N2-N3 neck nodal control without planned neck dissection for clinical/radiologic complete responders—Results of Trans Tasman Radiation Oncology Group Study 98.02

FGD-PET/CT three months after (chemo)radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma spares considerable number of patients from a salvage neck dissection

PURPOSE

In the last decades FDG-PET/CT is increasingly used in combination with the standard diagnostic modalities (MRI + US-FNA) to identify residual neck disease (RND) after (chemo)radiotherapy for head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The purpose of the current study is to identify the impact of increasing use of FDG-PET/CT on the accuracy of patient selection for salvage neck dissection (SND).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2022, 908 consecutive patients with node-positive HNSCC were treated with (chemo)radiotherapy in our institution.

PRIMARY ENDPOINT

positive predictive value (PPV) of FDG-PET/CT for pathologic-confirmed RND (pRND) after SND, compared to the standard of care; MRI + US-FNA. Secondary endpoints: oncologic outcomes.

RESULTS

Of the entire group, 130 patients (14 %) received SND. Of them only 53 patients (41 %) had pRND at the SND-specimens. The PPV of FDG-PET/CT for the detection of pRND was considerably better, compared to MRI + US-FNA; 89 % and 65 %, respectively. If FDG-PET/CT showed metabolic CR, these patients did not undergo SND. The NPV was 97.5 %, as only 2.5 % of these patients developed delayed regional failure. FDG-PET/CT considerably improved the accuracy of patient selection for SND, as significantly more patients treated in the second period, compared to first period of the study (n = 454 each) still had vital tumor at SND-specimen (53 % and 31 %, p = 0.008). Regional recurrence free-survival, DFS, OS and HNSCC-death were significantly worse in patients with pRND (p < 0.05) CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating FDG-PET/CT into the diagnostic pathway for the response evaluation after (chemo)radiotherapy significantly improved the accuracy of patient selection for SND and spared considerable number of patients (>20 %) from unnecessary SND. For patients with metabolic CR, SND can safely be omitted while for patients with no metabolic CR, SND is strongly advocated.

Results of salvage neck dissection after chemoradiation in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Salvage surgery is mandatory when regional persistence/recurrence after chemoradiation. The aim of this study is to describe the outcomes of salvage surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma that were primarily treated with chemorradiation and underwent salvage neck dissection (ND) with suspected recurrent/persistent nodal disease. All patients had a response evaluation at 12 weeks through clinical examination and computed tomography-positron emission tomography. Decision for ND was taken in case of suspected persistence or if there was suspicion of recurrence, histologically confirmed.

RESULTS

There were 40 patients included. 32/40 (80%) ND were done because of confirmed/suspected persistence and 8/40 (20%) were done because of recurrences. Persistence was confirmed histologically in 14/32 (43.8%) cases and recurrence in 6/8 (75%) cases. Median survival from diagnosis was 39 months (95% CI 28.162-49.838). Significant differences were observed between patients who had viable tumour cells in the sample and those who did not, but the differences were only significant when only deaths due to tumour progression were considered (p = 0.014). 14/32 (43.8%) patients with suspected or confirmed persistence developed a recurrence after the ND and 3/8 (37.5%) patients with suspected or confirmed recurrence developed a new recurrence. New recurrences were more frequent in cases that had viable tumor in the specimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with nodal persistence/recurrence have a poor prognosis, even after salvage surgery. However, in a substantial number of patients the disease is controlled after ND, so it should be offer to these patients.

Multi-institutional study of clinical outcomes of patients with head and neck cancer presenting with cN3 disease

BACKGROUND

To evaluate disease control, toxicities, and variables associated with clinical outcomes for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and clinical N3 disease (HNSCC N3) treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients with HNSCC N3 treated at two high-volume academic centers between 1996 and 2019.

RESULTS

We identified 85 patients with a median follow-up of 2.8 years. Five-year overall survival, regional control, and freedom from distant metastases rates were 38%, 80%, and 80%, respectively. Severe complications were identified in 19% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Favorable regional control is achievable with definitive chemoradiation therapy for patients with HNSCC N3 disease. Distant metastases are a common pattern of failure and should be a focus of prospective study.

Computed Tomography of Lymph Node Metastasis Before and After Radiation Therapy: Correlations With Residual Tumour

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) performed after radiation therapy (RT) is used to detect residual lymph node (LN) metastasis. Here, we investigated which LN parameters on pre- and post-RT CT images correlated with residual tumour in patients with head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled 23 patients who received RT. A total of 50 LNs were evaluated. Correlations between quantitative and qualitative findings and residual tumours were evaluated.

RESULTS

The median patient age was 61 years. Thirty-one LNs were histologically confirmed to contain residual tumour. LNs with residual tumour had significantly longer short and long axes on post-RT CT images. A new finding of obscured margins after RT were significantly associated with the presence of residual tumour by univariate and multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

Comparison of qualitative, LN parameters on pre- and post-RT CT images may improve the detection of residual tumour in patients with suspected residual or recurrent LN metastasis.

