Use of nasotracheal intubation in patients receiving oral cavity free flap reconstruction

Risk factors for postoperative adverse airway events in patients with primary oral cancer undergoing reconstruction without prophylactic tracheostomy

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors associated with adverse airway events (AAEs) in primary oral cancer patients undergoing tumor ablation followed by free tissue transfer without prophylactic tracheostomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected primary oral cancer patients who underwent tumor ablation surgery following free-tissue transfer without prophylactic tracheostomy during February 2017 to June 2019 in Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taiwan. 379 patients were included. Data were analysed from 2020 to 2021. Demographics, comorbidities, intraoperative variables and postoperative respiration profile were obtained from the medical record. Main outcome was postoperative AAEs, including requirement of endotracheal intubation after extubation and tracheostomy after prolonged intubation.

RESULTS

Of the 379 patients, postoperative AAEs happened in 29 patients (7.6 %). In reintubation group, patients were older with more diabetes mellitus, hypertension and cerebrovascular disease. These patients had lower preoperative hemoglobin, creatinine, and albumin level with more intraoperative blood transfusion. In postoperative respiration profile, rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) and PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio were poorer. On multivariate analysis, patient's age, tumor location, and cross-midline segmental mandibulectomy and a lower PF ratio were independent risk factors for postoperative AAEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In head and neck cancer patients that underwent tumor ablation followed by free tissue transfer without prophylactic tracheostomy, patient's age, tumor location, cross-midline segmental mandibulectomy and P/F ratio are associated with postoperative AAEs.

Immediate postoperative non-invasive positive pressure ventilation following midface microvascular free flap reconstruction

Background

There is a rare need for postoperative non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) following microvascular reconstruction of the head and neck. In midface reconstruction, the free flap vascular pedicle is especially vulnerable to the compressive forces of positive pressure delivery.

Case

A 60 year old female with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) presented with squamous cell carcinoma of the anterior maxilla, for which she underwent infrastructure maxillectomy and fibula free flap reconstruction. To avoid tracheotomy, the patient was extubated postoperatively and transitioned to NIPPV immediately utilizing a full‐face positive pressure mask with a soft and flexible sealing layer. The patient was successfully transitioned to NIPPV immediately after extubation. The free flap exhibited no signs of vascular compromise postoperatively, and healed very well.

Conclusion

Postoperative non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation can be successfully applied following complex microvascular midface reconstruction to avoid tracheotomy in select patients without vascular compromise of the free flap.

Identification of patients for a delayed extubation strategy versus elective tracheostomy for postoperative airway management in major oral cancer surgery: A prospective observational study in seven hundred and twenty patients

OBJECTIVES

Tracheostomy (TT) and delayed extubation (DE) are two approaches to postoperative airway management in patients after major oral cancer surgery. We planned a study to determine the safety of overnight intubation followed by extubation the next morning (DE) compared to elective TT and to identify factors that were associated with a safe DE (maintenance of a patent airway).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary referral cancer care center. We included adult patients undergoing elective major oral cancer surgery under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation. The decision regarding postoperative airway management using either TT or DE was made according to the usual practice at our center.

RESULTS

We screened a total of 4477 patients, 720 patients were included. DE was performed in 417 patients (58.4%) and TT in 303 patients (42.4%). On multivariable analysis, T1-T2 tumor stage, absence of extensive resection, primary closure or reconstruction using fasciocutaneous flap, absence of preoperative radiation, no neck dissection or unilateral neck dissection and shorter duration of anesthesia were independent predictors for a safe DE. Overall complications (4.3% versus 22.5%, p = 0.00) and airway complications (1.7% versus 8.7%, p = 0.00) were lower in the DE compared to the TT group respectively. DE was associated with a shorter hospital stay (7.2 ± 3.7 versus 11.5 ± 7.2 days, p = 0.00), time to oral intake and speech compared to TT.

CONCLUSIONS

A DE strategy after major oral cancer surgery is a safe alternative to TT in a select group of patients.

Radial Forearm Free Flap Reconstruction of Glossectomy Defects Without Tracheostomy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction of glossectomy defects without tracheostomy tube (TT).

