Decision management in transoral robotic surgery: Indications, individual patient selection, and role in the multidisciplinary treatment for head and neck cancer from a European perspective

Current treatments for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and the move towards molecular therapy

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we discuss oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) treatment options with a focus on the molecular mechanisms of OPSCC in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) and head and neck cancers (HNCs). Treatment can be radical intent (aim for cure) or palliative intent (aim for disease control and symptom management). OPSCC is a prominent subset of HNSCCs in Australia and the Western World.

METHOD

We looked at the current conventional treatment options with an overview of recent advances and future endeavours.

KEY FINDINGS

We identified that radiotherapy is the primary management for OPSCC in most countries, including the USA, UK, NZ, and Australia. In contrast, surgery is only considered for superficial OPSCC or neck surgery. If surgery is incomplete, then definitive management still requires radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Molecular therapy is largely at the preclinical stage, with cetuximab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, Lenvatinib, and bevacizumab being tested clinically currently.

[Surgical Treatment of Oropharyngeal Cancer - Recommendations of the Current German S3 Guideline, Part I]

In general, a trend towards transoral resection (as opposed to classic open approaches) + neck dissection + adjuvant radio- (chemo-) therapy has been observed for oropharyngeal carcinoma over the last 20 years. Techniques of transoral surgery (TOS), including transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have been propagated in retrospective comparisons with conventional surgery or primary radiochemotherapy as gentle, minimally invasive procedures with good late functional results. Meta-analyses of mostly uncontrolled retrospective analyses suggest that TORS may have better disease-free survival (DFS) and a reduced risk of free flap reconstruction compared with open surgery. TORS (TOS) was associated with fewer tumor-positive resection margins (R1), a lower number of recurrences, fewer intraoperative tracheostomies, a shorter inpatient stay and a shorter duration of postoperative nasal tube feeding compared to open surgery. In principle, based on the best evidence currently available from registry studies, stage I-II oropharyngeal carcinomas can be treated either with primary surgery or radiochemotherapy with a comparable chance of survival. With comparable evidence for stage III and IVa, p16neg. oropharyngeal carcinomas, the majority of authors advocate primary surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy as the treatment of first choice. For p16pos. patients the results of registry studies are inconsistent, although the largest registry study on 450 HPV-positive stage III patients shows a significant superiority of primary surgery + adjuvant radiochemotherapy. Since all registry studies did not adjust for smoking status, among other factors, the current data situation should be evaluated with the necessary caution.

Latin American Consensus on the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is well known as a serious health problem worldwide, especially in low-income countries or those with limited resources, such as most countries in Latin America. International guidelines cannot always be applied to a population from a large region with specific conditions. This study established a Latin American guideline for care of patients with head and neck cancer and presented evidence of HNSCC management considering availability and oncologic benefit. A panel composed of 41 head and neck cancer experts systematically worked according to a modified Delphi process on (1) document compilation of evidence-based answers to different questions contextualized by resource availability and oncologic benefit regarding Latin America (region of limited resources and/or without access to all necessary health care system infrastructure), (2) revision of the answers and the classification of levels of evidence and degrees of recommendations of all recommendations, (3) validation of the consensus through two rounds of online surveys, and (4) manuscript composition. The consensus consists of 12 sections: Head and neck cancer staging, Histopathologic evaluation of head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-oral cavity, Clinical oncology-oral cavity, Head and neck surgery-oropharynx, Clinical oncology-oropharynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-reconstruction and rehabilitation, and Radiation therapy. The present consensus established 48 recommendations on HNSCC patient care considering the availability of resources and focusing on oncologic benefit. These recommendations could also be used to formulate strategies in other regions like Latin America countries.

Staged neck dissection prior to transoral robotic surgery for oropharyngeal cancer: does it reduce post-operative complication rates? A multi-centre study of 104 patients

PURPOSE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has become increasingly recognised as a safe and effective treatment for early oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma, often performed in conjunction with neck dissection (ND) and vessel ligation. It has been proposed that performing the neck dissection in a staged fashion prior to TORS results in low rates of transoral haemorrhage and pharyngocutaneous fistula, and may aid in TORS patient selection by eliminating patients who would require multi-modality treatment based on nodal pathology. This study aims to assess the effect of staged neck dissection with TORS in mitigating pharyngocutaneous fistulae and post-operative haemorrhage as well as the impact of staged ND on TORS patient selection.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of patients undergoing staged ND with intent to proceed to TORS at two Australian hospitals between 2014 and 2022. Incidence of post-operative haemorrhage and pharyngocutaneous fistula and length of inpatient stay was identified. The number of patients who did not proceed to TORS was recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred and four patients were identified who underwent staged neck dissection with an intention to proceed to TORS. Six patients did not proceed to TORS following pathological assessment of the neck dissection specimen and ninety-eight patients (91 primary, 7 salvage) underwent TORS. There were six cases of secondary haemorrhage (one major, two intermediate and three minor). There were no cases of pharyngocutaneous fistula.

