Swallowing outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and adjuvant treatment in unknown primary

OBJECTIVES

Robotic transoral mucosectomy of the base of tongue was introduced as a diagnostic procedure in patients treated for head and neck cancer with unknown primary (CUP), increasing the identification rate of the primary tumour. For the treatment of CUP, a considerable percentage of patients require adjuvant (chemo)radiation. The aim of this study was to investigate swallowing outcomes among CUP patients after TORS and adjuvant treatment.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A systematic review was carried out on studies investigating the impact of TORS and adjuvant treatment on swallowing-related outcomes among CUP patients In addition, a cross-sectional study was carried out on swallowing problems (measured using the SWAL-QOL questionnaire) among CUP patients in routine care who visited the outpatient clinic 1-5 years after TORS and adjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

The systematic review (6 studies; n = 98) showed that most patients returned to a full oral diet. The cross-sectional study (n = 12) showed that all patients were able to return to a full oral diet, nevertheless, 50% reported swallowing problems in daily life (SWAL-QOL total score ≥14).

CONCLUSION

Although after TORS and adjuvant treatment for CUP a full oral diet can be resumed, patients still experience problems with eating and drinking in daily life.

Utility of video fluoroscopic swallow study in advancing oral diet post TORS for oropharyngeal malignancies

OBJECTIVE

TORS is a minimally invasive surgical alternative to chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal malignancies. While early postoperative oropharyngeal dysphagia is linked to TORS, this study explores both subjective and objective swallowing outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective and prospective review of the patients who underwent TORS for oropharyngeal malignancy from 2018 to 2023.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Postoperative transnasal feeding tubes were administered to 142 patients undergoing TORS. Data on oncological, clinical, surgical, and pathological parameters, including VFSS records, pain with swallow, and feeding tube removal timing, were collected. Clinical swallow exam (CSE) was conducted on POD-1, with a formal swallow study pursued if inconclusive. Once a safe swallow was confirmed, oral diets were initiated, and the feeding tube removed, with most patients discharged on POD-2.

RESULTS

At an average age of 59.3 years on the day of operation, the palatine tonsil (N = 101) was the predominant subsite. A dobhoff feeding tube was intraoperatively placed in 98 % of patients (N = 139). On POD-1, CSE was conducted in 119 patients, with 26 % (37/119) cleared for total oral diet (NOMS ≥ 4). Additionally, 30 out of 73 VFSS patients were cleared for total oral diet. A total of 54.9 % (78/142) had the feeding tube removed before discharge on POD-2, with a mean time of 6.5 ± 6.6 days. Overall, 71.1 % (101/142) achieved a total oral diet within one week after TORS.

CONCLUSION

Early post-TORS swallowing is vital for oropharyngeal malignancies. VFSS assesses post-operative swallowing safety, allowing most patients to resume total oral nutrition shortly after TORS.

Clinical Implementation of DIGEST as an Evidence-Based Practice Tool for Videofluoroscopy in Oncology: A Six-Year Single Institution Implementation Evaluation

Clinical implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) tools is a healthcare priority. The Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is an EBP tool developed in 2016 for videofluoroscopy in head and neck (H&N) oncology with clinical implementation as a goal. We sought to examine: (1) feasibility of clinical implementation of DIGEST in a national comprehensive cancer center, and (2) fidelity of DIGEST adoption in real-world practice. A retrospective implementation evaluation was conducted in accordance with the STARI framework. Electronic health record (EHR) databases were queried for all consecutive modified barium swallow (MBS) studies conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2016 to 2021. Implementation outcomes included: feasibility as measured by DIGEST reporting in EHR (as a marker of clinical use) and fidelity as measured by accuracy of DIGEST reporting relative to the decision-tree logic (penetration-aspiration scale [PAS], residue, and Safety [S] and Efficiency [E] grades). Contextual factors examined included year, setting, cancer type, MBS indication, and provider. 13,055 MBS were conducted by 29 providers in 7,842 unique patients across the lifespan in diverse oncology populations (69% M; age 1-96 years; 58% H&N cancer; 10% inpatient, 90% outpatient). DIGEST was reported in 12,137/13,088 exams over the 6-year implementation period representing 93% (95% CI: 93-94%) adoption in all exams and 99% (95% CI: 98-99%) of exams excluding the total laryngectomy population (n = 730). DIGEST reporting varied modestly by year, cancer type, and setting/provider (> 91% in all subgroups, p < 0.001). Accuracy of DIGEST reporting was high for overall DIGEST (incorrect SE profile 1.6%, 200/12,137), DIGEST-safety (incorrect PAS 0.4% 51/12,137) and DIGEST-efficiency (incorrect residue 1.2%, 148/12,137). Clinical implementation of DIGEST was feasible with high fidelity in a busy oncology practice across a large number of providers. Adoption of the tool across the lifespan in diverse cancer diagnoses may motivate validation beyond H&N oncology.