Locoregional control, progression-free survival and morbidity rates in N3 head and neck cancer patients with low primary tumour burden: A 301-patient study

OBJECTIVES

In patients with N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), N3 disease is associated with high regional relapse and metastatic risks. Patients with resectable N3 disease have better prognosis although their metastatic risk may be similar as in patients with unresectable disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been associated with lower metastatic rates, but N3 patients may die of rapid locoregional progression. We assessed outcomes with the three modalities in patients with low primary burden to better assess the specific prognosis of N3 disease.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric study included T0-2 N3 HNSCC patients. Outcomes and morbidity in upfront neck dissection (uND) vs non-surgical groups were analysed and oncological outcomes and morbidity compared between patients undergoing chemoradiation or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with initially unresectable N3 nodes.

RESULTS

Of 301 patients, 142 (47%) underwent uND, 68 (23%) neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 91 (30%) chemoradiation. The 24- and 60-month incidence of locoregional relapse was 23.2% [18.3%; 28.4%] and 27.4% [21.8%; 33.3%]; it was lower in patients undergoing uND (P = .006). In patients with non-surgical treatments, success rates were 57.8% [49.4%; 66.3%] after chemoradiation and 38.1% [29.6%; 46.7%] after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .001). Overall morbidity was more frequent in patients undergoing uND (68.8%) (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

uND improved locoregional control but increased morbidity and showed no survival benefit. Success rates were better after chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not reduce metastatic rates but non-responders to chemoradiation had poor PFS and survival rate, suggesting that predictive criteria are warranted.

Head and Neck Cancers, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Treatment is complex for patients with head and neck (H&N) cancers with specific site of disease, stage, and pathologic findings guiding treatment decision-making. Treatment planning for H&N cancers involves a multidisciplinary team of experts. This article describes supportive care recommendations in the NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers, as well as the rationale supporting a new section on imaging recommendations for patients with H&N cancers. This article also describes updates to treatment recommendations for patients with very advanced H&N cancers and salivary gland tumors, specifically systemic therapy recommendations.

Outcome of bimodality definitive chemoradiation does not differ from that of trimodality upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant treatment for >6 cm lymph node (N3) head and neck cancer

Currently, data regarding optimal treatment modality, response, and outcome specifically for N3 head and neck cancer are limited. This study aimed to compare the treatment outcomes between definitive chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to the neck and upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Ninety-three N3 squamous cell carcinoma head and neck cancer patients were included. Primary tumor treatment was divided to definitive CCRT (CCRT group) or curative surgery followed by adjuvant CCRT (surgery group). Neck treatment was also classified into two treatment modalities: definitive CCRT to the neck (CCRT group) or curative neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT (neck dissection group). Overall, the 2-year overall survival (OS), local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) were 51.8%, 47.3%, 45.6%, and 43.6%, respectively. In both oropharyngeal cancer and nonoropharyngeal cancer patients, in terms of OS, LRFS, RRFS or DMFS no difference was noted regarding primary tumor treatment (CCRT vs. surgery) or neck treatment (CCRT vs. neck dissection). In summary, N3 neck patients treated with definitive CCRT may achieve similar outcomes to those treated with upfront neck dissection followed by adjuvant CCRT. Caution should be made to avoid overtreatment for this group of patients.

Surgery or Radiotherapy of the Primary Tumor in T1-2 Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma with Resectable N3 Nodes: A Multicenter GETTEC Study

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of advanced nodal (N3) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) is poor. We investigated whether surgery or radiotherapy of early (T1-2) primary stage HSNCC is preferable to limit the overall morbidity after upfront neck dissection (uND) for N3 disease.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentric Groupe d'Étude des Tumeurs de la Tête Et du Cou study included patients undergoing uND and surgery or radiotherapy of their primary. Prognostic factors were evaluated using propensity score matching to account for biases in performing surgery depending on primary site and stage.

RESULTS

Of 189 T1-2, N3 HNSCC patients, 70 (37.0%) underwent uND: 42 with surgery of their primary and 28 with radiotherapy only. Radiotherapy alone was more frequent in patients with hypopharyngeal primaries. All local (N = 3) and regional (N = 10) relapses (included 2 locoregional relapses) occurred within the first 2 years. There were 16 distant metastatic failures. Five-year locoregional relapse and survival incidences were 15.7% and 66.5% and were similar regardless of the treatment of the primary. The overall morbidity rate was 65.2% and was similar after weighting by the inverse propensity score (p = 0.148). The only prognostic factor for morbidity was the radicality of the uND. Prolonged parenteral feeding was not more frequent in patients only irradiated to their primary (p = 0.118). Prolonged tracheostomy was more frequent after surgery of the primary.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with T1-2, N3 HNSCC undergoing uND, radiotherapy and surgery of the primary yield similar oncological outcomes. Morbidity was related to the extent of neck dissection.

Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one.

RECOMMENDATIONS

For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

Outcome of patients following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable cervical nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas

BACKGROUND

This study was undertaken to assess the effects of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) on patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) having advanced unresectable cervical nodal metastasis.

METHODOLOGY

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the response of unresectable nodes to NACT in a pragmatic manner. Patients were grouped according to the response noted and the treatment offered after chemotherapy. The median survival amongst the patients in these groups was compared.

RESULTS

The study included 51 patients. Oral cavity was the commonest site (67.2%). Favourable nodal response was seen in 64.7% of the patients. Up to 87.9% of the nodal responders were amenable to curative intent therapy. The overall survival of patients undergoing surgery, definitive chemoradiotherapy, palliative chemotherapy and palliative radiotherapy was 24, 13, 10 and 9 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

NACT may be utilized in HNSCC with advanced inoperable nodal disease to make them amenable to definitive therapy.

Prognostic role of extracapsular spread in planned neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of nodes with extracapsular spread (ECS) in patients treated with a planned neck dissection after chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective study of 109 cN+ patients who achieved a complete response in the primary location after chemoradiotherapy and treated with a planned neck dissection.

RESULTS

The 5-year disease-specific survival for patients without residual metastatic nodes in the neck dissection (pN0, n = 69) was 75.7% (95% CI: 64.4%-87.0%). For patients with metastatic nodes without ECS (pN+/ECS-negative, n = 17), the corresponding figure was 74.0% (95% CI: 48.2%-99.8%), and for patients with metastatic neck nodes with ECS (pN+/ECS-positive, n = 23) it was 8.7% (95% CI: 0.0%-24.3%) (P = .0001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of ECS in the pathologic study of the planned neck dissections carried out after chemoradiotherapy in patients with human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-negative) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) allows identification of a group of patients with a high risk of failure.

Clinical outcomes for patients presenting with N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) and N3 nodal disease.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients with N3 HNSCC identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 4867 patients with N3 HNSCC treated with primary surgery or chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Propensity-adjusted median survival was 54.2 and 44.8 months for surgery and CRT, respectively (P = .06). Oropharyngeal primary subsite demonstrated a survival advantage with surgery versus CRT with propensity-adjusted median survivals of 86.0 and 61.9 months, respectively (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Management of N3 HNSCC relies largely on CRT. Patients with N3 nodal disease with nonoropharyngeal primary tumors exhibit 5-year overall survival approaching 30% independent of initial treatment modality. Patients with oropharyngeal primaries exhibit improved outcomes with surgery largely influenced by the human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative subset. These data represent the most comprehensive analysis of N3 HNSCC outcomes and serves as a foundation for future research and clinical management.

Clinical outcome of salvage neck dissections in head and neck cancer in relation to initial treatment, extent of surgery and patient factors

OBJECTIVE

Salvage surgery has a higher complication rate compared to primary surgical treatment. We evaluated clinical outcome of salvage neck dissections in relation to initial treatment modality, extent of surgery and patient-related factors.

DESIGN

Single institution consecutive case series.

SETTING

Tertiary Head and Neck Cancer Centre.

PARTICIPANTS

In all, 87 patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, who underwent salvage neck dissection after initial radiotherapy (n = 30), radiotherapy with carboplatin/5-fluorouracil (n = 43) or radiotherapy with cetuximab (n = 14).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of complications, disease-specific survival.

RESULTS

Complications occurred in 28% of the patients. Multivariate analysis identified extent of neck dissection as the only independent predictor of surgical complications (P = 0.010). Surgical complication rate was 16% after radiotherapy with systemic treatment, and 47% after radiotherapy alone (P = 0.171). The 5-year disease-specific survival was 55%, independent of complications, initial treatment, extent of surgery and patient-related factors.

CONCLUSION

The only predictor for surgical complications was extent of surgery. Survival was not influenced by complications.

Outcomes for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma presenting with N3 nodal disease

Background

The present study evaluated clinical outcomes for patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma presenting with N3 nodal disease.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients was performed. Pearson chi-square and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to analyze patient demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment variables. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank test. Univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards models was used to define factors associated with overall survival. Patient and tumor characteristics associated with treatment assignments were analyzed by univariate multinomial logistic regression.

Results

We identified 36 patients with radiographically-defined N3 disease. For the entire cohort, median follow-up was 23.6 (range 2.8–135.0) months, and overall survival was 60% at 2 years and 30% at 5 years. Overall survival was similar between patients receiving primary surgery, radiotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.10). Primary, regional, and distant control at 5 years was 71%, 66%, and 53%, respectively. There was a trend towards improved regional control with primary surgery (p = 0.07). Planned neck dissection following primary chemoradiotherapy did not improve regional control (p = 0.55). Patients with p16-positive tumors exhibited improved overall (p = 0.05) and metastatic recurrence-free survival (p < 0.05). There were no factors predictive of treatment assignment nor factors associated with overall survival, local and regional control, or distant metastases free-survival on univariate analysis.

