Health-related quality of life profiles based on survivorship status for head and neck cancer patients

Prevalence and persistence of depressive symptoms during the first year postdiagnosis in a large sample of patients with head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The experience of persistent depressive symptomatology during the first year postdiagnosis has implications for recovery and adjustment by one year postdiagnosis. The present descriptive study sought to examine the prevalence and persistence of mild to moderate-severe depressive symptomology and associated disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with HNC.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This study was a prospective observational study at a single-institution tertiary cancer center. Depressive symptomatology was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), captured at diagnosis and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months postdiagnosis. HNC-specific HRQOL was measured using the Head and Neck Cancer Inventory (HNCI). Four subgroups were defined by BDI scores over time: persistent-moderate/severe subgroup, persistent-mild subgroup, transient subgroup, and resilient subgroup.

RESULTS

The distribution of patients (N = 946) was 65 (6.9 %) in the persistent-moderate/severe subgroup, 190 (20.1 %) in the persistent-mild subgroup, 186 (19.7 %) in the transient subgroup, and 505 (53.3 %) in the resilient subgroup. Across all four HNCI domains, patients in the persistent-moderate/severe subgroup failed to reach a score of 70 by 12-months postdiagnosis which is indicative of high functioning on the HNCI (aesthetics: M = 42.32, SD = 28.7; eating: M = 32.08, SD = 25.7; speech: M = 47.67, SD = 25.3; social disruption: M = 52.39, SD = 24.3). Patients in the persistent-mild subgroup failed to reach 70 in three of four domains. Patients in the resilient subgroup reached, on average, >70 on all HNCI domains.

CONCLUSIONS

Depression is a considerable issue during the first year postdiagnosis. Avenues for screening and intervention should be incorporated into HNC patient care per clinical practice guidelines to optimize recovery and HRQOL.

Feasibility of DW-MRI analysis of salivary glands during head and neck radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

With no effective treatment for xerostomia, there remains an unmet need to reduce radiation induced toxicity. Measuring physiological changes during RT in salivary glands using DW-MRI may predict which patients are most at risk of severe toxicity. This study evaluated the feasibility of measuring apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the major salivary glands and describes the observed changes in volume and ADC during RT.

METHODS

Scans were acquired at baseline (MR_base) and after 10 fractions (MR_rpt). Sequences included T1 post contrast fat saturated (T1PCFS) and DW-MRI (5b values, 0-1000 s/mm2). Ipsilateral and contralateral parotid (iPG/cPG), submandibular (iSMG/cSMG) and sublingual glands (iSLG/cSLG) were delineated on T1PCFS, modified on b0 and copied to the ADC map.

RESULTS

31 patients with intermediate/high risk squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx were evaluated. On 124 scans, SMG and SLG delineations were successful on all; parotids were fully contoured in 90.7%. Baseline mean ADC were significantly different between each gland type (p < 0.0001). IPG and cPG volume decreased during treatment by 6.7% and 11.2%. ISMG, cSMG, iSLG and cSLG volume increased by 6.9, 0.9, 60.8 and 60.3% respectively. All structures showed an increase in mean_ADC values. For each gland the increase in ADC was statistically significant p < 0.0001. A smaller mean percentage increase in ADC was observed in the group experiencing a higher grade (2 or > ) of toxicity.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to measure volume and ADC of the salivary glands prior to and during RT for HNC. Early data suggests a lower rise in ADC during treatment is associated with more severe late xerostomia.

Health-related quality of life and overall survival: a prospective study in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy

Purpose

We aimed to examine whether pre-treatment, post-treatment and change in health-related quality of Life (HRQoL) is associated with survival, in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC).

Methods

We included 948 newly diagnosed HNC patients treated with primary or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy with curative intent. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was assessed pre-treatment and at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to examine whether HRQoL at all time points and changes in HRQoL over time were associated with survival, after adjusting for demographic, clinical and lifestyle-related variables.

Results

Higher HRQoL scores were significantly associated with improved 5-year overall survival at all time points, except for the subscale global QoL at 6 weeks. Changes in HRQoL at 6 weeks post-treatment compared to pre-treatment were not significantly associated with survival. Changes in physical (HR: 0.88 95% CI: 0.82–0.96) and emotional functioning (HR: 0.90 95% CI: 0.85–0.96) from pre-treatment to 6 months post-treatment and changes in global QOL, and physical, emotional, and social functioning from pre-treatment to 12 months post-treatment were significantly associated with survival.

