Intensity-modulated radiotherapy followed by a brachytherapy boost for oropharyngeal cancer

Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Alone Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy and Brachytherapy for Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancers: Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone versus IMRT + brachytherapy (BT) in patients with T1-T2N0M0 oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted at Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. Patients with stage I and II OPSCC were considered for IMRT to a dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks in phase I followed by randomization (1:1) to further treatment with IMRT (20 Gy/10 fractions/2 weeks) or BT (192Ir high dose rate, 21 Gy/7 fractions/2 fractions per day). The primary endpoint of the trial was the reduction in xerostomia at 6 months evaluated using 99mTc salivary scintigraphy. Severe salivary toxicity (xerostomia) was defined as posttreatment salivary excretion fraction ratio <45%. Secondary endpoints were local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Between November 2010 and February 2020, 90 patients were randomized to IMRT (n = 46) alone or IMRT + BT (n = 44). Eleven patients (8 residual/recurrent disease, 2 lost to follow-up, 1 second primary) in the IMRT arm and 9 patients (8 residual/recurrence, 1 lost to follow-up) in the BT arm were not evaluable at 6 months for the primary endpoint. At 6 months, xerostomia rates using salivary scintigraphy were 14% (5/35: 95% CI, 5%-30%) in the BT arm while it was seen in 44% (14/32: 95% CI, 26%-62%) in the IMRT arm (P = .008). Physician-rated Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥2 xerostomia at any time point was observed in 30% of patients (9/30) in the IMRT arm and 6.7% (2/30) in the BT arm (P = .02). At a median follow-up of 42.5 months, the 3-year local control in the IMRT arm was 56.4% (95% CI, 43%-73%) while it was 66.2% (95% CI, 53%-82%) in the BT arm (P = .24).

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of BT to IMRT for T1-T2N0M0 OPSCC results in a significant reduction in xerostomia. This strongly supports the addition of BT to IMRT in suitable cases.

Dose escalation in oropharyngeal cancer: a comparison of simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost

BACKGROUND

Local recurrence is the most common pattern of failure in head and neck cancer. It can therefore be hypothesised that some of these patients would benefit from an intensified local treatment, such as radiation dose escalation of the primary tumour. This study compares treatment and toxicity outcomes from two different boost modalities in oropharyngeal cancer: simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and brachytherapy boost.

METHODS

Two hundred and forty-four consecutive patients treated with > 72 Gy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma between 2011 and 2018 at our institution were retrospectively analysed. Data on side effects were collected from a local quality registry and supplemented with a review of medical records. Patients receiving a brachytherapy boost first had external beam radiotherapy consisting of 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to the gross tumour volume (GTV), and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally. The brachytherapy boost was typically given using pulsed dose rate, 15 fractions and 0.56-0.66 Gy per fraction [total dose in EQD2 = 75.4-76.8 Gy (α/β = 10)]. The typical dose escalated radiotherapy with external beam radiotherapy only, was delivered using SIB with 74,8 Gy in 2.2 Gy fractions [EQD2 = 76.0 Gy (α/β = 10)] to the primary tumour, 68 Gy in 2 Gy fractions to GTV + 10 mm margin and elective radiotherapy to the neck bilaterally.

RESULTS

Dose escalation by SIB was given to 111 patients and brachytherapy boost to 134 patients. The most common type of cancer was base of tongue (55%), followed by tonsillar cancer (42%). The majority of patients had T3- or T4-tumours and 84% were HPV-positive. The 5-year OS was 72,4% (95% CI 66.9-78.3) and the median follow-up was 6.1 years. Comparing the two different dose escalation modalities we found no significant differences in OS or PFS and these results remained after a propensity-score matched analysis was performed. The analysis of grade ≥ 3 side effects showed no significant differences between the two different dose escalation techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant differences in survival or grade ≥ 3 side effects comparing simultaneous integrated boost and brachytherapy boost as alternative dose escalation modalities in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer.

World Workshop on Oral Medicine VIII: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Dry Mouth: A Systematic Review of Outcome Domains for Xerostomia

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify all outcome domains used in clinical studies of xerostomia, that is, subjective sensation of dry mouth. This study is part of the extended project "World Workshop on Oral Medicine Outcomes Initiative for the Direction of Research" to develop a core outcome set for dry mouth.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review was performed on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. All clinical and observational studies that assessed xerostomia in human participants from 2001 to 2021 were included. Information on outcome domains was extracted and mapped to the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials taxonomy. Corresponding outcome measures were summarized.

RESULTS

From a total of 34,922 records retrieved, 688 articles involving 122,151 persons with xerostomia were included. There were 16 unique outcome domains and 166 outcome measures extracted. None of these domains or measures were consistently used across all the studies. The severity of xerostomia and physical functioning were the 2 most frequently assessed domains.

