Headache in epilepsy: A prospective observational study

Relationship between migraine and epilepsy in a large population-based cohort: The HUNT Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Several studies have reported substantial comorbidity between epilepsy and migraine. Most of these were based on clinical cohorts or used unvalidated diagnostic instruments. Our study re-examined this association in a large general population cohort using validated diagnoses for both disorders.

METHODS

A total of 65,407 participants (≥20 years old) from HUNT (the Trøndelag Health Study) were classified for migraine and nonmigraine headache using a validated questionnaire. Medical record review was used to validate and classify epilepsy in 364 participants (cases), who were compared with 63,298 participants without epilepsy (controls). The association between epilepsy and migraine was analysed using logistic regression adjusted for sex and age.

RESULTS

Patients with epilepsy had no increased prevalence of migraine (odds ratio [OR] = 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.68-1.33) or nonmigraine headache (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.93-1.50) compared to controls. When stratified by headache frequency, epilepsy was associated with a higher prevalence of migraine with highly frequent headache (≥7 days/month; OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.08-2.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Migraine was equally common in people with and without epilepsy. Patients with epilepsy who suffered from migraine were more prone to having highly frequent migraine.

A cross-sectional, multicenter survey of the prevalence and influencing factors for migraine in epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

Epilepsy and migraine are common chronic neurological disease. Epidemiologic studies and shared pathophysiology and treatment suggest that these two diseases overlap. However, migraine is often underestimated among patients with epilepsy. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of migraine and identify the related influencing factors among adult patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

Adult patients with epilepsy were recruited at the outpatient epilepsy clinic of 13 tertiary hospitals in China from February to September 2022. ID Migraine questionnaire was applied to evaluate for migraine. Both univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to explore the influencing factors of migraine.

RESULTS

A total of 1326 patients with epilepsy were enrolled in this study. The prevalence of migraine among patients with epilepsy was 19.2% (254/1326). In the multivariable analysis, being female (OR = 1.451, 95% CI: 1.068-1.975; p = 0.018), focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (OR = 1.583, 95% CI: 1.090-2.281; p = 0.015), and current seizure attack in the last 3 months (OR = 1.967, 95% CI: 1.282-3.063; p = 0.002) were the influencing factors for migraine. However, <10% of patients with epilepsy received analgesics for migraine.

SIGNIFICANCE

Approximately 20% of patients with epilepsy screened positive for migraine. Being female, focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and current seizure attack in the last 3 months were the influencing factors for migraine. Neurologists should pay more attention to the screening and management of the migraine among patients with epilepsy in China.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

Epilepsy and migraine are common chronic neurological disease with shared pathophysiological mechanisms and therapeutic options. However, migraine is often underestimated among patients with epilepsy. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of migraine and current status of treatment. In this study, approximately 20% of patients with epilepsy screened positive for migraine. Female, focal and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures, and current seizure attack in the last 3 months were identified as independent influencing factors for migraine. Despite the high prevalence, the treatment for migraine was not optimistic, neurologists should pay more attention to the screening and management of migraine.

Diagnosis of comorbid migraine without aura in patients with idiopathic/genetic epilepsy based on the gray zone approach to the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 criteria

Background

Migraine without aura (MwoA) is a very frequent and remarkable comorbidity in patients with idiopathic/genetic epilepsy (I/GE). Frequently in clinical practice, diagnosis of MwoA may be challenging despite the guidance of current diagnostic criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders 3 (ICHD-3). In this study, we aimed to disclose the diagnostic gaps in the diagnosis of comorbid MwoA, using a zone concept, in patients with I/GEs with headaches who were diagnosed by an experienced headache expert.

Methods

In this multicenter study including 809 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of I/GE with or without headache, 163 patients who were diagnosed by an experienced headache expert as having a comorbid MwoA were reevaluated. Eligible patients were divided into three subgroups, namely, full diagnosis, zone I, and zone II according to their status of fulfilling the ICHD-3 criteria. A Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis was performed to bring out the meaningful predictors when evaluating patients with I/GEs for MwoA comorbidity, using the variables that were significant in the univariate analysis.

