUCTION

Health related quality of life (HRQoL) has become a pivotal outcome parameter after surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy. The aim of the study was to investigate HRQoL and its relationship to seizure outcome, neurological deficits and anxiety after epilepsy surgery in a specific subpopulation of elderly patients.

METHODS

A total of 85 elderly patients (older than 50 years) answered a standardized HRQoL questionnaire one year after epilepsy surgery. The questionnaire addressed the present self-assessed HRQoL in four subdomains (physical function, cognitive function, mood, social interaction). The questionnaire was based on the "Epilepsy Surgery Inventory-55", adapted for use in German speaking patients and validated by the QOLIE -10 and Beck Depression Inventory.

RESULTS

A total of 51 patients (60%) were completely seizure free (ILAE1) at last available outcome (LAO). Permanent neurological deficits were observed in 8 patients (7%). Correlation analysis confirmed significant association between seizure outcome and overall HRQoL (r = -0.368, p < .001). New permanent neurological deficits showed impact on both HRQoL and the "cognitive function" subdomain. Anxiety and subjective assessment of postoperative status were strongly correlated with overall HRQoL (r = 0.692, p < .001 and r = 0.591, p < .001 respectively) and remained as independent prognostic factors in a multivariate regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Surgery for drug-resistant epilepsy in elderly improves patients' HRQoL. Both seizure freedom and new neurological deficits influence overall HRQoL. Interestingly, anxiety and patients' subjective assessment of postoperative status showed the highest impact on HRQoL in this subpopulation of epilepsy patients.

Surgery for temporal lobe epilepsy in the elderly: Improving quality of life despite cognitive impairment

INTRODUCTION

Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) surgery is still underutilized, especially in the elderly population because of concerns related to postoperative complication rate and cognitive deterioration. The aim of the study was to evaluate surgical data, quality of life and neuropsychological outcome in elderly patients, who underwent resective surgery for drug resistant TLE.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All patients underwent standardized presurgical assessment including clinical, neuroradiological, neuropsychological, and EEG examination. Elderly were considered all patients being 50 years or above (mean 56 yr., range 50-71 yr.). Neuropsychology was assessed before and after surgery, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) only after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 94 consecutive elderly patients were analyzed. Temporo-mesial resections were performed in 85 patients (90 %). Seizure outcome was available in all patients with a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (1.2-19 ± 3.75 years). 57 patients (60.6 %) were completely seizure free (ILAE 1). The overall morbidity was 10 % including 5 surgical complications and 5 permanent neurological deficits. Neuropsychological assessments in 60 patients showed considerable preoperative impairment, losses in different domains in 25-45 % and gains in about 25 % of the patients. Postoperative HRQOL data was available in 75 patients, revealing significant increase of HRQOL in all domains. Complete seizure freedom was the strongest predictor for postoperative HRQOL (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Surgery for drug resistant temporal lobe epilepsy is a feasible option for elderly patients as seizure control rates are comparable to the younger population. The acceptable rate of permanent neurological deficits and relevant improvements in quality of life, despite considerable postoperative cognitive impairment, justify surgical resection in properly selected elderly patients.

Prognostic factors of postoperative seizure outcomes in older patients with temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The authors of this study aimed to investigate surgical outcomes and prognostic factors in older patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) who had undergone resective surgery.

METHODS

Data on patients older than 45 years of age with drug-resistant TLE who had undergone resective surgery at Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, between January 2009 and August 2017 were retrospectively collected. Postoperative seizure outcomes were evaluated according to the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) classification. Patients belonging to ILAE classes 1 and 2 were classified as having a favorable outcome, whereas patients belonging to ILAE classes 3-6 were classified as having an unfavorable outcome. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify the potential predictors of seizure outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients older than 45 years of age who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery for TLE were included in the present study. Eight (17.8%) of 45 patients had preoperative comorbidity in addition to seizures. The average age at the time of surgery was 51.76 years, and the average duration of epilepsy at the time surgery was 18.01 years. After an average follow-up period of 4.53 ± 2.82 years (range 2-10 years), 73.3% (33/45) of patients were seizure free. Surgical complications were observed in 13.3% of patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that an MRI-negative finding is the only independent predictor of unfavorable seizure outcomes (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.67, p = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Resective surgery is a safe and effective treatment for older patients with drug-resistant TLE. An MRI-negative finding independently predicts unfavorable seizure outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Epilepsy Surgery for Older Adult Patients with Refractory Epilepsy