Conclusions

Patients with N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma exhibit 5-year overall survival rates of approximately 30% regardless of treatment modality. Planned neck dissection does not improve regional control in patients undergoing definitive chemoradiotherapy. p16-positive patients represent a favorable cohort. Distant failure comprises the major failure pattern and should be the focus of future studies in improving the outcome of this patient cohort.

Neck lymph node metastases from unknown primary

Metastatic cervical carcinoma from unknown primary is a metastatic disease in the lymph nodes of the neck without any evidence of a primary tumour after appropriate investigation. The condition is rare and definite evidence is lacking for both diagnosis and treatment. In this review of the literature, we tried to draw some clinical indications based on the few available studies. We ultimately came to the following conclusions: (1) a thorough and accurate diagnostic work-up should be systematically offered. It includes accurate inspection with fibroscopy, CT or MRI, fine needle aspiration, panendoscopy and positron emission tomography, (2) Patients with low-volume neck disease, N1 and N2a stage and without extracapsular extension on histopathological examination should receive single modality treatment. Radiotherapy and surgery may be similarly effective but, if possible, surgery (excisional biopsy, neck dissection and tonsillectomy) should be favoured because it consents a more precise staging, (3) patients with more advanced conditions require combined treatment in the form of either resection followed by adjuvant radiation (±chemotherapy) or primary chemoradiation (±post-therapy neck dissection).

Less may be more: nodal treatment in neck positive head neck cancer patients

Ongoing debates about the need and extent of planned neck dissection (PND), and required nodal radiation doses volumes lead to this evaluation. Aim was to assess nodal control after definitive intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT ± systemic therapy) followed by PND in our head neck cancer cohort with advanced nodal disease. Between 01/2005 and 12/2013, 99 squamous cell cancer HNC patients with pre-therapeutic nodal metastasis ≥3 cm were treated with definitive IMRT followed by PND. In addition, outcome in 103 patients with nodal relapse after IMRT and observation only (no-PND cohort) were analyzed. Prior to PND, PET-CT, fine needle aspirations, ultrasound and palpation were assessed regarding its predictive value. Patterns of nodal relapse were assessed in patients with isolated neck failure after definitive IMRT alone. 70/99 (70 %) PND specimens showed histopathological complete response (hCR), which translated into statistically significantly superior survival compared with partial response (hPR) with 4-year overall survival, disease specific survival and nodal control rates of 90/83/96 vs 67/60/78 % (p = 0.002/0.001/0.003). 1/99 patient developed isolated subsequent nodal disease. 64/2147 removed nodes contained viable tumor (3 %). Predictive information of the performed diagnostic investigations was not reliable. 17/70 hCR patients showed true negative findings in available three to four investigations (0/29 hPR). 27/103 no-PND patients developed isolated neck disease (26 %) with successful salvage in 21/24 [88 %, or 21/27 (78 %)]. Nearly all failures occurred in the prior nodal gross tumor volume area. A more restrictive approach regarding PND and/or nodal IMRT dose-volumes may be justified.

Residual neck disease management in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiotherapy plus cetuximab

PURPOSE

Management of residual neck disease (RND) is one of the unsolved points after bio-radiotherapy (BRT) in loco-regional advanced squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). The aims of the study were to characterize the radiological pattern of response by computed tomography (CT) and to assess the role of positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT in this setting for a better decision-making in the indication of neck dissection (ND).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 202 patients consecutively diagnosed with node-positive SCCHN (N1: 24; N2: 152; N3: 26) who had been treated with concomitant radiotherapy and cetuximab with or without previous induction chemotherapy between 2006 and 2013. Radiological evaluation after treatment was assessed by standard criteria using CT and in addition by PET/CT when RND was suspected in cases from 2010.

RESULTS

There were 42 (21 %) patients who achieved complete response of the primary tumor persisting RND by CT. From this group, 24 patients were managed without PET/CT, leading to the performance of ND in 22 (92 %). On the other hand, 18 patients underwent PET/CT and ND was performed in only 6 (33 %). The overall survival was not different between both groups (p = 0.32). After histological examination and follow-up, PET/CT obtained a positive predictive value of 56 % and a negative predictive value of 89 %.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiological response after BRT is similar to that after treatment with chemo-radiotherapy, thereby validating in this scenario the accepted CT criteria to define complete response of the neck. However, when RND is suspected by CT, PET/CT is useful to prevent unnecessary ND.

Cervical nodal metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MRI criteria for treatment assessment

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess MRI criteria for detecting residual malignant head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) nodes after chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

One hundred and six metastatic nodes were assessed 6 weeks posttreatment by MRI for necrosis, extranodal neoplastic spread (ENS), size, and percentage of size change. Size measurements were reanalyzed after dividing posttreatment nodes into "discrete solid," "discrete necrotic," and "indiscrete" groups. Results were correlated with nodal response at 2 years.

