Outcomes of combined oncologic resection and carotid endarterectomy in patients with head and neck cancer

Carotid endarterectomy for the management of carotid stenosis occurring concurrently with head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Currently, most patients with concurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) and carotid stenosis (CS) are treated disjointedly for their oncologic and vascular lesions. The purpose of this review is to evaluate literature exploring a novel approach to these cases that poses several advantages, in which carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is performed simultaneously with surgical resection of HNC.

RECENT FINDINGS

Carotid stenosis is a common comorbidity of patients presenting with head and neck cancer as these pathologies have overlapping risk factors. Adjuvant oncologic therapy such as radiation therapy to the site of the lesion is known to increase development or progression of carotid stenosis. Performing simultaneous surgical management of CS and HNC decreases total procedures for the patient, provides a less challenging surgical field, and eliminates prioritization of treatment initiation for one pathology over the other. There has been limited reporting of simultaneous CEA with oncologic resection of HNC in the literature. However, of the 21 cases reviewed here, no perioperative strokes were reported with only one perioperative death from myocardial infarction.

SUMMARY

Available literature supports that simultaneous CEA with oncologic resection of HNC is safe and may offer several advantages, although larger studies are required.

Neck dissection for head and neck malignancies with concurrent carotid endarterectomy

Head and neck malignancies share similar risk factors as carotid artery stenosis and these can often present together. Patients who require external beam radiotherapy are at a higher risk of developing significant worsening stenosis. The workup of the oncologic patient often includes computed tomography, which can reveal underlying carotid artery stenosis, offering an opportunity to address both conditions in one operation and prevent the need for a complicated carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in irradiated and previously operated tissue. It was postulated that these two operations can be combined safely. The surgical protocol, surgical technique, and outcomes of a case series of four patients with head and neck cancer who underwent neck dissection and CEA for carotid artery stenosis during the same operation is presented. CEA was performed safely, simultaneously with neck dissection. CEA did not affect the surgical outcomes or postoperative course of the patients, and no minor or major complications were observed related to this procedure. Carotid endarterectomy performed by a vascular surgeon can be safely combined with oncologic neck dissection in the same procedure to avoid future complications in head and neck cancer patients.

The incidence of stroke post neck dissection surgery and perioperative management

BACKGROUND

Head and neck surgery encompasses major vessels, raising the concern of life-threatening complications such as stroke.

METHODS

Databases at UPMC were queried to identify patients with both neck dissections and stroke from January 1st, 2004, to October 1st, 2020. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who experienced a stroke within 30 days of a neck dissection.

RESULTS

Search of a UPMC database for carotid artery stenosis (CAS), transient ischemic attack (TIA), and stroke identified 20,527 patients. After matching with the Head and Neck Tumor Registry patients, 41 of 4230 patients with a neck dissection also had a stroke, TIA, or CAS in their lifetime. One patient, with multiple risk factors, despite pre-operative precautions, had a stroke 2 days post neck dissection in the setting of carotid occlusion from hypercoagulability of malignancy and intraoperative vessel injury. The patient subsequently underwent a carotid thrombectomy and vein patch repair and has had no additional cerebrovascular accidents.

CONCLUSION

Although the incidence of stroke post neck dissection is minimal, patients with multiple risk factors for stroke should be managed carefully to prevent deleterious outcomes.

Is Neck Dissection Associated with an Increased Risk of Postoperative Stroke?

Objective Prior studies have reported widely disparate rates of postoperative stroke, with conflicting analyses of whether neck dissection is an independent risk factor. Study Design Cohort study. Setting American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2005 to 2013. Subjects and Methods We compared the 30-day rate of postoperative stroke between patients undergoing complete or modified radical neck dissection and a control cohort composed of those undergoing resections in the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx without neck dissection. Propensity scores and paired statistics were used to compare the groups while adjusting for relevant covariates. Results We identified 9697 patients, including 5827 with neck dissection and 3870 without neck dissection. In the full cohort, the rate of postoperative stroke was greater with neck dissection than without it (0.31% vs 0.11%, P = .052), although the relationship was attenuated by propensity score matching to adjust for comorbidities (0.30% vs 0.13%, P = .18). Among patients with ≥2 risk factors for carotid artery stenosis, neck dissection was associated with an increased rate of postoperative stroke (2.68% with bilateral neck dissection, 0.41% with unilateral neck dissection, and 0.24% without neck dissection, P = .04). The incidence of stroke was strongly associated with 30-day mortality (7.4% vs 0.2%, P < .001). Conclusions Stroke is a rare but highly morbid complication after head and neck surgery. Compared with other head and neck surgery, neck dissection in patients at risk for carotid artery stenosis is associated with an increased risk of postoperative stroke.

The impact of HPV infection, smoking history, age and operability of the patient on disease-specific survival in a geographically defined cohort of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumours had better 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) than HPV-negative patients. TNM score only predicted prognosis among HPV-negative patients. A previous history of smoking and age at diagnosis predicted DSS among HPV-positive patients whereas operability at diagnosis predicted DSS among both HPV-positive and HPV-negative patients.

OBJECTIVES

HPV is a risk factor for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). The extent to which smoking, age and operability could play a role in HPV-positive surgically treated head and neck SCCs has not been extensively addressed previously and this study aimed to evaluate these factors.

METHODS

We identified 232 patients with OPSCC, of which 186 from the tonsil or base of the tongue region were treated in the period 1992-2008 in Western Norway. The 5-year DSS was recorded. Details on smoking history and whether the lesion was operable or not, as well as clinical information, were obtained retrospectively from the hospital records.

RESULTS

TNM stage predicted survival only among HPV-negative patients. A previous smoking affected prognosis only among HPV-positive patients (relative risk (RR) = 2.5; confidence interval (CI) = 1.0-6.2; p = 0.05). Increasing age of the patient had a negative effect on survival in HPV-positive patients only, especially among the oldest quartile (RR = 4.4; CI = 2.0-9.0; p < 0.001). Whether the tumour was operable or not uniquely predicted DSS both among HPV-positive (RR = 0.34; CI = 0.13-0.93; p < 0.05) and HPV-negative (RR = 0.25; CI = 0.10-0.66; p < 0.01) patients with tonsil/base of the tongue SCC.