Molecular characterization and follow-up of five CML patients with new BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts

The Recurrent Atypical e8a2 BCR::ABL1 Transcript with Insertion of an Inverted 55 Base Pair ABL1 Intron 1b Sequence: A Detailed Molecular Analysis

Atypical BCR::ABL1 transcripts are found in approximately 2% of cases of chronic myeloid leukemia. It is important to detect them since affected patients also benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. In the rare e8a2 atypical BCR::ABL1 transcript, two out-of-frame exons are fused, thus, interposed nucleotides are usually found at the fusion site to restore the reading frame. In approximately half of previously reported e8a2 BCR::ABL1 cases, an inserted 55 bp sequence homologous to an inverted sequence from ABL1 intron 1b was detected. The generation of this recurrent transcript variant is not obvious. This work describes the molecular analysis of such an e8a2 BCR::ABL1 translocation from a CML patient. The genomic chromosomal breakpoint is identified, and the formation of this transcript is theoretically explained. The clinical course of the patient is reported, and recommendations are provided for the molecular analysis of future e8a2 BCR::ABL1 cases.

PRDM12 in Health and Diseases

PRDM12 is a member of the PRDI-BF1 (positive regulatory domain I-binding factor 1) homologous domain (PRDM)-containing protein family, a subfamily of Kruppel-like zinc finger proteins, controlling key processes in the development of cancer. PRDM12 is expressed in a spatio-temporal manner in neuronal systems where it exerts multiple functions. PRDM12 is essential for the neurogenesis initiation and activation of a cascade of downstream pro-neuronal transcription factors in the nociceptive lineage. PRDM12 inactivation, indeed, results in a complete absence of the nociceptive lineage, which is essential for pain perception. Additionally, PRDM12 contributes to the early establishment of anorexigenic neuron identity and the maintenance of high expression levels of pro-opiomelanocortin, which impacts on the program bodyweight homeostasis. PRDMs are commonly involved in cancer, where they act as oncogenes/tumor suppressors in a “Yin and Yang” manner. PRDM12 is not usually expressed in adult normal tissues but its expression is re-activated in several cancer types. However, little information is currently available on PRDM12 expression in cancers and its mechanism of action has not been thoroughly described. In this review, we summarize the recent findings regarding PRDM12 by focusing on four main biological processes: neurogenesis, pain perception, oncogenesis and cell metabolism. Moreover, we wish to highlight the importance of future studies focusing on the PRDM12 signaling pathway(s) and its role in cancer onset and progression.

A comprehensive genome-wide analysis of long non-coding RNA and mRNA expression profiles of JAK2V617F-positive classical myeloproliferative neoplasms

Aberrant expression of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) is involved in the progression of myeloid neoplasms, but the role of lncRNAs in the JAK2V617F-positive subtype of classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (cMPNs) remains unclear. This study was conducted to clarify the expression and regulation patterns of lncRNAs in JAK2V617F-positive cMPNs, and to explore new potential carcinogenic factors of cMPNs. Bioinformatics analysis of microarray detection and wet testing verification were performed to study the expression and regulation signature of differentially expressed lncRNAs (DELs) and related genes (DEGs) in cMPNs. The expression of lncRNAs and mRNAs were observed to significantly dysregulated in JAK2V617F-positive cMPN patients compared with the normal controls. Co-expression analysis indicated that there were significant differences of the co-expression pattern of lncRNAs and mRNAs in JAK2V617F-positive cMPN patients compared to normal controls. GO and KEGG pathway analysis of DEGs and DELs showed the involvement of several pathways previously reported to regulate the pathogenesis of leukemia and cMPNs. Cis- and trans-regulation analysis of lncRNAs showed that ZNF141, DHX29, NOC2L, MAS1L, AFAP1L1, and CPN2 were significantly cis-regulated by lncRNA ENST00000356347, ENST00000456816, hsa-mir-449c, NR_026874, TCONS_00012136, uc003lqp.2, and ENST00000456816, respectively, and DELs were mostly correlated with transcription factors including CTBP2, SUZ12, REST, STAT2, and GATA4 to jointly regulate multiple target genes. In summary, expression profiles of lncRNAs and mRNAs were significantly altered in JAK2V617F-positive cMPNs, the relative signaling pathway, co-expression, cis- and trans-regulation were regulated by dysregulation of lncRNAs and several important genes, such as ITGB3, which may act as a promising carcinogenic factor, warrant further investigation.

