The Evolving Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Where Do We Stand?

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a precise and conformal radiation therapy (RT) that aims to deliver a high dose of radiation to the tumor whilst sparing surrounding normal tissue, making it an attractive option for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients who are not suitable for the traditional long course of RT with comprehensive RT target volume. Definitive SBRT for HNC has been investigated in different settings, including early stage glottis cancer, and as an alternative to brachytherapy boost after external beam RT. It is also used as a primary treatment option for elderly or medically unfit patients. More recently, an SBRT combination with immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HNC showed promising results. Salvage or adjuvant SBRT for HNC can be used in appropriately selected cases. Future studies are warranted to determine the optimum dose and fractionation schedules in any of these indications.

Stereotactic radiotherapy as planned boost after definitive radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: Systematic review

Management of locoregionally advanced head and neck cancers (HNCs) remains a challenge. Some groups have attempted to use stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) to deliver "boost" treatment following conventional radiotherapy to improve local control (LC) and overall survival (OS), while aiming for acceptable toxicities. Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for SBRT as curative-intent planned boost in HNC after conventional radiotherapy. Individual studies were reviewed from inception until January 2021, extracting patient, treatment, and outcome data. Nine studies met inclusion criteria, representing 454 unique patients treated with curative intent across multiple head and neck sites with conventional radiotherapy. At 3 years, median LC was 92% (90%-98%), and median OS was 80% (75%-91%). Seven treatment-related grade 5 toxicities (1.5%) were reported. Despite acceptable LC and OS rates, there were severe treatment-related late toxicities. As such, SBRT boost should only be used in investigational settings until more data is available.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for primary non-metastatic head and neck cancer: When less is enough

The advantage of highly conformal dose distribution and steep dose gradient has resulted in rapidly increasing use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in multiple cancer sites. Also there has been a surge in the use of SBRT in head neck cancer over the last decade. It is predominantly exploited in retreatment setting for recurrent and second primary head neck cancer as well as in metastatic setting. The literature on SBRT in primary non-metastatic head neck cancer is sparse and evolving. In the current review, available literature was critically analyzed focusing on the potential applications of SBRT in primary untreated non-metastatic head neck cancer. SBRT boost following external beam radiotherapy is temping as a method of dose escalation. Special attention was paid to the application of SBRT as a sole modality of treatment. The shorter treatment schedule makes it an attractive option for treatment in primary head neck cancer especially in elderly, co-morbid and medically unfits patients. Future investigation is needed to establish SBRT as an additional armamentarium in the radiotherapeutic management of head and neck cancers.

Volume de-escalation in radiation therapy: state of the art and new perspectives

PURPOSE

New RT techniques and data emerging from follow-up for several tumor sites suggest that treatment volume de-escalation may permit to minimize therapy-related side effects and/or obtain better clinical outcomes. Here, we summarize the main evidence about volume de-escalation in RT.

METHOD

The relevant literature from PubMed was reviewed in this article. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was searched for clinical trials related to the specific topic.

RESULTS

In Lymphoma, large-volume techniques (extended- and involved-field RT) are being successfully replaced by involved-site RT and involved-node RT. In head and neck carcinoma, spare a part of elective neck is controversial. In early breast cancer, partial breast irradiation has been established as a treatment option in low-risk patients. In pancreatic cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy may be used to dose escalation. Stereotactic radiosurgery should be the treatment choice for patients with oligometastatic brain disease and a life expectancy of more than 3 months, and it should be considered an alternative to WBRT for patients with multiple brain metastases.

CONCLUSION

Further clinical trials are necessary to improve the identification of suitable patient cohorts and the extent of possible volume de-escalation that does not compromise tumor control.

Long-term outcomes following stereotactic body radiotherapy boost for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Background/purpose: To determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) boost as a first line treatment in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study in 195 consecutive OPSCC patients with T1-small T3 disease, treated at Erasmus MC between 2009 and 2016 with a SBRT (3 × 5.5 Gy) boost after 46 Gy IMRT. Primary endpoints were disease-specific survival (DSS) and Grade ≥3 toxicity (Common Terminology Criteria). The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression model were applied to determine rates and risk factors. Results: The median follow-up was 4.3 years. Treatment compliance was high (100%). Rates of 5-year DSS and late grade ≥3 toxicity were 85% and 28%, respectively. Five-year overall survival was 67%. The most frequently observed toxicities were mucosal ulceration or soft tissue necrosis (n = 30, 5 year 18%), dysphagia or weight loss (n = 18, 5 year 12%) and osteoradionecrosis (n = 11, 5 year 9%). Current smoker status (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.9, p = .001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 (HR = 1.9, p = .03) were was associated with increased toxicity risk. Tooth extraction prior to RT was associated with increased osteoradionecrosis risk (HR = 6.4, p = .006). Conclusion: We reported on outcomes in the largest patient series to date treated with a hypofractionated boost for OPSCC. Efficacy was good with survival rates comparable to conventionally fractionated (chemo)radiotherapy. Grade ≥3 toxicity profiles showed high rates of soft tissue necrosis and osteoradionecrosis. Strategies to mitigate severe toxicity risks are under investigation to improve the tolerability of the SBRT boost.