1
|
Samanta D, Haneef Z, Albert GW, Naik S, Reeders PC, Jain P, Abel TJ, Al-Ramadhani R, Ibrahim GM, Warren AEL. Neuromodulation strategies in developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Epilepsy Behav 2024; 160:110067. [PMID: 39393142 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2024.110067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2024] [Revised: 09/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
Developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) are a group of childhood-onset epilepsy syndromes characterized by frequent seizures, severe cognitive and behavioral impairments, and poor long-term outcomes. These conditions are typically refractory to currently available medical therapies, prompting recent exploration of neuromodulation treatments such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), which aim to modulate epileptic networks spanning cortical and subcortical regions. These advances have occurred alongside an improved understanding of syndrome-specific and interictal epileptiform discharge/seizure-specific brain networks. By targeting key nodes within these networks, DBS and RNS hold promise for influencing seizures and associated cognitive and behavioral comorbidities. Initial experiences with centromedian (CM) thalamic DBS for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) have shown modest efficacy across multiple seizure types. Reports also indicate the application of DBS and RNS across various genetic and structural etiologies commonly associated with DEEs, with mixed success. Although DBS and RNS are increasingly used in LGS and other DEEs, their mixed efficacy highlights a knowledge gap in understanding why some patients with LGS do not respond and which neuromodulation approach is most effective for other DEEs. To address these issues, this review first discusses recent neuroimaging studies showing similarities and differences in the epileptic brain networks underlying various DEEs, revealing the common involvement of the thalamus and the default-mode network (DMN) across multiple DEEs. We then examine thalamic DBS for LGS to illustrate how such network insights may be used to optimize neuromodulation. Although network-based neuromodulation is still in its infancy, the LGS model may serve as a framework for other DEEs, where optimal treatment necessitates consideration of the underlying epileptic networks. Lastly, the review suggests future research directions, including individualized connectivity assessment and biomarker identification through collaborative efforts, which may enhance the therapeutic potential of neuromodulation for individuals living with DEEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debopam Samanta
- Division of Child Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Zulfi Haneef
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Neurology Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Gregory W Albert
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sunil Naik
- Department of Pediatrics and Neurology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Puck C Reeders
- Brain Institute, Nicklaus Children's Hospital, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Puneet Jain
- Epilepsy Program, Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taylor J Abel
- Departmen of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ruba Al-Ramadhani
- Division of Child Neurology, University of Pittsburgh, Department of Pediatrics, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - George M Ibrahim
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Program in Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Division of Neurosurgery, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Aaron E L Warren
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mass General Brigham, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brabant PJ, Beaudreault CP, Wolf SM, McGoldrick PE, Ghatan S, Muh CR. Responsive neurostimulation of the frontal lobe for the detection and treatment of seizures in intractable epilepsy due to tuberous sclerosis complex: illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY. CASE LESSONS 2024; 8:CASE23411. [PMID: 39378523 PMCID: PMC11465341 DOI: 10.3171/case23411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) is often considered to be a palliative therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is generally not considered to be a treatment for patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Here, the authors present the case of a 24-year-old male with TSC who obtained seizure freedom following RNS device implantation. OBSERVATIONS Prior to RNS device implantation, the patient underwent tuberectomies, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma resection, vagus nerve stimulator placement, and left frontal lobe resection but continued to have frequent seizures. An RNS device was implanted, which initially led to a decrease in seizures, but he continued to have 12 seizures per month. He then underwent lead revision for stimulation via a different electrode. After that lead change, he had no seizures for almost 3 years. In the following 3 years, he had two episodes of breakthrough seizures, both of which occurred with medication weans. Although the patient still requires antiseizure medication, he has had years of seizure freedom with RNS therapy. LESSONS This study exhibits the potential effectiveness of RNS therapy for patients with TSC and DRE. RNS should be considered for patients with TSC when other therapies have not sufficiently treated their epilepsy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23411.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steven M Wolf
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Boston Children’s Health Physicians, Hawthorne, New York
- Departments of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
| | - Patricia E McGoldrick
- Department of Pediatric Neurology, Boston Children’s Health Physicians, Hawthorne, New York
- Departments of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
| | - Saadi Ghatan
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
- Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Carrie R Muh
- New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York