RESULTS

Eighty-three residual nodes were benign and 23 were malignant. Significant predictors of outcome were percentage of change in solid volume (total-necrotic volume; p = .0002) for all posttreatment nodes and percentage of change in total volume for "discrete solid" posttreatment nodes (p = .0003), the latter showing a ≤78% reduction of predicted residual malignant nodes with a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.2% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 60%. Necrosis, ENS, and size of "discrete necrotic" and "indiscrete" nodes were not significant criteria.

CONCLUSION

Necrosis and ENS were inaccurate criteria for residual malignant nodes and hindered the accuracy of size measurements. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E1598-E1604, 2016.

Imaging strategy for response evaluation to chemoradiotherapy of the nodal disease in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is used to treat lymph node metastatic head and neck cancer patients. Regional control of the neck disease is important to improve the prognosis, and the accuracy of the method used to evaluate the metastatic lymph node(s) after CRT is crucial to the decision-making process for any following salvage surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CRT were divided in two groups of patients of those showing complete clinical response (CR) and those showing clinical non-response (non-CR), as assessed by computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography, fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), and fine needle aspiration cytology. The responses (CR vs. non-CR) were compared with the actual clinical outcomes. For the interim analysis, the study period was broken down into two periods, namely, the exploratory phase (patients treated between January 2002 and April 2012) and the validating phase (patients treated between May 2012 and January 2014).

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were as follows: CT and/or MRI, 66.7, 73.8, and 72.8 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase; ultrasonography, 91.7, 70.6, and 73.4 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 80.0, 82.8, and 82.4 %, respectively, in the validating phase; FDG-PET, 50.0, 97.5, and 91.3 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 60.0, 100, and 94.1 %, respectively, in the validating phase; cytology, 68.4, 95.9, and 90.3 %, respectively, in the exploratory phase and 66.7, 100, and 85.7 %, respectively, in the validating phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our results, CT and/or MRI appear to be inadequate methods for the evaluation of the response of lymph node(s) to CRT. In contrast, ultrasonography appears to be a highly sensitive and useful tool for positive screening at 6-8 weeks after CRT, and FDG-PET appears to be a highly specific and useful tool for negative screening at 8-12 weeks after CRT.

The role of neck dissection in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

ORIGINAL STATEMENT

Lymph node metastases in the neck are a major prognostic factor in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Assessment and treatment of lymph nodes in the neck are of utmost importance. Inappropriate management of lymph node metastases can result in regional failure. Radical neck dissection has been and is still considered the "gold standard" for the surgical management of lymph node metastases of HNSCC. However, the philosophy of treatment of the neck has evolved during the last decades. Surgeons progressively realized that extensive neck dissections were associated with a higher morbidity but not always with a better oncologic outcome than more limited procedures. Today, a comprehensive therapeutic approach of the neck is multidisciplinary, taking into account the patient's quality of life without jeopardizing cure and survival. A better understanding of the patterns of lymph node metastasis promoted the use of selective neck dissection in selected patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a reliable diagnostic procedure for staging the neck in node-negative early oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. With increasing use of chemoradiation in locally advanced HNSCC, paradigms are evolving. Currently, there are strong arguments supporting the position that neck dissection is no longer justified in patients without clinically residual disease in the neck.

Role of induction chemotherapy for N3 head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with N3 (>6cm) lymph nodes remains difficult, and the best treatment strategy has not been elucidated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of various treatment modalities.

METHODS

Sixty-nine patients with HNSCC and N3 neck disease treated with definitive therapy in our institute between 1987 and 2013 were included in the analysis. We compared the clinical outcomes of radiotherapy (RT) alone, chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and surgery with or without induction chemotherapy (ICT).

RESULTS

The overall survival (OS) at three years for the patients with N3 neck disease was 41%. The three-year OS rates of patients treated with definitive surgery and definitive CRT were 41% and 48%, respectively. There were no significant differences between these two treatments (P=0.82). The OS of patients who received ICT followed by definitive therapy was significantly better than that of patients who did not (P<0.001). The most common recurrence pattern was distant metastases. The rate of distant metastases was 61% of all treatment failures (20/33).

CONCLUSION

The high rate of distant metastases in patients with N3 neck disease suggests that prevention of distant metastases can improve survival. Based on this study, we consider that ICT may play an important role in the treatment of N3 neck disease.

[The accuracy of evaluating the response of metastatic lymph nodes after concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma]

BACKGROUND

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is used to treat advanced head and neck cancer. The accuracy of evaluating lymph nodes metastases following CCRT is important for subsequent therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were divided into two groups according to the nodal status, the complete response (CR) and the non-CR groups, as determined by imaging and fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) performed 4-8 weeks after the CCRT, and the findings were compared with the status 6 months after the treatment completion.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, the specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of each evaluation method were as follows: 66.7%, 73.5%, 26.7%, 93.8% and 72.5%, respectively, for computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); 91.7%, 69.9%, 30.6%, 98.3% and 72.6% for ultrasonography (US) ; 50.0%, 96.4%, 66.7%, 93.0% and 90.5% for fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) or PET-CT; and 68.4%, 96.1%, 81.3%, 92.5% and 90.6% for FNAC.