Conclusion

Higher HRQoL reported pre-treatment and post-treatment (6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months) are significantly associated with improved survival, as well as changes in HRQoL at 6 and 12 months compared to pre-treatment. Our results highlight the value of monitoring HRQoL and to identify those patients that report decreased or deteriorated HRQOL. This may help to further improve cancer care in a timely and efficient manner.

Head and neck survivorship care in the times of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

With the arrival of the coronavirus disease (SARS‐CoV‐2) in the United States, care practice paradigms have drastically changed. Data from China suggest that the new virus poses additional risks as case fatality of patients with cancer was higher at 5.6% compared to 2.3% of the general population. There are three proposed major strategies to address care for patients with cancer in this SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic with postponing treatment for those with stable cancer, increasing personal protection provisions for patients with cancer, and increasing monitoring if a patient becomes infected with SARS‐CoV‐2. In this present commentary, we discuss the unique mental health challenges and burdens of patients with head and neck cancer in the times of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic and approaches to mitigate these stressors through telemedicine to reduce future burdens to the patient and the health care system.

Single-Fraction Stereotactic vs Conventional Multifraction Radiotherapy for Pain Relief in Patients With Predominantly Nonspine Bone Metastases: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial

Importance

Consensus is lacking as to the optimal radiotherapy dose and fractionation schedule for treating bone metastases.

Objective

To assess the relative efficacy of high-dose, single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) vs standard multifraction radiotherapy (MFRT) for alleviation of pain in patients with mostly nonspine bone metastases.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective, randomized, single-institution phase 2 noninferiority trial conducted at a tertiary cancer care center enrolled 160 patients with radiologically confirmed painful bone metastases from September 19, 2014, through June 19, 2018. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either single-fraction SBRT (12 Gy for ≥4-cm lesions or 16 Gy for <4-cm lesions) or MFRT to 30 Gy in 10 fractions.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was pain response, defined by international consensus criteria as a combination of pain score and analgesic use (daily morphine-equivalent dose). Pain failure (ie, lack of response) was defined as worsening pain score (≥2 points on a 0-to-10 scale), an increase in morphine-equivalent opioid dose of 50% or more, reirradiation, or pathologic fracture. We hypothesized that SBRT was noninferior to MFRT.

Results

In this phase 2 noninferiority trial of 96 men and 64 women (mean [SD] age, 62.4 [10.4] years), 81 patients received SBRT and 79 received MFRT. Among evaluable patients who received treatment per protocol, the single-fraction group had more pain responders than the MFRT group (complete response + partial response) at 2 weeks (34 of 55 [62%] vs 19 of 52 [36%]) (P = .01), 3 months (31 of 43 [72%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]) (P = .03), and 9 months (17 of 22 [77%] vs 12 of 26 [46%]) (P = .03). No differences were found in treatment-related toxic effects or quality-of-life scores after SBRT vs MFRT; local control rates at 1 and 2 years were higher in patients receiving single-fraction SBRT.

Conclusions and Relevance

Delivering high-dose, single-fraction SBRT seems to be an effective treatment option for patients with painful bone metastases. Among evaluable patients, SBRT had higher rates of pain response (complete response + partial response) than did MFRT and thus should be considered for patients expected to have relatively long survival.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02163226.

Efficacy of exercise therapy during radiotherapy to prevent reduction in mouth opening in patients with head and neck cancer: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 2 protocols of exercise therapy to avoid reduction in mouth opening (MO) in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized, controlled, double-blind, 3-arm, parallel-group, prevention clinical trial. Ninety patients were randomized into 3 groups to perform exercises during radiotherapy treatment: intervention group 1 (G1); intervention group 2 (G2); and control group (CG). Maximum MO was measured before (T0), immediately after (T1), and at 12 months (T2) after completion of radiotherapy treatment. Generalized estimating equations model complemented by the least significant difference test was applied to group comparisons.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in MO measure between the groups at the 3 assessment time points (P = .264). The difference in MO measure from baseline to 12 months after having completed radiotherapy was -1 mm in CG (95% confidence interval [CI] -4.0 to 2.0); 1.3 mm in G1 (95% CI -1.7 to 4.3); and 0.5 mm in G2 (95% CI -3.4 to 4.4).

