1
|
Sergi MC, Lauricella E, Porta C, Tucci M, Cives M. An update on Merkel cell carcinoma. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2023; 1878:188880. [PMID: 36914034 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2023.188880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/13/2023]
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cancer of the skin characterized by a neuroendocrine phenotype and an aggressive clinical behavior. It frequently originates in sun-exposed body areas, and its incidence has steadily increased in the last three decades. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure are the main causative agents of MCC, and distinct molecular features have been documented in virus-positive and virus-negative malignancies. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized tumors, but even when integrated with adjuvant radiotherapy is able to definitively cure only a fraction of MCC patients. While characterized by a high objective response rate, chemotherapy is associated with a short-lasting benefit of approximately 3 months. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors including avelumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with stage IV MCC, and investigations on their use in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting are currently underway. Addressing the needs of those patients who do not persistently benefit from immunotherapy is currently one of the most compelling unmet needs in the field, and multiple clinical trials of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), therapeutic vaccines, immunocytokines as well as innovative forms of adoptive cellular immunotherapies are under clinical scrutiny at present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Chiara Sergi
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Eleonora Lauricella
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Camillo Porta
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Marco Tucci
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Mauro Cives
- Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy; Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline - Update 2022. Eur J Cancer 2022; 171:203-231. [PMID: 35732101 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.03.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all cutaneous malignancies. It is found predominantly in white populations and risk factors include advanced age, ultraviolet exposure, male sex, immunosuppression, such as AIDS/HIV infection, haematological malignancies or solid organ transplantation, and Merkel cell polyomavirus infection. MCC is an aggressive tumour with 26% of cases presenting lymph node involvement at diagnosis and 8% with distant metastases. Five-year overall survival rates range between 48% and 63%. Two subsets of MCC have been characterised with distinct molecular pathogenetic pathways: ultraviolet-induced MCC versus virus-positive MCC, which carries a better prognosis. In both subtypes, there are alterations in the retinoblastoma protein and p53 gene structure and function. MCC typically manifests as a red nodule or plaque with fast growth, most commonly on sun exposed areas. Histopathology (small-cell neuroendocrine appearance) and immunohistochemistry (CK20 positivity and TTF-1 negativity) confirm the diagnosis. The current staging systems are the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for international Cancer control 8th edition. Baseline whole body imaging is encouraged to rule out regional and distant metastasis. For localised MCC, first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended in all patients with MCC without clinically detectable lymph nodes or distant metastasis. Adjuvant RT alone, eventually combined with complete lymph nodes dissection is proposed in case of micrometastatic nodal involvement. In case of macroscopic nodal involvement, the standard of care is complete lymph nodes dissection potentially followed by post-operative RT. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies should be offered as first-line systemic treatment in advanced MCC. Chemotherapy can be used when patients fail to respond or are intolerant for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy or clinical trials.
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu KX, Milligan MG, Schoenfeld JD, Tishler RB, Ng AK, Devlin PM, Fite E, Rabinowits G, Hanna GJ, Silk AW, Yoon CH, Thakuria M, Margalit DN. Characterization of clinical outcomes after shorter course hypofractionated and standard-course radiotherapy for stage I-III curatively-treated Merkel cell carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2022; 173:32-40. [PMID: 35595174 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Limited data exists regarding the efficacy of curative hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) regimens compared to conventionally-fractionated radiotherapy (conv-RT) for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). METHODS A retrospective analysis of 241 patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MCC from 2005-2021 and who received RT at Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse using Gray's test with competing risks of death and isolated out-of-field recurrence. Secondary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and MCC-specific survival using log-rank tests, and risk factors of recurrence using Cox-proportional hazards regression. RESULTS There were 50 (20.6%) and 193 (79.4%) courses of hypo-RT and conv-RT, respectively. The hypo-RT cohort was older (≥73 years at diagnosis: 78.0% vs. 41.5%, p<0.01), and received a lower equivalent total RT dose in 2 Gy per fraction (<50 Gy: 58.0% vs. 5.2%, p<0.01). Median follow-up was 65.1 months (range: 1.2-194.5) for conv-RT and 25.0 months (range: 1.6-131.3) for hypo-RT cohorts. Two-year cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse was low in both groups (1.1% conv-RT vs. 4.1% hypo-RT, p=0.114). While two-year OS was lower for the hypo-RT group (62.6% vs. 84.4%, p=0.0008), two-year MCC-specific survival was similar (84.7 vs. 86.6%, p=0.743). On multivariable analysis, immunosuppression, clinical stage III disease, and lymphovascular invasion were associated with any-recurrence when controlling for sex, age, and hypo-RT. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE There was no difference in cumulative incidence of in-field locoregional relapse or MCC-specific survival between hypo-RT and conv-RT. Prospective studies are needed to confirm hypo-RT as an efficacious treatment option for MCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin X Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Michael G Milligan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Jonathan D Schoenfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Roy B Tishler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Andrea K Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Phillip M Devlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Elliott Fite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Guilherme Rabinowits
