Electrophysiologic facial nerve monitoring during parotidectomy

Update on the Treatment of Salivary Gland Carcinomas

Salivary gland carcinoma is a rare form of head and neck carcinoma, but it comprises a variety of subsites and histologic subtypes that each present with unique clinical courses and management challenges. Preoperative work-up generally consists of fine-needle aspiration cytology and MRI. However, because of the large variety of subtypes, there are often challenges obtaining a histologic diagnosis before surgery. Upfront surgery at the primary site leads to the greatest improvement in survival. Posttreatment surveillance of these patients is important. This article discusses some of the current controversies in the management of salivary gland carcinomas.

Facial Nerve Injury after Extracapsular Dissection for Benign Parotid Tumors with and without Intraoperative Monitoring: A Retrospective Study of a Single Center

BACKGROUND

Facial nerve injury (FNI) is the most common complication of parotid surgery and manifests as FN paralysis. The use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) is becoming an established intraoperative aid for surgeons, assisting in the identification of the location and dissection of the facial nerve trunk or branches. The postoperative outcomes of parotid surgery with and without monitoring have been addressed in only a limited number of studies.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of postoperative paralysis in patients undergoing extracapsular dissection (ED) for benign parotid tumors concerning the use or non-use of IFNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The retrospective study was conducted at the Maxillo-Facial Department of the Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 consisted of patients who underwent surgery without IFNM (1 January 2015 to 31 December 2018); Group 2, on the other hand, consisted of patients who underwent surgery with IFNM (1 January 2019 to 31 December 2022). Group 2 employed the Nerve Integrity Monitor (Medtronic's NIM®). To classify the FN function, we employed the modified House-Brackmann classification system. To evaluate the dependence between the "use of IFNM" and "postoperative paralysis", a descriptive analysis was conducted, including applying the Chi-squared test and calculating the Pearson correlation. Subsequently, a binary logistic regression model was applied to further evaluate the correlation between the latter. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 276 patients were included in the study: 120 subjects were assigned to Group 1 (43.5%, comprising 60 men and 60 women) and 156 subjects were assigned to Group 2 (56.5%, comprising 93 men and 63 women). In 91.7% of the cases (n. 253, precisely 105 in Group 1 and 148 in Group 2), no FNI occurred. In 8.33% of the cases (n. 23, specifically 15 in Group 1 and 8 in Group 2), postoperative paralysis was observed. Of these subjects, only two in Group 1 had permanent paralysis (8.69%); therefore, 91.31% had transient paralysis. As a result, 91.31% of the subjects exhibited transient paralysis. In the case of FNI, 78% of the cases involved the marginal mandibular branch (n. 18), 13% involved the temporo-zygomatic branch (n. 3), and 7% involved more than one branch (n = 2). The results of the multivariable binary logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the use of IFNM was a statistically significant influencing factor, with an estimated reduction in postoperative paralysis of approximately 62% (OR 0.378; 95% CI: 0.155-0.92). In Group 2, the occurrence of transient complications was significantly reduced (OR 0.387; 95% CI: 0.149-1.002 with p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The use of IFNM in the ED for benign parotid tumors significantly reduces the rate of FNI and, consequently, postoperative FN paralysis. On the other hand, the use of monitoring systems must not replace the experience and anatomical knowledge of the surgeon.

Impact of Surgeon's Experience and Tumor's Nature in the Use of Intraoperative Facial Nerve Monitoring in Superficial Parotidectomy. Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

To assess the effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) compared to non-monitoring in the prevention of post-operative facial nerve palsy during superficial parotidectomy. Patients treated with curative intent for parotid gland tumors between January 2020 and January 2022 were included. The study population has been divided in 2 groups, based on IFNM: the group A included patients operated with IFNM, whilst group B was the non-monitoring group. A further classification focused on the pathologies and the surgeons' experience. The study group included 58 patients, 27 female and 31 male. The mean age was 45.7 yr (range 36-78). No statistical difference has been found in post-operative HB grade between group A and B. The analysis of patients affected by pleomorphic surface lobe adenomas of the parotid did not show a statistical difference in HB outcome (p > 0.05). The analysis of the effect of surgeons' experience in IFNM advantage did not show statistical difference for superficial parotid tumors. The results of the present study suggest that the use of IFNM during parotid surgery is not mandatory to preserve the VII nerve function, both in case of primary tumor and in case of recurrence, and even when surgery is performed by less experienced surgeon compared to those cases treated by a more experienced surgeon.