CONCLUSION

Staged neck dissection prior to TORS results in low rates of haemorrhage and pharyngocutaneous fistula and can improve TORS patient selection.

Characteristics and outcomes of transoral robotic surgery with free-flap reconstruction for oropharyngeal cancer: a systematic review

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) approach for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer allows for reduced patient morbidity, amongst other advantages over the traditional lip-splitting mandibulotomy method. Free-flap reconstruction is commonly utilized in head and neck cancer surgeries; however, safety and outcomes of this technique in TORS procedures have not been well studied. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TORS with free-flap reconstruction (TORS-FFR) for oropharyngeal cancer. A systematic search of Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL and PubMed databases was completed. Following PRISMA guidelines, case series/reports, retrospective and prospective cohort studies were included. Primary outcomes measured were deaths and complication rates associated with TORS-FFR for oropharyngeal cancers. Secondary outcomes included functional swallowing and airway outcomes, operative time and length of hospital stay. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria comprising a total of 132 patients. The mean patient age was 58.4 years. The most frequent complication was infection (8.9%) followed by flap wound dehiscence (4.2%). The average total operative time was 710 min (n = 48), while average length of hospital stay was 13.5 days (n = 48). Reconstructions were most commonly fashioned from radial forearm free flaps (RFFF), with anterolateral thigh flaps (ALT) representing the second most common free-flap subtype. TORS-FFR procedures for oropharyngeal cancer are safe, with low serious complication rates. This surgical approach may be associated with decreased length of hospital stay; however, further studies are required to better characterize post-operative outcomes.Level of evidence 1a.

The Feasibility of Robot-Assisted Chin Osteotomy on Skull Models: Comparison with Surgical Guides Technique

Surgical robotic technology is characterized by its high accuracy, good stability, and repeatability. The accuracy of mandibular osteotomy is important in tumor resection, function reconstruction, and abnormality correction. This study is designed to compare the operative accuracy between robot-assisted osteotomy and surgical guide technique in the skull model trials which simulated the genioplasty. In an experimental group, robot-assisted chin osteotomy was automatically performed in 12 models of 12 patients according to the preoperative virtual surgical planning (VSP). In a control group, with the assistance of a surgical guide, a surgeon performed the chin osteotomy in another 12 models of the same patients. All the mandibular osteotomies were successfully completed, and then the distance error and direction error of the osteotomy plane were measured and analyzed. The overall distance errors of the osteotomy plane were 1.57 ± 0.26 mm in the experimental group and 1.55 ± 0.23 mm in the control group, and the direction errors were 7.99 ± 1.10° in the experimental group and 8.61 ± 1.05° in the control group. The Bland-Altman analysis results revealed that the distance error of 91.7% (11/12) and the direction error of 100% (12/12) of the osteotomy plane were within the 95% limits of agreement, suggesting the consistency of differences in the osteotomy planes between the two groups. Robot-assisted chin osteotomy is a feasible auxiliary technology and achieves the accuracy level of surgical guide-assisted manual operation.

Collaborative Control Method and Experimental Research on Robot-Assisted Craniomaxillofacial Osteotomy Based on the Force Feedback and Optical Navigation

Surgical robot has advantages in high accuracy and stability. But during the robot-assisted bone surgery, the lack of force information from surgical area and incapability of intervention from surgeons become the obstacle. The aim of the study is to introduce a collaborative control method based on the force feedback and optical navigation, which may optimally combine the excellent performance of surgical robot with clinical experiences of surgeons.

Existe espaço para a microcirurgia na cirurgia robótica?

Robotic surgery opened a new era of minimally-invasive procedures, through its improved precision, elimination of tremors, greater degrees of freedom, and other facilitating aspects. The field of robotic microsurgery showed great growth in recent years in particular, since robotics offers a potentially-ideal configuration to perform the sensitive manipulations required in microsurgery. We conducted a systematic review to assess the benefits of robotic surgery and its contributions to microsurgery, comparing it with other surgical techniques used in patients of all age groups. We assessed 25 articles found in the PubMed and Cochrane databases using the terms ' robotic surgery ' AND microsurgery , with a filter for studies published in the last five years, and studies conducted in humans and published in English or Portuguese. We concluded that there is plenty of room for robotic surgery in microsurgery, such as in male infertility procedures, neurological microsurgery, ocular and otological surgeries, and transoral, hepatobiliary, microvascular, plastic and reconstructive surgeries.