CONCLUSION

There is considerable heterogeneity in outcome domains and measures reported in clinical studies of xerostomia. This highlights the need for harmonization of dry mouth assessment to enhance comparability across studies and facilitate the synthesis of robust evidence for managing patients with xerostomia.

Function Preservation in Head and Neck Cancers

The treatment of head and neck cancers can have a significant impact on function and appearance, which results in impairment of quality of life. Various long-term sequelae of treatment include speech and swallowing difficulty, oral incompetence, trismus, xerostomia, dental caries and osteoradionecrosis. Management has evolved from single modality treatment of either surgery or radiation to multimodality treatment to attain acceptable functional outcomes. Brachytherapy, also known as interventional radiotherapy, with its ability to deliver high doses centrally to the target, has been shown to improve local control rates. Due to the rapid fall-off of the dose of brachytherapy there is better organ at risk sparing as compared with that of external beam radiotherapy. In the head and neck region, brachytherapy has been practiced in various sites, including the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, nasal vestibule and paranasal sinuses. Additionally, brachytherapy has also been considered for reirradiation as a salvage. Brachytherapy can also be considered as a perioperative technique together with surgery. Close multidisciplinary cooperation is required for a successful brachytherapy programme. In oral cavity cancers, depending on the location of the tumour, brachytherapy has been shown to preserve oral competence, maintain tongue mobility, maintain speech, swallowing and the hard palate. Brachytherapy in oropharyngeal cancers has been shown to reduce xerostomia and also reduce dysphagia and aspiration post-radiation therapy. For the nasopharynx, paranasal sinus and nasal vestibule, brachytherapy preserves the respiratory function of the mucosa. Despite such an incomparable impact on function and organ preservation, brachytherapy is an underutilised technique for head and neck cancers. There is a strong need to improve brachytherapy utilisation in head and neck cancers.

The combination of volumetric arc radiation therapy and boost high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy for T3N2c tongue cancer: a technical report

Currently, tongue cancers are primarily managed by surgery, and interstitial brachytherapy is only recommended for a selected group of early state T1-2N0 patients who refuse surgery or are medically inoperable. In this report, a case with T3N2cM0 tongue cancer who has been effectively treated by the combination of concurrent chemoradiotherapy involving volumetric arc therapy and boost high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy is presented. Of course, surgery remains the main treatment strategy for tongue cancer patients; however, the authors believe that if volumetric arc therapy is carefully planned to reduce the mandible dose as much as possible and high-dose rate interstitial brachytherapy with a mouthpiece that protects the mandible is combined, it is possible to treat T3N2 disease, and this can be considered for patients who want to preserve organ function.

Brachytherapy and osteoradionecrosis in patients with base of tongue cancer

BACKGROUND

Base of tongue cancer incidence and patient survival is increasing why treatment sequelae becomes exceedingly important. Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a late adverse effect of radiotherapy and brachytherapy (BT) could be a risk factor. Brachytherapy is used in three out of six health care regions in Sweden.

AIMS

Investigate if patients treated in regions using BT show an increased risk for ORN and whether brachytherapy has any impact on overall survival.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We used data from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register between 2008-2014. Due to the nonrandomized nature of the study and possible selection bias we compared the risk for ORN in brachy vs non-brachy regions.

RESULTS

Fifty out of 505 patients (9.9%) developed ORN; eight of these were treated in nonbrachy regions (16%), while 42 (84%) were treated in brachy regions. Neither age, sex, TNM-classification/stage, p16, smoking, neck dissection, or chemotherapy differed between ORN and no-ORN patients. The risk for ORN was significantly higher for patients treated in brachy regions compared to non-brachy regions (HR = 2,63, p = .012), whereas overall survival did not differ (HR = 0.95, p = .782).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Brachytherapy ought to be used cautiously for selected patients or within prospective randomized studies.

American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) consensus statement for soft-tissue sarcoma brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Growing data supports the role of radiation therapy in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). Brachytherapy has been used for decades in the management of STS and can be utilized as monotherapy or as a boost to external beam radiation. We present updated guidelines from the American Brachytherapy Society regarding the utilization of brachytherapy in the management of STS.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Members of the American Brachytherapy Society with expertise in STS and STS brachytherapy created an updated clinical practice guideline including step-by-step details for performing STS brachytherapy based on a literature review and clinical experience.

RESULTS

Brachytherapy monotherapy should be considered for lower-recurrence risk patients or after a local recurrence following previous external beam radiation; a brachytherapy boost can be considered in higher-risk patents meeting implant criteria. Multiple dose/fractionation regimens are available, with determination based on tumor location and treatment intent. Techniques to limit wound complications are based on the type of wound closure; wound complication can be mitigated with a delay in the start of brachytherapy with immediate wound closure or by utilizing a staged reconstruction technique, which allows an earlier treatment start with a delayed wound closure.