Facial nerve monitoring in parotid gland surgery: Design and feasibility assessment of a potential standardized technique

Background

Even though the use of nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery is not the gold standard to prevent damage to the nerve, it surely offers some advantages over the traditional approach. Different from thyroid surgery, where a series of steps in intraoperative nerve monitoring have been described to confirm not only the integrity but-most importantly-the function of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, in parotid gland surgery, a formal guideline to follow while dissecting the facial nerve has yet to be described.

Methods

A five-year retrospective study was done reviewing the intraoperative records of patients who underwent parotid gland surgery under neural monitoring. The operative findings regarding the neuromonitoring process, particularly in regard to the amplitude of two main branches, were revised. A literature search was done to search for guidelines to follow when a facial nerve loss of signal is encountered.

Results

Fifty-five patients were operated on using the Nim 3 Nerve Monitoring System (Medtronic); 31 were female patients, and 47 patients had benign lesions. Minimum changes were observed in the amplitude records after a comparison was made between the first and the last stimulation. There were only three articles discussing the term loss of signal during parotid gland surgery.

Conclusion

Today, no sufficient attention has been given to the facial nerve monitoring process during parotidectomy. This study proposes a formal guideline to follow during this procedure as well as an instruction to consider when a loss of signal is observed to develop a uniform technique of facial nerve stimulation.

Incidence and Possible Predictive Factors of Facial Nerve Paralysis after Superficial Parotidectomy for Benign Tumours: Our Experience

Salivary gland tumors represent 3-10% of all head and neck neoplasms. Most of the tumours are benign with parotid gland being most commonly affected. Surgical intervention in the form of parotidectomy forms the mainstay of treatment. Among the various postoperative complications that may occur after parotidectomy, facial nerve weakness is the most dreaded one for both the surgeon as well as the patient. In the literature, the incidence of transient facial weakness after parotid surgery ranges from 10 to 68%, and long-term dysfunction ranges from 0 to 19%. Apart from injury mechanisms such as nerve division, stretch, thermal injuries, ischemia, several other risk factors such as tumour size, disease duration etc. have also been identified for post parotidectomy facial nerve dysfunction which vary considerably from study to study. Thus, facial nerve injury despite being a common and dreaded complication is also a preventable one. We in our institute conducted a retrospective study from January 2018 to December 2021 to evaluate the incidence of facial nerve weakness and possible predictive factors among 60 patients who underwent superficial parotidectomy for benign tumours and found that when it comes to benign tumours surgical technique rather than tumour factors are more important in preventing nerve injury. Undertaking this study was important in order to emphasize the importance of extensive preoperative planning and better surgical practices among budding head and neck surgeons in our country.

Results of 301 Parotidectomies: A Twenty-Year Experience of One Single Institution

To evaluate demographic, clinical, surgical and histopathological results and complications of 301 parotidectomies performed in southern part of Turkey. The results of 297 patients undergoing 301 parotidectomies between 2000 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Four patients underwent bilateral parotidectomy. Age, gender, side and size of lesion, postoperative facial nerve function (FNF) for benign tumors and types of surgery were evaluated. There were 172 male and 125 female patients. The mean age was 52.53 ± 16.67 years (range 11-90 years). Patients with malignant tumor had higher mean age than the patients with benign diseases (p < 0.001) and the mean age of Warthin tumor (WT) patients was significantly higher than pleomorphic adenoma (PA) (p < 0.001). There was a significant male dominancy in WTs than the PAs (p < 0.001). The mean size of the malignant tumors was significantly higher than the benign tumors (p = 0.012). The mean of cigarette smoking value (pack/year) was higher in WTs than the PAs (p < 0.001). WT incidence was slightly higher than PA in between years 2010 and 2019 (p = 0.272) compared to between years 2000 and 2009. Fine needle aspiration biopsy had a sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 78% for the benign tumors. Tumor location (p < 0.001) and tumor size (p = 0.034) had negative effect on the postoperative FNF. The incidence of WT had a significant rise in the last decade. Deep lobe tumors and increased tumor size had effect postoperative FNF. Experience of surgeon is more important than nerve monitoring to prevent facial paralysis. Partial superficial parotidectomy was available methods for small benign tumors in tail of the parotid gland.