[Role of Robotic Surgery in ENT]

Since the beginning of the 21^st century, surgical robots have been used in the ENT-environment. They primarily support surgeons in minimal invasive transoral operations, especially in multidisciplinary treatment concepts of head and neck tumors, but also in snoring surgery the robot provides a complement to the established transoral laser surgery. In the meantime there is a large number of data that deals with the importance of oncological results, function maintenance, economics and future perspectives.Operation areas of the current robot devices are still limited in the ENT-environment. As the number of cases are small, efforts are being made to connect centres on a national and international level. Thus, uniform training standards, targeted knowledge and data exchange as well as further development of systems would be managed better. The creation of small and agile ENT-specific equipment could expand the possibilities as a next step for the future and finally lead to a wide scale of ENT-surgical applications.

Surgeon practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer

OBJECTIVES

Analyze how otolaryngologists approach HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer in terms of patient selection for transoral surgery, perceptions of treatment related risks and benefits, and adjuvant treatment decisions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey on HPV-related cancer management was distributed to otolaryngologists in the US through RedCap. Differences in responses were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

A total of 111 out of 143 (77.6%) otolaryngologists completed the survey. Overall, most prefer treating T1/T2 tumors using transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and T3 tumors through primary radiation therapy (RT), though there were significant differences between cohorts. Non-fellowship-trained surgeons and those in community practices favored RT for T1/T2 more than their fellowship-trained and academic counterparts, respectively. For adjuvant treatment, non-fellowship-trained surgeons favored adjuvant CRT, whereas fellowship-trained surgeons preferred only adjuvant RT, for patients with lymphovascular or perineural invasion, >1 lymph node involvement, or close deep margins. TORS was viewed as having less adverse sequelae (i.e. dysphagia, dysphonia, xerostomia). Though the two modalities had similar oncologic outcomes, TORS was perceived as providing better quality of life (QOL).

CONCLUSIONS

There are variations in HPV-related OPSCC management based on surgeon background and preferences across the US. TORS and primary RT are believed to offer similar oncologic control, but the former provides lesser adverse sequelae and better QOL. Additionally, surgeon demographics (i.e. fellowship status, practice type, and region) can affect management decisions, including patient selection for TORS and adjuvant therapy decisions. Further study is required to better understand and standardize appropriate HPV-positive OPSCC management.

Trans-oral robotic surgery: a safe and effective tool in head and neck surgery in an Australian rural setting

BACKGROUND

Trans-oral robotic surgery (TORS) facilitates surgical resection of tumours as an alternative to open surgery and has demonstrated favourable oncological results. Given the novelty of TORS and the paucity of evidence on TORS-specific complications in a rural setting, we report our experience with TORS at an Australian rural head and neck centre.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all robotic cases performed at a regional head and neck centre in Queensland was undertaken from 2014 to 2019. Patient demographics, pre-operative surgical risk, complications and outcomes such as margins and cancer recurrence were recorded. Complications were graded based on the Clavien-Dindo grading system. Descriptive statistics were used to present patient characteristics and statistical analyses were performed using Stata.

RESULTS

Forty-two TORS surgeries were performed. Twenty-one had histology confirming malignancy. There were no adverse intraoperative effects. Overall, seven patients (16.7%) had at least one complication. Four were recorded as a Clavien-Dindo 3b (post-operative bleed, wound infection and drain dislodgment). Of two cases with residual positive margins, one declined further surgery, and another received chemoradiotherapy. One patient recurred with distant metastatic disease, and another had locoregional nodal recurrence. The distribution of complications was significant across the pre-operative risk categories for both American Society of Anaesthesiologists and surgical risk score (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

TORS in a rural head and neck centre is a safe and viable treatment option for patients so long as this is undertaken with appropriate training, mentorship and teamwork.

Patient Selection for Transoral Robotic Surgery (TORS) in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: What the Surgeon Wants to Know

ABSTRACT

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is an excellent treatment strategy for well-selected patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Potential benefits of TORS are greatest among patients for whom surgical resection will reduce or eliminate the need for adjuvant therapy. Proper patient selection largely depends on imaging, which is used to determine tumor resectability, to inform expected morbidity and functional outcome, to assess the potential need for adjuvant therapy, to evaluate for vascular or other anatomic contraindications, and to gauge adequacy of transoral access to the tumor. This article provides the radiologist with a practical and accessible approach to interpreting preoperative imaging among patients with oropharyngeal cancer, emphasizing what the surgeon wants to know to inform the determination of whether the patient is a TORS candidate and why this information is important. By accurately reporting this information, the radiologist facilitates the multidisciplinary care team's selection of a treatment regimen optimized for the circumstances of the individual patient.

