Setting a Protective Threshold Value for Silver Toward Freshwater Organisms

European freshwater silver monitoring data do not suggest a potential European-wide risk

European legislations frequently focus on substances that are of potential concern to human or environmental health, such as "priority substances" under the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC ("WFD") that are identified as substances posing a significant risk to or via the aquatic environment. The EU REACH regulation also requires the assessment of the environmental risks of chemicals put on the EU market. To properly assess the potential risk of a substance, high-quality representative monitoring data should be compared with a safe threshold concentration. The objective of this article is to evaluate different publicly available freshwater monitoring data sets for silver and investigate them for a potential European-wide risk according to the methodology used by the European Commission. Most available silver monitoring data sets contain a large proportion of undetected samples with a reported concentration below the limit of quantification (LOQ) of the analytical technique, leading to considerable uncertainty in the data set. For silver, this LOQ is often at or above the safe threshold concentration, and the method used to handle undetected samples during the data processing considerably impacts the data assessment. We demonstrate that for large data sets covering many European countries (and often a wide range of LOQs), the uncertainty in the data set does not allow us to make a general conclusion about European-wide risk. However, by examining the data sets in more detail and assessing three additional country-specific monitoring data sets, we show that silver does not pose a risk to the freshwater environment in several countries. We conclude that the available data sets need careful assessment to account for the values that are below the LOQ, and that there is currently no reliable evidence indicating a European-wide risk for silver in the aquatic environment, meaning it should not be selected as  priority substance under the WFD. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2023;00:1-10. © 2022 SETAC.

Mercury, silver and selenium in serum before and after removal of amalgam restorations: results from a prospective cohort study in Norway

OBJECTIVE

A prospective cohort study on changes of health complaints after removal of amalgam restorations was carried out at the request of the Norwegian Directorate of Health. The aim was to provide and evaluate experimental treatment to patients with health complaints attributed to dental amalgam fillings.

METHODS

Patients (n = 32) with medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS), which were attributed to dental amalgam restorations had all their amalgam restorations removed and replaced with other dental restorative materials. Samples of blood were collected before and 1 year after removal of the fillings, and concentration of inorganic mercury (I-Hg), methylmercury (MeHg), silver (Ag) and selenium (Se) in serum was determined by inductively coupled plasma-sector field mass spectrometry. The comparison groups (one with MUPS but without attribution to amalgam [n = 28] and one group of healthy individuals [n = 19]) received no treatment. The participants responded to questionnaires at baseline and at follow-up after 1 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Concentration of I-Hg and Ag in serum decreased significantly after removal of all amalgam restorations. Concentration of MeHg and Se in serum were not changed. Intensity of health complaints was significantly reduced after amalgam removal, but there were no statistically significant correlations between exposure indicators and health complaints.

CONCLUSIONS

Removal of all amalgam restorations is followed by a decrease of concentration of I-Hg and Ag in serum. The results support the hypothesis that exposure to amalgam fillings causes an increase of the daily dose of both I-Hg and Ag. Even though intensity of health complaints decreased after removal of all amalgam restorations there was no clear evidence of a direct relationship between exposure and health complaints. Trial registration: The project is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01682278).

Comparative evaluation of the mechanisms of toxicity of graphene oxide and graphene oxide quantum dots to blue-green algae Microcystis aeruginosa in the aquatic environment

Due to the diverse applications, graphene-family nanomaterials (GFNs) have a high probability of release into the aquatic system, potentially posing risks to the aquatic environment. The acute effects on single-celled Microcystis aeruginosa by graphene oxide (GO) or graphene oxide quantum dots (GOQDs) were compared in the present study. GOQDs dispersed more effectively in water than GO at all pH values tested. The 96-hour median effective concentration (EC₅₀) of GO and GOQDs were determined to be 49.32 and 22.46 mg/L, respectively. Both GO and GOQDs were internalized by heteroagglomeration and envelopment processes, with GOQDs inducing stronger upregulation of cell permeability, plasmolysis and lipid bodies than GO. Cracking of thylakoid layers, disappearance of nucleoid, and disintegration of cell infrastructure were observed at higher concentrations. In comparison to GO, GOQDs induced higher reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (MDA) and disrupted antioxidant enzymes, leading to the inhibition of cellular contents such as chlorophyll a and proteins. Furthermore, both GO and GOQDs adsorbed nutrients from the algal medium, resulting in nutrient depletion-induced indirect toxicity, with GOQDs depleting more nutrients than GO. The current study provides new understanding of nanotoxicity of GO and GOQD and aids in the potential risks of nanomaterials in aquatic environments.