Pediatric parotidectomy outcomes: A 14-year multicenter study

Objectives

Parotidectomy increases childhood challenges. This study aimed to determine the clinical profiles, investigations, and outcomes of pediatric patients who had undergone parotidectomy.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective review of parotidectomy in pediatric patients between 2007 and 2020.

Results

In 108 parotidectomies, the final diagnoses were benign (47.22%), malignant (36.11%), and non-neoplastic (16.67%). The incidence of facial palsy was 37.03%, which was significantly lower in the superficial group than that in the total parotidectomy group (p = .021). The incidence of facial nerve palsy was significantly higher in the malignancy group than that in the benign group (p = .035). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) detected malignancy with 92.8% overall accuracy, 83.3% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. The sensitivity and specificity of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) were 54.2% and 92.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

Parotidectomy is commonly performed for benign and non-neoplastic diseases in pediatric patients. Facial nerve palsy is significantly associated with malignant tumors and total parotidectomy. MRI is the most accurate imaging modality for diagnosing malignant lesions. FNA exhibits moderate agreement with the final pathology.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Proposals for Standardization of Intraoperative Facial Nerve Monitoring during Parotid Surgery

Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (FNM) has been widely accepted as an adjunct during parotid surgery to facilitate identification of the facial nerve (FN) main trunk, dissection of FN branches, confirmation of FN function integrity, detection of FN injury and prognostication of facial expression after tumor resection. Although the use of FNM in parotidectomy is increasing, little uniformity exists in its application from the literature. Thus, not only are the results of many studies difficult to compare but the value of FNM technology is also limited. The article reviews the current literature and proposes our standardized FNM procedures during parotid surgery, such as standards in FNM setup, standards in general anesthesia, standards in FNM procedures and application of stimulus currents, interpretation of electrophysiologic signals and prediction of the facial expression outcome and pre-/post-operative assessment of facial expressions. We hope that the FNM standardized procedures will provide greater uniformity, improve the quality of applications and contribute to future research.

Pattern of facial nerve palsy during parotidectomy: a single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to report and analyze the prevalence of permanent facial nerve paralysis following parotidectomy for various benign and malignant lesions in a single center.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included all patients who underwent parotidectomy (total and superficial) for benign and malignant tumors and chronic inflammatory diseases during a 6-year period. Patients who had previously undergone an operation of the parotid gland and those with preoperative facial weakness were excluded.

RESULTS

The study included 127 patients ranging in age from 14 to 83 years (median, 45.89 years). Most patients were female (n = 83, 65.4%). The most prevalent procedure was superficial parotidectomy (n = 117, 92.1%), followed by total parotidectomy (n = 6, 4.7%). The average operative duration was 138 minutes (range, 80-400 minutes). Histopathology revealed that 109 (85.8%) patients had benign tumors, 14 (11.0%) had malignant tumors, and 4 (3.1%) had chronic sialadenitis. Only two patients sustained an injury to the cervical branch of the facial nerve.

CONCLUSION

In this single-center experience of parotid surgery, the rates of transient and permanent facial paralysis were acceptably low at 9.0% and 1.6%, respectively, for all pathologies.

Patient safety and quality improvements in parotid surgery

Parotidectomy is the mainstay treatment for tumors of the parotid gland. In an effort to improve clinical outcomes, several modern surgical techniques and perioperative interventions have been evaluated and refined. This review discusses current and actively debated perioperative interventions aimed at improving patient safety and the quality of parotidectomy. Relevant high-impact literature pertaining to preoperative diagnostic modalities, intraoperative surgical techniques, and postoperative care will be described.

Correlation between Electrophysiological Change and Facial Function in Parotid Surgery Patients

This observational study investigated intraoperative electrophysiological changes and their correlation with postoperative facial expressions in parotidectomy patients with visual confirmation of facial nerve (FN) continuity. Maximal electromyography(EMG) amplitudes of the facial muscles corresponding to temporal, zygomatic, buccal and mandibular branches were compared before/after FN dissection, and facial function at four facial regions were evaluated before/after parotidectomy in 112 patients. Comparisons of 448 pairs of EMG signals revealed at least one signal decrease after FN dissection in 75 (67%) patients. Regional facial weakness was only found in 13 of 16 signals with >50% amplitude decreases. All facial dysfunctions completely recovered within 6 months. EMG amplitude decreases often occur after FN dissection. An amplitude decrease >50% in an FN branch is associated with a high incidence of dysfunction in the corresponding facial region. This study tries to establish a standard facial nerve monitoring (FNM) procedure and a proper facial function grading system for parotid surgery that will be useful for the future study of FNM in parotid surgery.