Error Analysis of Robot-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Orthognathic surgery is an effective method to correct the dentomaxillofacial deformities. The aim of the study is to introduce the robot-assisted orthognathic surgery and demonstrate the accuracy and feasibility of robot-assisted osteotomy in transferring the preoperative virtual surgical planning (VSP) into the intraoperative phase.

METHODS

The CMF robot system, a craniomaxillofacial surgical robot system was developed, consisted of a robotic arm with 6 degrees of freedom, a self-developed end-effector, and an optical localizer. The individualized end-effector was installed with reciprocating saw so that it could perform osteotomy. The study included control and experimental groups. In control group, under the guidance of navigation system, surgeon performed the osteotomies on 3 skull models. In experimental group, according to the preoperative VSP, the robot completed the osteotomies on 3 skull models automatically with assistance of navigation. Statistical analysis was carried out to evaluate the accuracy and feasibility of robot-assisted orthognathic surgery and compare the errors between robot-assisted automatic osteotomy and navigation-assisted manual osteotomy.

RESULTS

All the osteotomies were successfully completed. The overall osteotomy error was 1.07 ± 0.19 mm in the control group, and 1.12 ± 0.20 mm in the experimental group. No significant difference in osteotomy errors was found in the robot-assisted osteotomy groups (P = 0.353). There was consistence of errors between robot-assisted automatic osteotomy and navigation-assisted manual osteotomy.

CONCLUSION

In robot-assisted orthognathic surgery, the robot can complete an osteotomy according to the preoperative VSP and transfer a preoperative VSP into the actual surgical operation with good accuracy and feasibility.

Human papillomavirus-related head and neck adenosquamous carcinoma: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis

This work examined published papers of patients affected by human papillomavirus-related head and neck adenosquamous carcinoma. Demographic data, tumor site and sub-site, TNM stage, HPV status (positive VS negative) and the technique used for its identification, the treatments performed, follow-up time and patient's status at follow-up were assessed. Three papers including 26 patients resulted eligible for the study. The incidence of HPV-positive Adenosquamous Carcinomas located in the oropharynx was significantly higher than HPV-negative tumors (p = 0.01), especially if the origin of primary unknown tumors was considered within this anatomical site (p < 0.0001). HPV-positive Adenosquamous Carcinomas had a higher incidence of small primary tumor (Tx + T1) (p = 0.03) and bulky cervical lymph node metastasis (N2) at presentation (p = 0.02). HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors had similar OS and DFS. Head & Neck HPV-positive Adenosquamous Carcinoma seems to act like HPV-positive conventional Squamous Cell Carcinoma, thus we suggest to determine the HPV status of Adenosquamous Carcinoma during the diagnostic phase.

Salvage transoral robotic surgery in early-stage oropharyngeal recurrence

OBJECTIVES

Limited data are currently available regarding outcomes following transoral robotic surgery (TORS) in the salvage setting. This study aims to investigate the functional and oncological outcomes following TORS in salvage oropharyngeal tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

All patients undergoing salvage TORS for a residual, recurrent, or new primary oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma within a previously radiated field between March 2014 and October 2018 were included. Patients undergoing salvage TORS for other subsites were excluded. Margin status, complication rates, long-term tracheostomy, and gastrostomy requirements and overall and disease-free survival outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients were included. Three patients (11%) experienced a TORS-specific major complication. A gastrostomy tube was required in 42% of patients on discharge (n = 11), and in 28% of patients on long-term follow-up (n = 7) at a median of 34 (interquartile range, 11.8-47.8) months. A tracheostomy was placed in 5 patients and all were removed before discharge. The 3-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 74% and 70%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Salvage TORS is a viable and effective option in the management of selected tumors within a previously radiated field.

Outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery in oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has evolved to a standard therapy modality for oropharyngeal carcinoma, especially in T1/ T2 tumors involving the base of the tongue due to its advantages compared with open surgery. However, knowledge about its benefits compared with transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) are scarce. This study compares oncological and functional results of TLM or TORS in the treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis comprises all patients with OPSCC treated with TLM (n = 30) or TORS (n = 24) between April 2003 and May 2018 (follow-up 43 ± 38.3 months). Both treatment groups (TLM and TORS) were comparable in terms of the stage of the disease, prognosis-determining factors, and adjuvant therapy modalities.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences regarding to the resection status (p = 0.272), the rate of local- (p = 0.834) and distant- recurrence (p = 0.416), with a disease-free survival of 86.7 % and 87.5 %, respectively (p = 0.892). In addition, we could not confirm any differences regarding to operating time (p = 0.860), intraoperative blood loss (p = 0.660), inpatient stay (p = 0.585) and postoperative bleeding rate (p = 0.245). The frequency of tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy between both groups is comparable, with a longer duration of tube feeding in patients who have received TLM (p = 0.030).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, TORS allows for similar oncological outcomes compared with TLM at comparable perioperative risks. The postoperative swallowing function may benefit from TORS.