Purpose

The population of elderly patients with epilepsy has been growing rapidly and the chances of referring older patients with refractory epilepsy for surgical options could be increasing. In general, epilepsy surgery at higher ages has been less likely to be performed, because little is known regarding the risks and benefits in elderly patients. We, therefore, investigated surgical outcomes and comorbidities in a population ≥50 years old who underwent epilepsy surgery.

Methods

Patients ≥50 years old who underwent epilepsy surgery were identified from the database of our epilepsy center for the period from 2009 to 2017. Surgical complications and seizure outcome were reviewed, and seizure outcomes were evaluated using the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) surgery outcome scale.

Results

The mean age of 32 patients at the time of surgery was 56.1±5.1 years. The mean duration of epilepsy was 23.4±18.5 years and mean follow-up was 2.7±2.0 years. As of the most recent visit, 56.3% of patients remained completely seizure-free (ILAE Class I). The surgery-related complication rate was 11.5%, comprising permanent deficits in 3.8% and transient deficits in 7.7%.

Conclusion

These results suggest that epilepsy surgery may represent a valuable approach in selected adult patients.

Epilepsy in older people

Globally, as populations age there will be challenges and opportunities to deliver optimal health care to senior citizens. Epilepsy, a condition characterised by spontaneous recurrent seizures, is common in older adults (aged >65 years) and yet has received comparatively little attention in this age group. In this Review, we evaluate the underlying causes of epilepsy in older people, explore difficulties in establishing a diagnosis of epilepsy in this population, discuss appropriate antiseizure medications, and evaluate potential surgical treatment options. We consider cognitive, psychological, and psychosocial comorbidities and the effect that epilepsy might have on an older person's broader social or care network in high-income versus middle-income and low-income countries. We emphasise the need for clinical trials to be more inclusive of older people with epilepsy to help inform therapeutic decision making and discuss whether measures to improve vascular risk factors might be an important strategy to reduce the probability of developing epilepsy.

Epilepsy in the elderly: Unique challenges in an increasingly prevalent population

Elderly individuals (aged at least 60 or 65 years) represent a rapidly growing segment of the population. The incidence and prevalence of epilepsy is higher in this age group than in any other. Diagnosing epilepsy in the elderly can be challenging because the causes and clinical manifestations of seizures often differ as compared with younger individuals. Particular differential diagnoses, such as syncope and amyloid spells, are commonly encountered in the elderly population. A diagnosis of epilepsy has important implications in the older adult, many of which already present a variety of concomitant complex medical problems, such as cognitive impairment, comorbid cerebrovascular disease, and frailty. The treatment of epilepsy in the elderly is complicated by a variety of factors related to aging, including physiological changes, medical comorbidities, and polypharmacy. In this narrative review, we will address the descriptive epidemiology, clinical presentation, differential diagnosis, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of epilepsy in the elderly individual.