Quality of life of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region: a scoping review of empirical evidence

BACKGROUND

There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes among patients who underwent robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. However, empirical evidence on the QoL outcomes from these procedures is yet to be mapped. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the available scientific evidence and gaps concerning the QoL outcomes of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region.

METHODS

This study adopted a scoping review design, and it was conducted and reported based on the Arksey and O'Malley, PRISMA-ScR, and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and APA PsycINFO were searched to retrieve relevant literature. Using Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were deduplicated, and screened based on the review's eligibility criteria. Only the eligible articles were included in the review. From the included articles, relevant data were charted, collated, and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 123 literature were retrieved from the literature search. After deduplication and screening, only 18 heterogeneous original articles were included in the review. A total of 771 transoral robotic surgeries (TORSs) were reported in these articles, and the TORSs were conducted on patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPC), recurrent tonsillitis, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In total, 20 different QoL instruments were used in these articles to assess patients' QoL outcomes, and the most used instrument was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Questionnaire (MDADI). Physical functions related to swallowing, speech and salivary functions were the most assessed QoL aspects. TORS was reported to result in improved QOL in patients with OPC, OSA, and recurrent tonsillitis, most significantly within the first postoperative year. Notably, the site of the lesion, involvement of neck dissections and the characteristics of the adjuvant therapy seemed to affect the QOL outcome in patients with OPC.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the conventional treatment modalities, TORS has demonstrated better QoL, mostly in the domains related to oral functions such as swallowing and speech, among patients treated with such. This improvement was most evident within the initial post-operative year.

Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Oral Cancers Using Transoral Robotic Surgery in an Endemic Region

Oral cancer poses a major health challenge in Taiwan, consistently ranking among the highest globally in both incidence and cancer-related mortality. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has potential advantages over open surgery, but its long-term oncologic outcomes are not well established. In this study, we sought to elucidate the role of TORS in improving treatment outcomes among oral cancer patients. A case-control study with propensity score matching was conducted in a single teaching hospital in Taiwan. It included 72 oral cancer patients in each group to analyze and compare survival outcomes between the surgical approaches. The TORS group demonstrated a higher negative resection margin rate, a lower mortality risk and better overall survival than the open-surgery group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed TORS's association with a reduced risk of death. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests indicated significantly better survival outcomes for the TORS group across all cancer stages. Moreover, the TORS group exhibited improved overall survival rates for stage III and IV patients compared to the conventional open-surgery group. In conclusion, this study suggests that TORS may offer better overall survival rates and potential advantages over conventional surgery for oral cancer treatment.

Optimized decision support for selection of transoral robotic surgery or (chemo)radiation therapy based on posttreatment swallowing toxicity

BACKGROUND

A primary goal in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) survivors is to optimize swallowing function. However, the uncertainty in the outcomes of TORS including postoperative residual positive margin (PM) and extranodal extension (ENE), may necessitate adjuvant therapy, which may cause significant swallowing toxicity to survivors.

