Postoperative brachytherapy alone and combined postoperative radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost for squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, with positive or close margins

Brachytherapy of the head and neck: An University of California Los Angeles guide to morbidity reduction

The head and neck (H&N) region is among the most intricate and functional part of our anatomy. Major functional nerves and blood vessels with importance that affect the entire body emanate from the base of skull. Brachytherapy plays an important role as a single modality therapy in early cancer of the lip and oral cavity and a supplemental role in the pharynx or in advanced or recurrent disease. Morbidity in the H&N is intensely personal and disabling. Its avoidance is critical in determining the success or failure of a treatment program, and it is essential to preservation of quality of life. This article summarizes the current literature regarding morbidity related to H&N brachytherapy to aid patients and physicians to achieve optimal outcomes.

The role of brachytherapy for margin control in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of using peri-operative brachytherapy (BRTx) for positive/narrow margins present post primary surgical resection of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC).

METHODS

Prospective single-centre study of patients with OTSCC (T1-3, N0-3, M0) treated with resection of primary tumour ± regional nodal resection and intra-operative insertion of BRTx catheters. BRTx was administered twice daily at 40.8Gy/12Fr for 'Positive' (≤2 mm) margins, at 34Gy/10Fr for 'Narrow' (2.1-5 mm) margins, and not given for 'Clear' (> 5 mm) margins over the course of 5-6 days, 3-5 days post operatively.

RESULTS

Out of 55 patients recruited 41 patients (74.6%) were treated with BRTx, as 12 patients had clear margins and 2 patients had unfavourable tumour anatomy for catheter insertion. EBRTx was avoided in 64.3% of patients. Overall Survival (OS) at 3 and 5 years was 75.6 and 59.1% respectively, while Disease Specific Survival (DSS) was 82.3 and 68.6% at 3 and 5 years respectively. Recurrence and survival outcomes were not associated with margin status or the use of or specific dose of BRTx on Cox regression analysis. Acute and late toxicity secondary to BRTx was minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of BRTx after primary OTSCC resection with positive/narrow margins ± EBRTx to the neck ± CTx achieves outcomes comparable to traditional treatment of surgery followed by re-resection or EBRTx ± CTx. Morbidity associated with oral cavity EBRTx or secondary resection and reconstruction is thus avoided. Both acute and late toxicity rates are low and compare favourably with other BRTx OTSCC studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Retrospectively registered. https://www.mcgill.ca/rcr-rcn/files/rcr-rcn/2017.06.05_rcn_hn.pdf .

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Prognostic factors, failure patterns and survival analysis in patients with resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

PURPOSE

There is sparse literature on treatment outcomes research on resectable oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC). The aim of this study was to measure the treatment outcomes, explore the failure patterns, and identify the potential clinicopathological prognostic factors affecting treatment outcomes for resectable OTSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It is a retrospective analysis of 202 patients with resectable OTSCC who underwent upfront primary surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy if indicated.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 35.2 months (range, 1.2 to 99.9 months). The median duration of locoregional control (LRC) was 84.9 months (95% confidence interval, 67.3-102.4). The 3- and 5-year LRC rate was 68.5% and 58.3%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing pT stage, increasing pN stage, and the presence of extracapsular extension (ECE) were significantly associated with poorer LRC. The median duration of overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rate was 70.5% and 66.6%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that increasing pT stage and the presence of ECE were significantly associated with a poorer OS.

CONCLUSION

Locoregional failure remains the main cause of treatment failure in resectable OTSCC. There is scope to further improve prognosis considering modest LRC and OS. Pathological T-stage, N-stage, and ECE are strong prognostic factors. Further research is required to confirm whether adjuvant therapy adds to treatment outcomes in cases with lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and depth of invasion, and help clinicians tailoring adjuvant therapy.

[Brachytherapy for head and neck cancers]

The main indications of the brachytherapy of head and neck cancers are the limited tumours of the lip, the nose, the oral cavity and the oropharynx. Nasopharynx tumours are nowadays treated by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. This technique can be exclusive, associated with external radiotherapy or postoperative. It can also be a salvage treatment for the second primaries in previously irradiated areas. If the low dose rate brachytherapy rules remain the reference, the pulse dose rate technique allows the prescription of the dose rate and the optimisation of the dose distribution. Results of high dose rate brachytherapy are now published. This paper reports the recommendations of the Gec-ESTRO, published in 2017, and takes into account the data of the historical low dose rate series, and is upgraded with the pulsed-dose rate and high dose rate series.

