A novel region of amplification at 11p12-13 in gastric cancer, revealed by representational difference analysis, is associated with overexpression of CD44v6, especially in early-onset gastric carcinomas

Apoptosis Inhibitor 5: A Multifaceted Regulator of Cell Fate

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a fundamental process that maintains tissue homeostasis, eliminates damaged or infected cells, and plays a crucial role in various biological phenomena. The deregulation of apoptosis is involved in many human diseases, including cancer. One of the emerging players in the intricate regulatory network of apoptosis is apoptosis inhibitor 5 (API5), also called AAC-11 (anti-apoptosis clone 11) or FIF (fibroblast growth factor-2 interacting factor). While it may not have yet the same level of notoriety as some other cancer-associated proteins, API5 has garnered increasing attention in the cancer field in recent years, as elevated API5 levels are often associated with aggressive tumor behavior, resistance to therapy, and poor patient prognosis. This review aims to shed light on the multifaceted functions and regulatory mechanisms of API5 in cell fate decisions as well as its interest as therapeutic target in cancer.

De novo expression of CD44 variants in sporadic and hereditary gastric cancer

CD44 is the major ubiquitously expressed cell surface receptor for hyaluronate. The CD44 gene encodes several protein isoforms due to extensive alternative splicing and post-translational modifications. Some of these CD44 variable isoforms have been foreseen as key players in malignant transformation and their expression is highly restricted and highly specific, unlike the canonical CD44 standard isoform. In this study, we aimed at dissecting the mRNA splicing pattern of CD44 in normal stomach and gastric cancer (GC) cell lines (n=9) using cloning and quantitative mRNA amplification assays. Moreover, we assessed the RNA levels and protein expression pattern of relevant splicing forms in distinct premalignant and malignant gastric lesions (sporadic (n=43) and hereditary (n=3) forms) using real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry. We also explored the association of CD44 and E-cadherin expression by immunohistochemistry, as E-cadherin has a pivotal functional role in GC. We established the pattern of CD44 variant forms in normal stomach and gastric malignancy. We observed that although exon v6-containing isoforms were rarely expressed in normal gastric mucosa, they became increasingly expressed both in gastric premalignant (hyperplastic polyps, complete and incomplete intestinal metaplasia, low- and high-grade dysplasia) and malignant lesions (cell lines derived from GCs, primary sporadic GCs and hereditary diffuse GCs (HDGCs)). Moreover, we verified that whenever E-cadherin expression was absent, exon v6-containing CD44 isoforms were overexpressed. The lack of expression of CD44 isoforms containing exon v6 in the surface and foveolar epithelia of normal stomach and, its de novo expression in premalignant, as well as in sporadic and hereditary malignant lesions of the stomach, pinpoint CD44 v6-containing isoforms as potential biomarkers for early transformation of the gastric mucosa. Further, our results raise the hypothesis of using CD44v6 as a marker of early invasive intramucosal carcinoma in HDGC CDH1 mutation carriers that lack CDH1 expression in their tumors.

Relationship between CD44v6 expression and tumor biological behavior in gastric carcinoma

AIM: To investigate the expression of CD44v6 in gastric cancer and analyze its relationship with tumor biological behavior.

METHODS: Fifty patients with gastric carcinoma, who were treated at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Liaoning Medical University between 2004 and 2009 and had detailed pathological data, were included in the study. The expression of CD44v6 in operative and gastroscopic samples collected from these patients was detected by immunohistochemistry using the streptavidin-peroxidase method.

RESULTS: The positive rates of CD44v6 expression in gastroscopic and operative samples and metastatic lymph node samples were 60.00%, 64.00% and 80.77%, respectively, significantly higher than that in benign gastric mucosa lesions (all P < 0.01). The positive rate of CD44v6 expression in intestinal-type gastric carcinoma tissue was significantly higher than that in diffuse-type gastric tissue (75.86% vs 47.62%, P < 0.05). The expression of CD44v6 was significantly correlated with the depth of invasion, TNM stage and lymph node metastasis in gastroscopic and operative samples (all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the positive rate of CD44v6 expression between gastroscopic and operative samples (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: CD44v6 may be used as a new parameter for preoperative prediction of the development, progression and metastatic potential of gastric carcinoma.

