Closure of radial forearm free flap donor site: A comparative study between keystone flap and skin graft

Outcomes of Radial Forearm Free Flap Closure With Split-Thickness Skin Graft Versus Primary Closure

BACKGROUND

This study compares patient-reported functional and aesthetic outcomes of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) versus hatchet flap closure of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site.

METHODS

Patients with RFFF (2015-2020) were retrospectively identified. Those willing to participate in patient-reported outcomes (PRO) filled out Patient-Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire (MHOQ).

RESULTS

198 patients met our inclusion criteria and 81 participated in PRO. There was a higher rate of tendon exposure in STSG versus hatchet flap (11 vs. 1, p = 0.0019), but a lower rate of skin necrosis (5 vs. 16, p = 0.0190) and epidermolysis (1 vs. 12, p = 0.0028). Scar quality in STSG was superior to hatchet flap in all domains of POSAS. MHOQ scores were similar between both groups with no statistical difference in overall scores (p = 0.2165).

CONCLUSIONS

STSG appeared to have less compromise in activities of daily living, better satisfaction and improved scar quality than hatchet flap, but a higher rate of tendon exposure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:4266-4273, 2024.

Dovetailing skin incision design of radial forearm free flap for forearm wound closure and maxillofacial reconstruction

Object

This study aimed to examine the feasibility of the dovetailing skin incision design of radial forearm free flap (RFFF) for closing forearm wounds and performing maxillofacial reconstruction.

Method

A total of 27 patients were divided into two groups. In the dovetail group (n = 16), forearm wounds were closed primarily and maxillofacial defects were reconstructed by dovetail RFFF. In the conventional group (n = 11), forearm wounds were closed by skin grafts from the abdomen or mattress suturing, and maxillofacial defects were reconstructed by conventional RFFF. Information on the healing time of the forearm wound, length of postsurgical hospitalization, esthetic assessments, and complications associated with the forearm wound and the maxillofacial region was collected at least 6 months postoperatively.

Result

The average size of the flap in the dovetail group was smaller than that in the conventional group (p = 0.134), and average healing time of the forearm wound in dovetail group was significantly shorter than that in conventional group (p = 0.000). Comparing with the conventional group, there were more cases in the dovetail group demonstrating decreased sensitivity (p = 1.000). Esthetic assessments of forearm wound and maxillofacial reconstructions in the dovetail group were significantly higher than that in the conventional group (p = 0.000).

Conclusion

Closure of forearm wounds and maxillofacial defects using dovetail design was found to be a feasible alternative to the conventional design.

Biomechanical and aesthetic outcomes following radial forearm free flap transfer: comparison of ipsilateral full-thickness skin graft and traditional split-thickness skin graft

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is associated with donor site morbidity. This study aimed to quantify the functional and aesthetic outcomes after closure of the RFFF donor site using triangular full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) harvested adjacent to the flap or traditional split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). The study included patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction with an RFFF between March 2017 and August 2021. The patients were divided into two groups based on the donor site closure method: FTSG or STSG. The primary outcomes were biomechanical grip strength, pinch strength, and range of wrist movements. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results were also analysed. The study included 75 patients (FTSG n = 35; STSG n = 40). Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference in grip strength (P = 0.049) and wrist extension (P = 0.047) between the FTSG and STSG groups, in favour of the STSG. Differences between the groups in pinch strength and other wrist motions were not statistically significant. The harvesting time was significantly shorter for the FTSG (P = 0.041) and the appearance of the donor site was better (P = 0.026) when compared to the STSG. Cold intolerance was more frequent in the STSG group (32.5% STSG vs 6.7% FTSG; P = 0.017). Subjective function, numbness, pain, hypertrophic scar, itching, and social stigma did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared with the STSG, the FTSG showed better cosmesis and avoided additional donor sites, with clinically negligible differences in hand biomechanics.

Radially Pedicled In-Situ Split-Thickness Skin Grafts, an Alternative to Distal Split-Thickness Skin Grafts

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to introduce a novel radially pedicled in-situ split-thickness skin graft (STSG). The morbidity, esthetic, and functional outcomes of the radially pedicled in-situ STSG were in comparison with those of the distal STSG.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective analysis.

SETTING

A single-institution review.