- Department of Medical Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Glenn J Hanna
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Ann W Silk
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Charles H Yoon
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Manisha Thakuria
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Department of Dermatology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Danielle N Margalit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Merkel Cell Carcinoma Center of Excellence, Dana-Farber/Brigham & Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Palencia R, Sandhu A, Webb S, Blaikie T, Bharmal M. Systematic literature review of current treatments for stage I-III Merkel cell carcinoma. Future Oncol 2021; 17:4813-4822. [PMID: 34494443 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2021-0574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: There is a need to evaluate current treatments for stages I-III of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to understand how patients with stage I-III MCC are treated and assess efficacy, safety, health-related quality of life and economic impact of current therapies. Embase was searched using the following inclusion criteria: publications from 2014 to 2019, in English, with adult patients (≥18 years) with early-stage MCC (i.e., stages I-III) and any interventions/comparators. Publications were excluded if they included only patients with stage IV MCC, had no distinction between early and advanced or metastatic MCC or had no extractable data. Results: A total of 18 retrospective studies were included. Few studies had evidence that surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy significantly increased survival versus surgery alone in early MCC. Limited safety data were reported in three studies. None of the studies reported data on health-related quality of life or economic impact of treatment in patients with early-stage MCC. Conclusion: Although surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy was a common treatment, no clear standard of care exists for stages I-III MCC and treatment outcomes need to be improved. All studies were retrospective with a high variability in sample sizes; hence, findings should be interpreted with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Murtuza Bharmal
- EMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc., Billerica, MA 01821, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Merkel Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Current State of Treatment and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13143506. [PMID: 34298720 PMCID: PMC8305628 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13143506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, cutaneous neuroendocrine malignancy with increasing incidence. The skin of the head and neck is a common subsite for MCC with distinctions in management from other anatomic areas. Given the rapid pace of developments regarding MCC pathogenesis (Merkel cell polyoma virus (MCPyV)-positive or virus-negative, cell of origin), diagnosis, staging and treatment, and up to date recommendations are critical for optimizing outcomes. This review aims to summarize currently available literature for MCC of the head and neck. The authors reviewed current literature, including international guidelines regarding MCC pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, staging, and treatment. Subsequently recommendations were derived including the importance of baseline imaging, MCPyV serology testing, primary site surgery, nodal evaluation, radiotherapy, and the increasing role of immune modulating agents in MCC. MCPyV serology testing is increasingly important with potential distinctions in treatment response and surveillance between virus-positive and virus-negative MCC. Surgical management continues to balance optimizing local control with minimal morbidity. Similarly, radiotherapy continues to have importance in the adjuvant, definitive, and palliative setting for MCC of the head and neck. Immunotherapy has changed the paradigm for advanced MCC, with increasing work focusing on optimizing outcomes for non-responders and high-risk patients, including those with immunosuppression.
Collapse
|
6
|
Primary Merkel Cell Carcinoma: The Clinical Experience of Taipei Veterans General Hospital Revisited. Ann Plast Surg 2021; 84:S40-S47. [PMID: 31833886 DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000002177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is rare among Asians. To evaluate the presence and characteristics of MCC in Taiwan, we described the characteristics, treatment, and prognostic findings of MCC in our institution. METHODS We revisited and carried out a retrospective chart review of 16 consecutive patients with MCC treated from 1995 to 2018. Patient demographic data, tumor size, location, previous treatment, and follow-up data about presence of locoregional recurrence and metastasis were evaluated. RESULTS There were 14 male and 2 female patients (mean age = 75.1 years; range = 26-91 years). Clinical follow-up revealed local recurrences in 5 patients 1 to 4 months after surgical excision. Lymph node metastasis was observed in 3 patients. We reviewed previously published articles and analyzed the clinical findings, pathologic examinations, and treatments. CONCLUSIONS Surgical wide excision of the primary tumor remains the mainstay of treatment for patients with local/regional MCC. Additional management strategies, such as lymphadenectomy, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, depend on the presence or absence of clinically detectable lymph node disease. The prognosis for MCC is variable. Our findings highlight the importance of maintaining a high clinical suspicion for this malignancy in the appropriate clinical context to avoid delays in diagnosis and management.
