1
|
van der Scheer FA, Jansen F, Eerenstein SEJ, Vergeer MR, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, Hendrickx JJ. Swallowing outcomes after transoral robotic surgery and adjuvant treatment in unknown primary. Oral Dis 2024. [PMID: 38988121 DOI: 10.1111/odi.15063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Robotic transoral mucosectomy of the base of tongue was introduced as a diagnostic procedure in patients treated for head and neck cancer with unknown primary (CUP), increasing the identification rate of the primary tumour. For the treatment of CUP, a considerable percentage of patients require adjuvant (chemo)radiation. The aim of this study was to investigate swallowing outcomes among CUP patients after TORS and adjuvant treatment. SUBJECTS AND METHODS A systematic review was carried out on studies investigating the impact of TORS and adjuvant treatment on swallowing-related outcomes among CUP patients In addition, a cross-sectional study was carried out on swallowing problems (measured using the SWAL-QOL questionnaire) among CUP patients in routine care who visited the outpatient clinic 1-5 years after TORS and adjuvant treatment. RESULTS The systematic review (6 studies; n = 98) showed that most patients returned to a full oral diet. The cross-sectional study (n = 12) showed that all patients were able to return to a full oral diet, nevertheless, 50% reported swallowing problems in daily life (SWAL-QOL total score ≥14). CONCLUSION Although after TORS and adjuvant treatment for CUP a full oral diet can be resumed, patients still experience problems with eating and drinking in daily life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fennetta A van der Scheer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Femke Jansen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone E J Eerenstein
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marije R Vergeer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C René Leemans
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Irma M Verdonck-de Leeuw
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Jaap Hendrickx
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam (CCA), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hunter CJ, Romaniw NN, Beckham R, Farsi S, Benefield A, Solverson M, Gray EA, Nguyen E, Marshall A, King D, Sunde J, Moreno M, Vural E. Utility of video fluoroscopic swallow study in advancing oral diet post TORS for oropharyngeal malignancies. Am J Otolaryngol 2024; 45:104336. [PMID: 38704947 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE TORS is a minimally invasive surgical alternative to chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal malignancies. While early postoperative oropharyngeal dysphagia is linked to TORS, this study explores both subjective and objective swallowing outcomes. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective and prospective review of the patients who underwent TORS for oropharyngeal malignancy from 2018 to 2023. SETTING Single tertiary referral center. METHODS Postoperative transnasal feeding tubes were administered to 142 patients undergoing TORS. Data on oncological, clinical, surgical, and pathological parameters, including VFSS records, pain with swallow, and feeding tube removal timing, were collected. Clinical swallow exam (CSE) was conducted on POD-1, with a formal swallow study pursued if inconclusive. Once a safe swallow was confirmed, oral diets were initiated, and the feeding tube removed, with most patients discharged on POD-2. RESULTS At an average age of 59.3 years on the day of operation, the palatine tonsil (N = 101) was the predominant subsite. A dobhoff feeding tube was intraoperatively placed in 98 % of patients (N = 139). On POD-1, CSE was conducted in 119 patients, with 26 % (37/119) cleared for total oral diet (NOMS ≥ 4). Additionally, 30 out of 73 VFSS patients were cleared for total oral diet. A total of 54.9 % (78/142) had the feeding tube removed before discharge on POD-2, with a mean time of 6.5 ± 6.6 days. Overall, 71.1 % (101/142) achieved a total oral diet within one week after TORS. CONCLUSION Early post-TORS swallowing is vital for oropharyngeal malignancies. VFSS assesses post-operative swallowing safety, allowing most patients to resume total oral nutrition shortly after TORS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney J Hunter
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Natalie N Romaniw
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Rachel Beckham
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Soroush Farsi
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Anna Benefield
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Matthew Solverson
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Emily A Gray
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Emma Nguyen
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Aubrey Marshall
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Deanne King
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Jumin Sunde
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Mauricio Moreno
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States
| | - Emre Vural
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Little Rock, AR, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hutcheson KA, Aldridge EF, Warneke CL, Buoy SN, Tang X, Macdonald C, Alvarez CP, Barringer DA, Barbon CEA, Ebersole BM, McMillan H, Montealegre JR. Clinical Implementation of DIGEST as an Evidence-Based Practice Tool for Videofluoroscopy in Oncology: A Six-Year Single Institution Implementation Evaluation. Dysphagia 2024:10.1007/s00455-024-10721-2. [PMID: 38935170 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-024-10721-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Clinical implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) tools is a healthcare priority. The Dynamic Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is an EBP tool developed in 2016 for videofluoroscopy in head and neck (H&N) oncology with clinical implementation as a goal. We sought to examine: (1) feasibility of clinical implementation of DIGEST in a national comprehensive cancer center, and (2) fidelity of DIGEST adoption in real-world practice. A retrospective implementation evaluation was conducted in accordance with the STARI framework. Electronic health record (EHR) databases were queried for all consecutive modified barium swallow (MBS) studies conducted at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2016 to 2021. Implementation outcomes included: feasibility as measured by DIGEST reporting in EHR (as a marker of clinical use) and fidelity as measured by accuracy of DIGEST reporting relative to the decision-tree logic (penetration-aspiration scale [PAS], residue, and Safety [S] and Efficiency [E] grades). Contextual factors examined included year, setting, cancer type, MBS indication, and provider. 