Dual‐phase CT angiography for presurgical planning in patients with vessel‐depleted neck

Reconstruction in Salvage Surgery for Head and Neck Cancers

Introduction

Salvage surgery is the treatment option in recurrences and second primary tumors. This paper aimed to study the options and outcomes of reconstruction and the predictors of poor reconstructive outcomes in salvage surgery for head and neck cancers.

Study Design

This is a retrospective study of all patients who underwent reconstructive flap surgery as part of salvage surgery for head and neck cancers between the years 2004 and 2017.

Methods

The initial treatment may be single modality radiotherapy or surgery or multimodality with combinations of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Any pathology that required surgical salvage was included. Any procedures done purely as reconstructive surgery were excluded. Predictor variables included demographical, clinical, and treatment factors. The outcome parameter was the occurrence of any flap-related complication or not. The complications and morbidity related to the procedures are reported.

Results

Ninety-three patients underwent loco-regional flaps (LRF group), and 100 had free flaps (FF group). Pectoralis major flap was the commonest flap used in 68 patients (73.1%). Anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap was the commonest free flap and comprised 41% of the FF group. Any skin-related complication was seen in 35 patients (37.6%) and 41 (41%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Any flap-related complication was seen in 16 patients (17.2%) and 29 patients (29%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. A summary measure "any one of the complications" was seen in 46 (49.5%) and 57 (57%), respectively, in LRF and FF subsets. Univariate and multivariate analysis for any flap-related complication identified no statistically significant predictor.

Conclusions

Soft tissue flaps were preferred in salvage reconstruction, though the defects had a bony component. In the microvascular free flap reconstruction era, pectoralis major flap has shifted its role from a "workhorse flap" to a "salvage flap." About half of the patients develop some complications. Flap-related complications are also common. In salvage surgery, it is important that an appropriate flap is selected, suitable for the setting, according to the indications, neck, and patient conditions.

Free tissue reconstruction in the "vessel-depleted" neck: A multi-institutional cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Much of the literature on free tissue reconstruction in the "vessel-depleted" neck is focused on identification of vessels outside the pretreated field and data on free flap outcomes when infield microvascular anastomosis is performed remain scarce. We aim to report on free flap outcomes and recipient vessel choice in a large cohort of patients with prior radiation and neck dissection (RTND) to the ipsilateral side of vessel anastomosis.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed including patients who received head and neck free tissue transfer following prior RTND to the ipsilateral side of vessel anastomosis. Pretreatment data, free flap type, defect site, and recipient vessel choice were reported. Recipient vessel choice was stratified according to neck dissection level and prior free flap. Primary outcome was free flap survival (total failure, partial failure, success) within 30 days after surgery.

RESULTS

This study included 72 free flap cases in 68 patients. Free flap success was 94.4%; one case (1.4%) resulted in total flap loss and three cases (4%) had partial flap loss. The facial (35%), external carotid (ECA) (25%), and superior thyroid arteries (16%) were the most common recipient arteries. The external jugular (EJV) (38%), facial (30%), and internal jugular veins (IJV) (15%) were the most common recipient veins. The superior thyroid artery was used less frequently with a prior level 2-3/4 neck dissection compared to a prior level 1-3/4 neck dissection (6% vs. 17%, p = 0.83). The facial artery (7% vs. 67%, p < 0.01) and vein (13% vs. 46%, p = 0.04) were used less frequently when a prior free flap with ipsilateral anastomosis was performed. The superior thyroid, ECA, IJV, and EJV were more commonly used in this subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Free tissue transfer with infield microvascular anastomosis in a neck with prior RTND can be safely done with comparable outcomes to surgically naïve, non-irradiated necks.

Secondary Reconstruction of Head and Neck Cancer Defects-Principles in its Practice

Objective

Secondary reconstruction is requested by patients who have completed their head and neck cancer treatment. The reason for the request for reconstruction may be to improve the functional deficits, achieve aesthetic refinements or most commonly both. The article looks at various issues related to reconstruction in the secondary setting and suggesting the ways to approaching patients requesting secondary reconstruction.

Discussion

While considering secondary reconstruction, various factors need to be considered. These include issues related to the disease, the treatment received as well as the patient's comorbid conditions. Aggressive disease and multiple recurrences should deter from undertaking complex reconstructions. Lack of tissue pliability resulting in a woody neck due to radiation makes dissection difficult and wound healing poor. The reconstructive requirements include release of contractures inside the mouth, reconstruction of the missing jaws, replacement of the missing volume of the tongue and correction of the incompetent angle of mouth. Goals of reconstruction should be prioritized by the surgical team. Free soft tissue or bone containing flaps would be provided ideal tissue to meet the reconstructive requirements in secondary reconstruction. However, several impediments could exist for their safe use. Release of contractures and provision of adequate soft tissue should be given priority and must be addressed before bony reconstruction is contemplated.

Conclusion

Bony reconstruction of both mandible and maxilla is possible, with the former being more difficult to deliver good results due to the associated soft tissue fibrosis. Virtual surgical planning with the aid of Stereo lithographic models and planning software will improve the quality of bony reconstruction. Detailed counseling sessions involving patient and the family are essential before embarking on secondary reconstruction as the patient expectations and the surgical outcome may not be easy to match. However excellent improvement in function and appearance will be possible in many patients with appropriate reconstructive procedure.

Surgical Techniques for Head and Neck Reconstruction in the Vessel-Depleted Neck

The vessel-depleted neck presents a unique and challenging scenario for reconstructive surgery of the head and neck. Prior surgery and radiation often result in significant scarring and damage to the neck vasculature, making identification of suitable recipient vessels for microvascular free tissue transfer exceedingly difficult. Therefore, alternative reconstructive techniques and/or vessel options must be considered to obtain a successful reconstructive outcome for a patient. In this article, we discuss our experience and approach to the management of the vessel-depleted neck, emphasizing the importance of preoperative planning and having multiple backup options prior to surgery. The various preoperative imaging modalities and available options for recipient arteries and veins are presented in detail. Additionally, we discuss modifications of select free flaps to maximize their utility in successful reconstruction. Together with thoughtful preoperative planning, these techniques can help aid the reconstructive surgeon in addressing the complex decisions associated with the vessel-depleted neck.

Head and Neck Reconstruction in the Vessel Depleted Neck

Microvascular free tissue transfer has revolutionized reconstruction and subsequently functional outcomes in the head and neck, but requires suitable recipient vessels for successful results. Recipient vessels can be significantly compromised by prior surgery, radiation therapy, or existing and/or underlying vascular disease in the neck. When further microvascular reconstruction is required in the vessel-depleted neck, identification of appropriate vessels for anastomosis can be difficult and can present complex decisions for the surgeon as well as the patient. In this article, we review the available literature on the vessel depleted neck and the possible vessel options. We present critical strategies for preoperative treatment planning and vessel selection in these patients. We also discuss the benefits and limitations of arterial and venous options while commenting on our unique institution's experiences. The external carotid branches as well as the available subclavian artery branches are presented in detail. The venous anatomy is also described, with particular focus on the accompanying veins and cephalic vein. We provide guidance on the selection and modification of free flaps to achieve the greatest function and cosmetic outcomes in the vessel depleted neck. Our collection of advanced management techniques will provide surgeons with more options to manage the complexity of the vessel depleted neck, and to further help patients understand the risk and benefits of these selections.