Results

Longer headache duration (<4 h) followed by throbbing pain, higher visual analog scale (VAS) scores, increase of pain by physical activity, nausea/vomiting, and photophobia and/or phonophobia are the main distinguishing clinical characteristics of comorbid MwoA in patients with I/GE, for being classified in the full diagnosis group. Despite being not a part of the main ICHD-3 criteria, the presence of associated symptoms mainly osmophobia and also vertigo/dizziness had the distinguishing capability of being classified into zone subgroups. The most common epilepsy syndromes fulfilling full diagnosis criteria (n = 62) in the CART analysis were 48.39% Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy followed by 25.81% epilepsy with generalized tonic-clonic seizures alone.

Conclusion

Longer headache duration, throbbing pain, increase of pain by physical activity, photophobia and/or phonophobia, presence of vertigo/dizziness, osmophobia, and higher VAS scores are the main supportive associated factors when applying the ICHD-3 criteria for the comorbid MwoA diagnosis in patients with I/GEs. Evaluating these characteristics could be helpful to close the diagnostic gaps in everyday clinical practice and fasten the diagnostic process of comorbid MwoA in patients with I/GEs.

Headache in idiopathic/genetic epilepsies: Cluster analysis in a large cohort

OBJECTIVES

The link between headache and epilepsy is more prominent in patients with idiopathic/genetic epilepsy (I/GE). We aimed to investigate the prevalence of headache and to cluster patients with regard to their headache and epilepsy features.

METHODS

Patients aged 6-40 years, with a definite diagnosis of I/GE, were consecutively enrolled. The patients were interviewed using standardized epilepsy and headache questionnaires and their headache characteristics were investigated by experts in headache. Demographic and clinical variables were analyzed and patients were clustered according to their epilepsy and headache characteristics using an unsupervized K-means algorithm.

RESULTS

Among 809 patients, 508 (62.8%) reported having any type of headache; 87.4% had interictal headache and 41.2% had migraine. Cluster analysis revealed two distinct groups for both adults and children/adolescents. In adults, having a family history of headache, ≥5 headache attacks, duration of headache ≥24 months, headaches lasting ≥ 1 hour, and visual analog scale scores >5 were grouped in one cluster, and juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), myoclonic, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) were clustered in this group (cluster 1). Self-limited epilepsy with centro-temporal spikes and epilepsy with GTCS alone were clustered in cluster 2 with the opposite characteristics. For children/adolescents, the same features as in adult cluster 1 were clustered in a separate group, except for the presence of JME syndrome and GTCS alone as a seizure type. Focal seizures were clustered in another group with the opposite characteristics. In the entire group, the model revealed an additional cluster, including patients with the syndrome of GTCS-alone (50.51%), with ≥ 5 attacks, headache lasting >4 hours, and throbbing headache; 65.66% of patients had a family history of headache in this third cluster (n=99).

SIGNIFICANCE

Patients with I/GE can be clustered into distinct groups according to headache features along with seizures. Our findings may help in management and planning for future studies.

Headache in people with epilepsy

Epidemiological estimates indicate that individuals with epilepsy are more likely to experience headaches, including migraine, than individuals without epilepsy. Headaches can be temporally unrelated to seizures, or can occur before, during or after an episode; seizures and migraine attacks are mostly not temporally linked. The pathophysiological links between headaches (including migraine) and epilepsy are complex and have not yet been fully elucidated. Correct diagnoses and appropriate treatment of headaches in individuals with epilepsy is essential, as headaches can contribute substantially to disease burden. Here, we review the insights that have been made into the associations between headache and epilepsy over the past 5 years, including information on the pathophysiological mechanisms and genetic variants that link the two disorders. We also discuss the current best practice for the management of headaches co-occurring with epilepsy and highlight future challenges for this area of research.

Treatment of postictal headache: a systematic review and future directions

BACKGROUND

Postictal headache (PIH) is a common complaint among patients with epilepsy. The prevalence of PIH is 43%. In the current endeavor, we systematically reviewed the existing treatment options for PIH in order to depict the state of the field and also to propose a research agenda to advance this topic.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase from the inception to 4 February, 2021 were systematically searched for related published articles. In all electronic databases, the following search strategy was implemented and these key words (in all fields) were used: "post-ictal" AND "Headache" AND "Treatment".