13,055 MBS were conducted by 29 providers in 7,842 unique patients across the lifespan in diverse oncology populations (69% M; age 1-96 years; 58% H&N cancer; 10% inpatient, 90% outpatient). DIGEST was reported in 12,137/13,088 exams over the 6-year implementation period representing 93% (95% CI: 93-94%) adoption in all exams and 99% (95% CI: 98-99%) of exams excluding the total laryngectomy population (n = 730). DIGEST reporting varied modestly by year, cancer type, and setting/provider (> 91% in all subgroups, p < 0.001). Accuracy of DIGEST reporting was high for overall DIGEST (incorrect SE profile 1.6%, 200/12,137), DIGEST-safety (incorrect PAS 0.4% 51/12,137) and DIGEST-efficiency (incorrect residue 1.2%, 148/12,137). Clinical implementation of DIGEST was feasible with high fidelity in a busy oncology practice across a large number of providers. Adoption of the tool across the lifespan in diverse cancer diagnoses may motivate validation beyond H&N oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1445, Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, US.
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
| | - Ella F Aldridge
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1445, Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, US
| | - Carla L Warneke
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1689, Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Sheila N Buoy
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery - Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, Unit 1445, Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Xiaohui Tang
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery - Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, Unit 1445, Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Cameron Macdonald
- Qualitative Health Research Center, 111 King St., Suite 23, Madison, WI, 53703, US
| | - Clare P Alvarez
- Department of Head & Neck Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 0340, Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Denise A Barringer
- Department of Endoscopy Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 0385, Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Carly E A Barbon
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1445, Houston, Texas, 77030-4009, US
| | - Barbara M Ebersole
- Department of Head & Neck Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. (R10.1810), Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Holly McMillan
- Department of Head & Neck Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd. (R10.1824), Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| | - Jane R Montealegre
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler (CPB3.3253), Houston, Texas, 77030, US
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bandara DL, Kanmodi KK, Salami AA, Aladelusi TO, Chandrasiri A, Amzat J, Jayasinghe RD. Quality of life of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region: a scoping review of empirical evidence. BMC Oral Health 2024; 24:276. [PMID: 38408988 PMCID: PMC10895822 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04035-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a blooming trend in the application of robotic surgery in oral and maxillofacial care, and different studies had evaluated the quality of life (QoL) outcomes among patients who underwent robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. However, empirical evidence on the QoL outcomes from these procedures is yet to be mapped. Thus, this study was conducted to evaluate the available scientific evidence and gaps concerning the QoL outcomes of patients treated with robotic surgery in the oral and maxillofacial region. METHODS This study adopted a scoping review design, and it was conducted and reported based on the Arksey and O'Malley, PRISMA-ScR, and AMSTAR-2 guidelines. SCOPUS, PubMed, CINAHL Complete, and APA PsycINFO were searched to retrieve relevant literature. Using Rayyan software, the retrieved literature were deduplicated, and screened based on the review's eligibility criteria. Only the eligible articles were included in the review. From the included articles, relevant data were charted, collated, and summarized. RESULTS A total of 123 literature were retrieved from the literature search. After deduplication and screening, only 18 heterogeneous original articles were included in the review. A total of 771 transoral robotic surgeries (TORSs) were reported in these articles, and the TORSs were conducted on patients with oropharyngeal carcinomas (OPC), recurrent tonsillitis, and obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). In total, 20 different QoL instruments were used in these articles to assess patients' QoL outcomes, and the most used instrument was the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory Questionnaire (MDADI). Physical functions related to swallowing, speech and salivary functions were the most assessed QoL aspects. TORS was reported to result in improved QOL in patients with OPC, OSA, and recurrent tonsillitis, most significantly within the first postoperative year. Notably, the site of the lesion, involvement of neck dissections and the characteristics of the adjuvant therapy seemed to affect the QOL outcome in patients with OPC. CONCLUSION Compared to the conventional treatment modalities, TORS has demonstrated better QoL, mostly in the domains related to oral functions such as swallowing and speech, among patients treated with such. This improvement was most evident within the initial post-operative year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dhanushka Leuke Bandara
- Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
| | - Kehinde Kazeem Kanmodi
- School of Dentistry, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
- Campaign for Head and Neck Cancer Education (CHANCE) Programme, Cephas Health Research Initiative Inc, Ibadan, Nigeria.