CONCLUSIONS

It was not possible to conclude that the exercise protocols performed in this study are more effective than the usual guidance to prevent reduction in MO in patients undergoing radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Pre-treatment quality of life as a predictor of distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival in patients with head and neck cancer who underwent free flap reconstruction

PURPOSE

This study examined the prognostic associations of pre-treatment quality of life (QoL) with overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DFMS) among patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) who underwent free flap reconstruction.

METHODS

A cohort of 127 HNC patients who received free flap reconstruction between November 2010 and June 2014 at a hospital were recruited. Pre-treatment QoL was measured by the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire, which contains six physical domains, including speech, swallowing, appearance, saliva, taste and chewing, as well as the six social-emotional domains of pain, activity, recreation, shoulder, mood, and anxiety. Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Results showed that pre-treatment QoL was predictive of OS and DMFS. Of the domains, swallowing, chewing, speech, taste, saliva, pain and shoulder were demonstrated to be significant predictors of OS. Additionally, swallowing, chewing, speech, pain and activity were demonstrated making significant contributions to DMFS.

CONCLUSION

Our data supported that physical domains of pre-treatment QoL were predictors for OS and DFMS in HNC patients with free-flap reconstruction. Longitudinal studies are warranted to clarify the prognostic abilities of social-emotional domains. Information on pre-treatment QoL should be taken into account to individualize care plan for these patients, and hence prolong their survival.

Study Protocol: Evaluation of a DVD intervention designed to meet the informaton needs of patients with head and neck cancer and their partner, carer and families

Background

Patients who undergo surgery for cancer of the head and neck and their families face complex and difficult challenges and are at risk of anxiety and depression and inability to cope with symptom and treatment burden. Information available to support them is not flexible enough to adjust to individual need.

Design/Methods

A randomised clinical trial pre and post intervention design, comparing the use of a tailored DVD intervention, provided preoperatively and used throughout the post- operative period, with usual treatment. One hundred fifty-six individuals or partner couples will be randomly recruited into either the intervention or control group. A survey will be administered at three time points, preoperatively, post operatively and 3 months post-surgery. Anxiety and empowerment are the primary outcome measures. Qualitative data about use of the resource will be gathered by phone interview.

Discussion

This is the first study to rigorously evaluate the impact of a DVD intervention for this group of patients and their family members. The study will help to understand the impact of information usage on patient and family well- being and test a means by which to evaluate information and education resources for this and other cancer patient groups.

Trial registration

ACTRN12614001104640. Date registered: 17/10/2014.

Comparing the Performance Status Scale and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory as swallowing outcome measures in head and neck cancer: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between the two disease-specific measures currently in use to assess swallowing outcomes following treatment in patients with head and neck cancer: the Performance Status Scale (PSS) and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI).

DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Four head and neck cancer multidisciplinary clinics in the North of England Cancer Network.

PARTICIPANTS

114 patients with cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Measures of swallowing function administered prospectively across 4 timepoints

RESULTS

Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to measure the relationship between the two scales. There was statistically significant correlation between the two tools at pre-treatment (rs = 0.428, P < 0.000), 3 months post-treatment (rs = 0.454, P < 0.002), 6 months post-treatment (rs = 0.551, P < 0.000) and 12 months post-treatment (rs = 0.680, P < 0.000).

CONCLUSION

This is the first prospective study comparing the MDADI and PSS questionnaires at multiple time points. Our study shows that these different instruments have a good relationship in measuring swallowing function in patients with head and neck cancer in short and medium term after treatment.

The experiences of head and neck cancer patients requiring major surgery

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of head and neck cancers is lower (3.5% of total cancers in Australia) than for a number of other cancers. Treatment for head and neck cancer is often drastic and debilitating and patient outcomes are poorer.

OBJECTIVE

This qualitative study explored the experiences of cancer patients who underwent surgery for head and neck cancer.