[Description of the GORTEC 2017-03 study: Postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy for early stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margin (PHRC-K-16-164)]

The GORTEC 2017-03-Stereo-postop study is a phase 2, multicentric, nationwide study, funded by the hospital clinical research program (PHRC). The sponsor is Centre Jean-Perrin in Clermont-Ferrand, in partnership with the GORTEC. The principal investigators are Dr J Biau and Dr M Lapeyre. The main objective is to study severe late toxicity of postoperative stereotactic radiotherapy (6×6Gy) for early stage oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins. The secondary objectives include acute toxicity, efficacy, nutritional impact and quality of life. The population is adult patients, with pT1 or pT2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx or oral cavity (except lips), without indication of neck irradiation or concomitant chemotherapy, with at risk margin (R1, less than 5mm or uncertain). Ninety patients will be included over a 2-year period; this was calculated to limit the rate of 2-year severe toxicity at 5 to 15%, with a 2-year local control of at least 80 to 90%. If this study is considered as positive, stereotactic radiotherapy (6×6Gy) could become the third therapeutic option, with brachytherapy and normofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), for postoperative irradiation of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer with high risk margins.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update - Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology

The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combined external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy for base of tongue tumors and other head and neck sites in the era of new technologies

Irradiation plays an important role in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck providing a high locoregional tumor control and preservation of organ functions. External beam irradiation (EBI) results in unnecessary radiation exposure of the surrounding normal tissues increasing the incidence of side effects (xerostomy, osteoradionecrosis, and so forth). Brachytherapy (BT) seems to be the best choice for dose escalation over a short treatment period and for minimizing radiation-related normal tissue damage due to the rapid dose falloff around the source. Low-dose-rate BT is being increasingly replaced by pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate BT because the stepping source technology offers the advantage of optimizing dose distribution by varying dwell times. Pulsed-dose and high-dose rates appear to yield local control and complication rates equivalent to those of low-dose rate. BT may be applied alone; but in case of high risk of nodal metastases, it is used together with EBI. This review presents the results and the indications of combined BT and EBI in carcinoma of the base of tongue and other sites of the head and neck region, as well as the role BT plays among other-normal tissue protecting-modern radiotherapy modalities (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy) applied in these localizations.

Postoperative interstitial brachytherapy for resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of postoperative brachytherapy (POBT) in the treatment of resectable mobile tongue squamous cell carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study of patients with SSC of the mobile tongue who were treated between August 1992 and June 2013 by glossectomy and neck dissection followed by (192)Ir interstitial brachytherapy of the tumor bed. Endpoints were local control, cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and morbidity. Independent prognostic factors were analyzed in a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were identified (median age, 55 years [range, 15-84]; 76% male). Patient and tumor characteristics were: T1T2N0 (85%), pN+ (13%), positive surgical margins (14%), negative margins <5 mm (29%), dysplasic margins (14%), lymphatic vessel invasion (5%), and perineural spread (5%). Median followup was 6.7 years (1.5 months to 17.7 years). Local control, CSS, and OS rates at 2 years were 79%, 81%, and 72%, respectively. The corresponding 5-year rates were 76%, 67%, and 56%, respectively. After POBT, 22% of patients presented grade ≥2 necrosis and 8% experienced chronic pain. Independent prognostic factors were positive surgical margins for poor local control and tumor recurrence and lymphatic vessel invasion for poor OS.

CONCLUSION

POBT provided good local control and better CSS and OS than reported for surgery alone. Morbidity was higher than that reported for brachytherapy alone but may be considered acceptable in a well-selected patient population at high risk of local recurrence.

Pulsed dose rate brachytherapy of lip cancer

Purpose

Purpose: To present our experience with pulsed dose rate brachytherapy (PDR BT) of lip cancer.

Material and methods

The study group included 32 T1-4N0M0 lip cancer patients with a median age of 71 years (ranged 41-87 years), treated with interstitial PDR BT to the planned total dose of 60-70 Gy; 1 Gy/pulse, pulses repeated every hour a day. There were 26 untreated patients, and six patients after previous surgery including five implanted at the time of cancer relapse.

Results

PDR BT was delivered over few days and was well tolerated. After therapy, all patients experienced temporary, usually mild, acute mucositis. Late severe (Grade 3) mucositis of oral vestibule mucosa occurred in one case. Among 31 patients who completed the therapy, local control was achieved in 29 (93.5%). One patient with reccurrent upper lip T2 tumor was susccessfully salvaged surgically, another one died due to persisted T3 lip tumor with lymph node metastases. Overall, four patients developed neck nodal cancer relapse and two – distant metastases. The 5-year local control, and all-cause overall survival probabilities are 94% and 73%, respectively. Good/excellent cosmetic and functional outcome was obtained in all but two patients.