CONCLUSIONS

These updated guidelines provide clinicians with data on indications for STS brachytherapy as well as guidelines on how to perform and deliver high quality STS brachytherapy safely with minimal toxicity.

Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy boost for keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of inferior wall of the nasopharynx

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) is relatively rarely applied for the head and neck cancer because of its anatomical complexity and difficulty of applicator placement. However, its dose distribution is more confined even better than intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and can deliver a higher dose while sparing surrounding normal tissues. In this case report, the effectiveness of HDR-ISBT as a boost following IMRT for keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of nasopharynx was presented. A 76-year-old female who suffered from cT3N0M0 keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx was treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy involving IMRT. However, physical examination and laryngoscope fibre finding showed evident residual tumour at 60 Gy of IMRT, then, boost HDR-ISBT was proposed. After delivering 66 Gy of IMRT, CT image-guided HDR-ISBT 4 Gy in a single fraction was performed under local anaesthesia and sedation. MRI taken 5 months after HDR-ISBT showed remarkable shrinkage of the primary tumour. After HDR-ISBT, the remaining session of IMRT was delivered from the next day until 70 Gy in 35 fractions. It was demonstrated that boost HDR-ISBT combined with IMRT for keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx was performed safely and showed favourable efficacy.

Image-guided interstitial brachytherapy boost for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: technical aspects

Nasopharyngeal cancer generally responds well to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, there is a small group of patients who respond poorly to CCRT, and experience local residual tumor or local relapse. Although several attempts have been performed to such a group of patients including re-irradiation with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or salvage surgery, clinical results remain unsatisfactory. Intracavitary brachytherapy (ICBT) boost after CCRT with EBRT has been explored, however, its efficacy is limited to those with superficial residual tumors. For those residual tumors thickness with more than 5 mm, interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) boost would be an appropriate modality of choice. Here, we describe technical aspects of the high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) boost for nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients who responded poorly to the CCRT with EBRT.

Per-oral interstitial brachytherapy catheter insertion for boost in case of recurrent tonsillar carcinoma: dosimetry and clinical outcome

High-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy (HDR-ISBT) is relatively rarely applied for the head and neck cancer. However, its dose distribution is more confined than intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and can deliver higher dose while sparing surrounding normal tissues. In this case report, the effectiveness of HDR-ISBT as a boost following IMRT for post-operative recurrent oropharyngeal cancer patient was indicated. A 73-year-old male who developed local recurrence after surgery for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Salvage IMRT up to 70 Gy concurrent with weekly cetuximab was planned. However, CT taken at 60 Gy found a residual tumor, then, boost HDR-ISBT was proposed. 1 week after 60 Gy of IMRT, HDR-ISBT, 12 Gy in 2 fractions, was delivered under local anesthesia. MRI taken 2 months after HDR-ISBT showed no residual tumor. It was demonstrated that boost HDR-ISBT following IMRT for local recurrence of oropharyngeal cancer was performed safely and showed favorable efficacy.

Nodal response after 46 Gy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy is associated with human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

This study aimed to analyze the effect of human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated T1-2 node-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) on nodal response, recurrent disease, and survival in patients treated according to the Rotterdam protocol.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

In total, 77 patients with T1-2 OPSCC with nodal disease, treated between 2000 and 2012, were included in this study. Patients were treated according to the Rotterdam protocol: 46 Gy of IMRT followed by a local boost using cyberknife or brachytherapy (22 Gy) and neck dissection. The presence of HPV was determined by p16^INK4A immunostaining. Outcomes were overall survival, disease-free survival, and the extent of nodal response. Nodal stage was determined following the 7th and 8th American Joint Cancer Committee/Union for International Cancer Control classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 68.4% of patients had p16-positive disease, and 35.4% of all patients achieved complete nodal response (pN0) after 46 Gy of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Based on the 7th TNM classification, nodal response (partial or complete) was significantly associated with HPV status (P = .002). Patients with p16-positive OPSCC had an odds ratio (OR) of 4.6 to achieve complete nodal response. However, smoking interacted with this effect. Applying the 8th TNM classification, complete or partial response was associated with HPV status but was not significant (OR: 1.7, P = .138). Complete nodal response led to 100% overall survival in p16-positive OPSCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HPV-related OPSCCs are associated with complete nodal response after 46 Gy of IMRT. Patients with full regional control (pN0) after IMRT and subsequent neck dissection show a significantly better overall survival, but smoking negatively interacts with this effect.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 128:2333-2340, 2018.