METHODS

In-depth face-to-face interviews were conducted with 12 patients 7 to 26 months after surgery. Interviews were thematically analyzed to produce a rich description of patients' experiences from diagnosis through surgery and beyond.

RESULTS

Critical aspects of patients' experiences are described through the following themes: only having half the story, shocks and aftershocks, living with the aftermath, and being supported. Participants identified difficulties arising from receiving insufficient, confusing, and often untimely information. The persistent and traumatic nature of what patients endure challenges their physical, mental, and emotional coping capacity and, in some cases, their motivation to live.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need to address gaps in support and education of patients and carers. Of particular concern is the problem related to information provision and comprehension. Critical examination of current practices, together with efforts toward coordinated care tailored to individual needs, is required, along with outreach services for patients in rural areas.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The development and evaluation of targeted resources in a variety of forms such as DVD, Internet, and pamphlets are needed. Robust assessment strategies are required to inform supportive interventions matched to stages and significant events in patients' journeys.

Survivorship and Quality of Life in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck cancer is becoming more common, and survival rates are improving. Human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer, in particular, is increasing in incidence and is associated with an excellent prognosis. However, toxicity from disease and treatment leads to long-term impairment, disability, and handicap. Currently, more than 60% of survivors have unmet needs. As the numbers of survivors increase, current models of care will be increasingly inadequate to meet their needs. Exploration of new strategies and models of care to better address quality-of-life issues and meet the needs of survivors of head and neck cancer is urgently required.

Quality of life after different oncologic interventions in head and neck cancer patients

Patient reported outcomes following head and neck cancer are of great importance, given the functional, psychological, and social impacts of the disease and its treatment. In addition, not only is the number of publications on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) increasing in a variety of specialties, but there is also a growing awareness of the potential role of HRQOL in practice. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the HRQOL of head and neck cancer patients following different oncologic interventions, using an internationally established test. In this cross-sectional study, we included three different groups of 32 patients each. Participants had histologically confirmed invasive oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in the anterior floor of the mouth. Group allocation was based on treatment modality, as follows: only surgery (group 1), operation and adjuvant radiotherapy (XRT) (group 2), and the additional presence of osteoradionecrosis (ORN) (group 3). All patients were questioned about their HRQOL, using the standardized University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire (UW-QOL). Surveys for groups 1 and 2 were conducted at least 24 months after the end of tumor-related treatment, in cases of ORN (group 3) 12 months after completion of disease-related treatment. A total of 96 patients were included into this study. The mean age was 62.79 ± 8.93 years. The patients in groups 1 and 2 revealed a reduced quality of life, of a greater magnitude after radiation therapy. Patients felt that radiotherapy was much worse than surgery; however, half of the patients stated that they would repeat radiation therapy if necessary. The subjective evaluation of the HRQOL after surgery and radiotherapy was a valuable instrument for assessing the rehabilitation of patients in the context of their function and quality of life. Radiation therapy can be considered a trigger of functional limitations and emotional distress that contributes to decreased HRQOL in patients with head and neck cancer.

The humanistic burden of head and neck cancer: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment can affect communication, nutrition, and physical appearance, and the global impact of this disease on patients' quality of life may be substantial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic literature review was to describe the impact of HNC and its treatment on the physical, emotional, and social well-being of patients over time, by examining longitudinal studies of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluating these domains.

METHODS

Databases (MEDLINE and Embase) were searched to identify studies published in English between January 2004 and January 2014 analyzing the humanistic aspects of HNC in adult patients. Additional relevant publications were identified through manual searches of abstracts from recent conference proceedings.

RESULTS

Of 1,566 studies initially identified, 130 met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated in the assessment. Investigations using a variety of PRO instruments in heterogeneous patient populations consistently reported that PRO scores decrease significantly from diagnosis through the treatment period, but generally recover to baseline in the first year post-treatment. This trend was observed for many functional domains, although some side effects, such as xerostomia, persisted well beyond 1 year. In addition, considerable evidence exists that baseline PRO scores can predict clinical endpoints such as overall and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Many aspects of HNC, both disease and treatment specific, profoundly affect patients' quality of life. Improved knowledge of these effects on PRO may allow for more informed treatment decisions and can help physicians to better prepare patients for changes they may experience during therapy. Furthermore, the predictive value of baseline PRO data may enable healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients in need of more intensive intervention.