Conclusions

PDR at the dose of 1 Gy/pulse is effective and well tolerated BT technique in treating lip cancer patients.

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the mobile tongue or tongue margins: an interdisciplinary challenge

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment is surgery with stage dependent postoperative radio(chemo)therapy, however, for organ preservation preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is used as an individual approach. The present analysis was performed to access outcome and toxicity of radiotherapeutical treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-six patients (median age 55 years) with cancer of the mobile tongue (n=30) or tongue margins (n=36) treated between 1982 and 2006 were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment consisted of definitive- (n=13, median dose 66 Gy), adjuvant- (n=31, median dose 60 Gy) or neoadjuvant radiotherapy (n=22, median dose 40 Gy) and chemotherapy (n=34) or immunotherapy (n=1).

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 29 months the three- and five-year overall survival (OS) rates were 59% and 46%, respectively. The median OS was 54 months. Forty-two patients achieved complete remission whereas 14 patients showed partial remission. The one- and two-year loco-regional progression-free survival (LRPFS) rates were 76% and 58%, respectively. The median LRPFS time was 36 months. In χ(2)-test, T-stage showed a trend towards impact on local recurrence (Pearson, p=0.082). In multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption (p=0.003) and gender (p=0.031) were prognostic. Grade III/IV acute toxicity was seen in 52% of patients. None of the locally controlled patients reported grade IV or higher late toxicity.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant differences between treatment modalities were found, but one should keep in mind that organ preservation plays a major role for quality of life. None of the locally controlled patients reported grade IV or higher late toxicity. However, tumor recurrence is common, especially in advanced tumor stage. Interdisciplinary concepts, further increasing the chance of tumor control are warranted.

Oral cancer: Current role of radiotherapy and chemotherapy

The term oral cavity cancer (OSCC) constitutes cancers of the mucosal surfaces of the lips, floor of mouth, oral tongue, buccal mucosa, lower and upper gingiva, hard palate and retromolar trigone. Treatment approaches for OSCC include single management with surgery, radiotherapy [external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and/or brachytherapy], as well as adjuvant systemic therapy (chemotherapy and/or target agents); various combinations of these modalities may also be used depending on the disease presentation and pathological findings. The selection of sole or combined modality is based on various considerations that include disease control probability, the anticipated functional and cosmetic outcomes, tumor resectability, patient general condition, and availability of resources and expertise. For resectable OSCC, the mainstay of treatment is surgery, though same practitioners may advocate for the use of radiotherapy alone in selected "early" disease presentations or combined with chemotherapy in more locally advanced stage disease. In general, the latter is more commonly reserved for cases where surgery may be problematic. Thus, primary radiotherapy ± chemotherapy is usually reserved for patients unable to tolerate or who are otherwise unsuited for surgery. On the other hand, brachytherapy may be considered as a sole modality for early small primary tumor. It also has a role as an adjuvant to surgery in the setting of inadequate pathologically assessed resection margins, as does postoperative external beam radiotherapy ± chemotherapy, which is usually reserved for those with unfavorable pathological features. Brachytherapy can also be especially useful in the re-irradiation setting for persistent or recurrent disease or for a second primary arising within a previous radiation field. Biological agents targeting the epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) have emerged as a potential modality in combination with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy and are currently under evaluation in clinical trials.

Implantation of radioactive particles into the cranial base and orbital apex with the use of a magnetic resonance imaging-based surgical navigation system

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was try to find a new way with high precision to implant (125)I-radioactive particles for safe and effective control of tumors that have invaded into the cranial base and orbital regions.

STUDY DESIGN

Eight patients with invasive adenoid cystic carcinoma of the cranial base and orbital apex and a history of multiple surgeries were selected. A preoperative magnetic resonance scan was performed and the Brainlab surgical navigation system was used to aid the surgery.

RESULTS

The radioactive particles were distributed evenly within the tissue and accurately positioned. No intracranial injury or visual impairment occurred, and the treatment was effective.

CONCLUSIONS

The implantation of radioactive particles with the use of magnetic resonance imaging guidance is an effective and safe method for treating invasive malignancies of the skull base and orbital apex, and it should be considered for conditional use.