Clinical outcomes of bulky parotid gland cancers: need for self-examination and screening program for early diagnosis of parotid tumors

Background

Early detection and diagnosis of parotid gland cancer (PGC) are essential to improve clinical outcomes, because Tumor-Node-Metastasis stage at diagnosis is a very strong indicator of prognosis in PGC. Nevertheless, some patients still present with large parotid mass, maybe due to the unawareness or ignorance of their disease. In this study, we aimed to present the clinical outcomes of bulky PGC (defined by a 4 cm cutoff point for T3–4 versus T1–2 tumors), to emphasize the necessity of a self-examination tool for parotid gland tumor.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 60 consecutive cases with bulky (equal to and greater than 4 cm in the longest diameter, determined radiologically) malignant tumors arising from the parotid gland from 1995 to 2016. The clinical and pathological factors were analyzed to identify risk factors for poor outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, we designed a self-examination tool for parotid gland tumors, similar to breast self-examination for breast cancer detection.

Results

Patients with bulky parotid cancer showed 48.9% 5-year and 24.5% 10-year overall survival rates and a 47.9% risk of high-grade malignancy. The common pathological diagnoses were carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (18.3%), adenocarcinoma (16.7%), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (16.7%), salivary duct carcinoma (16.7%), and adenoid cystic carcinoma (11.7%). Survival analyses revealed that tumor size (hazard ratio, HR = 1.262 upon increase of 1 cm, 95% confidence interval, 95%CI 1.059–1.502), lymph node metastasis (HR = 2.999, 95%CI 1.048–8.583), and high tumor grade (HR = 4.148, 95%CI 1.215–14.154) were independent prognostic factors in multivariable analysis. Functional preservation of the facial nerve was possible only in less than half of patients.

Conclusion

In bulky PGC, lymph node metastasis at diagnosis and high tumor grade indicated poor survival outcomes, and functional outcomes of the facial nerve were suboptimal. Thus, a public effort seems to be necessary to decrease these patients with bulky PGC, and to increase patients’ self-awareness of their disease. As a way of early detection, we proposed a parotid self-examination tool to detect parotid gland tumors at an early stage, which is similar to breast self-examination.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-07902-9.

Facial nerve monitoring during parotid gland surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Facial nerve injury remains the most severe complication of parotid gland surgery. However, the use of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (IFNM) during parotid gland surgery among Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons continues to be a matter of debate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted including articles from 1970 to 2019 to try to determine the effectiveness of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring in preventing immediate and permanent postoperative facial nerve weakness in patients undergoing primary parotidectomy. Acceptable studies included controlled series that evaluated facial nerve function following primary parotidectomy with or without intraoperative facial nerve monitoring.

RESULTS

Ten articles met inclusion criteria, with a total of 1069 patients included in the final meta-analysis. The incidence of immediate and permanent postoperative weakness following parotidectomy was significantly lower in the IFNM group compared to the unmonitored group (23.4% vs. 38.4%; p = 0.001) and (5.7% vs. 13.6%; p = 0.001) when all studies were included. However, when we analyze just prospective data, we are not able to find any significant difference.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that IFNM may decrease the risk of immediate post-operative and permanent facial nerve weakness in primary parotid gland surgery. However, due to the low evidence level, additional prospective-randomized trials are needed to determine if these results can be translated into improved surgical safety and improved patient satisfaction.

Application of an Intraoperative Neuromonitoring System Using a Surface Pressure Sensor in Parotid Surgery: A Rabbit Model Study

Objectives

Facial nerve monitoring (FNM) can be used to identify the facial nerve, to obtain information regarding its course, and to evaluate its status during parotidectomy. However, there has been disagreement regarding the efficacy of FNM in reducing the incidence of facial nerve palsy during parotid surgery. Therefore, instead of using electromyography (EMG) to identify the location and state of the facial nerve, we applied an intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) system using a surface pressure sensor to detect facial muscle twitching. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of using the IONM system with a surface pressure sensor to detect facial muscle twitching during parotidectomy.

Methods

We evaluated the stimulus thresholds for the detection of muscle twitching in the orbicularis oris and orbicularis oculi, as well as the amplitude and latency of EMG and the surface pressure sensor in 13 facial nerves of seven rabbits, using the same stimulus intensity.