The association between health related quality of life and survival in patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review

The aim of this study was to systematically review available evidence on the association between health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and survival in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), adjusted for important clinical, demographic and lifestyle-related factors. A systematic literature search in four electronic bibliographic databases was conducted in January 2014. We included studies that provided data on HRQoL, survival, and the association between HRQoL and survival among HNC patients. Two researchers independently rated the quality of the included studies. A best evidence synthesis was applied to draw conclusions. Nineteen studies were included, of which twelve focused on all subscales of a HRQoL questionnaire and seven focused on selected subscales. The mean (SD) quality score was 72 (17)% and 11 (58)% studies were of high quality. According to the best evidence synthesis, we found strong evidence for a positive association between pre-treatment physical functioning and survival and between change in global QoL from pre-treatment to 6 months after treatment and survival. Due to inconsistent findings, we found insufficient evidence for an association with survival of other HRQoL domains, including role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning, mental health and well-being. Future high quality studies with a longitudinal design are needed to examine the complex association between HRQoL and survival.

A comprehensive assessment protocol including patient reported outcomes, physical tests, and biological sampling in newly diagnosed patients with head and neck cancer: is it feasible?

PURPOSE

Large cohort studies are needed taking into account cancer-related, personal, biological, psychobehavioral, and lifestyle-related factors, to guide future research to improve treatment and supportive care. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a comprehensive baseline assessment of a cohort study evaluating the course of quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Newly diagnosed head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were asked to participate. Assessments consisted of questionnaires (635 items), a home visit (including a psychiatric interview, physical tests, and blood and saliva collection), and tissue collection. Representativeness of the study sample was evaluated by comparing demographics, clinical factors, depression, anxiety, and QoL between responders and non-responders. Feasibility was evaluated covering the number of questions, time investment, intimacy, and physical burden.

RESULTS

During the inclusion period (4 months), 15 out of 26 (60 %) patients agreed to participate. Less women participated, 13 % in responders group versus 63 % in non-responders group (p = 0.008). No other differences were found between responders and non-responders. Responders completed more than 95 % of the questionnaires' items and rated the number of questions, time investment and intimacy as feasible, and the physical and psychological burden as low. It took on average 3 h to complete the questionnaires and 1.5 h for the home visit.

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that a comprehensive assessment including various questionnaires, physical measurements, and biological assessments is feasible according to patients with newly diagnosed HNC. A large prospective cohort study has started aiming to include 739 HNC patients and their informal caregivers in the Netherlands.

Shoulder pain, functional status, and health-related quality of life after head and neck cancer surgery

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients experience treatment-related complications that may interfere with health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this study was to describe the symptom experience (shoulder pain) and functional status factors that are related to global and domain-specific HRQOL at one month after HNC surgery. In this exploratory study, we examined 29 patients. The outcome variables included global HRQOL as well as physical, functional, emotional, and social well-being. Symptom experience and functional status factors were the independent variables. In the symptom experience variables, shoulder pain distress was negatively associated with physical well-being (R (2) = 0.24). Among the functional status variables, eating impairment was negatively related to global HRQOL (R (2) = 0.18) and physical well-being (R (2) = 0.21). Speaking impairment and impaired body image explained a large amount of the variance in functional well-being (R (2) = 0.45). This study provided initial results regarding symptom experience and functional status factors related to poor HRQOL in the early postoperative period for HNC patients.

Prospective evaluation of health-related quality of life in long-term oral and oropharyngeal cancer survivors and the perceived need for supportive care

PURPOSE

To evaluate long-term changes in health related quality of life (HRQOL) in oral/oropharyngeal cancer survivors and their need for and use of supportive care.

METHODS

Between 1999 and 2001, 80 advanced oral or oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with free-flap reconstruction and postoperative radiotherapy were included in a prospective study of whom 27 patients were long-term survivors (mean 9.2 years, range 8-11 years). The HRQOL of 26 patients (response rate 96%) was assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 questionnaires at four points in time: pretreatment (baseline), and at 6 months, 12 months (short term) and 8-11 years (long-term) follow up. A study specific questionnaire was developed to evaluate the need for and use of supportive care (allied health services, peer contact, psychosocial care, and complementary care) and was completed at the period of treatment and at long-term follow up.