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with at least oral tongue defects who underwent RFFF reconstruction. Pre- and intra-operative factors were documented. Post-operative respiratory complications included inability to extubate, pneumonia, or need for re-intubation or TT within 30 days.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients underwent RFFF reconstruction without TT, and 36 patients with TT. The average hospital length of stay was 1.5 days shorter in those without TT (P < .01). Two patients who underwent TT placement experienced a respiratory complication (P = .27). There were no respiratory complications among those without TT. After multivariate analyses, large tongue base defect (>25% resection, P < .001) and bilateral neck dissection (P < .001) were independently associated with TT placement.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, RFFF reconstruction of glossectomy defects is feasible without TT among selected patients with small tongue base defects (≤25% resection) and unilateral neck dissection.

Endotracheal Tube Migration Associated With Extension During Tracheotomy

Tracheotomy is occasionally performed to prevent postoperative airway obstruction especially for invasive surgical procedures involving head and neck cancer. When performed under general anesthesia, attention must be paid to avoid rupture of the tracheal tube cuff during the incision into the trachea. In this study, changes in the position of the endotracheal tube tip during extension of the head and neck for a tracheotomy were investigated. Twelve patients underwent placement of a tracheotomy during surgical procedures for oral cancer. After nasal intubation, the distance between the tube tip and the carina was measuring using a fiberoptic scope with the patient's head placed at an angle of 110°. Patients were repositioned for tracheotomy by placing a pillow under the shoulders and extending the head and neck at an angle of 140°. The distance measurements were subsequently repeated. The difference between the first and second measurements was calculated and analyzed statistically using a paired t test. On average the patients were 69.5 ± 9.0 years in age. The distance between the tube tip and the carina at an angle of 140° (3.6 ± 1.1 cm) was significantly longer than that at an angle of 110° (1.7 ± 1.0 cm) (p < 0.001). The migration in the positioning of the endotracheal tube tip was 1.9 ± 0.7 cm (range: 0.7-3.7 cm) upon extension. In 3 cases, the tube cuff was ruptured during incision of the trachea. The endotracheal tube tip may migrate in the cephalad direction approximately 2 cm as a result of the extension of the patient's head and neck during a tracheotomy. Therefore, consideration should be given to advancing the endotracheal tube tip towards the caudal side and to confirming the position of the tube and cuff during a tracheotomy.

The submental flap for head and neck reconstruction: Comparison of outcomes to the radial forearm free flap

OBJECTIVES

To compare intraoperative, postoperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes of the submental island pedicled flap (SIPF) to the radial forearm free flap (RFFF).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review; comparison with statistical analysis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on patients at two tertiary care academic hospitals by a single surgeon. Consecutive patients who underwent cancer resection and reconstruction with SIPF or RFFF between 2004 and 2016 were included. Cancer staging, surgical procedure, hospital stay, complications, and functional and oncologic results were extracted.

RESULTS

The study included 146 patients (57 SIPF; 89 RFFF). The most prevalent primary site was oral cavity, with a minority in the oropharynx, paranasal sinuses, or external face. Mean area of the SIPF was smaller at 28 cm² compared to 48 cm² for the RFFF. Operative time for SIPF was shorter at 6.5 hours compared to 9 hours for RFFF. Hospital stay was 8.0 days for SIPF patients and 10.0 days for RFFF patients. Multivariate analysis confirmed these differences were significant. Functional outcomes of speech quality and gastrostomy feeding tube dependence were similar between the SIPF and RFFF groups. There was no difference in local recurrence rate for SIPF (16%) and RFFF (19%), and there was no difference in overall recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference in recurrence between both groups, and multivariate logistic regression demonstrated no association between SIPF and local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Operative time and hospital stay are both significantly reduced with the SIPF. Functional and oncologic results are similar with no contraindication to the SIPF. The SIPF is a good first-line choice for head and neck reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 130:S1-S10, 2020.

Scoring system for selective tracheostomy in head and neck surgery with free flap reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Selective tracheostomy is an effective but invasive airway management method for patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction. Studies have shown that not all patients need tracheostomy. Several systems evaluating the need for tracheostomy have been proposed, but none is used clinically.

METHODS

A total of 533 cases underwent head and neck free flap reconstruction at Peking University School of Stomatology were reviewed for system development. Another 131 cases undergone the same surgery were included for system verification. Patients' demographic and surgical-related information were analyzed.