Results

The surface pressure sensor detected muscle twitching in the orbicularis oris and orbicularis oculi in response to a stimulation of 0.1 mA in all 13 facial nerves. The stimulus threshold did not differ between the surface pressure sensor and EMG.

Conclusion

The application of IONM using a surface pressure sensor during parotidectomy is noninvasive, reliable, and feasible. Therefore, the IONM system with a surface pressure sensor to measure facial muscle twitching may be an alternative to EMG for verifying the status of the facial nerve.

Feasibility of Brachial Plexus Schwannoma Enucleation With Intraoperative Neuromonitoring

Objectives

To evaluate the feasibility of brachial plexus schwannoma enucleation under intraoperative neuromonitoring.

Methods

Five patients who were treated for brachial plexus schwannoma under intraoperative neuromonitoring from 2008 to 2018 were included in this retrospective review. Neuromonitoring was performed with a 100-μV event threshold of the neuromonitoring system (NIM-2 or 3) at the deltoid, biceps brachii, triceps brachii, and brachioradialis muscles. Patient characteristics, tumor size and location, intraoperative neuromonitoring findings, and postoperative function were evaluated.

Results

The intraoperative neuromonitoring findings were in accordance with the preoperative assessment of the included nerve root. Three patients had no postoperative morbidity, one patient had temporary paresthesia of the forearm for 2 months, and one patient mild loss of grip strength for 1 month.

Conclusion

Intraoperative neuromonitoring of the arm and forearm muscles during enucleation of brachial plexus schwannoma promoted confident and successful surgery with minimal postoperative morbidity.

Incidence of postoperative facial weakness in parotid tumor surgery: a tumor subsite analysis of 794 parotidectomies

Background

The reported incidence of facial weakness immediately after parotid tumor surgery ranges from 14 to 65%. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of postoperative facial weakness related to parotidectomy with use of preoperative computed tomography (CT), intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, and surgical magnification. Also, we sought to elucidate additional information about risk factors for postoperative facial weakness in parotid tumor surgery, particularly focusing on the tumor subsites.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 794 cases with parotidectomy for benign and malignant tumors arising from the parotid gland (2009–2016). Patients with pretreatment facial palsy were excluded from the analyses. Tumor subsites were stratified based on their anatomical relations to the facial nerve as superficial, deep, or both. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for postoperative facial weakness.

Results

The overall incidences of temporary and permanent (more than 6 months) facial weakness were 9.2 and 5.2% in our series utilizing preoperative CT, intraoperative facial nerve monitoring, and surgical magnification. Multivariable analysis revealed that old age, malignancy, and recurrent tumors (revision surgery) were common independent risk factors for both temporary and permanent postoperative facial weakness. In addition, tumor subsite (tumors involving superficial and deep lobe) was associated with postoperative facial weakness, but not tumor size. Extent of surgery was strongly correlated with tumor pathology (malignant tumors) and tumor subsite (tumors involving deep lobe).

Conclusion

Aside from risk factors for facial weakness in parotid tumor surgery such as old age, malignant, or recurrent tumors, the location of tumors was found to be related to postoperative facial weakness. This study result may provide background data in a future prospective study and up-to-date information for patient counseling.

Localization of Parotid Gland Tumors in Relation to the Intraparotid Facial Nerve on 3D Double-Echo Steady-State with Water Excitation Sequence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reliable preoperative facial nerve mapping may help avoid or minimize facial nerve injury during parotid tumor resection. The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic performance of the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence in localizing parotid gland tumors through direct visualization of the intraparotid facial nerve in comparison with indirect methods of estimating the facial nerve location.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 91 parotid gland tumors in 90 patients who underwent surgical resection and preoperative MR imaging, including the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence. The tumor locations were categorized as deep or superficial on the basis of direct and 3 indirect methods: the facial nerve line, retromandibular vein, and Utrecht line. Surgical localization was considered the criterion standard. The diagnostic performance for localizing deep lobe lesions using direct and indirect methods was calculated and compared using the McNemar test.

RESULTS

Surgical localization confirmed 75 superficial lesions and 16 deep lesions. The interobserver variability of the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence was excellent (κ = 0.870). The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for localizing deep lobe lesions using the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation method were 97.8%, 87.5%, 100%, 100%, and 97.4%, respectively. These findings were significantly higher than the facial nerve line in sensitivity, the retromandibular vein in sensitivity, and the Utrecht line in accuracy and specificity (P < .05). Overall, the direct method was the most accurate, sensitive, and specific in localizing parotid gland tumors.