METHODS

Seventy patients with oral cancer who underwent radical surgical resection and simultaneous radial forearm free flap (RFFF) reconstruction from July 2021 to March 2022 were included. De-epithelialized RFFFs and traditional RFFFs were used to repair oral defects of 35 patients in Group A and Group B, respectively, while radially pedicled in-situ STSGs and distal STSGs taken from abdomens were used to repair donor site defects in the above groups, respectively. Patient demographics, wound healing complications, and esthetic and functional outcomes of the forearms were compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

No significant difference between Group A and Group B was observed in terms of donor site and recipient site complications. The esthetic outcome was superior in Group A compared to Group B (P = .011). The extension range, sensation, and pinch strength of operated forearms were significantly reduced in both groups after surgery (P < .05), however, intergroup differences were not observed.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results suggest that radially pedicled in-situ STSG is an applicable technique for direct closure and better esthetic outcomes in the forearm donor site.

Free-style propeller ulnar artery perforator flaps for radial forearm flap donor site repair

INTRODUCTION

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is still one of the most used free flaps to repair soft tissue defects of the head and neck. Among its main drawbacks, it presents severe donor site complications. We report our experience about the use of free-style propeller ulnar artery perforator flaps (UAP) to repair RFFF donor site.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From February 2010 to June 2020, six patients who underwent immediate tongue reconstruction with RFFF after cancer excision, had the donor site at the forearm reconstructed with a free-style propeller UAP flap. The indication for a UAP flap was based on defect size and the presence of tendons or radial nerve exposure. Ulnar artery perforators were identified intra-operatively with a handheld Doppler. The UAP flaps were harvested and rotated to cover donor site defects. The patients' mean age was 59, ranging from 49 to 65 years old. The defects size ranged from 8-12 cm × 5-7 cm with a mean size of 10.5 × 6.7 cm.

RESULTS

The UAP flap harvested ranged from 8-11 cm × 5-7 cm with a mean size of 10.5 × 5.5 cm. The perforators, identified with a power Doppler, were located at the middle third of the forearm. Flaps' rotation varied from 90 to 160° with a mean rotation of 122°. Mean operating time was 60 min ranging from 40 to 75 min for UAP flap elevation. No flap necrosis or tendon exposure occurred. One case of wound dehiscence was reported. Two out of six patients suffered from tendon adhesions to the flap. UAP flap donor site was primarily closed in four out of six patients, whereas two cases required a split-thickness skin grafts. Mean donor site healing time was about 20 days (19.8 days) ranging from 14 to 30 days. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 31 months with a mean follow up time of 19 months (18.6 months). At 6 months follow-up only one patient experienced a functional limitation of wrist and finger joints extension of 20° which required tenolysis. At the end of the patient's follow up that is 22 months, the range of movement was within normal limits. In our casuistry neuropathic pain was absent.

CONCLUSIONS

RFF is still a paramount tool in reconstructive surgery but its donor site is still burdened by a high complication rate. Free-style UAP flaps can provide a local and safe solution.

Coverage of radial forearm free flap donor site defect using another free flap

BACKGROUND

Donor site defects following the radial forearm flap (RFF) harvest have been usually covered with skin grafting, which often lead to suboptimal outcomes and donor morbidities, including delayed healing and scar contractures. The present report aimed to evaluate the outcomes of using another free flap, the domino flap, for coverage of donor site defects following RFFF harvest.

METHODS

Five patients (two males and three females) who underwent coverage of donor defects of RFFF using another free flap between 2019 and 2021 were reviewed. Their mean age was 74 years and the mean dimension of the defect of the RFF donor site was 8.7 × 5.6 cm. Four patients used an anterolateral thigh flap and one used a superficial circumflex iliac artery perforator flap.

RESULTS

The mean size of the domino flaps were 12.2 × 5.8 cm. Distal stumps of radial vessels adopting retrograde flow were used as recipients in four cases, and proximal ones adopting anterograde in one. The donor site of the domino flaps was primarily closed. All patients recovered well without any postoperative complications. Aesthetically pleasing outcomes with no functional impairment related to scar contractures were observed in the donor site of RFF during the mean follow-up of 15.7 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of another free flap for coverage of RFFF donor defects may provide rapid wound healing and satisfactory outcomes, and may be considered an alternative option in cases with large-sized defects that are expected to take a long time to achieve complete healing with skin grafting.