The impact of pathologic close margin on the survival of patients with early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma

Pathologic positive margin (PPM) has been proved to be an adverse prognostic factor for patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). Pathologic close margin (PCM) may occur as a result of limited resection. However, it's impact on the survival of early stage OSCC patients is relatively unclear. The medical records of all patients with early stage OSCC between 1999 and 2006 were reviewed. We analyzed 407 early stage OSCC patients, including 362 patients with pathologic safe margin (PSM), 14 patients with PPM and 31 patients with PCM. All patients with PCM didn't receive adjuvant radiotherapy, while 11 patients with PPM received adjuvant radiotherapy. The 5-year disease-free survival rates of patients with PSM, PPM and PCM were 78.2%, 61.4% and 50.8%, respectively (p=.002). The 5-year overall survival rates of patients with PSM, PPM and PCM were 91.2%, 85.1% and 70.1%, respectively (p=.001). On multivariate analyses using the Cox logistic regression method, PCM was the independent adverse prognostic factor for disease-free survival and overall survival (p=.002 and .006, respectively). Pathologic close margin is a poor prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survivals of patients with early stage OSCC. Postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy or revised surgery with a wider margin might be necessary for early stage OSCC patients with PCM.

Clinical outcomes for T1-2N0-1 oral tongue cancer patients underwent surgery with and without postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the results of curative surgery with and without radiotherapy in patients with T1-2N0-1 oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and to evaluate survival and prognostic factors.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 86 patients with T1-2N0-1 OSCC who received surgery between January 2000 and December 2006. Fourteen patients (16.3%) received postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, treatment modality, failure patterns, and survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 45 months. The five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 80.8% and 80.2%, respectively. Higher tumor grade and invasion depth > or = 0.5 cm were the significant prognostic factors affecting five-year OS and DFS (OS rate; 65% vs. 91%, p = 0.001 for grade; 66% vs. 92%, p = 0.01 for invasion depth: DFS rate; 69% vs. 88%, p = 0.005 for grade; 66% vs. 92%, p = 0.013 for invasion depth). In the risk group, there was no local failure in patients with postoperative radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In T1-2N0-1 OSCC, factors that affected prognosis after primary surgery were higher tumor grade and deep invasion depth over 0.5 cm. Postoperative radiotherapy should be considered in early oral tongue cancer patients with these high-risk pathologic features.

GEC-ESTRO recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

Both primary and recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck are classic indications for brachytherapy. A high rate of local tumor control at the cost of limited morbidity can be achieved with brachytherapy through good patient selection, meticulous source implantation and careful treatment planning. However, no randomized trials have been performed, and there is scant evidence in the literature especially regarding practical clinical recommendations for brachytherapy for head and neck subsites. The Head and Neck Working Group of the European Brachytherapy Group (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie-European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) therefore decided to formulate the present consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery is also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the paucity of evidence in the literature, these recommendations are mainly based on clinical experience accumulated by the members of the working group over several decades and the respective publications. The recommendations cover in a general part (1) patient selection, the pre-treatment work up and patient care, (2) treatment strategy, (3) target definition, (4) implant techniques, (5) dose and dose rate prescription, (6) treatment planning and reporting, (7) treatment monitoring (8) catheter removal, and (9) post-treatment patient care and follow-up. The recommendations are then specified for the classical brachytherapy tumor sites following an analogue more focussed structure (patient selection, implant technique, target definition, dose and dose rate prescription, results): lip, oral mucosa, mobile tongue, floor of mouth, oropharynx, nasopharynx, paranasal sinuses.

Quality of interstitial PDR-brachytherapy-implants of head-and-neck-cancers: predictive factors for local control and late toxicity?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Parameters and indices related to the implant geometry in use for describing the quality of volume implants in interstitial brachytherapy were developed on the basis of LDR-brachytherapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate their usefulness for predicting late toxicity and local control in the PDR-brachytherapy of head-and-neck-tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2000 and October 2004, 210 patients were treated with PDR-brachytherapy which was administered either postoperatively or as definitive treatment. Brachytherapy was used as sole treatment in some cases while in others a combination with EBRT was used. For assessment of quality of implants we analyzed the following indices and parameters using the univariate chi2 test and multivariate logistic regression analysis: V85, V120 and V150 (volume enclosed by the surface of the 85%-, 120%- and 150%-isodose), UI (uniformity index), QI (quality index), HI (homogeneity index), VGR (volume gradient ratio), DNR (dose non-uniformity ratio), LD (low dose), HD (high dose), PD (peak dose) and the intersource spacing.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 24 months (4-50) the rate of - usually transient - soft tissue necrosis (STN) was 11%, osteoradionecrosis (ORN) was seen in 7.6% of cases and local relapse occurred in 7% of cases. Univariate analysis shows a significant influence on the development of soft tissue necrosis for V85, and on osteoradionecrosis for HD and PD. In the multivariate analysis a correlation between soft tissue necrosis and QI was found. For local control a correlation with QI, VGR and minimal tube distance was found using univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using interstitial PDR-brachytherapy in head-and-neck-tumors the probability of local control and of the development of soft tissue necrosis or osteoradionecrosis is dependent on dose and volume parameter like the volume of the reference isodose, the high and peak dose values, on the homogeneity of the dose distribution, quantified by the quality index or the volume gradient ratio as well on the minimal tube distance.

