Methylation profile of the MLH1 promoter region and their relationship to colorectal carcinogenesis

Microsatellite Instability-high-positive Cancer of Unknown Primary Origin with a Long-term Survival after Surgery Alone

An 80-year-old woman was referred to our hospital for a thorough examination of enlarged lymph nodes on the lesser curvature of the stomach. Upon suspicion of malignant lymphoma, the patient underwent open lymphadenectomy and was diagnosed with lymph node metastasis of poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. The patient was subsequently diagnosed with microsatellite instability-high cancer of unknown primary origin. Surgical removal of the affected lymph nodes achieved full remission. Chemotherapy was considered in case of recurrence or identification of the primary site. Recurrence has not occurred in three years since the surgery. However, a long-term survival without chemotherapy is rare.

Haplotype defined by the MLH1-93G/A polymorphism is associated with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in sporadic colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND

Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region has been suggested to be a major mechanism of gene inactivation in sporadic microsatellite instability-positive (MSI-H) colorectal cancers (CRCs). Recently, single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in the MLH1 promoter region (MLH1-93G/A; rs1800734) has been proposed to be associated with MLH1 promoter methylation, loss of MLH1 protein expression and MSI-H tumors. We examined the association of MLH1-93G/A and six other SNPs surrounding MLH1-93G/A with the methylation status in 210 consecutive sporadic CRCs in Japanese patients.

METHODS

Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region was evaluated by Na-bisulfite polymerase chain reaction (PCR)/single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. The genotype frequencies of SNPs located in the 54-kb region surrounding the MLH1-93G/A SNP were examined by SSCP analysis.

RESULTS

Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region was observed in 28.6% (60/210) of sporadic CRCs. The proportions of MLH1-93G/A genotypes A/A, A/G and G/G were 26% (n=54), 51% (n=108) and 23% (n=48), respectively, and they were significantly associated with the methylation status (p=0.01). There were no significant associations between genotype frequency of the six other SNPs and methylation status. The A-allele of MLH1-93G/A was more common in cases with methylation than the G-allele (p=0.0094), especially in females (p=0.0067). In logistic regression, the A/A genotype of the MLH1-93G/A SNP was shown to be the most significant risk factor for methylation of the MLH1 promoter region (odds ratio 2.82, p=0.003). Furthermore, a haplotype of the A-allele of rs2276807 located -47 kb upstream from the MLH1-93G/A SNP and the A-allele of MLH1-93G/A SNP was significantly associated with MLH1 promoter methylation.

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that individuals, and particularly females, carrying the A-allele at the MLH1-93G/A SNP, especially in association with the A-allele of rs2276807, may harbor an increased risk of methylation of the MLH1 promoter region.

Epimutation and cancer: a new carcinogenic mechanism of Lynch syndrome (Review)

Epimutation is defined as abnormal transcriptional repression of active genes and/or abnormal activation of usually repressed genes caused by errors in epigenetic gene repression. Epimutation arises in somatic cells and the germline, and constitutional epimutation may also occur. Epimutation is the first step of tumorigenesis and can be a direct cause of carcinogenesis. Cancers associated with epimutation include Lynch syndrome (hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, HNPCC), chronic lymphocytic leukemia, breast cancer and ovarian cancer. Epimutation has been shown for many tumor suppressor genes, including RB, VHL, hMLH1, APC and BRCA1, in sporadic cancers. Methylation has recently been shown in DNA from normal tissues and peripheral blood in cases of sporadic colorectal cancer and many studies show constitutive epimutation in cancers. Epimutation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes (BRCA1, hMLH1 and hMSH2) involved in development familial cancers has also been found. These results have led to a focus on epimutation as a novel oncogenic mechanism.

Pharmacoepigenomics in colorectal cancer: a step forward in predicting prognosis and treatment response

Despite therapeutic innovations and increasing education on lifestyle to prevent colorectal cancer, it is still one of the most common cancer types, and for men the second cause of cancer-related death. Lately, much attention has been given to identify molecular markers involved in colorectal cancer prognosis and treatment with the aim to develop a more accurate classification system based on (epi)genetic alterations and, in addition, find markers that could potentially enhance management of colorectal cancer by predicting treatment response in advance. Although many genetic markers have been claimed to have prognostic or predictive influence, results are often inconclusive and, with some exception, they are not used in standard practice. Epigenetic alterations have received less attention although they are probably even more interesting as they can potentially be reversed through drug treatment. This review describes the current knowledge on the prognostic and predictive value of epigenetic markers in colorectal cancer.