- Departments of Pediatrics, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Maria Fareri Children’s Hospital, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Avila EK, Tobochnik S, Inati SK, Koekkoek JAF, McKhann GM, Riviello JJ, Rudà R, Schiff D, Tatum WO, Templer JW, Weller M, Wen PY. Brain tumor-related epilepsy management: A Society for Neuro-oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:7-24. [PMID: 37699031 PMCID: PMC10768995 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Tumor-related epilepsy (TRE) is a frequent and major consequence of brain tumors. Management of TRE is required throughout the course of disease and a deep understanding of diagnosis and treatment is key to improving quality of life. Gross total resection is favored from both an oncologic and epilepsy perspective. Shared mechanisms of tumor growth and epilepsy exist, and emerging data will provide better targeted therapy options. Initial treatment with antiseizure medications (ASM) in conjunction with surgery and/or chemoradiotherapy is typical. The first choice of ASM is critical to optimize seizure control and tolerability considering the effects of the tumor itself. These agents carry a potential for drug-drug interactions and therefore knowledge of mechanisms of action and interactions is needed. A review of adverse effects is necessary to guide ASM adjustments and decision-making. This review highlights the essential aspects of diagnosis and treatment of TRE with ASMs, surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy while indicating areas of uncertainty. Future studies should consider the use of a standardized method of seizure tracking and incorporating seizure outcomes as a primary endpoint of tumor treatment trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward K Avila
- Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Steven Tobochnik
- Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Neurology, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sara K Inati
- Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Johan A F Koekkoek
- Department of Neurology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Guy M McKhann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - James J Riviello
- Division of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience “Rita Levi Montalcini,” University of Turin, Italy
| | - David Schiff
- Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | - William O Tatum
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Jessica W Templer
- Department of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, Clinical Neuroscience Centre, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Center, and Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Karakas C, Houck K, Handoko M, Trandafir C, Coorg R, Haneef Z, Riviello JJ, Weiner HL, Curry D, Ali I. Responsive Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Children With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. Pediatr Neurol 2023; 145:97-101. [PMID: 37302216 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To review seizure outcomes in children with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) treated with the responsive neurostimulation (RNS) System. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed children (<21 years old) with TSC implanted with the RNS System at Texas Children's Hospital between July 2016 and May 2022. RESULTS Five patients meeting the search criteria were identified (all female). The median age of the RNS implantation was 13 years (range: 5 to 20 years). The median epilepsy duration before the RNS implantation was 13 years (range: 5 to 20 years). Surgeries before RNS implantation included vagus nerve stimulator placement (n = 2), left parietal resection (n = 1), and corpus callosotomy (n = 1). The median number of antiseizure medications tried before RNS was 8 (range: 5 to 12). The rationale for the RNS System implantation included seizure onset in eloquent cortex (n = 3) and multifocal seizures (n = 2). The maximum current density for each patient ranged between 1.8 and 3.5 μC/cm2, with an average daily stimulation of 2240 (range: 400 to 4200). There was an 86% median seizure reduction (range 0% to 99%) at a median follow-up duration of 25 months (range: 17 to 25 months). No patient experienced implantation or stimulation-related complications. CONCLUSIONS We observed a favorable improvement in seizure frequency in pediatric patients with DRE secondary to TSC treated with the RNS System. The RNS System may be a safe and effective treatment for DRE in children with TSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cemal Karakas
- Norton Children's Medical Group, The University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky
| | - Kimberly Houck
- Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Maureen Handoko
- Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Cristina Trandafir
- Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Rohini Coorg
- Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Zulfi Haneef
- Neurology Care Line, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas
| | - James J Riviello
- Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Howard L Weiner
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Daniel Curry
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosurgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Irfan Ali
- Section of Neurology and Developmental Neuroscience, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Singh A, Hadjinicolaou A, Peters JM, Salussolia CL. Treatment-Resistant Epilepsy and Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Treatment, Maintenance, and Future Directions. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2023; 19:733-748. [PMID: 37041855 PMCID: PMC10083014 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s347327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a neurogenetic disorder that affects multiple organ systems, including the heart, kidneys, eyes, skin, and central nervous system. The neurologic manifestations have the highest morbidity and mortality, in particular in children. Clinically, patients with TSC often present with new-onset seizures within the first year of life. TSC-associated epilepsy is often difficult to treat and refractory to multiple antiseizure medications. Refractory TSC-associated epilepsy is associated with increased risk of neurodevelopmental comorbidities, including developmental delay, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, and attention hyperactivity disorder. An increasing body of research suggests that early, effective treatment of TSC-associated epilepsy during critical neurodevelopmental periods can potentially improve cognitive outcomes. Therefore, it is important to treat TSC-associated epilepsy aggressively, whether it be with pharmacological therapy, surgical intervention, and/or neuromodulation. This review discusses current and future pharmacological treatments for TSC-associated epilepsy, as well as the importance of early surgical evaluation for refractory epilepsy in children with TSC and consideration of neuromodulatory interventions in young adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avantika Singh
- Division of Epilepsy and Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aristides Hadjinicolaou