Salvage for cervical recurrences of head and neck cancer with dissection and interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy

Salvage therapy in head and neck cancer (HNC) is a controversy issue and the literature is scarce regarding the use of interstitial high-dose rate brachytherapy (I-HDR) in HNC. We evaluated the long-term results of a treatment policy combining salvage surgery and I-HDR for cervical recurrences of HNC. Charts of 21 patients treated from 1994 to 2004 were reviewed. The crude local control rate for all patients was 52.4%. The 5- and 8-years overall (OS) and local relapse-free survival (LRFS) rates were 50%, 42.9%, 42.5% and 28.6%, respectively. The only predictive factor associated to LFRS and OS was negative margin status (p = 0.0007 and p = 0.0002). We conclude that complete surgery is mandatory for long term control and the doses given by brachytherapy are not high enough to compensate for microscopic residual disease after surgery.

Current Radiation Therapy Management Issues in Oral Cavity Cancer

Oral cavity cancer presents a therapeutic challenge to the treating surgeons,radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists. In early-stage disease, surgery or radiation alone often achieves excellent local control. Patients who have risk factors for recurrence after surgery should undergo adjuvant radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. In locally advanced disease, recurrence rates and deaths caused by disease progression continue to be unacceptably high. During the past decade, multiple randomized studies have shown a benefit in the addition of chemotherapy to radiation in the definitive or postoperative setting. Also, hyperfractionated and concomitant boost radiotherapy has shown superior results when compared with conventional once-daily radiotherapy. The addition of chemotherapy to hyperfractionated or concomitant boost radiotherapy also seems to improve outcomes at the cost of increased toxicities. In addition to traditional therapeutic modalities, new targeted agents seem promising to improve outcomes and possibly allow use of decreased doses of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, thus decreasing the toxicity of treatment.Overall, the management of cancer of the oral cavity is evolving rapidly,and a multidisciplinary approach to the patient who has oral cavity cancer is important to ensure the highest quality of patient care.

Interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy combined with cervical dissection on head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The literature is scarce regarding the use of interstitial high-dose-rate brachytherapy (I-HDR) as adjuvant treatment of the cervical region, and most reports are focused on primary tumors of the mobile tongue and oropharynx. We evaluated the outcome and morbidity related to an institutional treatment policy, using I-HDR as the sole adjuvant treatment or in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) at the Departments of Radiation Oncology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital do Cancer, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

METHODS

From October 1994 to December 2003, charts of 42 patients who had biopsy-proven cervical head and neck cancer, with a median follow-up of 36 months (range, 8-111 months), were reviewed. The median age of the patients was 55 years (range, 31-76 years), and the male/female ratio was 4.25:1.00. Thirty-five patients had previous irradiation with EBRT, with doses ranging from 30 Gy to 65 Gy (median, 52 Gy). The total dose of I-HDR ranged from 12 Gy to 48 Gy (median, 24 Gy), given in three to 14 fractions (median, 6 fractions) in 2 to 8 days (median, 4 days).

RESULTS

The total treatment time ranged from 19 to 83 days (median, 35 days). The 5- and 8-year overall survival (OS) rates were 52.5% and 48.1%, respectively; and the relapse-free survival (RFS) rates were 48.5% and 38.1%, respectively. The only statistically significant prognostic factor for RFS and OS at 5 and 8 years was margin status (p = .0050). Four patients (9.5%) had late adverse side effects, such as local dehiscence (n = 2), local ulcer (n = 1), and extensive neck fibrosis (n = 1), not related to a higher dose to the skin or graft.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that I-HDR can be recommended in selected patients with first presentation lesions, local recurrences, or second primary carcinomas, even with a previous course of EBRT, but further studies are eagerly awaited to delineate the optimum schedule for this combination-treatment modality.