Transgenerational epigenetic effects

Transgenerational epigenetic effects include all processes that have evolved to achieve the nongenetic determination of phenotype. There has been a long-standing interest in this area from evolutionary biologists, who refer to it as non-Mendelian inheritance. Transgenerational epigenetic effects include both the physiological and behavioral (intellectual) transfer of information across generations. Although in most cases the underlying molecular mechanisms are not understood, modifications of the chromosomes that pass to the next generation through gametes are sometimes involved, which is called transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. There is a trend for those outside the field of molecular biology to assume that most cases of transgenerational epigenetic effects are the result of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance, in part because of a misunderstanding of the terms. Unfortunately, this is likely to be far from the truth.

Clinical features and mismatch repair genes analyses of Chinese suspected hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer: a cost-effective screening strategy proposal

China has the largest numbers of hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) patients based on its population of 1.4 billion. However, the clinical data and mismatch repair (MMR) gene analyses have been limited. Here we performed microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) analyses on a series of patients with a high-risk for HNPCC: 61 patients with family histories fulfilling Amsterdam criteria II (ACII-HNPCC) or suspected HNPCC criteria (S-HNPCC), and 106 early onset colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Sixty late-onset CRC patients were used as control. Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter was analyzed on tumors lacking hMLH1 expression. MMR germ-line mutations were screened on patients with tumors classified as MSI-H/L or negative for IHC. We identified 27 germ-line MMR variants in the 167 patients with a high-risk for HNPCC while only one germ-line mutation in hMSH6 was found in the late-onset CRC group. Of those, 23 were pathogenic mutations. The high incidence of gastric and hepatobiliary cancers coupled with the increasing number of small families in China reduces the sensitivity (43.5%, 30.4%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (45.5%, 17.9%) of the ACII- or S-HNPCC criteria. MSI or IHC testing are highly sensitive in detecting pathogenic mutations (sensitivities = 91.3% and 95.6%, respectively), but the PPVs are quite low (25.6% and 27.8%, respectively). Considering that all 12 tumors with pathogenic mutations in hMLH1 also showed promoter unmethylation, the sensitivity of IHC in conjunction with hMLH1 promoter methylation analysis is not reduced, but the PPV was increased from 27.8% to 61.1%, and the total cost was greatly reduced.

Role of the BRAF mutations in the microsatellite instability genetic pathway in sporadic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Between 10 and 15% of all cases of colorectal cancer are the result of microsatellite instability (MSI) in the genetic pathway due to an alteration in the DNA repair genes. Tumors with high MSI are characterized by a better prognosis. The BRAF oncogene has been linked to the MSI pathway in tumorogenesis. The objective of this study was to determine whether alterations in BRAF are related to MSI and whether they can result in differences in survival rates.

METHODS

The study cohort comprised 351 patients diagnosed with sporadic colorectal cancer. MSI was determined in accordance with the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) recommendations by means of PCR and sequence analyses. Mutational analysis of the BRAF gene was performed by real-time PCR and subsequent sequencing of the altered samples. The methylation pattern of the hMLH1 gene was determined using methylation-specific PCR analyses of bisulfite-treated DNA and the results confirmed by sequencing.

RESULTS

Of the patients tested, 6.9% showed high MSI and 3.7% showed a BRAF gene mutation. hMLH1 methylation was observed in 67.2% of the patients with MSI and/or the BRAF alteration. The BRAF mutation was related to the MSI genetic pathway (P < 0.0001) and with hMLH1 methylation. In the analysis of overall survival only MSI had an independent prognostic value for the risk of death. Patients with the BRAF mutation showed a higher risk of death, although this association was found not to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a subgroup of carcinomas which develop via the MSI pathway that carry an alteration of the BRAF gene. This alteration confers a poorer outcome on these patients within the total group of patients with MSI who have a better prognosis. This hypothesis should be further investigated in a larger study population due to the low incidence of BRAF mutations in colorectal cancer.

Tumor buds show reduced expression of laminin-5 gamma 2 chain in DNA mismatch repair deficient colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Tumor budding at the invasive margin of colorectal cancer is an important adverse prognostic factor. The subset of colorectal cancer that is deficient in DNA mismatch repair has been associated with a good prognosis. It is hypothesized that tumor budding in this subset may lack biologic aggressiveness because it is not associated with aberrant expression of the independent prognostic factor, laminin-5 gamma 2.

METHODS

Eighty colorectal cancers with high-grade tumor budding were studied, including nine sporadic colorectal cancers with immunohistochemical loss of expression of MLH1 (MLH1(-)), seven colorectal cancers from patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, and 64 sporadic colorectal cancers expressing both MLH1 and MSH2 (MLH1(+)). Two regulatory mechanisms for laminin-5 gamma 2 expression were explored, including aberrant nuclear expression of beta-catenin by immunohistochemistry and promoter methylation of laminin-5 gamma 2 by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Only three of nine MLH1(-) colorectal cancers showed expression of laminin-5 gamma 2 compared with 46 of 64 MLH1(+) colorectal cancers (P = 0.05). Only two of seven hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers expressed laminin-5 gamma 2 compared with MLH1(+) colorectal cancers (P= 0.03). Expression of nuclear beta-catenin was more frequent (58 percent) in MLH1(+) colorectal cancers compared with MLH1(-) colorectal cancers (11 percent, P = 0.01). Methylation of laminin-5 gamma 2 was found in 5 of 38 (13 percent) cases but did not differ among colorectal cancer subsets. Four of five colorectal cancers with methylation of laminin-5 gamma 2 were scored as negative for laminin-5 gamma 2 by immunohistochemistry.