CONCLUSIONS

We can achieve higher diagnostic performance in localizing parotid gland tumors by directly visualizing the intraparotid facial nerve using the 3D double-echo steady-state with water excitation sequence compared with indirect methods.

Improved facial nerve identification during parotidectomy with fluorescently labeled peptide

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

Additional intraoperative guidance could reduce the risk of iatrogenic injury during parotid gland cancer surgery. We evaluated the intraoperative use of fluorescently labeled nerve binding peptide NP41 to aid facial nerve identification and preservation during parotidectomy in an orthotopic model of murine parotid gland cancer. We also quantified the accuracy of intraoperative nerve detection for surface and buried nerves in the head and neck with NP41 versus white light (WL) alone.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-eight mice underwent parotid gland cancer surgeries with additional fluorescence (FL) guidance versus WL reflectance (WLR) alone. Eight mice were used for additional nerve-imaging experiments.

METHODS

Twenty-eight parotid tumor-bearing mice underwent parotidectomy. Eight mice underwent imaging of both sides of the face after skin removal. Postoperative assessment of facial nerve function measured by automated whisker tracking were compared between FL guidance (n = 13) versus WL alone (n=15). In eight mice, nerve to surrounding tissue contrast was measured under FL versus WLR for all nerve branches detectable in the field of view.

RESULTS

Postoperative facial nerve function after parotid gland cancer surgery tended to be better with additional FL guidance. Fluorescent labeling significantly improved nerve to surrounding tissue contrast for both large and smaller buried nerve branches compared to WLR visualization and improved detection sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

NP41 FL imaging significantly aids the intraoperative identification of nerve braches otherwise nearly invisible to the naked eye. Its application in a murine model of parotid gland cancer surgery tended to improve functional preservation of the facial nerve.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA Laryngoscope, 126:2711-2717, 2016.

The effect of partial superficial parotidectomy on amplitude, latency and threshold of facial nerve stimulation

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of partial superficial parotidectomy and facial nerve dissection to electrophysiologic parameters of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring such as nerve stimulation threshold, stimulus amplitude and latency. Twenty-five patients who underwent partial superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid gland mass were included in the study. After the identification of the facial nerve main trunk, minimum stimulation threshold, latencies and amplitudes of the orbicularis oculi (electrode 1) and orbicularis oris (electrode 2) electrodes at 0.50 milliamperes (mA) were recorded. All of the recordings were repeated after the completion of parotidectomy. Median nerve dissection duration was calculated and size of the tumors was measured during macroscopic pathology. The median minimum nerve stimulation threshold was 0.15 mA [interquartile range (IQR) = 0.05] before and 0.15 mA (IQR = 0.08) after the parotidectomy (p = 0.02). Median nerve dissection duration was 49 min (IQR = 38). Median amplitude and latency in electrode 1 before and after the facial nerve dissection were 322 millivolts (mV) (IQR = 330), 370 mV (IQR = 370) (p = 0.02), 3 milliseconds (ms) (IQR = 1) and 4 ms (IQR = 2) (p = 0.05), respectively. Median amplitude and latency in electrode 2 before and after the facial nerve dissection were 396 mV (IQR = 275), 365 mV (IQR = 836) (p = 0.86), 3 ms (IQR = 1.5) and 4 ms (IQR = 1.5) (p = 0.17), respectively. Minimal nerve stimulation threshold and amplitude of electrode 1 were affected by facial nerve dissection among the electrophysiologic parameters (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02). Of the electrophysiological parameters only the latency of electrode 2 was significantly correlated with tumor size (p = 0.03). Besides, none of the parameters were predictive for a possible postoperative facial nerve dysfunction regarding superficial partial parotidectomy.

Use of steroids for facial nerve paralysis after parotidectomy: A systematic review

AIM: To systematically review the literature to assess the efficacy of corticosteroids in treating post-parotidectomy facial nerve palsy (FNP).

METHODS: We searched the Cochrane library, EMBASE and MEDLINE (from inception to 2014) for studies assessing the use of corticosteroids in post-parotidectomy FNP. Studies were assessed for inclusion and quality. Data was extracted from included studies.