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
| | - Afeez Abolarinwa Salami
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Campaign for Head and Neck Cancer Education (CHANCE) Programme, Cephas Health Research Initiative Inc, Ibadan, Nigeria
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
| | | | - Ayodhya Chandrasiri
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
| | - Jimoh Amzat
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
- Department of Sociology, Usmanu Danfodiyo University, Sokoto, Nigeria
- Department of Sociology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Ruwan Duminda Jayasinghe
- Department of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka
- Faculty of Dentistry, University of Puthisastra, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chang CC, Chen CH, Hsieh TL, Chang KH, Huang JY, Lin FCF, Tsai SCS. Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Oral Cancers Using Transoral Robotic Surgery in an Endemic Region. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4896. [PMID: 37835589 PMCID: PMC10571799 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Revised: 09/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Oral cancer poses a major health challenge in Taiwan, consistently ranking among the highest globally in both incidence and cancer-related mortality. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has potential advantages over open surgery, but its long-term oncologic outcomes are not well established. In this study, we sought to elucidate the role of TORS in improving treatment outcomes among oral cancer patients. A case-control study with propensity score matching was conducted in a single teaching hospital in Taiwan. It included 72 oral cancer patients in each group to analyze and compare survival outcomes between the surgical approaches. The TORS group demonstrated a higher negative resection margin rate, a lower mortality risk and better overall survival than the open-surgery group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis confirmed TORS's association with a reduced risk of death. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests indicated significantly better survival outcomes for the TORS group across all cancer stages. Moreover, the TORS group exhibited improved overall survival rates for stage III and IV patients compared to the conventional open-surgery group. In conclusion, this study suggests that TORS may offer better overall survival rates and potential advantages over conventional surgery for oral cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Chun Chang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan; (C.-C.C.); (C.-H.C.); (T.-L.H.)
| | - Chung-Hsiung Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan; (C.-C.C.); (C.-H.C.); (T.-L.H.)
| | - Tsai-Ling Hsieh
- Department of Otolaryngology, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan; (C.-C.C.); (C.-H.C.); (T.-L.H.)
- Department of Medical Research, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan;
| | - Kuang-Hsi Chang
- Department of Medical Research, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan;
- Jenteh Junior College of Medicine, Nursing and Management, Miaoli 35664, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Yang Huang
- Department of Medical Research, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan;
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | - Frank Cheau-Feng Lin
- Department of Surgery, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | - Stella Chin-Shaw Tsai
- Department of Otolaryngology, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan; (C.-C.C.); (C.-H.C.); (T.-L.H.)