Transoral robotic surgery in head and neck district: a retrospective study on 67 patients treated in a single center

BACKGROUND

The anatomical complexity of the oropharynx and the difficulty in reaching its distal portion have always conditioned the surgical accessibility.Robotic surgery represents an excellent alternative in the treatment of cervico-facial oncological diseases.

METHODS

This series comprises all patients managed for head and neck cancer by Trans Oral Robotic Surgery TORS.The staging assessment, including neck ultrasound and total body PET/CT scan, was performed in each patient according to the TNM classification.All charts were recorded with the following data: name and surname, age, gender, date of surgery intra or post-operative hemorragia, tumor site, histology, TNM stage, robot set-up time, tumor resection time, whether or not tracheotomy was performed, whether or not neck dissection was performed, insertion of a nasogastric tube or gastrostomy, time to resumption of oral feeding, surgical margins, mean length of hospital stay, adjuvant treatment and follow-up.

RESULTS

From February 2013 to February 2018, TORS was performed in 67 consecutive patients affected by head and neck tumours.We divided, our sample, in 3 subsites: supraglottic larynx, parapharyngeal space and oropharynx.Pathology reports confimed malignancy in 44 cases: 8 cases lymphomas, 36 cases of Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), 5 cases of benign salivary glands tumors and 18 miscellaneous cases. Neck dissection was performed in 12 cases.Tracheotomy was perfomed in 3/67 cases for respiratory failures. A nasogastric tube was inserted at the end of the surgical procedure in 21 patients. The mean length of hospital stay was 10 days .Major complications included post-operative bleeding in 3 patients, 1 exitus for massive bleeding 20 days post-surgery and 1 respiratory failure treated with tracheotomy and monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for 3 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic surgery has been considered a valid alternative to traditional open treatment in many specializations with the advantages of an endoscopic procedure, with the same oncological and functional results and with fewer complications. The advantages of this type of surgical technique have been discussed, it is mandatory to focus on the indications and contraindications.

Transoral robotic surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx in a primarily human papillomavirus-negative patient population

PURPOSE

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is one of the main treatment options for non-locally advanced primary oropharyngeal cancer in the United States. However, its use is more limited in countries with a low incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV), such as Spain, in patients with advanced disease, and as salvage surgery. To shed light on the use and potential benefit of TORS in Spanish patients, we analyzed the functional and oncologic outcomes of TORS as both primary and salvage surgery in a primarily HPV-negative population which is representative of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) patients in Spain.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data on OPSCC patients treated with TORS at our center between February 2017 and February 2019.

RESULTS

Fifty-four OPSCC patients were included; 79.6% were males and 80.5% were HPV negative. Median age was 62 years. Primary surgery was performed on 73.7% (48.1% stage I-II; 51.9% stage III-IV) and salvage surgery on 25.9% of patients. Positive margin rates were 4.3% for T1-2 and 25.8% for T3-4. None of the stage I-II patients and 27.7% of stage III-IV patients required adjuvant treatment. Reconstructive surgery was performed in 19.2% of all patients. Normal swallowing was achieved in 92.7% of patients at 6 months after surgery. 1- and 2-year survival rates for all patients were 94.5% and 89%, respectively. The overall complication rate was 16.1%. Bleeding occurred in 11.5% of patients. Longer hospitalization time was associated with surgical complications (P = 0.03) and reconstructive surgery (P = 0.03) but not with salvage surgery.

CONCLUSION

TORS is a safe and effective treatment for HPV-negative T1-2 OPSCC patients. The positive margin rate was worse in T3-4 patients, indicating the need for careful patient selection in this subgroup.

