Tobacco and alcohol consumption after total laryngectomy and survival: A German multicenter prospective cohort study

Patients' Reflections on Treatment Decision After Surgery for Laryngeal Cancer

Importance

Clinicians should understand how patients who were treated with laryngeal cancer surgery think about this later on and what factors may be related with regretting surgery.

Objective

To assess variables associated with a positive attitude toward laryngeal cancer surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This combination of 2 cohorts, based on patient interviews and questionnaires, was studied in 16 hospitals in Germany. Participants scheduled for laryngeal cancer surgery were enrolled before surgery and followed up until 1 year after surgery. Data collection began on November 28, 2001, and ended on March 15, 2015. Statistical analysis was performed from August 21, 2023, to January 19, 2024.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The attitude toward surgery was measured with the Psychosocial Adjustment After Laryngectomy Questionnaire (scores range from 0 to 100, with high scores representing a positive attitude toward the surgery) at 1 year after surgery. In multivariate regression analysis, the following variables were investigated: type of surgery, number of surgeries to the larynx, receipt of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, quality of life, speech intelligibility (objectively measured), age, sex, educational level, employment status, having a partner or not, counseling by patient association, and shared decision-making.

Results

Patients (n = 780; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [10.4] years; 701 [90%] male) who had received counseling from the patient association reported a more positive attitude toward surgery (adjusted B = 8.8; 95% CI, 1.0-16.6). Among patients after total laryngectomy, those with a university degree had a less positive attitude toward their surgery (adjusted B = -50.8; 95% CI, -84.0 to -17.6); this result was not observed in patients after partial laryngectomy (adjusted B = -4.8; 95% CI, -15.1 to 5.4). Among patients after partial laryngectomy, the attitude toward surgery was most positive in those who had experienced shared decision-making (mean [SD] questionnaire score, 84 [20] in those without a wish and 83 [20] in those with a wish for shared decision-making). Those who had wished they could decide together with the physician but where this eventually was not experienced expressed the most regret toward surgery (mean [SD] score, 71 [22]). There was no association between attitudes toward surgery and type of surgery (total vs partial laryngectomy) and all other variables tested.

Conclusion and Relevance

In this cohort study, most patients with head and neck cancer reported a positive attitude toward surgery, suggesting low levels of decision regret. Counseling by members of patient associations as well as individualized shared decision-making prior to surgery may have a positive impact on decision regret and is advisable in daily practice.

Health related Quality of Life over time in German sarcoma patients. An analysis of associated factors - results of the PROSa study

Introduction

Sarcomas are rare cancers and very heterogeneous in their location, histological subtype, and treatment. Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) of sarcoma patients has rarely been investigated in longitudinal studies.

Methods

Here, we assessed adult sarcoma patients and survivors between September 2017 and February 2020, and followed-up for one year in 39 study centers in Germany. Follow-up time points were 6 (t1) and 12 months (t2) after inclusion. We used a standardized, validated questionnaire (the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Instrument (EORTC QLQ-C30) and explored predictors of HRQoL in two populations (all patients (Analysis 1), patients in ongoing complete remission (Analysis 2)) using generalized linear mixed models.

Results

In total we included up to 1111 patients at baseline (915 at t1, and 847 at t2), thereof 387 participants were in complete remission at baseline (334 at t1, and 200 at t2). When analyzing all patients, HRQoL differed with regard to tumor locations: patients with sarcoma in lower extremities reported lower HRQoL values than patients with sarcomas in the upper extremities. Treatment which included radiotherapy and/or systemic therapy was associated with lower HRQoL. For patients in complete remission, smoking was associated with worse HRQoL-outcomes. In both analyses, bone sarcomas were associated with the worst HRQoL values. Being female, in the age group 55-<65 years, having lower socioeconomic status, and comorbidities were all associated with a lower HRQoL, in both analyses.

Discussion

HRQoL increased partially over time since treatment and with sporting activities. HRQoL improved with time since treatment, although not in all domains, and was associated with lifestyle and socioeconomic factors. Bone sarcomas were the most affected subgroup. Methods to preserve and improve HRQoL should be developed for sarcoma patients.

Personalizing Surveillance in Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) encompasses a spectrum of heterogeneous diseases originating in the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. Within the United States, head and neck cancer (HNC) accounts for 66,470 new cases, or 3% of all malignancies, annually.¹ The incidence of HNC is rising, largely driven by increases in oropharyngeal cancer.^2-4 Recent molecular and clinical advancements, particularly with regard to molecular and tumor biology, reflect the heterogeneity of the subsites contained within the head and neck. Despite this, existing guidelines for post-treatment surveillance remain broad without much consideration given to different anatomic subsites and etiologic factors (such as human papillomavirus [HPV] status or tobacco exposure).⁵ Surveillance incorporating the physical examination, imaging, and emerging molecular biomarkers is an essential part of care for patients treated for HNC and allows for the detection of locoregional recurrence, distant metastases, and second primary malignancies aiming for better functional and survival outcomes. Additionally, it allows for evaluation and management of post-treatment complications.

Post-diagnosis smoking cessation and survival of patients with head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Cigarette smoking is the main risk factor for head and neck cancer (HNC) and many HNC patients are active smokers at diagnosis. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to quantify the survival impact of smoking cessation at or around the time of HNC diagnosis. We searched studies published until December 31, 2021, and used random-effects meta-analysis to pool study-specific estimates into summary hazard ratio (SHR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Sixteen studies were published between 1983 and 2021, and over 2300 HNC patients were included. Studies were diverse in terms of design, patients, tumours and treatment characteristics, and criteria used to discriminate quitters from continued smokers. HNC patients who quit smoking at or around diagnosis had significantly better overall survival than continued smokers (SHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.70-0.91, n studies = 10). A beneficial effect of post-diagnosis smoking cessation was suggested for other survival endpoints as well, but the results were based on fewer studies (n = 5) and affected by publication bias. Cessation counselling should be offered to all smokers who start a diagnostic workup for HNC and should be considered standard multidisciplinary oncological care for HNC patients. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021245560.