- Superintendents’ Office, Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 43503, Taiwan
- Department of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung 40227, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hemmati M, Barbon C, Mohamed ASR, van Dijk LV, Moreno AC, Gross ND, Goepfert RP, Lai SY, Hutcheson KA, Schaefer AJ, Fuller CD. Optimized decision support for selection of transoral robotic surgery or (chemo)radiation therapy based on posttreatment swallowing toxicity. Cancer Med 2023; 12:5088-5098. [PMID: 36229990 PMCID: PMC9972156 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 04/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A primary goal in transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (OPSCC) survivors is to optimize swallowing function. However, the uncertainty in the outcomes of TORS including postoperative residual positive margin (PM) and extranodal extension (ENE), may necessitate adjuvant therapy, which may cause significant swallowing toxicity to survivors. METHODS A secondary analysis was performed on a prospective registry data with low- to intermediate-risk human papillomavirus-related OPSCC possibly resectable by TORS. Decision trees were developed to model the uncertainties in TORS compared with definitive radiation therapy (RT) and chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Swallowing toxicities were measured by Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST), MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head and Neck (MDASI-HN) instruments. The likelihoods of PM/ENE were varied to determine the thresholds within which each therapy remains optimal. RESULTS Compared with RT, TORS resulted in inferior swallowing function for moderate likelihoods of PM/ENE (>60% in short term for all instruments, >75% in long term for DIGEST and MDASI) leaving RT as the optimal treatment. Compared with CRT, TORS remained the optimal therapy based on MDADI and MDASI but showed inferior swallowing outcomes based on DIGEST for moderate-to-high likelihoods of PM/ENE (>75% for short-term and >40% for long-term outcomes). CONCLUSION In the absence of reliable estimation of postoperative PM/ENE concurrent with significant postoperative PM, the overall toxicity level in OPSCC patients undergoing TORS with adjuvant therapy may become more severe compared with patients receiving nonsurgical treatments thus advocating definitive (C)RT protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Hemmati
- Computational Applied Mathematics and Operations ResearchWilliam Marsh Rice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Carly Barbon
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Abdallah S. R. Mohamed
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Lisanne V. van Dijk
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center‐ GroningenGroningenNetherlands
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Neil D. Gross
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Ryan P. Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Stephen Y. Lai
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Katherine A. Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck SurgeryThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Andrew J. Schaefer
- Computational Applied Mathematics and Operations ResearchWilliam Marsh Rice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Computational Applied Mathematics and Operations ResearchWilliam Marsh Rice UniversityHoustonTexasUSA
- Department of Radiation OncologyThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer CenterHoustonTexasUSA
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHoustonTexasUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hutcheson KA, Barbon CEA, Alvarez CP, Warneke CL. Refining measurement of swallowing safety in the Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) criteria: Validation of DIGEST version 2. Cancer 2022; 128:1458-1466. [PMID: 34985765 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Revised: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is a validated method to grade the severity of pharyngeal swallowing impairment as a toxicity of cancer based on the degree and patterns of penetration/aspiration and pharyngeal residue over a standardly acquired radiographic modified barium swallow (MBS) study. Since its implementation in 2016, areas for the refinement of grading mild safety impairments have been identified by clinical and research users. The objective of this study was to assess the performance and validity of refined DIGESTsafety grading criteria (per DIGEST version 2 [DIGESTv2 ]). METHODS Refined safety criteria were developed and vetted with clinical and research users. DIGESTv2 included 2 changes to the safety criteria. All MBSs with blinded DIGEST version 1 grading were sampled from a registry database (1331 patients underwent MBS over the period of December 2005 to July 2019). New criteria were applied to derive DIGESTsafety grading version 2. Measures of criterion validity, including the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory [MDADI] composite score, the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) pharyngeal total, the MBSImP hyolaryngeal components (items 8-11), and the Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck Cancer Patients [PSS-HN] diet, were correlated with DIGESTsafety and overall DIGEST grades from versions 1 and 2 and were compared pairwise between reassigned grades. RESULTS With the application of version 2 safety criteria, 112 of 1331 examinations (8.4%) and 79 of 1331 examinations (5.9%) changed in their DIGESTsafety and overall grades, respectively. The safety and overall DIGEST grades (versions 1 and 2) significantly correlated with criterion measures, including the MBSImP pharyngeal total, laryngeal MBSImP parameters of interest, MDADI, and PSS-HN (P < .0001); correlations maintained a similar magnitude between versions 1 and 2. Forty-six upgraded examinations (reassigned from safety grade 1 per version 1 to grade 2 per version 2) performed similarly to other safety grade 2 examinations (version 1), and this was likewise true for 66 downgraded examinations (reassigned from safety grade 1 per version 1 to grade 0 per version 2). CONCLUSIONS Refined criteria defining mild safety impairments with the DIGEST methodology changed grades in small numbers of examinations. DIGESTv2 criteria maintained criterion validity, demonstrated ordinality, and improved the performance of the method in these rare scenarios. LAY SUMMARY Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) is a method developed and validated by the investigators in 2016 to grade the severity of pharyngeal swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) with a decision tree or flowsheet to guide the clinician's review of a standard radiographic modified barium swallow study. This work reports on the validity of updated DIGEST criteria (version 2) that incorporate 2 modifications to the decision tree.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carly E A Barbon