Histopathologic substrate of drug-resistant epilepsy in older adults and the elderly undergoing surgery

Patients 60 years or older are one of the highest risk age groups for development of epilepsy. Clinical and neuroimaging analysis has typically accounted for etiology in two-thirds of these patients, while the data on histopathology are lacking. We provide the first analysis of the histopathological substrates underlying drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in older adults/elderly patients who underwent resective epilepsy surgery (RES) at Cleveland Clinic. A total of 78 patients (mean age ± standard deviation: 64.7 ± 3.7 years; 59% female) were included in the study. The most common pathologies included hippocampal sclerosis (HS; 35.9%; all visible on magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]), focal cortical dysplasia (FCD; 25.6%) and remote infarct/ischemic changes (12.8%). Underlying pathology did not differ significantly between the patients achieving a good seizure outcome (Engel class I; 77% [47 of 61 patients]) and the rest of the cohort. With one exception, all MRI-negative cases had FCD type Ib. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis found a significant association (P = 0.002) between seizure-onset age and HS, whereby the odds of its presence were reduced by 4% for every 1 year increase in the age at seizure onset. The model showed that the age cutoff for seizure onset predicting HS was 43 years, with a negative predictive value of 81.6%. None of the 14 patients with late-onset epilepsy (≥60 years of age) were found to have HS; they mostly had acquired lesions. Our study provides histopathologic evidence for the diminished role of late-onset HS in DRE in older adults/elderly who undergo RES.

Age is but a number when considering epilepsy surgery in older adults

BACKGROUND

A quarter of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy are older, yet they are less likely to be offered resective surgery potentially because of clinical bias that they incur increased surgical risks. There are few peer-reviewed case series that address this cohort and their outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

In the context of current literature, the objective of this study was to report on all epilepsy surgeries in patients aged 50 years or older from a tertiary care center over 15 years with an average follow-up period of 6 years.

METHODS

Patients with epilepsy who underwent surgery between 2001 and 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were age > 50 at surgery, availability of presurgical evaluation data, and minimum one year of follow-up data. We identified 34 patients. Seizure outcome was evaluated using the Engel classification system.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients aged 50 years and older out of 276 underwent epilepsy surgery. Average age at time of surgery was 55 years, and average duration of epilepsy was 30 years. Average length of follow-up was 6 years (1-15 years). Twenty-two out of 34 patients (64%) were seizure-free (Engel class I) at their last follow-up visit. Patients with lesional pathology on neuroimaging were more likely to achieve seizure freedom (p < 0.02). Parameters associated with poorer outcome included extratemporal epileptogenic focus (p = 0.07) and bitemporal interictal epileptiform activity (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our study cohort is one of the largest and most representative outcome studies of this age group, following the cohort for 6 years. Our findings demonstrated that when considering epilepsy surgery in an older adult, their age should not play a determining role in the decision-a finding that is more common in modern literature.

Extra operative intracranial EEG monitoring for epilepsy surgery in elderly patients

OBJECT

The objective of the study is to investigate and report our experience with extra operative intracranial EEG monitoring for evaluation of epilepsy surgery among elderly (≥ 60 years) patients.

METHODS

After IRB approval, we searched our prospectively maintained epilepsy surgery database to find patients who underwent eiEEG at the age of 60 years or older. Electronic medical records were reviewed to extract clinical and surgery-related information. Patients who underwent resective epilepsy surgery after eiEEG and had at least 1 year of clinical follow-up were assessed for seizure outcome. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using Pearson chi-square and Student's t-test, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients, with 13 (62%) women, underwent eiEEG in our center at the age of 60 years or older. The mean age at time of implantation was 63.8 ± 2.7 years. Sub-dural grids (SDG) were implanted in five (24%) patients, whereas sixteen (76%) patients underwent stereo-EEG (SEEG) implantation. Median number of contacts in SDG were 106 (56-136) and depth electrodes in SEEG were 12 (9-14). There were 2 complications, including one mortality due to intracerebral hemorrhage. Sixteen (76%) patients underwent respective epilepsy surgery after eiEEG and eleven (69%) achieved Engel class I outcome on the last follow-up [mean follow-up duration of 2.7 (± 1.8) years].

CONCLUSION

We noticed an increased utilization of eiEEG in elderly patients after the introduction of SEEG at our center. Overall, we found that eiEEG can help achieve good seizure outcomes in the elderly population. However, the one eiEEG-related mortality serves a word of caution about the potential risks in this population.