RESULTS

The primary search yielded 626 studies; only five studies were related to the topic and were included in the current systematic review. None of these studies provided a good class of evidence. These studies suggested that flunarizine and sumatriptan may help patients with PIH.

CONCLUSION

While PIH is a common and disabling condition, its treatment is overlooked by the epilepsy society. Flunarizine and sumatriptan can be good candidates to be used in future clinical trials of the treatment of PIH. To obtain the desired evidence on the efficacy of either flunarizine or sumatriptan in treating PIH in patients with epilepsy, we need well-designed, randomized controlled trials.

Kopfschmerz bei Parietal- und Okzipitallappenepilepsien

Epilepsiepatienten leiden überdurchschnittlich häufig unter Kopfschmerzen. Dies gilt insbesondere für Patienten mit idiopathisch generalisierten und parietookzipitalen Epilepsien. Die Häufigkeit des gemeinsamen Auftretens von Kopfschmerzen und Epilepsie überschreitet dabei die rechnerische Koinzidenz, sodass von einer Komorbidität beider Syndrome auszugehen ist. Bestärkt wird diese Hypothese durch überlappende genetische Veränderungen sowie gemeinsame pathophysiologische Mechanismen. Bis zu 62 % der Patienten mit z. B. Parietal- und Okzipitallappenepilepsie (POLE) geben Kopfschmerzen an. Diese treten v. a. nach dem Anfall (postiktal) auf und manifestieren sich am häufigsten als Migräne-ähnlicher Kopfschmerz oder Spannungskopfschmerz. Seltener kommt es zu Kopfschmerzen vor (periiktal), während (iktal) oder zwischen (interiktal) epileptischen Anfällen. Bei transienten neurologischen Ausfallsymptomen mit begleitenden Kopfschmerzen ist differenzialdiagnostisch neben der Migräne an vaskuläre Ereignisse wie Synkopen oder eine transiente ischämische Attacke zu denken.

Lasmiditan in patients with common migraine comorbidities: a post hoc efficacy and safety analysis of two phase 3 randomized clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

Determine whether common migraine comorbidities affect the efficacy and safety of lasmiditan, a 5-HT_1F receptor agonist approved in the United States for the acute treatment of migraine.

METHODS

In SPARTAN and SAMURAI (double-blind Phase 3 clinical trials), patients with migraine were randomized to oral lasmiditan 50 mg (SPARTAN only), 100mg, 200 mg, or placebo. Lasmiditan increased the proportion of pain-free and most bothersome symptom (MBS)-free patients at 2 h after dose compared with placebo. Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness, paraesthesia, somnolence, fatigue, nausea, muscular weakness, and hypoesthesia. Based upon literature review of common migraine comorbidities, Anxiety, Allergy, Bronchial, Cardiac, Depression, Fatigue, Gastrointestinal, Hormonal, Musculoskeletal/Pain, Neurological, Obesity, Sleep, and Vascular Comorbidity Groups were created. Using pooled results, efficacy and TEAEs were assessed to compare patients with or without a given common migraine comorbidity. To compare treatment groups, p-values were calculated for treatment-by-subgroup interaction, based on logistic regression with treatment-by-comorbidity condition status (Yes/No) as the interaction term; study, treatment group, and comorbidity condition status (Yes/No) were covariates. Differential treatment effect based upon comorbidity status was also examined. Trial registration at clinicaltrials.gov: SAMURAI (NCT02439320) and SPARTAN (NCT02605174).

RESULTS

Across all the Comorbidity Groups, with the potential exception of fatigue, treatment-by-subgroup interaction analyses did not provide evidence of a lasmiditan-driven lasmiditan versus placebo differential treatment effect dependent on Yes versus No comorbidity subgroup for either efficacy or TEAE assessments.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy and safety of lasmiditan for treatment of individual migraine attacks appear to be independent of comorbid conditions.