CONCLUSION

To evaluate the response of lymph node(s) treated by CCRT, US is useful as a positive screening tool and FDG-PET and PET-CT as negative screening tools. FNAC is useful in evaluating suspicious lymph nodes in both positive and negative cases.

The nodal response to chemoselection predicts the risk of recurrence following definitive chemoradiotherapy for pharyngeal cancer

CONCLUSIONS

The poor response of neck tumors to induction chemotherapy (ICT) as chemoselection is related to a significantly worse prognosis, including higher risks of local recurrence and/or distant metastasis, after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

OBJECTIVES

Neck dissection is frequently performed to treat residual lymph nodes after CRT for the purpose of locoregional control; however, the prognosis of patients with pathologically proven residual neck tumors is poor, and no methods for predicting unfavorable results before CRT have been established. Therefore, in the present study, we focused on the response of lymph nodes to ICT and its relationship with the prognosis among patients treated with chemoselection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 27 oropharyngeal and 24 hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma stage III/IV consecutive patients with cervical lymph node metastasis who exhibited a response of >50% in the primary tumor to ICT followed by concurrent definitive CRT.

RESULTS

The relapse-free survival of the patients who responded (partial response/complete response, PR/CR) to ICT was significantly superior to that of the patients who did not respond (stable disease, SD) to ICT (p = 0.008).

Management of advanced laryngeal cancer

Squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx continues to be the commonest head and neck cancer in many Western countries. The larynx plays a key role for many essential functions, including breathing, voice production, airway protection, and swallowing. The goals of laryngeal cancer treatment are thus to provide best possible oncologic control, while optimizing functional outcomes. In recent decades, the treatment paradigm for advanced laryngeal cancer has shifted from one of primary surgery (total laryngectomy) as gold standard, toward non-surgical organ-preserving treatment using radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. However, concerns have emerged regarding functional outcomes after chemoradiotherapy, as well as possible decreased overall survival in patients with laryngeal cancer. The purpose of the present review is to review surgical and non-surgical options for treatment of advanced laryngeal cancer, as well as the evidence supporting each of these.

Temporal nodal regression and regional control after primary radiation therapy for N2-N3 head-and-neck cancer stratified by HPV status

PURPOSE

To compare the temporal lymph node (LN) regression and regional control (RC) after primary chemoradiation therapy/radiation therapy in human papillomavirus-related [HPV(+)] versus human papillomavirus-unrelated [HPV(-)] head-and-neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

All cases of N2-N3 HNC treated with radiation therapy/chemoradiation therapy between 2003 and 2009 were reviewed. Human papillomavirus status was ascertained by p16 staining on all available oropharyngeal cancers. Larynx/hypopharynx cancers were considered HPV(-). Initial radiologic complete nodal response (CR) (≤1.0 cm 8-12 weeks after treatment), ultimate LN resolution, and RC were compared between HPV(+) and HPV(-) HNC. Multivariate analysis identified outcome predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 257 HPV(+) and 236 HPV(-) HNCs were identified. The initial LN size was larger (mean, 2.9 cm vs 2.5 cm; P<.01) with a higher proportion of cystic LNs (38% vs 6%, P<.01) in HPV(+) versus HPV(-) HNC. CR was achieved is 125 HPV(+) HNCs (49%) and 129 HPV(-) HNCs (55%) (P=.18). The mean post treatment largest LN was 36% of the original size in the HPV(+) group and 41% in the HPV(-) group (P<.01). The actuarial LN resolution was similar in the HPV(+) and HPV(-) groups at 12 weeks (42% and 43%, respectively), but it was higher in the HPV(+) group than in the HPV(-) group at 36 weeks (90% vs 77%, P<.01). The median follow-up period was 3.6 years. The 3-year RC rate was higher in the HPV(-) CR cases versus non-CR cases (92% vs 63%, P<.01) but was not different in the HPV(+) CR cases versus non-CR cases (98% vs 92%, P=.14). On multivariate analysis, HPV(+) status predicted ultimate LN resolution (odds ratio, 1.4 [95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.7]; P<.01) and RC (hazard ratio, 0.3 [95% confidence interval 0.2-0.6]; P<.01).

CONCLUSIONS

HPV(+) LNs involute more quickly than HPV(-) LNs but undergo a more prolonged process to eventual CR beyond the time of initial assessment at 8 to 12 weeks after treatment. Post radiation neck dissection is advisable for all non-CR HPV(-)/non-CR N3 HPV(+) cases, but it may be avoided for selected non-CR N2 HPV(+) cases with a significant LN involution if they can undergo continued imaging surveillance. The role of positron emission tomography for response assessment should be investigated.