[Smoking Behaviour after Partial Resection of the Larynx: The Role of Causal Attribution]

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to examine how different causal attributions in patients with laryngeal cancer are associated with smoking behaviours (smoking cessation rates and amount of cigarettes per day) after partial resection of the larynx.

METHODS

Multicentre prospective cohort study including 4 interviews: between diagnosis and partial resection of larynx (t1), one week (t2), 3 months (t3) and 12 months (t4) after surgery. Presented in this study are t1 and t4. A total of 134 patients (mean age 62 years, 93% male) were interviewed at t1 and t4 between 2007 and 2013. Key items were causal attribution as well as previous and current smoking behaviour. Patients were grouped according to the subjectively stated causal attribution. Results were analysed descriptively and group as well as mean value comparisons were conducted.

RESULTS

Smoking was the most commonly stated causal attribution (43.3%). The quantity of cigarettes decreased significantly by about 6 cigarettes from 17 (range 3-40) to 11 (range 2-30) cigarettes per day in this group (p=0.001). 25% of patients did not recognize a reason for their illness. In longitudinal analyses of all groups of different causal attributions, there was a non-significant decrease in the percentage of smokers.

CONCLUSION

We show that causal attribution does not affect smoking cessation rate significantly in a positive way. But active smokers after PRL reduce their quantity of cigarettes per day significantly. This impact is more noticeable in patients who were able to define a causal attribution. Psycho-oncological care, information services and smoking cessation programs could contribute to this effect by making the causal attribution a subject of discussion.

Indicators for secondary carcinoma in head and neck cancer patients following curative therapy: A retrospective clinical study

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) are at risk for local and regional relapse, as well as for occurrence of synchronous or metachronous secondary carcinoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the frequency of secondary malignancies amongst HNSCC patients and their association with age, sex and TNM classification, as well as smoking and alcohol abuse. Data from 394 patients with HNSCC who were treated at the Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery of the University Hospital Mannheim between 2011 and 2015 were retrieved and analyzed using t-tests and P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 394 patients, 50 (12.7%) developed a secondary carcinoma. In this cohort, >70% of secondary malignancies were diagnosed using clinical inspection or microlaryngoscopy. The majority of secondary malignancies were identified in the oropharynx, with men being more often affected overall. Continued abuse of carcinogenic substances appeared to increase the incidence of secondary carcinoma, whereas the localization of the primary tumor, age, sex or TNM classification were not identified as significant indicators of the occurrence of a secondary carcinoma. The purpose of the present study was to emphasize the importance of intensive follow-up to ensure early detection of secondary malignancies. The aim was to help predict numbers and occurrence within smaller cohorts, and to evaluate the quality of data collected during the establishment of a certified tumor center. To fully evaluate the role of continued exposure to noxious substances and other possible contributing factors, and in order to improve the rate of early diagnosis and establish preventive strategies, multicentered studies with larger cohorts are required.

Multicenter prospective study on the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the use and outcome of rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Germany.

METHODS

We enrolled patients who were scheduled for total laryngectomy, approached them again after surgery, after 3 months and 1 year. Patients completed questionnaires and were interviewed.

RESULTS

Of 309 participants, 14% had not received any rehabilitation. Reasons for nonuse were primarily ongoing treatment and poor health. Users of rehabilitation had 4 times the odds of attaining any ability to speak compared to nonusers (odds ratio 3.8, P = .02). The main aim of rehabilitation from the perspective of the users was speech rehabilitation, mentioned by 71% before starting rehabilitation. This was also what most users (27%) found the most helpful part of rehabilitation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients are interested in attending rehabilitation. They especially want to improve their speech capacity, which indeed is better among users of rehabilitation than in those without.

Course of psychiatric comorbidity and utilization of mental health care after laryngeal cancer: a prospective cohort study

In a German multi-center prospective cohort study, we wanted to assess the course of psychiatric comorbidity, utilization of mental health care and psychosocial care needs in laryngeal cancer patients during the first year after partial laryngectomy (PRL). Structured interviews with patients were conducted before surgery, 1 week (1 w), 3 months (3 m) and 1 year (12 m) after PRL. Psychiatric comorbidity was assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Psychosocial care needs and utilization of mental health care were evaluated with standardized face-to-face interviews. In 176 patients, psychiatric disorders were prevalent in 11 % (1 w), 15 % (3 m) and 14 % (12 m), respectively, of which 4 % (12 m) underwent psychiatric treatment or psychotherapy. Two percent had acute, 15 % emerging and 6 % chronic psychiatric comorbidity. Chronically mental ill patients were more frequently younger than 65 years (p = 0.026), female (p = 0.045) and experienced more often a need for psychological counseling (p ≤ 0.001). One year after surgery, 27 % of the comorbid psychiatric patients expressed a need for additional psychological counseling. Alcohol-related disorders were diagnosed in 3 % (1 w), 3 % (3 m) and 8 % (12 m), respectively. Only one of these patients received psychological treatment, while 14 % expressed a need for psychological counseling and 7 % for additional medical consultations. The non-treatment of alcohol-related disorders measured in our sample indicates a major problem since continued alcohol consumption in laryngeal cancer patients is associated with reduced global quality of life, increased functional impairments and reduced overall survival. Screening instruments integrated into acute care are necessary to detect harmful drinking behavior.