CONCLUSIONS

The reduced expression of laminin-5 gamma 2 in colorectal cancers with deficient DNA mismatch repair may underlie a variant of tumor budding that is relatively nonaggressive.

Microsatellite instability caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided sporadic colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVE

A subset of sporadic colorectal cancers (SCRCs) exhibits microsatellite instability (MSI). Most MSI in SCRCs is caused by hMLH1 inactivation due to promoter methylation. However, the role of MSI in the progression of SCRCs remains unclear.

METHODS

Thirty-two intramucosal cancers and 63 cancers with submucosal invasion were assigned to group 1 (early-stage cancer), and 30 Dukes' B and 26 Dukes' C cancers to group 2 (advanced-stage cancer). hMLH1 promoter methylation status was determined by methylation-specific PCR. MSI was determined using five markers. hMLH1 expression was determined immunohistochemically.

RESULTS

MSI was found in 1 of 95 (1.1%) tumors in group 1, compared with 4 of 56 (7.1%) tumors in group 2. In right-sided tumors, the overall frequency of hMLH1-methylation-positive tumors in group 1 was not significantly different from that in group 2 (17 of 43, 39.5%, vs. 9 of 23, 39.1%). In right-sided tumors with hMLH1 promoter methylation, the frequency of MSI-positive tumors in group 1 was significantly lower than that in group 2 (1 of 17, 5.9%, vs. 4 of 9, 44.4%, p=0.0081).

CONCLUSION

The frequency of MSI caused by hMLH1 promoter methylation increases with tumor progression in right-sided SCRCs.

DNA binding sites for putative methylation boundaries in the unmethylated region of the BRCA1 promoter

Changes in DNA methylation patterns are frequently observed in human cancers and are associated with a decrease in tumor suppressor gene expression. Hypermethylation of the BRCA1 promoter has been reported in a portion of sporadic breast tumours that correspond to a reduction in BRCA1 transcription and expression. Questions remain concerning the maintenance of methylation free zones in promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes in normal tissues. Sodium bisulfite based analysis of the BRCA1 promoter defines a methylation free zone in normal breast tissue that starts 650 bp upstream of the transcription start site and extends for 1.4 kb through most of the BRCA1 CpG island. We provide data implicating 2 proteins, Sp1 and CTCF, in the maintenance of this methylation-free zone. Both of these proteins have been shown to function as methylation boundaries in other genes. Four Sp1 sites have been identified in the BRCA1 promoter by gel shift assays. In vivo binding of Sp1 has been confirmed at 2 of these sites in the BRCA1 promoter and at 2 CTCF sites that flank the unmethylated region. Our data suggest that these DNA binding sites for Sp1 and CTCF may act as boundary elements that are important in maintaining genomic integrity by delineating the normal methylation free BRCA1 promoter. Inactivation or disruption of these boundaries may facilitate an epigenetic "hit", in this case DNA methylation, leading to BRCA1 downregulation and contributing to tumorigenesis, particularly the genesis of sporadic breast tumours.

Extensive but hemiallelic methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region in early-onset sporadic colon cancers with microsatellite instability

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region is frequently observed in microsatellite instability (MSI)-positive sporadic colorectal carcinomas. We studied hMLH1 promoter methylation in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 87 index patients representing 29 cases of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers (HNPCCs), 28 cases of atypical HNPCCs, and 30 sporadic cases of the development of early-onset colorectal carcinomas or multiple primary cancers.

METHODS

Methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region was analyzed by Na-bisulfite polymerase chain reaction/single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis or methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction. MSI, allelic status of the hMLH1 locus, and loss of hMLH1 protein expression were examined in cases for which tumor tissues were available.

RESULTS

Extensive methylation of the hMLH1 promoter was detected in peripheral blood lymphocytes of 4 of 30 patients with sporadic early-onset colon cancer, among whom multiple primary cancers (1 colon and 1 endometrial cancer) developed in 2 cases. This methylation was not detected in analyses of HNPCC or atypical HNPCC groups or healthy control subjects. MSI was positive, and extensive methylation was detected in both cancers (colon and endometrial cancer) and normal tissues (colon, gastric mucosa, endometrium, and bone marrow) in all of the examined cases (3 of 3). Analysis of a polymorphic site in the hMLH1 promoter in 2 informative cases showed that methylation was hemiallelic. In 1 case, the unmethylated allele was lost in the colon cancer but not in the metachronous endometrial cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Constitutive, hemiallelic methylation of the hMLH1 promoter region was shown to be associated with carcinogenesis in sporadic, early-onset MSI-positive colon cancers.