METHODS

A secondary analysis was performed on a prospective registry data with low- to intermediate-risk human papillomavirus-related OPSCC possibly resectable by TORS. Decision trees were developed to model the uncertainties in TORS compared with definitive radiation therapy (RT) and chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Swallowing toxicities were measured by Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) instruments. The likelihoods of PM/ENE were varied to determine the thresholds within which each therapy remains optimal.

RESULTS

Compared with RT, TORS resulted in inferior swallowing function for moderate likelihoods of PM/ENE (>60% in short term for all instruments, >75% in long term for DIGEST and MDASI) leaving RT as the optimal treatment. Compared with CRT, TORS remained the optimal therapy based on MDADI and MDASI but showed inferior swallowing outcomes based on DIGEST for moderate-to-high likelihoods of PM/ENE (>75% for short-term and >40% for long-term outcomes).

CONCLUSION

In the absence of reliable estimation of postoperative PM/ENE concurrent with significant postoperative PM, the overall toxicity level in OPSCC patients undergoing TORS with adjuvant therapy may become more severe compared with patients receiving nonsurgical treatments thus advocating definitive (C)RT protocols.

Refining measurement of swallowing safety in the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) criteria: Validation of DIGEST version 2

BACKGROUND

Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is a validated method to grade the severity of pharyngeal swallowing impairment as a toxicity of cancer based on the degree and patterns of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue over a standardly acquired radiographic modified barium swallow (MBS) study. Since its implementation in 2016, areas for the refinement of grading mild safety impairments have been identified by clinical and research users. The objective of this study was to assess the performance and validity of refined DIGEST_safety grading criteria (per DIGEST version 2 [DIGEST_v2 ]).

METHODS

Refined safety criteria were developed and vetted with clinical and research users. DIGEST_v2 included 2 changes to the safety criteria. All MBSs with blinded DIGEST version 1 grading were sampled from a registry database (1331 patients underwent MBS over the period of December 2005 to July 2019). New criteria were applied to derive DIGEST_safety grading version 2. Measures of criterion validity, including the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [MDADI] composite score, the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) pharyngeal total, the MBSImP hyolaryngeal components (items 8-11), and the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients [PSS-HN] diet, were correlated with DIGEST_safety and overall DIGEST grades from versions 1 and 2 and were compared pairwise between reassigned grades.

RESULTS

With the application of version 2 safety criteria, 112 of 1331 examinations (8.4%) and 79 of 1331 examinations (5.9%) changed in their DIGEST_safety and overall grades, respectively. The safety and overall DIGEST grades (versions 1 and 2) significantly correlated with criterion measures, including the MBSImP pharyngeal total, laryngeal MBSImP parameters of interest, MDADI, and PSS-HN (P < .0001); correlations maintained a similar magnitude between versions 1 and 2. Forty-six upgraded examinations (reassigned from safety grade 1 per version 1 to grade 2 per version 2) performed similarly to other safety grade 2 examinations (version 1), and this was likewise true for 66 downgraded examinations (reassigned from safety grade 1 per version 1 to grade 0 per version 2).

CONCLUSIONS

Refined criteria defining mild safety impairments with the DIGEST methodology changed grades in small numbers of examinations. DIGEST_v2 criteria maintained criterion validity, demonstrated ordinality, and improved the performance of the method in these rare scenarios.

LAY SUMMARY

Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is a method developed and validated by the investigators in 2016 to grade the severity of pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) with a decision tree or flowsheet to guide the clinician's review of a standard radiographic modified barium swallow study. This work reports on the validity of updated DIGEST criteria (version 2) that incorporate 2 modifications to the decision tree.

Dysphagia profiles after primary transoral robotic surgery or radiation for oropharyngeal cancer: A registry analysis

OBJECTIVE

To describe the physiologic swallowing impairments (MBSImP™©) associated with safety/efficiency impairments (DIGEST_safety /DIGEST_efficiency grades) at 3-6 months after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or radiation therapy (RT).

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of registry data.