RESULTS

A number of HRQOL domains worsened significantly (p < 0.01) in the long-term: emotional functioning, social functioning, swallowing, speech, taste/smell, dry mouth, sticky saliva and coughing assessed by the mixed effects statistical model. At time of treatment, the need for supportive care was the highest for a dental hygienist (77%), a physical therapist (73%), a speech therapist (42%), a dietician (38%), and a special diet (62%). At long-term follow up, the need for supportive care was limited to a dental hygienist (46%) and a physical therapist (23%). Only small differences were observed between the perceived need for and actual use of supportive care.

CONCLUSION

A range of HRQOL domains in head and neck cancer survivors were deteriorated in the long-term compared to baseline and to the first year after treatment. At time of treatment and less frequently at long-term follow up, patients reported needing and using a variety of supportive care services.

Neighborhood deprivation and clinical outcomes among head and neck cancer patients

The unique effects of neighborhood-level economic deprivation on survival, recurrence, and second primary malignancy development were examined using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models among 1151 incident squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck patients. Cancer site was examined as a potential moderator. Main analyses yielded null results; however, interaction analyses indicated poorer overall survival [HR=1.59 (1.00-2.53)] and greater second primary malignancy development [HR=2.99 (1.46-6.11)] among oropharyngeal cancer patients from highly deprived neighborhoods relative to less deprived neighborhoods. Results suggest a dual focus on individual and neighborhood risk factors could help improve clinical outcomes among oropharyngeal cancer patients.

The relationship between weight loss and health-related quality of life in persons treated for head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

This study explores the relationship between weight loss, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and symptom burden in patients treated for head and neck cancers.

METHODS

Participants completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck (FACT-H&N) and the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS) pre-treatment, mid-treatment, and post-treatment. Weights were recorded prior to treatment and at the post-treatment follow-up visit, and percentage weight loss was tabulated. Relationships between weight loss, HRQOL, and symptom burden were evaluated using the nonparametric Spearman rho. A simple linear regression model was developed to examine the influence weight loss has on HRQOL in a predictive manner.

RESULTS

Average weight loss per patient was 12 lb with a modal value of 19. Weight loss was found to be significantly correlated with decreases in physical well-being, functional well-being, the Head and Neck specific subscale, and composite QOL scores. No significant correlations were found between weight loss and symptom burden as measured by the MSAS. Linear regression suggested that a 10% decrease in baseline weight resulted in a 19% decrease in the FACT-H&N score.

CONCLUSION

The strong association between weight loss and HRQOL supports the importance of efforts to prevent weight loss via patient education, aggressive monitoring, and immediate intervention to stop or reverse weight loss during treatment. New approaches to the weight loss and wasting experienced by patients should be developed and tested.

Identifying the needs of brain tumor patients and their caregivers

The purpose of this study is to identify the needs of brain tumor patients and their caregivers to provide improved health services to these populations. Two different questionnaires were designed for patients and caregivers. Both questionnaires contained questions pertaining to three realms: disease symptoms/treatment, health care provider, daily living/finances. The caregivers’ questionnaires contained an additional domain on emotional needs. Each question was evaluated for the degree of importance and satisfaction. Exploratory analyses determined whether baseline characteristics affect responder importance or satisfaction. Also, areas of high agreement/disagreement in satisfaction between the participating patient-caregiver pairs were identified. Questions for which >50% of the patients and caregivers thought were “very important” but >30% were dissatisfied include: understanding the cause of brain tumors, dealing with patients’ lower energy, identifying healthful foods and activities for patients, telephone access to health care providers, information on medical insurance coverage, and support from their employer. In the emotional realm, caregivers identified 9 out of 10 items as important but need further improvement. Areas of high disagreement in satisfaction between participating patient-caregiver pairs include: getting help with household chores (P value = 0.006) and finding time for personal needs (P value < 0.001). This study provides insights into areas to improve services for brain tumor patients and their caregivers. The caregivers’ highest amount of burden is placed on their emotional needs, emphasizing the importance of providing appropriate medical and psychosocial support for caregivers to cope with emotional difficulties they face during the patients’ treatment process.