GEC-ESTRO ACROP recommendations for head & neck brachytherapy in squamous cell carcinomas: 1st update - Improvement by cross sectional imaging based treatment planning and stepping source technology

The Head and Neck Working Group of the GEC-ESTRO (Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie - European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology) published in 2009 the consensus recommendations for low-dose rate, pulsed-dose rate and high-dose rate brachytherapy in head & neck cancers. The use of brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy and/or surgery was also covered as well as the use of brachytherapy in previously irradiated patients. Given the developments in the field, these recommendations needed to be updated to reflect up-to-date knowledge. The present update does not repeat basic knowledge which was published in the first recommendation but covers in a general part developments in (1) dose and fractionation, (2) aspects of treatment selection for brachytherapy alone versus combined BT+EBRT and (3) quality assurance issues. Detailed expert committee opinion intends to help the clinical practice in lip-, oral cavity-, oropharynx-, nasopharynx-, and superficial cancers. Different aspects of adjuvant treatment techniques and their results are discussed, as well the possibilities of salvage brachytherapy applications.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combined external beam irradiation and interstitial brachytherapy for base of tongue tumors and other head and neck sites in the era of new technologies

Irradiation plays an important role in the treatment of cancers of the head and neck providing a high locoregional tumor control and preservation of organ functions. External beam irradiation (EBI) results in unnecessary radiation exposure of the surrounding normal tissues increasing the incidence of side effects (xerostomy, osteoradionecrosis, and so forth). Brachytherapy (BT) seems to be the best choice for dose escalation over a short treatment period and for minimizing radiation-related normal tissue damage due to the rapid dose falloff around the source. Low-dose-rate BT is being increasingly replaced by pulsed-dose-rate and high-dose-rate BT because the stepping source technology offers the advantage of optimizing dose distribution by varying dwell times. Pulsed-dose and high-dose rates appear to yield local control and complication rates equivalent to those of low-dose rate. BT may be applied alone; but in case of high risk of nodal metastases, it is used together with EBI. This review presents the results and the indications of combined BT and EBI in carcinoma of the base of tongue and other sites of the head and neck region, as well as the role BT plays among other-normal tissue protecting-modern radiotherapy modalities (intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy) applied in these localizations.

The humanistic burden of head and neck cancer: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Head and neck cancer (HNC) and its treatment can affect communication, nutrition, and physical appearance, and the global impact of this disease on patients' quality of life may be substantial.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic literature review was to describe the impact of HNC and its treatment on the physical, emotional, and social well-being of patients over time, by examining longitudinal studies of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) evaluating these domains.

METHODS

Databases (MEDLINE and Embase) were searched to identify studies published in English between January 2004 and January 2014 analyzing the humanistic aspects of HNC in adult patients. Additional relevant publications were identified through manual searches of abstracts from recent conference proceedings.

RESULTS

Of 1,566 studies initially identified, 130 met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated in the assessment. Investigations using a variety of PRO instruments in heterogeneous patient populations consistently reported that PRO scores decrease significantly from diagnosis through the treatment period, but generally recover to baseline in the first year post-treatment. This trend was observed for many functional domains, although some side effects, such as xerostomia, persisted well beyond 1 year. In addition, considerable evidence exists that baseline PRO scores can predict clinical endpoints such as overall and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Many aspects of HNC, both disease and treatment specific, profoundly affect patients' quality of life. Improved knowledge of these effects on PRO may allow for more informed treatment decisions and can help physicians to better prepare patients for changes they may experience during therapy. Furthermore, the predictive value of baseline PRO data may enable healthcare providers to identify at-risk patients in need of more intensive intervention.

Brachytherapy or stereotactic body radiotherapy boost for early-stage oropharyngeal cancer: comparable outcomes of two different approaches

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcome, toxicity and QoL of two boost modalities for T1-2 oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2012, 250 consecutive patients with T1-2N0-3 were treated with 46-Gy of IMRT followed by boost using brachytherapy (BTB) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (CKB). Endpoints were local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and prospective QoL-assessment.

RESULTS

The 3-year actuarial incidence of LC were 97% and 94% for the CKB and BTB, respectively (p=0.33). The figures for DFS were 92% and 86% (p=0.15) and for OS were 81% and 83% (p=0.82), respectively. The incidence of tube feeding were 17% and 20%, respectively (p=0.47). The figures for grade ⩾2 late dysphagia were 11% and 8% (p=0.34) and for xerostomia were 16% and 12% (p=0.28), respectively. For both modalities, clinically relevant deteriorations were seen on all scales at end of treatment but the scores returned to almost baseline levels within 6-12months, with exception of QLQ-H&N35-xerostomia. The difference on that scale was neither statistically significant nor clinically relevant between both modalities.

CONCLUSION

Comparable outcome, toxicity and QoL-scores were achieved with both modalities. In the light of the logistical hassle around the implantation, the need of dexterity, and the risk of anaesthesia and peri-operative complications associated with BTB, CKB might be regarded as the optimal option to boost early-stage OPC. However, in radiotherapy departments where no facilities are available for stereotactic radiotherapy, BTB is an elegant option to achieve excellent outcome with low toxicity profile and good QoL.