Current Role of Surgery in the Management of Oropharyngeal Cancer

In the last few decades, the surgical treatment of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has undergone enormous changes. Until the 1990s, open surgery was the primary treatment for OPSCC. However, due to the potentially severe functional morbidity of this approach, open surgery was largely displaced by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in the 1990s. At the same time, new, less-invasive surgical approaches such as transoral surgery with monopolar cautery began to emerge, with the potential to reduce functional morbidity and avoid the late-onset toxicity of CRT. More recently, the growing incidence of HPV-positive disease has altered the patient profile of OPSCC, as these patients tend to be younger and have a better long-term prognosis. Consequently, this has further bolstered interest in minimally-invasive techniques to de-intensify treatment to reduce long-term toxicity and treatment-related morbidity. In this context, there has been a renewed interest in the primary surgery, which allows for accurate pathologic staging and thus—potentially—de-intensification of postoperative CRT. The continuous advances in minimally-invasive surgical approaches, including transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robotic surgery (TORS), have also altered the surgical landscape. These minimally-invasive approaches offer excellent functional outcomes, without the severe toxicity associated with intensive CRT, thus substantially reducing treatment-related morbidity. In short, given the increasing prevalence of HPV-positive OPSCC, together with the severe long-term sequela of aggressive CRT, surgery appears to be recapturing its previous role as the primary treatment modality for this disease. While a growing body of evidence suggests that TLM and TORS offer oncologic outcomes that are comparable to CRT and open surgery, many questions remain due to the lack of prospective data. In the present review, we explore the emerging range of surgical options and discuss future directions in the treatment of OPSCC, including the most relevant clinical trials currently underway.

Management of the Neck in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

PURPOSE

The aim of the current work is to provide evidence-based recommendations to practicing physicians and others on the management of the neck in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel of medical oncology, surgery, radiation oncology, and advocacy experts to conduct a literature search, which included systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective comparative observational studies published from 1990 through 2018. Outcomes of interest included survival, regional disease control, neck recurrence, and quality of life. Expert Panel members used available evidence and informal consensus to develop evidence-based guideline recommendations.

RESULTS

The literature search identified 124 relevant studies to inform the evidence base for this guideline. Six clinical scenarios were devised; three for oral cavity cancer and three for oropharynx cancer, and recommendations were generated for each one.

RECOMMENDATIONS

For oral cavity cancers, clinical scenarios focused on the indications for and the hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, indications for postoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, and whether radiotherapy alone is sufficient elective treatment of an undissected neck compared with high-quality neck dissection. For oropharynx cancers, clinical scenarios focused on hallmarks of a high-quality neck dissection, factors that would favor operative versus nonoperative primary management, and clarifying criteria for an incomplete response to definitive chemoradiation for which salvage neck dissection would be recommended. Consensus was reached and recommendations were made for all six clinical scenarios. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines .

Robotics in otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery

A look at the past, present and future.

Recent advances in the understanding and management of oropharyngeal cancer

Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is an increasing health problem in the developing and developed world. In recent years, there have been major changes in the treatment paradigms for OPSCC. This is because of a number of reasons: the understanding and discovery of a new viral etiology (the human papillomavirus [HPV]), changes in practice patterns owing to advances in radiotherapy, and then an organ preservation strategy with the increased use of chemotherapy. Next came the development of new surgical technologies and the emergence of a new treatment modality, immunotherapy. In this article, we discuss the evolution of OPSCC treatments, starting with the traditional tobacco era. Treatment paradigms then evolved during the organ preservation era, the HPV era, and the minimally invasive surgery era. We are currently in the immunotherapy era, with a number of new drugs becoming available both on trial and by approval for use in the clinical setting for head and neck cancer patients. We discuss a number of trials and the reasons behind attempts at both treatment escalation and treatment de-escalation.

Survival and Functional Outcome after Treatment for Primary Base of Tongue Cancer: A Comparison of Definitive Chemoradiotherapy versus Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes in patients with primary base of tongue (BOT) cancer who received definitive radiotherapy (RT) or surgery followed by radiotherapy (SRT).

Materials and Methods

Between January 2002 and December 2016, 102 patients with stage I-IVB primary BOT cancer underwent either definitive RT (n=46) or SRT (n=56), and treatment outcomes were compared between two groups. The expression of p16 was also analyzed.

Results

The RT group had more patients with advanced T stage (T3-4) disease (58.7% vs. 35.7%, p=0.021) and who received chemotherapy (91.3% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001) than the SRT group. At a median follow up of 36.9 months (range, 3.3 to 181.5 months), the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 75.5% and 68.7%, respectively. With respect to treatment group, the 5-year OS and DFS in the RT and SRT groups did not differ significantly (OS, 68.7% vs. 80.5%, p=0.601; DFS, 63.1% vs. 73.1%, p=0.653). In multivariate analysis, OS differed significantly according to p16 expression (p16-negative vs. p16-positive; hazard ratio [HR], 0.145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.025 to 0.853; p=0.033). Regarding DFS, p16 expression (p16-negative vs. p16-positive; HR, 0.164; 95% CI, 0.045 to 0.598; p=0.006) showed a significant effect in multivariate analysis. Functional defects (late grade ≥ 3 dysphagia or voice alteration) were more frequently reported in the SRT than in the RT group (16.1% vs. 2.2%, p=0.021).