RESULT

A total of 321 cases in the development cohort and 68 cases in the system cohort underwent tracheostomy. The score was estimated: score = ∑(|log₂ OR|). Patients scoring >3 required tracheostomy, those scoring <2 should avoid tracheostomy, and those scoring 2 or 3 need further evaluation.

CONCLUSION

This scoring system can help determine the need for selective tracheostomy in patients undergoing head and neck free flap reconstruction.

Anesthesia and Enhanced Recovery After Head and Neck Surgery

Enhanced recovery protocols have been developed from gastrointestinal, colorectal, and thoracic surgery populations. The basic tenets of head and neck enhanced recovery are: a multidisciplinary team working around the patient, preoperative carbohydrate loading, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization and oral feeding, and frequent reassessment and auditing of protocols to improve patient outcomes. The implementation of enhanced recovery protocols across surgical populations appear to decrease length of stay, reduce cost, and improve patient satisfaction without sacrificing patient quality of care or changing readmission rates. This article examines evidence-based enhanced recovery interventions and tailors them to a major head and neck surgery population.

Immediate Use of Uncuffed Tracheostomy after Free Flap Reconstruction of the Head and Neck

Objective To determine if immediate postoperative uncuffed tracheostomy placement following oral cavity or oropharyngeal head and neck free flap reconstruction is associated with shorter hospital length of stay and higher inpatient decannulation rates without an increase in respiratory complications, as compared with immediate placement of cuffed tracheostomy. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting Tertiary referral center. Subjects and Methods Patients were included if they underwent free flap reconstruction for oral cavity or oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and had an intraoperative tracheostomy placed between 2005 and 2016. In 2012, head and neck surgeons changed from routine placement of cuffed to uncuffed tracheostomy tubes immediately after free flap reconstruction. This study compares length of hospital stay, inpatient decannulation rates, and respiratory complications between patients who had cuffed and uncuffed tracheostomies. Analysis of variance and chi-square test were used to examine continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to determine whether cuff status was independently associated with primary outcomes of length of hospital stay, decannulation, and respiratory complications. Results Of 752 patients who underwent free flap reconstruction, 493 patients met inclusion criteria (cuffed, n = 366; uncuffed, n = 127). Patient variables (ie, age, sex, body mass index, prior chemoradiation) and tumor characteristics (ie, location, stage) did not differ significantly between groups. Adjusted analysis showed that an uncuffed tracheostomy (vs a cuffed tracheostomy) was associated with shorter length of stay (7.7 vs 9.7 days, P < .001) and did not increase the rate of respiratory complications. Conclusion Immediate placement of a uncuffed tracheostomy after oral cavity or oropharyngeal free flap reconstruction is associated with shorter hospital stays without an increase in respiratory complications.

Predictors of Failed and Delayed Decannulation after Head and Neck Surgery

Objective

To determine the variables that are predictive of failed decannulation (FD), delayed decannulation (DD), and days to decannulation in patients who underwent head and neck cancer resection with free tissue transfer reconstruction for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

Tertiary care otolaryngology–head and neck surgery referral center.

Subject and Methods

Patients (N = 108) were included who underwent head and neck cancer resection with free tissue transfer reconstruction and tracheostomy between 2011 and June 2014. Patients with laryngectomy, previous tracheostomy, and other airway pathology necessitating tracheotomy were excluded. Preoperative patient variables and cancer site/staging variables were analyzed, as well as extent of structures resected and type of reconstruction. Univariate and multivariate binary logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to determine predictors of FD and DD. Cox regression analysis was used to determine predictors of days to decannulation.

Results

Of the 108 included patients, 16 had FD, and 26 had DD. Univariate analysis demonstrated that advanced stage ( r = 0.233, P = .021), total glossectomy ( r = 0.924, P < .001), anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction ( r = 0.906, P < .001), smoking at time of surgery ( r = 0.319, P = .002), and pack years ( r = 0.322, P = .001) were associated with FD. Cox regression analysis showed that total glossectomy, exp(B) = 15.837 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.949-128.679); anterolateral thigh flap reconstruction, exp(B) = 8.439 (95% CI: 2.435-29.620); and smoking status, exp(B) = 2.970 (95% CI: 1.617-5.456) were independent predictors of days to decannulation and FD.

Conclusions

Patients with total glossectomy defects and those who continue to smoke are at increased risk for FD and DD. Aggressive smoking cessation programs may decrease the risk of FD and DD. Patients should be counseled about their risk profiles.