Outcomes after primary chemoradiotherapy for N3 (>6 cm) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after an FDG-PET--guided neck management policy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess whether a positron emission tomography (PET)-directed policy remains appropriate for managing neck nodes (N3; >6 cm) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

METHODS

All patients with N3 (>6 cm) HNSCC treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) at our institution between 2005 and 2012 were included in the analysis. Patients underwent PET assessment before and 12 weeks after CRT. Neck dissections were performed for PET-avid residual nodal abnormalities after complete response at the primary site. Rate of isolated nodal failure (INF) was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Median follow-up from diagnosis for 33 patients was 30 months (range, 6-76 months). INF occurred in 2 patients (6%) with neck dissections performed in 4 cases (12%). First failure was predominantly distant metastatic (10; 30%).

CONCLUSION

The rate of INF remains low when following a PET-directed neck management policy after definitive CRT for N3 (>6 cm) HNSCC.

Cisplatin and radiotherapy with or without erlotinib in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a randomized phase II trial

PURPOSE

The combination of cisplatin and radiotherapy is a standard treatment for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab-radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in this population, validating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) as a target. Erlotinib is a small-molecule inhibitor of EGFR. Adding EGFR inhibition to standard cisplatin-radiotherapy may improve efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with locally advanced SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 22, and 43 combined with 70 Gy of radiotherapy (arm A) or the same chemoradiotherapy with erlotinib 150 mg per day, starting 1 week before radiotherapy and continued to its completion (arm B). The primary end point was complete response rate (CRR), evaluated by central review. The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Available tumors were tested for p16 and EGFR by fluorescent in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

Between December 2006 and October 2011, 204 patients were randomly assigned. Arms were well balanced for all patient characteristics including p16, with the exception of more women on arm A. Patients on arm B had more rash, but treatment arms did not differ regarding rates of other grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Arm A had a CRR of 40% and arm B had a CRR of 52% (P = .08) when evaluated by central review. With a median follow-up time of 26 months and 54 progression events, there was no difference in PFS (hazard ratio, 0.9; P = .71).

CONCLUSION

Erlotinib did not increase the toxicity of cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced HNSCC but failed to significantly increase CRR or PFS.

The role of neck dissection after radical chemoradiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer: should we move back?

Until a few decades ago neck dissection (ND) was the standard surgical approach for node-positive tumours. Nowadays patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer can be treated with definitive chemoradiation (CRT), which includes the treatment of the neck; however, results on residual viable tumour after conservative treatment are heterogeneous and depend on initial node stage and primary treatment. Many authors accept adjuvant surgery in patients with N2-3 disease. Regardless of the results of upfront CRT, even if there is no evidence of lymph node metastases, when the risk for persistent positive neck nodes exceeds 15-20%, elective ND might be indicated. However, despite the diffusion of innovative technologies and therapies, there are controversies about both response evaluation and surgical management of initially involved neck nodes after definitive CRT and organ preservation treatment. In this paper we will analyse state of art of neck evaluation after CRT and discuss the role of ND.

Current advances in diagnosis and surgical treatment of lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer

Still today, the status of the cervical lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor for head and neck cancer. So the individual treatment concept of the lymphatic drainage depends on the treatment of the primary tumor as well as on the presence or absence of suspect lymph nodes in the imaging diagnosis. Neck dissection may have either a therapeutic objective or a diagnostic one. The selective neck dissection is currently the method of choice for the treatment of patients with advanced head and neck cancers and clinical N0 neck. For oncologic reasons, this procedure is generally recommended with acceptable functional and aesthetic results, especially under the aspect of the mentioned staging procedure. In this review article, current aspects on pre- and posttherapeutic staging of the cervical lymph nodes are described and the indication and the necessary extent of neck dissection for head and neck cancer is discussed. Additionally the critical question is discussed if the lymph node metastasis bears an intrinsic risk of metastatic development and thus its removal in a most possible early stage plays an important role.