Collapse
|
7
|
Yusuf M, Gaskins J, Wall W, Tennant P, Bumpous J, Dunlap N. Optimal adjuvant radiotherapy dose for stage I, II or III Merkel cell carcinoma: an analysis of the National Cancer Database. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:175-184. [PMID: 31697368 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyz153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We performed an analysis of the National Cancer Database to determine optimal doses of conventionally-fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with stage I/II or III Merkel cell carcinoma. METHODS The cohort included 2735 patients with resected Merkel cell carcinoma of the head and neck, trunk or extremities receiving radiotherapy. Exclusion criteria included doses of radiotherapy <30 or >80 Gy, or dose per fraction >200 or <180 cGy. Recursive partitioning analysis and spline models were used to select dose thresholds. Multivariable Cox regression was performed to validate thresholds with respect to overall survival. RESULTS Recursive partitioning analysis models defined a threshold of 57 Gy for stage I/II Merkel cell carcinoma, above which 3-year overall survival rate was decreased (P < 0.0001). The 3-year overall survival rate for patients receiving 50.0-57.0 Gy (81.2%) was greater compared to doses of 30.0-49.9 Gy (75.3%) or >57.0 Gy (70%, P < 0.0001). Doses > 57.0 Gy were associated with an increased hazard of death (1.31, confidence interval 1.07-1.60) with respect to doses of 50.0-57.0 Gy. Doses < 50.0 Gy for stage III Merkel cell carcinoma were associated with worsened 3-year overall survival (P < 0.0001) and increased hazard of death (2.01, confidence interval 1.43-2.82) with respect to doses between 50.0 and 57.0 Gy. CONCLUSIONS Our results support doses of 50-57 Gy for most patients with stage I/II Merkel cell carcinoma receiving conventionally-fractionated adjuvant radiotherapy. In contrast to a prior National Cancer Database analysis, our results suggest doses ≥ 50 Gy should be strongly considered for patients with stage III Merkel cell carcinoma regardless of anatomic subsite.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehran Yusuf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville Hospital, 529 South Jackson Street, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, USA
| | - Jeremy Gaskins
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, 529 South Jackson Street, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, USA
| | - Weston Wall
- Department of Dermatology, Medical College of Georgia, 1447 Harper Street, #4328, Augusta, Georgia, 30912, USA
| | - Paul Tennant
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Communicative Disorders, University of Louisville Hospital, 529 South Jackson Street, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bumpous
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Communicative Disorders, University of Louisville Hospital, 529 South Jackson Street, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, USA
| | - Neal Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville Hospital, 529 South Jackson Street, Louisville, Kentucky, 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Management Recommendations for Merkel Cell Carcinoma-A Danish Perspective. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12030554. [PMID: 32121063 PMCID: PMC7139291 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12030554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 02/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare malignant neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin with a poor prognosis and an apparent increase in incidence. Due to its rarity, evidence-based guidelines are limited, and there is a lack of awareness among clinicians. This review constitutes the consensus management recommendations developed by the Danish MCC expert group and is based on a systematic literature search. Patients with localized disease are recommended surgical excision and adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary site; however, this may be omitted in patients with MCC with low risk features. Patients with regional lymph node involvement are recommended complete lymph node removal and adjuvant radiotherapy in case of extracapsular disease. Metastatic disease was traditionally treated with chemotherapy, however, recent clinical trials with immune therapy have been promising. Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) axis should therefore be strongly considered as first-line treatment for fit patients. A 5-year follow-up period is recommended involving clinical exam every 3 months for 2 years and every 6 months for the following 3 years and PET-CT one to two times a year or if clinically indicated. These national recommendations are intended to offer uniform patient treatment and hopefully improve prognosis.