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clare P Alvarez
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carla L Warneke
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barbon CEA, Yao CMKL, Alvarez CP, Goepfert RP, Fuller CD, Lai SY, Gross ND, Hutcheson KA. Dysphagia profiles after primary transoral robotic surgery or radiation for oropharyngeal cancer: A registry analysis. Head Neck 2021; 43:2883-2895. [PMID: 34080249 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the physiologic swallowing impairments (MBSImP™©) associated with safety/efficiency impairments (DIGESTsafety /DIGESTefficiency grades) at 3-6 months after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or radiation therapy (RT). STUDY DESIGN Secondary analysis of registry data. SETTING Single, academic institution. METHODS Two hundred and fifty-seven patients with HPV+ oropharynx cancer were stratified by primary treatment (75 TORS, 182 RT). Modified barium swallow studies were analyzed at baseline and 3-6 months using MBSImP scores and DIGESTsafety /DIGESTefficiency grades. DIGESTsafety /DIGESTefficiency grades and MBSImP were compared groupwise and associations between DIGESTsafety /DIGESTefficiency grades and MBSImP were explored by ordinal logistic regression. Exploratory analyses were stratified by multimodality treatment. RESULTS Neither DIGESTsafety /DIGESTefficiency differed significantly between groups at baseline or 3-6 months. Laryngeal vestibule closure was impaired more frequently in the RT group (RT: 41% vs. TORS: 27%; p = 0.02) while the TORS group had significantly more pharyngeal contraction impairment (63%; p < 0.001) compared to RT at 3-6 months. CONCLUSION The results suggest a focal injury associated with DIGESTsafety /DIGESTefficiency post-TORS in contrast to a low-level diffuse physiologic impairment associated with post-RT dysphagia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly E A Barbon
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Christopher M K L Yao
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clare P Alvarez
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ryan P Goepfert
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neil D Gross
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Katherine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ottenstein L, Cornett H, Switchenko JM, Nathan M, Thomas S, Gillespie AI, McColloch N, Barrett T, Studer MB, Brinkman M, Kaka AS, Boyce BJ, Ferris RL, Aiken AH, El-Deiry M, Beitler JJ, Patel MR. Characterizing postoperative physiologic swallow function following transoral robotic surgery for early stage tonsil, base of tongue, and unknown primary human papillomavirus-associated squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2021; 43:1629-1640. [PMID: 33547716 PMCID: PMC8046724 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data objectively evaluating acute post-transoral robotic surgery (TORS) swallow function are limited. Our goal was to characterize and identify clinical variables that may impact swallow function components 3 weeks post-TORS. METHODS Retrospective cohort study. Pre/postoperative use of the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) and Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was completed on 125 of 139 TORS patients (2016-2019) with human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dynamic Imaging Grade of Swallowing Toxicity (DIGEST) scores were retrospectively calculated. Uni/multivariate analysis was performed. RESULTS Dysfunctional pre-TORS DIGEST scores were predictive of post-TORS dysphagia (p = 0.015). Pre-TORS MBSImP deficits in pharyngeal stripping wave, swallow initiation, and clearing pharyngeal residue correlated with airway invasion post-TORS based on PAS scores (p = 0.012, 0.027, 0.048, respectively). Multivariate analysis of DIGEST safety scores declined with older age (p = 0.044). Odds ratios (ORs) for objective swallow function components after TORS were better for unknown primary and tonsil primaries compared to base of tongue (BOT) (OR 0.35-0.91). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative impairments in specific MBSImP components, older patients, and BOT primaries may predict more extensive recovery in swallow function after TORS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Ottenstein
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hannah Cornett
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jeffrey M. Switchenko
- Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Meghana Nathan
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Susan Thomas
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Amanda I. Gillespie
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Nancy McColloch
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | | | - Meghan Brinkman
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Azeem S. Kaka
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Brian J. Boyce
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Robert L. Ferris
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashley H. Aiken
- Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mark El-Deiry
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jonathan J. Beitler