- Division of Epilepsy and Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jurriaan M Peters
- Division of Epilepsy and Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine L Salussolia
- Division of Epilepsy and Neurophysiology, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Department of Neurology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Correspondence: Catherine L Salussolia, 3 Blackfan Circle, Center for Life Sciences 14060, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, Tel +617-355-7970, Email
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kusyk DM, Meinert J, Stabingas KC, Yin Y, Whiting AC. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Responsive Neurostimulation in Epilepsy. World Neurosurg 2022; 167:e70-e78. [PMID: 35948217 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuromodulatory implants provide promising alternatives for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in whom resective or ablative surgery is not an option. Responsive neurostimulation (RNS) operates a unique "closed-loop" system of electrocorticography-triggered stimulation for seizure control. A comprehensive review of the current literature would be valuable to guide clinical decision-making regarding RNS. METHODS Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocols, a systematic PubMed literature review was performed to identify appropriate studies involving patients undergoing RNS for DRE. Full texts of included studies were analyzed and extracted data regarding demographics, seizure reduction rate, responder rate (defined as patients with >50% seizure reduction), and complications were compiled for comprehensive statistical analysis. RESULTS A total of 313 studies were screened, and 17 studies were included in the final review, representative of 541 patients. Mean seizure reduction rate was 68% (95% confidence interval 61%-76%), and the mean responder rate was 68% (95% confidence interval 60%-75%). Complications occurred in 102 of 541 patients, for a complication rate of 18.9%. A strong publication bias toward greater seizure reduction rate and increased responder rate was demonstrated among included literature. CONCLUSIONS A meta-analysis of recent RNS for DRE literature demonstrates seizure reduction and responder rates comparable with other neuromodulatory implants for epilepsy, demonstrating both the value of this intervention and the need for further research to delineate the optimal patient populations. This analysis also demonstrates a strong publication bias toward positive primary outcomes, highlighting the limitations of current literature. Currently, RNS data are optimistic for the treatment of DRE but should be interpreted cautiously.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorian M Kusyk
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin Meinert
- College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Yue Yin
- Allegheny-Singer Research Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander C Whiting
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nie JZ, Karras CL, Trybula SJ, Texakalidis P, Alden TD. The role of neurosurgery in the management of tuberous sclerosis complex–associated epilepsy: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E6. [DOI: 10.3171/2022.2.focus21789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant, multisystem neurocutaneous disorder associated with cortical tubers, brain lesions seen in nearly all patients with TSC, which are frequently epileptogenic. Seizures are often the earliest clinical manifestation of TSC, leading to epilepsy in over 70% of patients. Medical management with antiepileptic drugs constitutes early therapy, but over 50% develop medically refractory epilepsy, necessitating surgical evaluation and treatment. The objective of this study was to summarize the literature and report seizure outcomes following surgical treatment for TSC-associated epilepsy.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed and Embase databases were searched for journal articles reporting seizure outcomes following epilepsy surgery in TSC patients. Included studies were placed into one of two groups based on the surgical technique used. Excellent and worthwhile seizure reductions were defined for each group as outcomes and extracted from each study.
RESULTS
A total of 46 studies were included. Forty of these studies reported seizure outcomes following any combination of resection, disconnection, and ablation on a collective 1157 patients. Excellent and worthwhile seizure reductions were achieved in 59% (683/1157) and 85% (450/528) of patients, respectively. Six of these studies reported seizure outcomes following treatment with neuromodulation. Excellent and worthwhile seizure reductions were achieved in 34% (24/70) and 76% (53/70) of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Surgery effectively controls seizures in select patients with TSC-associated epilepsy, but outcomes vary. Further understanding of TSC-associated epilepsy, improving localization strategies, and emerging surgical techniques represent promising avenues for improving surgical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Z. Nie
- Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois
| | - Constantine L. Karras
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - S. Joy Trybula
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - Pavlos Texakalidis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and
| | - Tord D. Alden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois; and
- Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nabavi Nouri M, Zak M, Jain P, Whitney R. Epilepsy Management in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex: Existing and Evolving Therapies and Future Considerations. Pediatr Neurol 2022; 126:11-19. [PMID: 34740132 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare autosomal dominant condition that affects multiple body systems. Disruption of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway results in abnormal cell growth, proliferation, protein synthesis, and cell differentiation and migration in TSC. In the central nervous system, mTOR disruption is also believed to influence neuronal excitability and promote epileptogenesis. Epilepsy is the most common neurological manifestation of TSC and affects 80% to 90% of individuals with high rates of treatment resistance (up to 75%). The onset of epilepsy in the majority of individuals with TSC occurs before the age of two years, which is a critical time in neurodevelopment. Both medically refractory epilepsy and early-onset epilepsy are associated with intellectual disability in TSC, while seizure control and remission are associated with lower rates of cognitive impairment. Our current knowledge of the treatment of epilepsy in TSC has expanded immensely over the last decade. Several new therapies such as preemptive vigabatrin therapy in infants, cannabidiol, and mTOR inhibitors have emerged in recent years for the treatment of epilepsy in TSC. This review will provide clinicians with a comprehensive overview of the pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies available for the treatment of epilepsy related to TSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Nabavi Nouri
- Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Maria Zak
- Division of Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Puneet Jain
- Division of Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robyn Whitney
- Division of Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rao VR. Chronic electroencephalography in epilepsy with a responsive neurostimulation device: current status and future prospects. Expert Rev Med Devices 2021; 18:1093-1105. [PMID: 34696676 DOI: 10.1080/17434440.2021.1994388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Implanted neurostimulation devices are gaining traction as therapeutic options for people with certain forms of drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Some of these devices enable chronic electroencephalography (cEEG), which offers views of the dynamics of brain activity in epilepsy over unprecedented time horizons. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on clinical insights and basic neuroscience discoveries enabled by analyses of cEEG from an exemplar device, the NeuroPace RNS® System. Applications of RNS cEEG covered here include counting and lateralizing seizures, quantifying medication response, characterizing spells, forecasting seizures, and exploring mechanisms of cognition. Limitations of the RNS System are discussed in the context of next-generation devices in development. EXPERT OPINION The wide temporal lens of cEEG helps capture the dynamism of epilepsy, revealing phenomena that cannot be appreciated with short duration recordings. The RNS System is a vanguard device whose diagnostic utility rivals its therapeutic benefits, but emerging minimally invasive devices, including those with subscalp recording electrodes, promise to be more applicable within a broad population of people with epilepsy. Epileptology is on the precipice of a paradigm shift in which cEEG is a standard part of diagnostic evaluations and clinical management is predicated on quantitative observations integrated over long timescales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vikram R Rao
- Associate Professor of Clinical Neurology, Chief, Epilepsy Division, Department of Neurology and Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Updated International Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Diagnostic Criteria and Surveillance and Management Recommendations. Pediatr Neurol 2021; 123:50-66. [PMID: 34399110 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2021.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 272] [Impact Index Per Article: 90.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/20/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is an autosomal dominant genetic disease affecting multiple body systems with wide variability in presentation. In 2013, Pediatric Neurology published articles outlining updated diagnostic criteria and recommendations for surveillance and management of disease manifestations. Advances in knowledge and approvals of new therapies necessitated a revision of those criteria and recommendations. METHODS Chairs and working group cochairs from the 2012 International TSC Consensus Group were invited to meet face-to-face over two days at the 2018 World TSC Conference on July 25 and 26 in Dallas, TX, USA. Before the meeting, working group cochairs worked with group members via e-mail and telephone to (1) review TSC literature since the 2013 publication, (2) confirm or amend prior recommendations, and (3) provide new recommendations as required. RESULTS Only two changes were made to clinical diagnostic criteria reported in 2013: "multiple cortical tubers and/or radial migration lines" replaced the more general term "cortical dysplasias," and sclerotic bone lesions were reinstated as a minor criterion. Genetic diagnostic criteria were reaffirmed, including highlighting recent findings that some individuals with TSC are genetically mosaic for variants in TSC1 or TSC2. Changes to surveillance and management criteria largely reflected increased emphasis on early screening for electroencephalographic abnormalities, enhanced surveillance and management of TSC-associated neuropsychiatric disorders, and new medication approvals. CONCLUSIONS Updated TSC diagnostic criteria and surveillance and management recommendations presented here should provide an improved framework for optimal care of those living with TSC and their families.
Collapse
|
11
|
McDermott DS, Mirro EA, Fetrow K, Burdette DE, Chen S, Hopp J, Masel T, Johnson EA, Elefant FMK, Le S, Patra SE, Brown MG, Haneef Z. Brain-Responsive Neurostimulation for the treatment of adults with epilepsy in tuberous sclerosis complex: A case series. Epilepsia Open 2021; 6:419-424. [PMID: 34033253 PMCID: PMC8166788 DOI: 10.1002/epi4.12481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 02/18/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a genetic disorder primarily characterized by the development of multisystem benign tumors. Epilepsy is the most common neurologic manifestation, affecting 80%-90% of TSC patients. The diffuse structural brain abnormalities and the multifocal nature of epilepsy in TSC pose diagnostic challenges when evaluating patients for epilepsy surgery. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the safety experience and efficacy outcomes of five adult TSC patients who were treated with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation (RNS System, NeuroPace, Inc). RESULTS The average follow-up duration was 20 months. All five patients were responders (≥50% disabling seizure reduction) at last follow-up. The median reduction in disabling seizures was 58% at 1 year and 88% at last follow-up. Three of the five patients experienced some period of seizure freedom ranging from 3 months to over 1 year. SIGNIFICANCE In this small case series, we report the first safety experience and efficacy outcomes in patients with TSC-associated drug-resistant focal epilepsy treated with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kirsten Fetrow
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Stephanie Chen
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jennifer Hopp
- University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Todd Masel
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Emily A Johnson
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | | | | | | - Mesha-Gay Brown
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|