RESULTS: Two randomised controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. One study assessed the use of dexamethasone and the other prednisolone. None of the studies demonstrated a significant difference in the outcome of FNP post-parotidectomy with the use of corticosteroids vs no therapy. The majority of FNP post-parotidectomy is transient. Preoperative factors (size of tumour and malignancy), intraoperative factors (extent of parotidectomy and integrity of facial nerve at the end of the operation) are important in determining prognosis of FNP if it does occur.

CONCLUSION: Corticosteroids do not appear to improve FNP prognosis post-parotidectomy. Further studies assessing patients by cohort and with long term follow-up are required to increase scientific evidence.

Correlations between the clinical, histological and neurophysiological examinations in patients before and after parotid gland tumor surgery: verification of facial nerve transmission

Parotid gland tumor surgery sometimes leads to facial nerve paralysis. Malignant more than benign tumors determine nerve function preoperatively, while postoperative observations based on clinical, histological and neurophysiological studies have not been reported in detail. The aims of this pilot study were evaluation and correlations of histological properties of tumor (its size and location) and clinical and neurophysiological assessment of facial nerve function pre- and post-operatively (1 and 6 months). Comparative studies included 17 patients with benign (n = 13) and malignant (n = 4) tumors. Clinical assessment was based on House-Brackmann scale (H-B), neurophysiological diagnostics included facial electroneurography [ENG, compound muscle action potential (CMAP)], mimetic muscle electromyography (EMG) and blink-reflex examinations (BR). Mainly grade I of H-B was recorded both pre- (n = 13) and post-operatively (n = 12) in patients with small (1.5-2.4 cm) benign tumors located in superficial lobes. Patients with medium size (2.5-3.4 cm) malignant tumors in both lobes were scored at grade I (n = 2) and III (n = 2) pre- and mainly VI (n = 4) post-operatively. CMAP amplitudes after stimulation of mandibular marginal branch were reduced at about 25 % in patients with benign tumors after surgery. In the cases of malignant tumors CMAPs were not recorded following stimulation of any branch. A similar trend was found for BR results. H-B and ENG results revealed positive correlations between the type of tumor and surgery with facial nerve function. Neurophysiological studies detected clinically silent facial nerve neuropathy of mandibular marginal branch in postoperative period. Needle EMG, ENG and BR examinations allow for the evaluation of face muscles reinnervation and facial nerve regeneration.

Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base: pitfalls and complications

Surgery of the ear and the lateral skull base is a fascinating, yet challenging field in otorhinolaryngology. A thorough knowledge of the associated complications and pitfalls is indispensable for the surgeon, not only to provide the best possible care to his patients, but also to further improve his surgical skills. Following a summary about general aspects in pre-, intra-and postoperative care of patients with disorders of the ear/lateral skull base, this article covers the most common pitfalls and complications in stapes surgery, cochlear implantation and surgery of vestibular schwannomas and jugulotympanal paragangliomas. Based on these exemplary procedures, basic "dos and don'ts" of skull base surgery are explained, which the reader can easily transfer to other disorders. Special emphasis is laid on functional aspects, such as hearing, balance and facial nerve function. Furthermore, the topics of infection, bleeding, skull base defects, quality of life and indication for revision surgery are discussed. An open communication about complications and pitfalls in ear/lateral skull base surgery among surgeons is a prerequisite for the further advancement of this fascinating field in ENT surgery. This article is meant to be a contribution to this process.

Epidemiology of iatrogenic facial nerve injury: a decade of experience

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the procedure-specific incidence, risk factors, and injury patterns in patients with iatrogenic facial nerve injury as seen at a tertiary care facial nerve center.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Facial Nerve Center patient records from 2002 to 2012 were reviewed for cases of iatrogenic facial nerve injury. These were analyzed by type of inciting procedure, injury location, patient demographics, and referral pattern.

RESULTS

Out of 1,810 patient records, 102 were identified that involved iatrogenic facial nerve injury. Oral and maxillofacial surgical procedures accounted for 40% of injuries, resections of head and neck lesions 25%, otologic procedures 17%, cosmetic procedures 11%, and other procedures 7%. The most common operation resulting in facial nerve injury was temporomandibular joint replacement. The most frequent pattern of injury was total hemifacial weakness.

CONCLUSIONS

Iatrogenic facial nerve injury occurs most commonly in temporomandibular joint replacement, mastoidectomy, and parotidectomy. Direct visualization of the nerve may decrease the incidence of injury, and early referral for facial nerve exploration may result in improved outcomes.