Robot-assisted radial forearm free flap harvesting: a propensity score-matched case-control study

Although some surgeons prefer anterolateral thigh and latissimus dorsi flap for soft tissue reconstruction in the head and neck area because it minimizes donor site complications, the radial forearm flap remains the workhorse for soft tissue reconstruction due to its reliability. To reduce donor site morbidity, the authors developed a novel technique for radial forearm flap harvesting using a robotic device. 42 radial forearm free flap reconstruction cases were studied, consisting of 31 conventional and 11 robot-assisted cases. 1:1 propensity score matching was done according to age, sex, previous and postoperative radiation therapy history and method used for vein anastomosis. There was no significant difference in flap outcome, which was 100% vitality in the robot-assisted group and 90.9% vitality in the conventional group. The robot-assisted group showed significantly longer mean harvesting time than did the conventional group, being 107.2 min and 67.0 min, respectively. Robot-assisted radial forearm flap harvesting can reduce donor site complications by minimizing incision. When more surgical experience is gained under appropriate case selection, we expect our robot-assisted method will yield a harvesting time similar to that of the conventional method and thus become more reliable and feasible.

Clinical Application of Pre-Expanded Perforator Flaps

Background: Challenging large soft tissue defects are typically treated with microvascular free tissue transfer; however, success has been noted with pre-expanded perforator flaps. Objective: To report outcomes and complications from pre-expanded perforator flaps. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing tissue reconstruction with pre-expanded perforator flaps between 2014 and 2020. Data collection included flap type, defect characteristics, and complications. Results: All 29 patients had successful flap reconstruction without major complication. The median area of tissue defect was 17 × 13 cm² (range 7 × 4 to 27 × 24 cm²). Mean tissue expansion period was 15.2 weeks (range 9-26 weeks). The most common flap was the pre-expanded internal mammary artery perforator flaps. Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest that combining tissue expansion with a perforator flap for large tissue reconstruction can be successful with limited complications. This technique may allow a larger pliable skin flap that deserves further investigation.

Reducing morbidity in radial forearm free flap donor site: a review of closure techniques

PURPOSE

Radial forearm free tissue transfer (RFFF) has been an extremely reliable reconstructive option for head and neck oncologic defects for over 30 years. With high reliability, interest has shifted in minimizing donor site morbidity, much of which results from closure techniques.

RECENT FINDINGS

Portable negative pressure wound devices, newer dermal substitutes, and local flap techniques have improved donor site aesthetics and function.

SUMMARY

Outcomes of the RFFF donor site may benefit from newer techniques in closure.

Higher incidences of neuropathic pain and altered sensation following radial forearm free flap: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) has been used extensively for complex tissue defect reconstructions; however, the potential for significant donor-site morbidity remains a major drawback. Despite an abundance of literature on donor-site morbidities, no consensus has been reached on exact incidences of sensory morbidities that vary largely between 0% and 46%. Incidences of neuropathic pain in the donor site following RFFF still lack, even though clinical experience shows it often occurs. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to identify the incidence of neuropathic pain and altered sensation in the hand following harvesting of a RFFF.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in multiple databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Google Scholar). Studies from 1990 onwards that reported donor-site morbidities following harvest of the RFFF were included. Analyzed parameters included hand pain, hypoesthesia, cold intolerance, hyperesthesia, neuroma formation, paresthesia, sharp sensation loss, light sensation loss, and defect closure.

RESULTS

Of the 987 selected studies, 51 eligible articles were selected. The mean level of evidence was 3 (SD 0.6). Twenty articles reported pain as a donor-site morbidity, and the mean incidence of pain reported was 23% (SD 7.8). Hypoesthesia was reported by 37 articles and had a mean incidence of 34% (SD 25). Locations of pain and hypoesthesia included, amongst others, the area of the radial sensory nerve and the skin graft area. The mean incidences of cold intolerance and hyperesthesia were 13% (SD 13) and 16% (SD 15), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review suggest that 23% of all patients are dealing with neuropathic pain in the donor-site following harvest of an RFFF. Future studies should therefore focus on the prognostic factors and preventive measures of neuropathic pain to further improve clinical outcomes of this widely used flap.

The external pudendal artery free flap in women: Anatomical study of a novel flap for buccopharyngeal reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Because of the widespread and high reliability of free flaps in head and neck reconstruction, the challenge today is to reduce donor site morbidity. The external pudendal artery (EPA) free flap has been described in men and provides a minimal functional and cosmetic impact. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of the EPA free flap in women for buccopharyngeal reconstruction.