SETTING

Single, academic institution.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with HPV+ oropharynx cancer were stratified by primary treatment (75 TORS, 182 RT). Modified barium swallow studies were analyzed at baseline and 3-6 months using MBSImP scores and DIGEST_safety /DIGEST_efficiency grades. DIGEST_safety /DIGEST_efficiency grades and MBSImP were compared groupwise and associations between DIGEST_safety /DIGEST_efficiency grades and MBSImP were explored by ordinal logistic regression. Exploratory analyses were stratified by multimodality treatment.

RESULTS

Neither DIGEST_safety /DIGEST_efficiency differed significantly between groups at baseline or 3-6 months. Laryngeal vestibule closure was impaired more frequently in the RT group (RT: 41% vs. TORS: 27%; p = 0.02) while the TORS group had significantly more pharyngeal contraction impairment (63%; p < 0.001) compared to RT at 3-6 months.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest a focal injury associated with DIGEST_safety /DIGEST_efficiency post-TORS in contrast to a low-level diffuse physiologic impairment associated with post-RT dysphagia.

Characterizing postoperative physiologic swallow function following transoral robotic surgery for early stage tonsil, base of tongue, and unknown primary human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Data objectively evaluating acute post-transoral robotic surgery (TORS) swallow function are limited. Our goal was to characterize and identify clinical variables that may impact swallow function components 3 weeks post-TORS.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study. Pre/postoperative use of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was completed on 125 of 139 TORS patients (2016-2019) with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scores were retrospectively calculated. Uni/multivariate analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Dysfunctional pre-TORS DIGEST scores were predictive of post-TORS dysphagia (p = 0.015). Pre-TORS MBSImP deficits in pharyngeal stripping wave, swallow initiation, and clearing pharyngeal residue correlated with airway invasion post-TORS based on PAS scores (p = 0.012, 0.027, 0.048, respectively). Multivariate analysis of DIGEST safety scores declined with older age (p = 0.044). Odds ratios (ORs) for objective swallow function components after TORS were better for unknown primary and tonsil primaries compared to base of tongue (BOT) (OR 0.35-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative impairments in specific MBSImP components, older patients, and BOT primaries may predict more extensive recovery in swallow function after TORS.

Swallowing and communication outcomes following primary transoral robotic surgery

BACKGROUND

Heterogeneity within studies examining transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has made it challenging to make clear conclusions on functional outcomes. Infrequent use of instrumental swallow examinations compounds uncertainty surrounding the proposed functional advantage to TORS.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 49 patients underwent speech and swallowing assessment 12 months following treatment for OPC. Patients were assessed using fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), clinician- and patient-reported outcomes. Participants were matched according to tumor site, T category, and age. Speech and swallowing outcomes were compared for those receiving TORS versus chemoradiation.

RESULTS

When adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary site could be avoided, TORS demonstrated an advantage for feeding tube duration, secretion severity, penetration/aspiration, M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and airway protection.

CONCLUSION

This explorative study suggests that a treatment philosophy of selecting patients for TORS where adjuvant therapy can be omitted or confined to the neck warrants further evaluation.

Functional Swallow-Related Outcomes Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Base of Tongue Carcinoma

In an era where the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is growing steadily, there have been few studies exploring functional outcomes for individuals whose definitive cancer management approach includes transoral robotic surgical (TORS) resection. This study was designed to examine swallow-related outcomes in individuals newly diagnosed with base of tongue cancer whose treatment plan included surgical resection via TORS. The aims of this study were to determine whether TORS resection for early stage BOT SCCA affected: (a) lingual strength, (b) swallow safety and efficiency, (c) oral intake, and (d) swallowing-related quality of life. Nine individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited to participate from March 2017 to April 2018. Each participant was evaluated at four distinct time points: (a) preoperatively, (b) 1 week postoperatively, (c) 1 month postoperatively, and (d) 3 months postoperatively. The following data were collected at each time point: (a) maximum isometric lingual pressure, (b) Penetration-Aspiration Scale score, (c) Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale scores, (d) Functional Oral Intake Scale score, and (e) EAT-10 score. Data analysis revealed that a significant decline in maximum isometric lingual pressure, EAT-10 scores, and Functional Oral Intake Scale scores occurred between preoperative baseline measurements and 1 week post surgery. All participants in the study demonstrated a return to levels at or near their baseline level of function for maximum isometric lingual pressure, EAT-10 score, and Functional Oral Intake Scale score by 1 or 3 months post surgery. There were no significant changes in swallow safety or efficiency observed at any time point during the study.