Retrospective review of positron emission tomography with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the posttreatment setting in human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To determine the value of positron emission tomography (PET) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in assessing the need for neck dissection by retrospectively reviewing the pathology reports of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Seventy-seven patients with HPV-related SCC.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Seventy-seven consecutive patients with a diagnosis of HPV-related SCC who were treated with radiotherapy as the primary treatment between August 2007 and October 2010 were retrospectively evaluated for radiologic and pathologic rate of persistence of nodal metastasis after completion of definitive radiotherapy. Pretreatment and posttreatment imaging included contrast-enhanced CT and PET. Response to treatment was measured on CT, PET at standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds of 2 and 2.5, and PET/CT by a neuroradiologist in a blinded fashion. Then, the pathology report of the patients who underwent neck dissections was reviewed for nodal status after resection and correlated with the imaging findings.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients, 67 met the study criteria, with an average follow-up PET/CT scan at 90.5 days after completion of radiotherapy. Ten patients did not undergo follow-up PET/CT imaging. Twenty patients underwent neck dissections after completion of radiation therapy. Of these 20 patients, 4 had persistent tumor and 16 did not have viable tumor. Using the final pathology report to correlate with imaging responses, CT had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 85.7% (95% CI, 48.7%-97.4%), PET with SUV thresholds of 2 had an NPV of 91.7% (95% CI, 64.6%-98.5%), PET with a cutoff SUV of 2.5 had an NPV of 85.7% (95% CI, 60.1%-96.0%), PET/CT with an SUV of 2 had an NPV of 100% (95% CI, 59.8%-100.0%), and PET/CT with an SUV of 2.5 had an NPV of 85.7% (95% CI, 48.7%-97.4%). The 47 patients who did not undergo neck dissection had a median follow-up of 26 months without an isolated neck failure. Analysis of all 67 patients in the cohort revealed the following values: CT had an NPV of 95.7% (95% CI, 85.8%-98.8%), PET with an SUV of 2 had an NPV of 98.2% (95% CI, 90.4%-99.7%), PET with an SUV of 2.5 had an NPV of 95.0% (95% CI, 86.3%-98.3%), PET/CT with an SUV of 2 had an NPV of 100.0% (95% CI, 92.0%-100.0%), and PET/CT with an SUV of 2.5 had an NPV of 95.7% (95% CI, 85.8%-98.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Positron emission tomography combined with contrast-enhanced CT has a better NPV than either imaging modality alone in patients with HPV-associated oropharyngeal SCC. Furthermore, PET/CT with an SUV threshold of 2 used in patients with HPV-related SCC offers an imaging modality with a high NPV that may obviate the need for unnecessary neck dissections.

Persistent neck disease after chemoradiation for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify the incidence of residual viable neck disease in patients with mucosal squamous cell carcinoma of the upper aero-digestive tract, following primary chemoradiation at a tertiary centre.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients treated with primary chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the aero-digestive tract between August 2001 and August 2008. Neck status pre- and post-treatment was the primary focus.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients with node-positive disease prior to chemoradiation were included. Thirty-seven (88.1 per cent) achieved complete response to treatment: no patient in this group underwent neck dissection, five died due to recurrence at the primary site or distant metastasis, and none suffered neck recurrence. Five (11.9 per cent) patients achieved partial response to chemoradiation and underwent neck dissection; viable tumour was found in one patient.

CONCLUSION

Our data support conservative management of the neck in patients with complete response to chemoradiation, and consolidation neck dissection in patients with partial response.

Economic analysis of FDG-PET-guided management of the neck after primary chemoradiotherapy for node-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this economic analysis was to model different strategies using pre-treatment nodal stage or nodal response assessment with CT or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT to determine the need for neck dissection.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis was developed on the basis of probability data from a prospective study of PET-guided management of the neck in patients achieving a complete response at the primary site. Costs were derived from our institution's activity-based clinical costing system. The effect of uncertainty was tested with sensitivity and scenario analyses including nationally representative cost data.

RESULTS

Strategies incorporating PET had a 7% rate for neck dissection compared with 44% for CT-guided and 90% for planned neck dissection. The cost per patient was A$16,502 for planned neck dissection, A$8014 for CT-guided, and A$2573 for PET-guided. A policy with PET used only for incomplete response on CT was the least-cost strategy (A$2111). Policies incorporating PET remained the most efficient for all sensitivity/scenario analyses.

CONCLUSION

The incorporation of PET/CT into nodal response assessment significantly reduced the number of unnecessary neck dissections and generated considerable cost savings in our cohort.

Is neck dissection necessary after induction plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in complete responder head and neck cancer patients with pretherapy advanced nodal disease?

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to assess, in the setting of a single-institution prospective clinical trial, the necessity of planned neck dissection (PND) in physically and radiologically complete responders with pretherapy advanced nodal disease.

METHODS

Between January 2000 and July 2007 a total of 139 patients were enrolled to receive a regimen of platinum-based multidrug induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC/CCRT). A total of 75 of the enrolled patients with advanced nodal disease were included in this retrospective study. Between 8 and 12 weeks from the end of treatment, the response to IC/CCRT was evaluated by fiber-optic endoscopy and head and neck contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

The complete clinical response (cCR) rate was 68%. Among the 51 patients who achieved locoregional cCR at the end of CCRT, 8 underwent PND according to the study recommendation. Of the 43 patients with cCR who did not undergo PND, 2 patients (4.7%) experienced isolated regional recurrences with the 5-year regional control being 82%. Patients with cCR did not have a significantly lower regional control compared with patients with cCR who underwent ND (P=.962). Pathological evidence of residual disease was found in 81% of the patients with less than cCR who underwent ND.

CONCLUSIONS

In physically and radiologically complete responders to IC/CCRT, a PND appears not justified. Conversely, PND should be performed in patients clinically suspected of having residual disease in the neck, as a significant proportion have viable tumor cell in post CCRT ND.