METHODS

A dissection of the inguinal region was performed bilaterally on fresh female cadavers. The anatomy of the EPA and its angiosome were described, along with the design of the EPA free flap. A computed tomography angiographic study of the flap perfusion was performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen cadavers were dissected. The EPA was constant. Its diameter ranged from 1.12 to 2.96 mm (median 2.0 mm). The mean area of its angiosome was 167.3 ± 38.5 cm². An axial fasciocutaneous flap was designed with a horizontal skin paddle measuring on average 9.2 × 6 cm and a pedicle length of 8.4 ± 1.9 cm. The mean flap thickness was 11.7 ± 6.8 mm and depended on individual factors. A primary closure was achieved in all cases with a scar hidden in the underwear.

CONCLUSIONS

This anatomical study demonstrates that the EPA seems constant despite variations in its origin pattern. Its diameter and angiosome allow the design of an EPA free flap in women. A clinical study should confirm that this flap is suitable for the repair of buccopharyngeal defects and could be added to the armamentarium of the head and neck reconstructive surgeon.

[Application of Keystone flap in the repair of soft tissue defect of lower extremity]

Objective

To study the effectiveness of Keystone flap in the repair of soft tissue defect of lower extremity.

Methods

The clinical data of 27 cases with soft tissue defects of lower extremity treated by Keystone flap between January 2018 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 18 males and 9 females, with an average age of 43.9 years (range, 8-63 years). The cause of soft tissue defects included skin tumor in 3 cases, ulcer in 2 cases, soft-tissue infection in 8 cases, trauma in 7 cases, and donor site defect after free or pedicled flap transplantation in 7 cases. Defect size ranged from 2.0 cm×1.5 cm to 15.0 cm×9.5 cm. The types of Keystone flaps included type Ⅰ in 2 cases, type Ⅱa in 16 cases, type Ⅱb in 1 case, type Ⅲ in 6 cases, and Moncrieff modified type in 2 cases. The area of flap ranged from 3.0 cm×1.5 cm to 20.0 cm×10.0 cm. The donor site was directly sutured (26 cases) or repaired with skin grafting (1 case).

Results

The operation time was 45-100 minutes, with an average of 67.5 minutes; the hospitalization stay was 3-12 days, with an average of 8.5 days. Postoperative incision dehiscence occurred in 1 case, and flap marginal necrosis occurred in 2 cases, all of which were completely healed after dressing change; 1 case of incision was swollen and congested with tension blisters, which resolved spontaneously at 7 days after operation. The other flaps and the skin grafting survived and healed successfully, the wounds of recipient and donor sites healed by first intention. The healing time was 2-3 weeks (mean, 2.2 weeks). No pain occurred in all patients. All 27 cases were followed up 3-26 months (mean, 11.5 months). No obvious scar contracture and bloated skin flap were found. The texture and color of the skin in the recipient area were similar to those of the surrounding tissues and feel existed.

Conclusion

The Keystone flap is a feasible and efficient way to repair soft tissue defect of lower extremity. Furthermore, the skin color and texture is similar to the surrounding tissue after healing.

A Novel Design of V-shaped Radial Forearm Free Flap Facilitates the Direct Closure of Donor Site Wound

ABSTRACT

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is one of the commonly used flaps in the repair of head and neck soft tissue defects, especially small and medium-sized defects. The free skin grafts from abdomen are usually used to repair the RFFF donor site wound. This study aims to design a novel V-shaped RFFF, hoping that it might facilitate the direct closure of the forearm donor site wound. From August to December in 2019, 20 patients with oral cancers received radical surgeries, and V-shaped RFFFs were designed to repair the soft defects and the forearm donor site wound was directly closed. The patients were followed up for 6 months to assess the final outcome of repair. The results showed that the pre-designed V-shaped RFFF met the needs of soft tissue defect repair, with the size ranging from 24 cm2 to 30 cm2. Fifteen patients with tongue cancers and four with buccal cancers had satisfactory repair results, and only one patient with buccal cancer had mild limitation of mouth opening. There were 3 patients with a small area of ischemia. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 13.85 ± 1.09 days. In 5 patients, wrist tilt motility decreased compared with that before surgery. The postoperative influence score of wrist exercise on daily life was 2.75 ± 0.44 points. In conclusion, the V-shaped RFFF can meet the needs of small and medium-sized defect repair. This novel design can directly close the forearm donor site wound, which avoids surgical trauma to secondary donor site, and significantly reduces related complications.