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), a rapidly progressing skin cancer, has poor prognosis. We reviewed the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of MCC, with a focus on recent therapeutic advancements. RECENT FINDINGS Risk factors for MCC, such as old age, immunosuppression, polyomavirus infection and exposure to UV radiation have already been identified, but the underlying mechanisms leading to carcinogenesis still need clarification. On the basis of recent advances, immunotherapy - in particular, inhibition targeting the programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD1)/PDL1) immune checkpoint blockade - is currently being investigated in the treatment of metastatic MCC. Avelumab, an anti-PDL1 antibody, was the first drug to be approved internationally as second-line monotherapy for patients with advanced MCC, based on results from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 clinical trial. Avelumab has also recently been approved as first-line treatment for advanced MCC in Europe. Pembrolizumab (anti-PD1) in first-line and nivolumab (anti-PD1) in first-line and second-line treatments are two other checkpoint inhibitors that are under investigation, and showing promising results. New innovative therapies are also in development. SUMMARY New insights concerning advances in MCC diagnosis and treatment have been highlighted. Immunotherapy for metastatic MCC constitutes a recent breakthrough in an unmet medical need, but alternative therapies should continue to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Del Marmol
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hopital Erasme-Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Celeste Lebbé
- APHP, Department of Dermatology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Sorbonne Paris Cité Université, Paris Diderot, INSERM U976, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Integrating the Management of Nodal Metastasis Into the Treatment of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019; 29:171-179. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
11
|
Garbutcheon‐Singh KB, Veness MJ. The role of radiotherapy in the management of non‐melanoma skin cancer. Australas J Dermatol 2019; 60:265-272. [DOI: 10.1111/ajd.13025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran B Garbutcheon‐Singh
- Department of Radiation Oncology Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Michael J Veness
- Department of Radiation Oncology Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre Westmead Hospital Sydney New South Wales Australia
- University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Singh B, Qureshi MM, Truong MT, Sahni D. Demographics and outcomes of stage I and II Merkel cell carcinoma treated with Mohs micrographic surgery compared with wide local excision in the National Cancer Database. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018; 79:126-134.e3. [PMID: 29408552 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.01.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2017] [Revised: 01/19/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal surgical approach (wide local excision [WLE] vs Mohs micrographic surgery [MMS]) for treating Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is yet to be determined. OBJECTIVE To compare survival outcomes in patients with early-stage MCC treated with MMS versus with WLE. METHODS A retrospective review of all cases in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) of MCC of clinical stage I or II MCC treated with WLE or MMS was performed. RESULTS A total of 1795 cases of stage I or II MCC who underwent WLE (n = 1685) or MMS (n = 110) were identified. There was no difference in residual tumor on surgical margins between the 2 treatment groups (P = .588). On multivariate analysis, there was no difference in overall survival between the treatment modalities (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.45; P = .897). There was no difference in overall survival between the 2 groups on propensity score-matched analysis. LIMITATIONS Disease-specific survival was not reported, as these data are not available in the National Cancer Database. CONCLUSIONS MMS appears to be as effective as WLE in treating early-stage MCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Babu Singh
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Muhammad M Qureshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Minh Tam Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Debjani Sahni
- Department of Dermatology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Amdur RJ, Shaw C, Dziegielewski PT. Management of cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:320-323. [PMID: 28712323 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1349926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the outcomes of patients with previously untreated cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) managed with curative intent. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between December 1984 and August 2015, 59 patients with previously untreated cutaneous MCC were managed with curative intent with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy (54 patients) or radiotherapy alone (5 patients) at the University of Florida. Primary sites included head and neck (45 patients), extremities (11 patients) and trunk (3 patients). Adjuvant chemotherapy was employed in 14 patients. Patients were staged according to the AJCC staging system: stage I, 25 patients; stage IIA, 7 patients; and, stage III, 27 patients. No patients had distant metastases. Median follow-up for all patients was 3.2 years (range, 0.3-20.9 years). Median follow-up for survivors was 6.7 years (range, 1.6-20.9 years). RESULTS The 5-year outcomes were as follows: local control, 91%; regional control, 79%; local-regional control, 77%; disease metastasis-free survival, 60%; cause-specific survival, 53%; and overall survival, 39%. The 5-year outcomes for patients with stage I-IIA versus stage-III disease were the following: local-regional control, 90% versus 57% (p = .0115); distant metastasis-free survival, 78% versus 36% (p = .0002); cause-specific survival, 68% versus 35% (p = .0050); and overall survival, 48% versus 27% (p = .0377). Local-regional recurrences occurred in 12 patients; no patients were successfully salvaged. Severe late complications were observed in four patients. CONCLUSIONS Although radiotherapy alone or combined with surgery results in a relatively high likelihood of local-regional control, the majority of recurrences are distant and approximately half of patients are cured. Patients with regional disease at diagnosis have significantly worse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M. Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G. Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jessica M. Kirwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Robert J. Amdur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Christiana Shaw
- Department of Surgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Peter T. Dziegielewski
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Radiation Therapy in Merkel Cell Carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52619-5_16-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive skin cancer with a neuroendocrine phenotype. Incidence varies according to the geographic regions but is overall increasing. Different risk factors have been identified namely advanced age, immunosuppression, and ultraviolet light exposure. An association between MCC and polyomavirus infection is known. However, the exact mechanism that leads to carcinogenesis is yet to be fully understood. Surgery when feasible is the recommended treatment for localized disease, followed by adjuvant radiation or chemoradiation. In the metastatic setting, chemotherapy has been the standard treatment. However, two recently published trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors in first and second line showed promising results with a tolerable safety profile and these might become the standard therapy shortly. Somatostatin receptors are expressed in many MCC but such expression is not associated with disease severity. Presently there are no biomarkers predictive of response that could help to better select patients to these new therapies, and additional research is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Amaral
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
- Portuguese Air Force Health Direction, Paço do Lumiar, 1649-020, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Ulrike Leiter
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center for Dermatooncology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Patel SA, Qureshi MM, Sahni D, Truong MT. Identifying an Optimal Adjuvant Radiotherapy Dose for Extremity and Trunk Merkel Cell Carcinoma Following Resection: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database. JAMA Dermatol 2017; 153:1007-1014. [PMID: 28746702 DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.2176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Importance Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive cutaneous neuroendocrine neoplasm with a high risk of recurrence following resection. Despite a rising incidence over the past 3 decades, there is a paucity of prospective data owing to the rarity of this disease. Objective To determine the optimal adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) dose following resection of localized MCC of the extremities or trunk. Design, Setting, and Participants Using the National Cancer Database, a large national database consisting of a heterogeneous population and treatment settings, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 2093 patients 18 years or older with stage I to III MCC of the extremities and/or trunk treated with definitive surgery and adjuvant RT between 1998 and 2011. Exclusion criteria included receiving treatment with palliative intent, preoperative RT, non-external-beam RT, and radiation dose of 30 Gy or lower or 70 Gy or higher. Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare overall survival (OS) between RT dose groups, accounting for age, sex, race, stage, surgery type, margin status, comorbidities, and use of chemotherapy. Exposures Radiation therapy dose was categorized into 4 groups: group 1 received the lowest dose (>30 to <40 Gy); group 2, the next lowest (40 to <50 Gy); group 3, the second highest dose (50 to 55 Gy); and group 4, the highest dose (>55 to 70 Gy). Main Outcome and Measure Overall survival. Results Data from 2093 patients were analyzed; there were 1293 men (61.8%) and 800 women (38.2%) (median age, 73 years). After a median follow-up of 37 months for the entire cohort, 904 deaths were reported. The 3-year OS rates for groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 41.8%, 69%, 69.2%, and 66%, respectively (omnibus P < .001). Compared with group 3 (50 to 55 Gy), equivalent OS was seen in group 2 (40 to <50 Gy; adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.89; 95% CI, 0.63-1.27; P = .52) and group 4 (>55 to 70 Gy; AHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.93-1.48; P = .17), but worse OS was found in group 1 (>30 to <40 Gy; AHR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.44-4.80; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Adjuvant RT dose from 40 to lower than 50 Gy appears adequate for extremities and/or trunk stage I to III MCC, with OS equivalent to that found at higher-dose regimens (>50 to 70 Gy).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sagar A Patel
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Muhammad M Qureshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Debjani Sahni
- Department of Dermatology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Minh Tam Truong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|