Early-onset gastric cancer: Learning lessons from the young

There is by no means a clear-cut pattern of mutations contributing to gastric cancers, and gastric cancer research can be hampered by the diversity of factors that can induce gastric cancer, such as Helicobacter pylori infection, diet, ageing and other environmental factors. Tumours are unquestionably riddled with genetic changes yet we are faced with an unsolvable puzzle with respect to a temporal relationship. It is postulated that inherited genetic factors may be more important in early-onset gastric cancer (EOGC) than in gastric cancers found in older patients as they have less exposure to environmental carcinogens. EOGC, therefore, could provide a key to unravelling the genetic changes in gastric carcinogenesis. Gastric cancers occurring in young patients provide an ideal background on which to try and uncover the initiating stages of gastric carcinogenesis. This review summarizes the literature regarding EOGC and also presents evidence that these cancers have a unique molecular-genetic phenotype, distinct from conventional gastric cancer.

Current status and issues in cancer stem cell study

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) have been positively identified and successfully isolated from some but not all cancers. The studies on CSCs to date suggest that these cells are rare among the tumor cell population, and they are capable of self-renewing and maintaining tumor growth and heterogeneity. Therapies aimed at CSCs have shown some promise, but their further development will require a more thorough understanding of the biology of CSCs and methods for identifying and isolating this cell subpopulation. This review examines what is known to date regarding the similarities and differences between cancer and somatic stem cells: CSC surface marker development and cell isolation (including a model isolation from our lab), the frequency, potential origin, and signal transduction of CSCs, and the current state of CSC-targeting therapeutic strategies.

Involvement of CD44, a molecule with a thousand faces, in cancer dissemination

Tumor progression is substantially dependent on network of multiple factors, including adhesion and homing molecules, which support the malignant metastatic spread. CD44, one of the adhesion/homing molecules, has attracted much attention not only because it is expressed on many types of tumors, but also owing to its numerous functions, such as supporting cell migration and transmitting survival signals, thereby being pro-oncogenic by nature. We have used the mouse malignant LB lymphoma cell line as a model for comprehensive in vitro and in vivo analyses of the interaction between CD44 and hyaluronic acid (HA), and its relevance to tumor dissemination. The in vitro studies revealed that LB cells could not bind HA, either under static or dynamic (i.e., shear flow) conditions, unless their CD44 is activated by phorbol ester, deglycosylated (to increase the CD44 positive net charge) or transfected with CD44 variants. In parallel, in vivo experiments showed that LB cell dissemination could be controlled by injection of anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies or hyaluronidase. Furthermore, LB cells transfected with CD44v4-v10 variant, rather than standard CD44, displayed enhanced invasion of the peripheral lymph nodes. This effect was completely lost if the HA binding site of CD44 were mutated. LB cell accumulation in the lymph nodes is caused by enhanced migration via the afferent lymphatics rather than by accelerated proliferation within the lymph node. This information can be exploited to tailor a "therapeutic suit" that should be maximally effective in inducing tumor resistance, while minimizing destructive side effects.

Moesin expression is a marker of basal breast carcinomas

Basal breast cancers (BBCs) have a high risk of metastasis, recurrence and death. Formal subtype definition relies on gene expression but can be approximated by protein expression. New markers are needed to help in the management of the basal subtype of breast cancer. In a previous transcriptional analysis of breast cell lines we found that Moesin expression was a potential basal marker. We show here that Moesin protein expression is a basal marker in breast tumors. In a tissue microarray (TMA) containing 547 sporadic breast cancers, of which 108 were profiled for gene expression, Moesin was expressed in 31% of all tumors and in 82% of the basal tumors. To confirm that Moesin expression remained associated with the basal phenotype in specific types of BBCs, we analyzed Moesin expression in 2 other TMAs containing 40 medullary breast cancers (MBCs) and 27 BRCA1-associated breast cancers (BRCA1-BCs), respectively. Moesin was strongly expressed in MBCs (87%; p = 2.4 x 10(-5)) and in BRCA1-BCs (58%; p = 1.3 x 10(-5)) as compared with non-MBCs and sporadic cases. Moesin-expressing tumors display features of BBCs, such as high proliferation rate, hormone receptors negativity, expression of putative basal/myoepithelial markers (CAV1, CD10, CK5/6, CK14, EGFR, P53, P-cadherin and SMA). Survival analysis showed a reduced specific survival and metastasis-free survival in Moesin-expressing tumors by log-rank test (p(SS) = 0.014 and p(MFS) = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, Moesin expression was nearly an independent prognostic marker of poor outcome as shown by Cox proportional hazard model in patients without lymph node metastasis (p = 0.052, HR = 2.38, CI 95[0.99-5.69]).