Multifaceted Role of PRDM Proteins in Human Cancer

The PR/SET domain family (PRDM) comprise a family of genes whose protein products share a conserved N-terminal PR [PRDI-BF1 (positive regulatory domain I-binding factor 1) and RIZ1 (retinoblastoma protein-interacting zinc finger gene 1)] homologous domain structurally and functionally similar to the catalytic SET [Su(var)3-9, enhancer-of-zeste and trithorax] domain of histone methyltransferases (HMTs). These genes are involved in epigenetic regulation of gene expression through their intrinsic HMTase activity or via interactions with other chromatin modifying enzymes. In this way they control a broad spectrum of biological processes, including proliferation and differentiation control, cell cycle progression, and maintenance of immune cell homeostasis. In cancer, tumor-specific dysfunctions of PRDM genes alter their expression by genetic and/or epigenetic modifications. A common characteristic of most PRDM genes is to encode for two main molecular variants with or without the PR domain. They are generated by either alternative splicing or alternative use of different promoters and play opposite roles, particularly in cancer where their imbalance can be often observed. In this scenario, PRDM proteins are involved in cancer onset, invasion, and metastasis and their altered expression is related to poor prognosis and clinical outcome. These functions strongly suggest their potential use in cancer management as diagnostic or prognostic tools and as new targets of therapeutic intervention.

Prevalence and outcomes of uncommon BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia: data from a single centre

To explore the type, prevalence and outcomes in chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients with uncommon BCR-ABL1 transcripts in the era of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), uncommon BCR-ABL1 transcripts were screened in 4750 patients by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and type-specific real-time quantitative PCR was regularly performed for molecular monitoring. A total of 19 uncommon transcripts, including e1a2, e1a3, e6a2, e8a2, e12a2, unusual e13a2, e13a3, unusual e14a2, e14a3 and e19a2 were identified in 83 (1·7%) patients. The three most frequent types were e19a2, e13a3/e14a3 and e1a2. Compared with the 571 newly diagnosed CML patients in chronic phase with common e13a2/e14a2 transcripts receiving frontline imatinib therapy, patients with the e19a2 (n = 16) and e1a2 (n = 11) transcripts had significantly reduced probabilities of 1-year complete cytogenetic response (CCyR, P = 0·0004 and 0·016) and major molecular response (MMR, P = 0·0018 and 0·0035), and patients with the e13a3/e14a3 transcript (n = 10) had significantly increased probabilities of 1-year CCyR (P = 0·0072) and MMR (P = 0·0073). Patients with the e19a2 transcript had low probabilities of 2-year event-free survival (EFS, P = 0·0004) and progression-free survival (P = 0·0067), and patients with the e1a2 transcript had low probability of 2-year EFS (P < 0·0001). Therefore, uncommon BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts are rare and diverse in patients with CML and may be relevant for TKI therapy outcomes.

Characterization of a novel variant BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia: Implications for molecular monitoring

Molecular monitoring of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels using quantitative polymerase chain reaction is an essential part of the modern management of chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Establishing the diagnostic BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript is necessary in order to select appropriate primers and probes for such monitoring. A case is described in which quantitative polymerase chain reaction failed to detect the presence of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript in a Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia patient. Further investigation demonstrated a novel in-frame BCR-ABL1 fusion transcript with a breakpoint in BCR exon 13 and insertion of a sequence of ABL1 intron 1, therefore enabling subsequent molecular monitoring. This case highlights the requirement for characterization of the BCR-ABL1 transcript type at chronic myeloid leukemia diagnosis. Issues concerning standardized methodological approaches and interpretation of transcript levels in such rare cases are discussed.

Impact of BCR-ABL transcript type on outcome in patients with chronic-phase CML treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors

The most common breakpoint cluster region gene-Abelson murine leukemia viral oncogene homolog 1 (BCR-ABL) transcripts in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are e13a2 (b2a2) and e14a2 (b3a2). The impact of the type of transcript on response and survival after initial treatment with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors is unknown. This study involved 481 patients with chronic phase CML expressing various BCR-ABL transcripts. Two hundred patients expressed e13a2 (42%), 196 (41%) expressed e14a2, and 85 (18%) expressed both transcripts. The proportion of patients with e13a2, e14a2, and both achieving complete cytogenetic response at 3 and 6 months was 59%, 67%, and 63% and 73%, 81%, and 82%, respectively, whereas major molecular response rates were 27%, 49%, and 50% at 3 months, 42%, 67%, and 70% at 6 months, and 55%, 83%, and 76% at 12 months, respectively. Median (international scale) levels of transcripts e13a2, e14a2, and both at 3 months were 0.2004, 0.056, and 0.0612 and at 6 months were 0.091, 0.0109, and 0.0130, respectively. In multivariate analysis, e14a2 and both predicted for optimal responses at 3, 6, and 12 months. The type of transcript also predicted for improved probability of event-free (P = .043; e14a2) and transformation-free survival (P = .04 for both). Compared to e13a2 transcripts, patients with e14a2 (alone or with coexpressed e13a2) achieved earlier and deeper responses, predicted for optimal European Leukemia Net (ELN) responses (at 3, 6, and 12 months) and predicted for longer event-free and transformation-free survival.