Use of intraoperative neural monitoring for prognostication of recovery of vocal mobility and reduction of permanent vocal paralysis after thyroidectomy

Does the Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring during Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery Reduce the Incidence of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) can be a devastating complication of thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been proposed as a method to reduce the number of RLN injuries but the data are inconsistent. We performed a meta-analysis to critically assess the data. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 60 studies, including five randomized trials and eight non-randomized prospective trials, were included. A meta-analysis of all studies demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 0.66 (95% CI [0.56, 0.79], p < 0.00001) favoring IONM compared to the visual identification of the RLN in limiting permanent RLN injuries. A meta-analysis of studies employing contemporaneous controls and routine postoperative laryngoscopy to diagnose RLN injuries (considered to be the most reliable design) demonstrated an OR of 0.69 (95% CI [0.56, 0.84], p = 0.0003), favoring IONM. Strong consideration should be given to employing IONM when performing thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Intra-operative nerve monitoring and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery: a network meta-analysis of prospective studies

PURPOSE

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a feared complication of thyroid surgery occurring in 1-5% of cases. The present approaches to RLN preservation include RLN visualization with no nerve monitoring (No-NM), intermittent intra-operative nerve monitoring (I-IONM) and continuous intra-operative nerve monitoring (C-IONM). There is ambiguity as to which of these strategies should be the preferred method of RLN preservation.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Collaboration databases was undertaken with network meta-analysis (NMA) performed according to the PRISMA and Cochrane Collaboration guidelines. A Bayesian NMA was conducted using R packages netmeta with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Only prospective studies were included.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met inclusion criteria, including 22,080 patients and 40,642 nerves at risk (NAR). Overall, 23,364 NARs (57.5%) underwent I-IONM, 17,176 (42.3%) No-NM and 98 (0.2%) underwent C-IONM. There were no significant differences between groups regarding the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery (I-IONM vs.No-NM, OR 0.84, 95% CrI 0.55-1.19; C-IONM vs. No-NM, OR 0.44, 95% CrI 0.02-5.00). Pooled analysis showed that IONM (I-IONM or C-IONM) demonstrated a protective effect versus No-NM in reducing the incidence of transient RLN injury (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.59-0.97, p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

IONM strategies did not significantly reduce the incidence of permanent RLN injury following thyroid surgery. However, the small number of C-IONM NARs limits conclusions that may be drawn. Further well-designed prospective studies will be required to definitively assess the utility of C-IONM.

Thyroidectomy using a single-port cervico-mental angle approach

Background

Over the last two decades, several endoscopic thyroidectomy methods have been developed. However, there are some limitations in these procedures. To date, the optimal surgical approach for thyroid cancer has not yet been developed. This study reported the surgical operation steps, clinical outcomes, and experience of 30 patients who underwent trans-cervico-mental angle single-port endoscopic thyroidectomy (TCMASPET) at our centre.

Patients and Methods

A total of 30 patients were enrolled in the present study. Patients underwent unilateral or bilateral thyroidectomy through a cervico-mental angle incision of 2.48 ± 0.31 cm, after which the lymphoid adipose tissues in the central region were dissected.

Results

All surgeries were successfully completed. Two patients underwent bilateral thyroid carcinoma resection with bilateral central region lymph node dissection, 23 patients received unilateral thyroid cancer resection with unilateral central region lymph node dissection, four patients underwent unilateral thyroid resection, and one patient received bilateral thyroid resection with unilateral central region lymph node dissection. No permanent post-operative complications were observed.

Conclusions

TCMASPET was a safe and feasible approach that was relatively easy to perform. This approach may expand the indications for endoscopic thyroidectomy while maintaining excellent cosmetic outcomes.

Effects of Intraoperative Neural Tunnel in Protecting Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve: Experiences in Open, Trans Breast, and Transoral Endoscopic Thyroidectomy

Background

Energy-based devices (EBDs) increase the risks of thermal nerve injuries. This study aimed to introduce a surgical strategy of intraoperative neural tunnel protecting (INTP) for evaluating the effect in reducing the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) damage in open, trans breast, and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Methods

INTP strategy was introduced: a tunnel was established and protected by endoscopic gauze along the direction of the nerve. A total of 165, 94, and 200 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) were to use INTP in respectively open, trans breast, and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy as the INTP group. Additionally, 150, 95, and 225 patients who received the same methods without INTP were enrolled in the control group. Ipsilateral thyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy, and central compartment dissection were performed on the enrolled patients.

Results

Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical outcomes, and surgical complications were similar between the INTP group and the control group in open, trans breast, and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy. The incidences of electromyography (EMG) changes in the INTP group were lower as compared to the control group in trans breast endoscopic thyroidectomy (p < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative hoarse in the INTP group was lower as compared to the control group in open and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy (p < 0.05). Postoperative calcium levels (p < 0.01) were significantly higher, and the white blood cells (p < 0.05) and C-reactive protein levels (p < 0.01) were significantly decreased in the INTP group compared with the control group in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy.

Conclusions

This was the first instance of the INTP strategy being introduced and was found to be an effective method for protecting the RLN in open, trans breast, and transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy. Additionally, INTP helped protect other important tissues such as the parathyroid glands in transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy as well as in reducing postoperative inflammatory responses.

The value of intraoperative nerve monitoring against recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in thyroid reoperations

Reoperative thyroidectomy is challenging for surgeons because of the higher incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy. RLN identification is the gold standard during thyroidectomy; however, it is sometimes difficult to perform thyroid reoperations. In recent years, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) has gained increased acceptance, and the use of IONM can be a valuable adjunct to visual identification. The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of IONM during thyroid reoperation.A total of 109 patients who met our criteria at the Affiliated Hospital of Hangzhou Normal University from January 2010 to June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the IONM group and the visualization-alone group (VA group) according to whether neuromonitoring was used during the operation. The patients' characteristics, perioperative data, and intraoperative information including the RLN identification, time of RLNs confirmation, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and the rate of RLN injury were collected.Sixty-five procedures (94 RLNs at risk) were performed in the IONM group, whereas 44 (65 RLNs at risk) were in the VA group. The rate of RLN identification was 96.8% in the IONM group and 75.4% in the VA group (P < .05). The incidence of RLN injury was 5.3% in the IONM group and 13.8% in the VA group (P > .05). The incidence of surgeon-related RLN injury rate was 0% in the IONM group compared to 7.7% in the VA group (P < .05), but the tumor-related or scar-related RLN injury rate between the 2 groups were not significantly different (4.3% vs 3.1%, 1.1% vs 3.1%, P > .05).IONM in thyroid reoperation was helpful in improving the RLN identification rate and reducing the surgeon-related RLN injury rate, but was ineffective in reducing the tumor-related and scar-related RLN injury rate. In the future, multicenter prospective studies with large sample sizes may be needed to further assess the role of IONM in thyroid reoperations.