Conclusion

Despite advanced disease, patients in the RT group showed comparable survival outcomes and better functional preservation than those in the SRT group.

Variation in use of postoperative chemoradiation following surgery for T1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma; National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Primary surgical treatment of patients with early T-classification (T1-T2) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has increased. We sought to determine how often these patients receive postoperative chemoradiation (CRT).

METHODS

Patients with T1-T2 OPSCC in the National Cancer Database who underwent primary surgery were evaluated for receipt of postoperative CRT. Postoperative CRT use was examined among patients with high risk factors (positive margins and/or extracapsular spread [ECS]), intermediate risk factors (negative margins, no ECS, and either pT3-4 and/or N2-N3), and no apparent risk factors.

RESULTS

Of 4833 patients with T1-T2 OPSCC who underwent primary surgery, 43% had high risk pathologic factors, of whom only 63% received postoperative CRT. Another 31% had no apparent risk factors, of whom 16% nonetheless received postoperative CRT. On multivariable analysis, in addition to tumor and demographic factors, patients treated at community hospitals were more likely to receive postoperative CRT (O.R. 1.41 C.I. 1.18-1.87, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Variation in postoperative CRT use indicates a lack of consensus and/or knowledge about its benefits and indications. Usage of postoperative CRT regardless of pathologic risk factors suggests an area where future efforts at implementation of best practices may be targeted.

A case report of invasive candidiasis and fungal osteomyelitis mimicking oropharyngeal carcinoma recurrence in an immunocompetent patient following transoral robotic surgery

INTRODUCTION

Transoral robotic surgery(TORS) for the excision of oropharyngeal tumour is increasingly considered for its lower rates of postoperative complications and better functional outcomes. However, we report a case of invasive candidiasis in an immunocompetent patient with previous radiation therapy years ago who underwent TORS recently.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 55year old Chinese female with previous radiation therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma diagnosed in 1986 underwent wide excision of a newly diagnosed oropharyngeal carcinoma with TORS. From 4 to 8 weeks post-op, an enlarging exophytic lesion at the surgical excision site was noted. Initial biopsy did not show malignancy or fungal organisms. A repeat biopsy under anaesthesia was done as CT imaging showed suspicion of either infective or tumour recurrence. The patient was treated with long term antifungals as final culture results showed invasive candidiasis. The surgical site showed no further lesions 6 months post-op.

DISCUSSION

Previous radiation therapy to the oropharyngeal area predisposes a patient to colonization of fungal organisms. Despite TORS showing lower rates of infection, patients who have had previous radiotherapy may be more susceptible to infections as the dissection involves down to the pre-vertebral fascia. Hence, it is appropriate for such patients to have microbiological and fungal cultures performed for a lesion such as this and be treated according to the results of the culture.

CONCLUSION

This case serves as a reminder of the risk of invasive candidiasis requiring early investigation and treatment in an immunocompetent patient with prior history of both radiation therapy and recent TORS.

Radiotherapy alone or combined with chemotherapy for base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To evaluate the long-term disease control, survival, and complications after definitive radiotherapy (RT) alone or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without planned neck dissection for base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 467 patients treated at the University of Florida with definitive RT alone or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy between 1964 and 2011 for base of tongue SCC.

METHODS

Median follow-up was 5.6 years. Median total dose to the primary site was 74.4 Gy. Eighty-seven patients (19%) were treated with once-daily fractionation, and 380 (81%) received altered fractionation schedules. Intensity-modulated RT was used in 128 patients (27%). Chemotherapy was administered to 173 (37%) patients. Planned neck dissection after RT was performed in 226 patients (48%). Data regarding p16 pathway activation were available for 25 patients.

RESULTS

At 5 years, the local, local-regional, and regional control rates were 85.5%, 80.0%, and 90.0%, respectively. The 5-year overall, cause-specific, and distant metastasis-free survival rates were 59.1%, 71.5%, and 84.1%, respectively. Sixty-four patients (14%) developed one or more severe late complications. Fifty patients (11%) required late gastrostomy tube placement.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the continued use of RT alone or combined with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with base of tongue SCC, as this treatment yields high rates of cause-specific survival and disease control, with a relatively low rate of late complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 127:1589-1594, 2017.