The use of ipsilateral skin grafts or local flaps for the closure of a free radial forearm flap donor site: a systematic review

Skin grafts from distant sites are typically used to close free radial forearm flap (FRFF) donor sites. However, a variety of closure methods have been reported that avoid a second donor site. These are divided into four groups: separately combined full-thickness skin graft (FTSG), FTSG method based on V-Y closure, perforator flap, and non-perforator flap. We aimed to assess the differences in outcomes, including adapted FRFF size and postoperative complications, among the four groups of closure methods used for FRFF defects. Applying the Preferred Reporting Items for the PRISMA protocol systematic reviews and meta-analysis, the PubMed and MEDLINE medical databases were searched from inception to September 2020 to identify articles about closure using an ipsilateral FTSG or local flap of the FRFF donor site. Study characteristics, FRFF size, complication rates were extracted for analysis. Twenty-four studies were included for analysis. The FTSG method based on V-Y closure was the most widely used and could be adapted to the largest and more variable FRFF sizes. The short-term complications rate was lowest for the FTSG method based on V-Y closure and the highest for the perforator flap method. The FTSG method based on V-Y closure was considered to be the most convenient and reliable. However, FRFF size should be restricted to ≤60 cm², and the non-perforator flap can be a good choice if FRFF is <35 cm².

Radial Flap in Reconstructions of the Hand - Case Series Study

Radial forearm flap is an axial flap that has become an important technique in reconstructive surgery as a free flap or as a pedicled flap. Defects of the skin and other tissues on the hand are very common and most often they are work-related injuries. In deep defects, flap must be used, as well as in reconstruction of the amputated thumb. There are many flaps that provide adequate soft tissue coverage for the hand. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to present the results of the use of radial forearm flap in various reconstructions on the hand. The retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent reconstruction with radial forearm flaps due to defects of the skin and other tissues on the hand, in the period 1997-2019. Results and complications of the surgery were analyzed. The functional and aesthetic outcome was assessed using Michigan Hand Outcome Qusteionnarire. All patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year. Fasciocutaneous flap was the most commonly used (65.71%), followed by adiposofascial (20%) and osteocutaneous (14.29%). The size of the fasciocutaneous flap ranged from 2.2x3.1cm to 9x13.5cm. The majority of donor sites were closed with split-thickness skin grafts (56.52%), and less frequently with direct suture, local skin flap, and full-thickness skin graft. There were no complete flap losses in the study. Marginal necrosis was noted in 8.57%, and graft failure at the donor site in 14.29%. Secondary surgical procedures were performed in 13 patients. The functional-aesthetic result of the operation, based on the MHQ score, ranged from 31 (1/35) to 130 points (3/35). The ultimate aim of hand reconstruction is to restore sufficient function and form, also, closing the wound within three days following the injury is desirable. Meticulous intraoperative dissection of radial flap and early physical therapy after surgery are mandatory. The radial flap is a suitable method, especially for large and more distal skin defects on the hand, and a very good method for thumb reconstruction.

Lower limb perforator flaps: Current concept

Following a long period dominated by random fasciocutaneous flaps or muscle flaps, solutions to cover the lower limb have been largely diversified by the advent of so-called "perforator" flaps. Extended knowledge of vascular anatomy has propagated the development of this innovative procedure, in the objective of reducing morbidity. The existence of close to 400 perforator vessels in the body makes it possible to offer new flap perspectives for many defects, which were sometimes previously impossible to manage before except by free flap. For us, perforator flaps have become the current first-line solutions for small to medium size loss of substances. Understanding of vascular physiology and surgical experience are essential in choosing indications, detecting perforators, and modeling flaps to be optimally positioned in the reconstructive decisional algorithm. New skills are needed to master this type of reconstruction and limit failures, which implies a learning curve not only for flap design, perforator detection and surgical procedure, but also for monitoring and management of complications. In this manuscript, we outline the concepts and principles of the majority of the pedicled perforator flaps available for coverage of the lower limb, based on experience of more than 400 perforator flaps suitable for this localization.