Long-term quality of life & functional outcomes after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer

Functional and QoL outcomes were compared longitudinally in a cohort of patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or radiotherapy (RT). Forty‐four patients undergoing primary TORS (n = 31) or RT (n = 13) for any stage OPSCC were included. Only low‐stage disease was treated with TORS. Functional outcomes were: salivary flow rate, image‐based swallowing function, and a self‐reported 10‐point scale comparing current swallowing function to baseline (CvB scale). QoL was assessed with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ‐C30), Head & Neck Module (EORTC QLQ‐HN35), and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Shoulder impairment was assessed with Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). In the RT group, salivary flow rates had significantly declined at 12‐month follow‐up, with the biggest declines in QoL subscale scores recorded in the RT group for dry mouth and sticky saliva. Swallowing function on imaging studies was overall good, with no severe dysphagia within 1 year although, both treatment groups showed significant deterioration relative to baseline at the 12‐month follow‐up with increased DIGEST scores and pharyngeal retention. Shoulder impairment was rare at 1 year in both groups. A comprehensive examination of this cohort treated for OPSCC showed overall good functional and QoL outcomes 1 year after treatment. However, persistent impairment was seen in both groups with regards to swallowing function. In the TORS group, at 12‐months follow‐up, the QoL questionnaires showed worse scores in only one subscale (sticky saliva).

Early fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallow in transoral robotic surgery: Description of swallow function and recovery in the acute postoperative period for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. The effects on swallowing and speech need to be comprehensively evaluated to understand the associated morbidity.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 21 patients was recruited to undergo pre-TORS and post-TORS swallowing and communication assessment. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was used in the first postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixteen participants (76.2%) had penetration-aspiration scores ≥3 or higher, seven (33.3%) aspirated on thin liquids, three (14.3%) did so silently. Prolonged recovery trajectory occurred for the majority of the cohort, particularly if TORS was followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Swallowing and communication scores were significantly worse in base of tongue primary tumors and with advanced age.

CONCLUSION

Early FEES demonstrates a significant decline in swallowing function, including increased secretion load, pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration. Silent aspiration occurred in 14% and thus highlights the necessity for instrumental assessment to ascertain aspiration risk.

Volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures following head and neck cancer chemoradiation therapy

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients treated with CRT for esophageal carcinoma (EC), where pharyngeal structures were not part of the radiation treatment fields, were controlled for dysphagia-associated weight loss. We hypothesize that tissue volume alteration is a contributing factor of post-CRT dysphagia.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

METHODS

This study measured pre- and 1-year posttreatment volumes of the base of tongue (BOT), parapharyngeal spaces, posterior pharyngeal constrictors (PCs), and retropharyngeal space (RPS) in patients undergoing CRT for HNSCC or EC treated January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015. All HNSCC patients were treated to doses of 66 to 70 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 49 HNSCC and 11 EC patients. Within the HNSCC cohort, the PCs volume increased 1.55 cm³ (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77 to 2.34 cm³ , P = .0002), RPS increased 1.22 cm³ (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.77 cm³ , P < .0001), and BOT decreased 2.29 cm³ (95% CI: -0.20 to 4.79 cm³ , P = .070). The EC cohort showed no significant volumetric changes for any anatomic space, with combined PCs and RPS volume changes statistically less than the HNSCC cohort (P = .031). There was no difference in mean body mass index reduction between groups (P = .10).

CONCLUSIONS

Volumetric changes following CRT may play a role in posttreatment dysphagia. Our findings support loss of physiologic function from posterior pharynx tissue thickening combined with reduced pharyngeal constriction capacity, and BOT atrophy secondary to radiation effects contribute to dysphagia.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 130:597-602, 2020.