Mutations of BRAF are associated with extensive hMLH1 promoter methylation in sporadic colorectal carcinomas

Activating mutations of BRAF have been frequently observed in microsatellite unstable (MSI+) colorectal carcinomas (CRCs), in which mutations of BRAF and KRAS are mutually exclusive. Previously, we reported that hypermethylation of hMLH1 might play an important role in the tumorigenesis of right-sided sporadic CRCs with MSI showing less frequency of KRAS/TP53 alteration. Therefore, we have assumed that BRAF mutations might be highly associated with hMLH1 methylation status rather than MSI status. In this study, mutations of BRAF and KRAS and their relationship with MSI and hMLH1 methylation status were examined in 140 resected specimens of CRC. The methylation status was classified into 3 types: full methylation (FM), partial methylation (PM) and nonmethylation (NM). Only FM closely linked to reduced expression of hMLH1 protein. BRAF mutations were found in 16 cases (11%), all leading to the production of BRAF(V599E). As for MSI status, BRAF mutations were found in 43% of MSI+ and 4% of MSI- cases (p < 0.0001). Among the MSI+ individuals, BRAF mutations were more frequent in cases with hMLH1 deficiency (58%) than those with hMSH2 deficiency (0%; p=0.02). Moreover, they were found in 69% of FM, 4% of PM and 4% of NM, revealing a striking difference between FM and the other 2 groups (FM vs. PM or NM; p < 0.0001). These findings suggest that BRAF activation may participate in the carcinogenesis of sporadic CRCs with hMLH1 hypermethylation in the proximal colon, independently of KRAS activation.

Regulation of the human MSH6 gene by the Sp1 transcription factor and alteration of promoter activity and expression by polymorphisms

Defects in human DNA mismatch repair have been reported to underlie a variety of hereditary and sporadic cancer cases. We characterized the structure of the MSH6 promoter region to examine the mechanisms of transcriptional regulation of the MSH6 gene. The 5'-flanking region of the MSH6 gene was found to contain seven functional Sp1 transcription factor binding sites that each bind Sp1 and Sp3 and contribute to promoter activity. Transcription did not appear to require a TATA box and resulted in multiple start sites, including two major start sites and at least nine minor start sites. Three common polymorphisms were identified in the promoter region (-557 T-->G, -448 G-->A, and -159 C-->T): the latter two were always associated, and each of these functionally inactivated a different Sp1 site. The polymorphic allele -448 A -159 T was demonstrated to be a common Caucasian polymorphism found in 16% of Caucasians and resulted in a five-Sp1-site promoter that had 50% less promoter activity and was more sensitive to inactivation by DNA methylation than the more common seven Sp1 site promoter allele, which was only partially inactivated by DNA methylation. In cell lines, this five-Sp1-site polymorphism resulted in reduced MSH6 expression at both the mRNA and protein level. An additional 2% of Caucasians contained another polymorphism, -210 C-->T, which inactivated a single Sp1 site that also contributes to promoter activity.

Role of promoter methylation in regulation of the mammalian heparanase gene

Mammalian heparanase (endo-beta-glucuronidase) degrades heparan sulfate proteoglycans and is an important modulator of the extracellular matrix and associated factors. The enzyme is preferentially expressed in neoplastic tissues and contributes to tumour metastasis and angiogenesis. To investigate the epigenetic regulation of the heparanase locus, methylation-specific and bisulfite PCR were performed on a panel of 22 human cancer cell lines. Cytosine methylation of the heparanase promoter was associated with inactivation of the affected allele. Despite lack of sequence homology, extensively methylated CpG islands were found both in human choriocarcinoma (JAR) and rat glioma (C-6) cells which lack heparanase activity. Treatment of these cells with demethylating agents (5-azacytidine, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine) resulted in stable dose- and time-dependant promoter hypomethylation accompanied by reappearance of heparanase mRNA, protein and enzymatic activity. An inhibitor of histone deacetylase, Trichostatin A, failed to induce either of these effects. Upregulation of heparanase expression and activity by demethylating drugs was associated with a marked increase in lung colonization by pretreated C-6 rat glioma cells. The increased metastatic potential in vivo was inhibited in mice treated with laminaran sulfate, a potent inhibitor of heparanase activity. We propose a model wherein expression of mammalian heparanase gene is modulated by the interplay between trans-activating genetic and cis-inhibitory epigenetic elements in its promoter.