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mihir R. Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology – Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Winship Cancer Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Charters E, Wu R, Milross C, Bogaardt H, Freeman-Sanderson A, Ballard K, Davies S, Oates J, Clark J. Swallowing and communication outcomes following primary transoral robotic surgery. Head Neck 2021; 43:2013-2023. [PMID: 33687115 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterogeneity within studies examining transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) has made it challenging to make clear conclusions on functional outcomes. Infrequent use of instrumental swallow examinations compounds uncertainty surrounding the proposed functional advantage to TORS. METHODS A prospective cohort of 49 patients underwent speech and swallowing assessment 12 months following treatment for OPC. Patients were assessed using fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), clinician- and patient-reported outcomes. Participants were matched according to tumor site, T category, and age. Speech and swallowing outcomes were compared for those receiving TORS versus chemoradiation. RESULTS When adjuvant radiotherapy to the primary site could be avoided, TORS demonstrated an advantage for feeding tube duration, secretion severity, penetration/aspiration, M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI), and airway protection. CONCLUSION This explorative study suggests that a treatment philosophy of selecting patients for TORS where adjuvant therapy can be omitted or confined to the neck warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Charters
- Department of Speech and Language Pathology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Raymond Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Milross
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hans Bogaardt
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy Freeman-Sanderson
- Sydney University Technology Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Speech Pathology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Division of Critical Care, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirrie Ballard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Davies
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justine Oates
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan Clark
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Functional Swallow-Related Outcomes Following Transoral Robotic Surgery for Base of Tongue Carcinoma. Dysphagia 2021; 37:28-36. [PMID: 33492468 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-021-10246-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
In an era where the incidence of oropharyngeal cancer is growing steadily, there have been few studies exploring functional outcomes for individuals whose definitive cancer management approach includes transoral robotic surgical (TORS) resection. This study was designed to examine swallow-related outcomes in individuals newly diagnosed with base of tongue cancer whose treatment plan included surgical resection via TORS. The aims of this study were to determine whether TORS resection for early stage BOT SCCA affected: (a) lingual strength, (b) swallow safety and efficiency, (c) oral intake, and (d) swallowing-related quality of life. Nine individuals meeting the inclusion criteria were recruited to participate from March 2017 to April 2018. Each participant was evaluated at four distinct time points: (a) preoperatively, (b) 1 week postoperatively, (c) 1 month postoperatively, and (d) 3 months postoperatively. The following data were collected at each time point: (a) maximum isometric lingual pressure, (b) Penetration-Aspiration Scale score, (c) Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale scores, (d) Functional Oral Intake Scale score, and (e) EAT-10 score. Data analysis revealed that a significant decline in maximum isometric lingual pressure, EAT-10 scores, and Functional Oral Intake Scale scores occurred between preoperative baseline measurements and 1 week post surgery. All participants in the study demonstrated a return to levels at or near their baseline level of function for maximum isometric lingual pressure, EAT-10 score, and Functional Oral Intake Scale score by 1 or 3 months post surgery. There were no significant changes in swallow safety or efficiency observed at any time point during the study.
Collapse
|
12
|
Scott SI, Kathrine Ø Madsen A, Rubek N, Charabi BW, Wessel I, Fredslund Hadjú S, Jensen CV, Stephen S, Patterson JM, Friborg J, Hutcheson KA, Kehlet H, von Buchwald C. Long-term quality of life & functional outcomes after treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. Cancer Med 2020; 10:483-495. [PMID: 33277795 PMCID: PMC7877346 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional and QoL outcomes were compared longitudinally in a cohort of patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with primary transoral robotic surgery (TORS) or radiotherapy (RT). Forty‐four patients undergoing primary TORS (n = 31) or RT (n = 13) for any stage OPSCC were included. Only low‐stage disease was treated with TORS. Functional outcomes were: salivary flow rate, image‐based swallowing function, and a self‐reported 10‐point scale comparing current swallowing function to baseline (CvB scale). QoL was assessed with European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (EORTC QLQ‐C30), Head & Neck Module (EORTC QLQ‐HN35), and MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Shoulder impairment was assessed with Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) and Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS). In the RT group, salivary flow rates had significantly declined at 12‐month follow‐up, with the biggest declines in QoL subscale scores recorded in the RT group for dry mouth and sticky saliva. Swallowing function on imaging studies was overall good, with no severe dysphagia within 1 year although, both treatment groups showed significant deterioration relative to baseline at the 12‐month follow‐up with increased DIGEST scores and pharyngeal retention. Shoulder impairment was rare at 1 year in both groups. A comprehensive examination of this cohort treated for OPSCC showed overall good functional and QoL outcomes 1 year after treatment. However, persistent impairment was seen in both groups with regards to swallowing function. In the TORS group, at 12‐months follow‐up, the QoL questionnaires showed worse scores in only one subscale (sticky saliva).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne I Scott
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Kathrine Ø Madsen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Niclas Rubek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Birgitte W Charabi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Irene Wessel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sara Fredslund Hadjú
- Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Cancer Late Effects Research Unit (CASTLE), Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Claus V Jensen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sarah Stephen
- Department of Speech, Voice and Swallow, ENT, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Joanne M Patterson
- School of Health Sciences / Head and Neck Cancer Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Jeppe Friborg
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kathrine A Hutcheson
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Henrik Kehlet
- Section for Surgical Pathophysiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian von Buchwald
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery & Audiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Charters EK, Bogaardt H, Freeman-Sanderson AL, Ballard KJ, Davies S, Oates J, Clark J. Early fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallow in transoral robotic surgery: Description of swallow function and recovery in the acute postoperative period for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2020; 43:116-127. [PMID: 32964561 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) is a minimally invasive approach for the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer. The effects on swallowing and speech need to be comprehensively evaluated to understand the associated morbidity. METHODS A prospective cohort of 21 patients was recruited to undergo pre-TORS and post-TORS swallowing and communication assessment. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was used in the first postoperative week. RESULTS Sixteen participants (76.2%) had penetration-aspiration scores ≥3 or higher, seven (33.3%) aspirated on thin liquids, three (14.3%) did so silently. Prolonged recovery trajectory occurred for the majority of the cohort, particularly if TORS was followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Swallowing and communication scores were significantly worse in base of tongue primary tumors and with advanced age. CONCLUSION Early FEES demonstrates a significant decline in swallowing function, including increased secretion load, pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration. Silent aspiration occurred in 14% and thus highlights the necessity for instrumental assessment to ascertain aspiration risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma K Charters
- Department of Speech Pathology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Hans Bogaardt
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia
| | | | - Kirrie J Ballard
- Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Davies
- Department of Speech Pathology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justine Oates
- Department of Speech Pathology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jonathan Clark
- Sydney Head and Neck Cancer Institute, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
- Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Royal Prince Alfred Institute of Academic Surgery, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hinther A, Samson N, Lau H, Quon H, Banerjee R, Lysack JT, Grendarova P, Matthews TW, Randall DR. Volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures following head and neck cancer chemoradiation therapy. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:597-602. [PMID: 31260128 DOI: 10.1002/lary.28164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To determine the volumetric changes in pharyngeal structures in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with curative chemoradiation therapy (CRT). Patients treated with CRT for esophageal carcinoma (EC), where pharyngeal structures were not part of the radiation treatment fields, were controlled for dysphagia-associated weight loss. We hypothesize that tissue volume alteration is a contributing factor of post-CRT dysphagia. STUDY DESIGN Case series. METHODS This study measured pre- and 1-year posttreatment volumes of the base of tongue (BOT), parapharyngeal spaces, posterior pharyngeal constrictors (PCs), and retropharyngeal space (RPS) in patients undergoing CRT for HNSCC or EC treated January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015. All HNSCC patients were treated to doses of 66 to 70 Gy in 30 to 33 fractions using intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques. RESULTS Our cohort included 49 HNSCC and 11 EC patients. Within the HNSCC cohort, the PCs volume increased 1.55 cm3 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.77 to 2.34 cm3 , P = .0002), RPS increased 1.22 cm3 (95% CI: 0.67 to 1.77 cm3 , P < .0001), and BOT decreased 2.29 cm3 (95% CI: -0.20 to 4.79 cm3 , P = .070). The EC cohort showed no significant volumetric changes for any anatomic space, with combined PCs and RPS volume changes statistically less than the HNSCC cohort (P = .031). There was no difference in mean body mass index reduction between groups (P = .10). CONCLUSIONS Volumetric changes following CRT may play a role in posttreatment dysphagia. Our findings support loss of physiologic function from posterior pharynx tissue thickening combined with reduced pharyngeal constriction capacity, and BOT atrophy secondary to radiation effects contribute to dysphagia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:597-602, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Hinther
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nina Samson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Harold Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Harvey Quon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Robyn Banerjee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - John T Lysack
- Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Petra Grendarova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - T Wayne Matthews
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Derrick R Randall
- Section of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Patient-reported outcomes of symptom burden in patients receiving surgical or nonsurgical treatment for low-intermediate risk oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A comparative analysis of a prospective registry. Oral Oncol 2019; 91:13-20. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|