Qualidade de vida e voz pós-radioterapia: repercussões para a fonoaudiologia

TEMA: o tratamento radioterápico do câncer de cabeça e pescoço tem mostrado resultados importantes no controle da doença quando neoadjuvante ou mesmo concomitante à quimioterapia. Pesquisas apontam um aumento da sobrevida após 5 anos de tratamento do câncer de laringe, o que torna necessário e justifica os esforços realizados na reabilitação da comunicação dos pacientes, e destaca a presença do profissional de Fonoaudiologia na equipe de radioterapia. OBJETIVO: descrever as seqüelas com repercussão fonoaudiológica, tais como alterações na qualidade vocal e na qualidade de vida, associadas ao tratamento proposto para tumores de cabeça e pescoço, em especial aquelas originadas após a radioterapia. CONCLUSÃO: Várias seqüelas, agudas e crônicas, como rouquidão, odinofagia e afonia, que envolvem dificuldades na comunicação oral e/ou deglutição dos pacientes após o tratamento radioterápico em cabeça e pescoço, interfere de maneira direta na comunicação, deglutição e qualidade de vida dos pacientes. Os profissionais envolvidos no tratamento desse câncer, dentre eles o fonoaudiólogo, através do conhecimento sobre o tratamento e as fragilidades terapêuticas que comprometem a qualidade vocal e qualidade de vida desses pacientes, busca contribuir no processo de recuperação minimizando os danos causados pela doença e melhorando a condição de saúde do indivíduo.

Rehabilitation: long-term physical and functional changes following treatment

OBJECTIVES

To describe the life altering issues that survivors of a head and neck cancer report post treatment and discuss multidimensional rehabilitation approaches.

DATA SOURCES

Published journal articles, literature reviews, research reports, book chapters.

CONCLUSION

Survivors and their family caregivers encounter many changes during the first 3 months following treatment for head and neck cancer, placing them at risk of multiple adjustment difficulties. Progressive weight loss, loss of energy, strength, muscle endurance and decreased functioning severely compromise healthy adjustment and quality of life.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses can help patients and family identify survivorship issues to be managed at home. Planning, exploring, coaching, practicing skills with survivors and their family caregivers, providing specific information, and linking them with resources can help them bridge this transition into extended survivorship.

Systemic therapies for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

OBJECTIVES

To discuss current clinical recommendations for treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), to identify common toxicities associated with combined chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, and describe strategies for management of the most common treatment-related toxicities.

DATA SOURCES

Current research, published literature, National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and Oncology Nursing Society.

CONCLUSION

Advances in options for systemic therapy for SCCHN have provided hope for patients with this disease. However, effective management of these patients requires a proactive and persistent multidisciplinary treatment approach, including toxicity management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Careful evaluation of each patient before initiating treatment with the goals of therapy reviewed by the multidisciplinary team, the patient, and the caregivers, will allow selection of the most appropriate treatment plan. The goals of therapy should provide guidance in balancing tumor response, toxicity (both acute and late effects), survival, and quality of life.

Quality of life scores predict survival among patients with head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine whether quality of life (QOL) scores predict survival among patients with head and neck cancer, controlling for demographic, health behavior, and clinical variables.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A self-administered questionnaire was given to 495 patients being treated for head and neck cancer while they were waiting to be seen for a clinic appointment. Data collected from the survey included demographics, health behaviors, and QOL as measured by Short Form-36 (SF-36) physical and mental component scores and the Head and Neck QOL scores. Clinical measures were collected by chart abstraction. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the association between QOL scores and survival time.

RESULTS

After controlling for age, time since diagnosis, marital status, education, tumor site and stage, comorbidities, and smoking, the SF-36 physical component score and three of the four Head and Neck QOL scales (pain, eating, and speech domains) were associated with survival. Controlling for the same variables, the SF-36 mental component score and the emotional domain of the Head and Neck QOL were not associated with survival.

CONCLUSION

QOL instruments may be valuable screening tools to identify patients who are at high risk for poor survival. Those with low QOL scores could be followed more closely, with the potential to identify recurrence earlier and perform salvage treatments, thereby possibly improving survival for this group of patients.