Patient reported outcomes in patients with head and neck cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiation with weekly versus bolus cisplatin

Association between radiation dose to organs at risk and acute patient reported outcome during radiation treatment for head and neck cancers

BACKGROUND

Associations between patient-reported outcomes and dose to organs at risk (OARs) may promote management and guide future investigations.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated PROs and OAR dose in head and neck (H&N) cancer.

RESULTS

In 169 patients, we identified weak associations between: "Difficulty swallowing/chewing" and increased mean RT dose to the oral cavity, larynx, pharyngeal constrictor muscles (PCM) and contralateral parotid; "choking/coughing" and larynx mean dose; "problems with mucus in mouth and throat" and oral cavity, contralateral parotid mean dose and parotid V30, contralateral submandibular gland and PCM mean dose; "difficulty with voice/speech" and oral cavity, contralateral parotid, contralateral submandibular gland and larynx mean dose; and "dry mouth" and ipsilateral submandibular gland, oral cavity and PCM mean dose.

CONCLUSION

We identified weak associations between PRO and dose to OARs-these data can guide on treatment management, patient counseling, and serve as a baseline for future investigations.

Three weekly versus weekly concurrent cisplatin: safety propensity score analysis on 166 head and neck cancer patients

Background

Radio-chemotherapy with CDDP is the standard for H&N squamous cell cancer. CDDP 100 mg/m²/q3 is the standard; alternative schedules are used to reduce toxicity, mostly 40 mg/m²/q1.

Methods

Patients were treated from 1/2010 to 1/2017 in two Radiation Oncology Centres. Propensity score analysis (PS) was retrospectively used to compare these two schedules.

Results

Patients analyzed were 166. Most (114/166) had 1w-CDDP while 52 had 3w-CDDP. In the 3w-CDDP group, patients were younger, with better performance status, smaller disease extent and a more common nodal involvement than in the 1w-CDDP. Acute toxicity was similar in the groups. Treatment compliance was lower in the w-CCDP. Overall survival before PS was better for female, for oropharyngeal disease and for 3w-CDDP group. After PS, survival was not related to the CDDP schedule.

Conclusions

3w-CDDP remains the standard for fit patients, weekly schedule could be safely used in selected patients.