Incidental finding of an extensive oropharyngeal mass in magnetic resonance imaging of a patient with temporomandibular disorder: A case report

In this report, we describe the incidental finding of an oropharyngeal mass in a patient who presented with a chief complaint of temporomandibular pain. The patient was initially evaluated by an otorhinolaryngologist for complaints of headaches, earache, and sinus congestion. Due to worsening headaches and trismus, he was further referred for the management of temporomandibular disorder. The clinical evaluation was uneventful except for limited mouth opening (trismus). An advanced radiological evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging revealed a mass in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal region. The mass occupied the masticatory space and extended superioinferiorly from the skull base to the mandible. A diagnostic biopsy of the lesion revealed a long-standing human papilloma virus (HPV-16)-positive squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. This case illustrates the need for the timely radiological evaluation of seemingly innocuous orofacial pain.

Increase in primary surgical treatment of T1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and rates of adverse pathologic features: National Cancer Data Base

BACKGROUND

There has been increasing interest in the primary surgical treatment of patients with early T classification (T1-T2) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), with the stated goal of de-escalating or avoiding adjuvant treatment. Herein, the authors sought to determine the degree to which this interest has translated into changes in practice patterns, and the rates of adverse postoperative pathologic features.

METHODS

Patients with T1 to T2 OPSCC in the National Cancer Data Base who were treated from 2004 through 2013 were categorized as receiving primary surgical or primary radiation-based treatment. Trends in treatment selection and factors related to the selection of primary surgery were examined. The rates of adverse pathologic features including positive surgical margins, extracapsular spread (ECS), and advanced T and N classifications after surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS

Of 8768 patients with T1 to T2 OPSCC, 68% underwent primary surgical treatment, increasing from 56% in 2004 to 82% in 2013 (P<.0001). The highest versus lowest volume hospitals treated 78% versus 59% of patients with primary surgery (odds ratio, 2.23; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-3.22 [P<.0001]). Higher lymph node classification was found to be predictive of lower rates of primary surgery, but the majority of patients with clinical N2/N3 disease underwent primary surgery. Among patients treated with surgery, positive surgical margins were present in 24% and ECS in 25% of patients. The rate of positive surgical margins decreased over time (P<.0001) and was observed less often at high-volume centers (P<.0001). Among candidates for single-modality therapy (those with clinical T1-T2/N0-N1 disease), 33% had positive surgical margins and/or ECS and 47% had at least 1 adverse feature (T3-T4 disease, N2-N3 disease, positive surgical margins, and/or ECS).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary surgical treatment among patients with early T classification OPSCC has become more widespread. Cancer 2016;122:1523-32. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Recent Progress in Therapeutic Treatments and Screening Strategies for the Prevention and Treatment of HPV-Associated Head and Neck Cancer

The rise in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) has elicited significant interest in the role of high-risk HPV in tumorigenesis. Because patients with HPV-positive HNSCC have better prognoses than do their HPV-negative counterparts, current therapeutic strategies for HPV⁺ HNSCC are increasingly considered to be overly aggressive, highlighting a need for customized treatment guidelines for this cohort. Additional issues include the unmet need for a reliable screening strategy for HNSCC, as well as the ongoing assessment of the efficacy of prophylactic vaccines for the prevention of HPV infections in the head and neck regions. This review also outlines a number of emerging prospects for therapeutic vaccines, as well as for targeted, molecular-based therapies for HPV-associated head and neck cancers. Overall, the future for developing novel and effective therapeutic agents for HPV-associated head and neck tumors is promising; continued progress is critical in order to meet the challenges posed by the growing epidemic.

Targeted Therapy in Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Implications of HPV for Therapy

Oropharyngeal cancers caused by human papillomaviruses (HPV) have a different epidemiology, prognosis, genetic mutational landscape, response to treatment, and outcome when compared to HPV-negative cancers. In this review, a summary of our current understanding of HPV in head and neck cancer and the important advances that have shown HPV to be an etiological agent are discussed. HPV-positive and HPV-negative tumors are compared discussing clinicopathological factors, prognosis, outcome following treatment, and the molecular and genetic differences. Currently, the standard of care for oropharyngeal cancer is both surgery and post-operative radiotherapy with or without cisplatin or concurrent chemo-radiotherapy. The latter is used more often, especially in cancers of tonsil and base of tongue. However, there is increased interest in trying to de-intensify treatment and in the development of new treatments to target the underlying different molecular pathways of HPV-positive cancers. The current clinical trials involving surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are discussed. The new targeted treatments are also summarized. Although there is currently is no evidence from prospective studies to support a change in the treatment algorithm, the treatment options for patients with HPV-positive disease are likely to change in the future.