Assessment of different induction chemotherapy regimens in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Meta-analysis

Comparison of TPF and PF induction chemotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) is induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). However, the ideal ICT regimen for LA-NPC remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the survival outcomes, responses, and incidences of toxicities between taxane, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF) and cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF) ICT regimens plus CCRT in LA-NPC.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of TPF versus PF followed by CCRT with cisplatin every 3 weeks or weekly cisplatin and intensity-modulated radiotherapy in LA-NPC.

RESULTS

Three studies with 2482 patients met the inclusion criteria. ICT with the TPF regimen plus CCRT resulted in a significantly improved progression-free survival (hazard ratios [HR] 0.84 [95% CI 0.73-0.96], P = .01), overall survival (HR 0.83 [95% CI 0.71-0.97], P = .02), and 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival (risk ratios [RR] 1.03 [95% CI 1.01-1.06], P = .009) compared with the PF regimen plus CCRT in LA-NPC. However, distant metastasis-free survival was not statistically significant (P = .07). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (RR 2.08 [95% CI 1.84-2.36]) and diarrhea (RR 1.94 [95% CI 1.07-3.52]) during ICT was higher in the TPF group than in the PF group.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, the TPF plus CCRT with cisplatin is superior to PF plus CCRT with cisplatin in LA-NPC. Thus, the TPF plus CCRT regimen appears to be a reasonable treatment option, and further confirmation by prospective studies is needed.

Long-term outcomes of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

Background

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a prevalent form of head and neck cancer, particularly in specific regions with a higher incidence. The optimal treatment strategy for locally advanced NPC (stage III and IVA, LA-NPC) involves various combinations of induction chemotherapy (IC), concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), each with distinct advantages. This one institutional study aims to retrospectively analysis the efficacy and clinical outcomes of IC with CCRT (IC+CCRT), CCRT with AC (CCRT+AC), and the comprehensive approach of IC followed by CCRT and subsequently AC (IC+CCRT+AC) in the management of LA-NPC.

Materials and methods

A total of 352 LA-NPC patients were included: 173 accepted IC+CCRT, 60 received CCRT+AC, and 119 underwent IC+CCRT+AC. The primary endpoints including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

Results

The median follow-up was 61.2 months (1-216 months). There was no significant difference in 5-year OS and PFS between IC group and no IC group, extending the observation time to 90 months, the OS and PFS were significantly better in IC group than no IC group (OS: 76% vs. 70%,P<0.05; PFS: 76% vs. 71%, P<0.05). Patients with 1, 2, or 3 cycles of IC had higher 5-year OS and PFS than those with more than 3 cycles (1-4 cycles IC OS: 89% vs. 87% vs. 88% vs. 79%, P<0.05; 1-4 cycles IC PFS: 87% vs. 85% vs. 85% vs. 70%, P<0.05). NP regimen demonstrated higher OS and PFS than TP, PF, and TPF regimens (OS: 95% vs. 82% vs. 85% vs. 71%, P<0.05; PFS: 93% vs. 83% vs. 81% vs. 80%, P<0.05). The 5-year OS and PFS were significantly better in AC group than no AC group (OS: 82% vs. 72%, P<0.05; PFS: 81% vs. 69%, P<0.05). In the AC group, there was no differential effect of chemotherapy cycles and chemotherapy regimens on patients' OS and PFS. In the ThNh group, patients receiving IC+CCRT+AC had higher OS and PFS compared to those receiving IC+CCRT, with no significant difference in the rest (OS: 85% VS 66% P<0.05; PFS: 78% VS 62%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

CCRT combined with IC or AC could benefit LA-NPC patients. The IC+CCRT +AC regimen was most beneficial for NPC patients with later T and N stages.

Efficacy of induction chemotherapy in lymph node-positive stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma and identification of beneficiaries based on clinical features: A propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in lymph node-positive (LN-positive) stage III nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

In total, 627 patients with newly diagnosed LN-positive stage III NPC receiving CCRT or IC plus CCRT were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the intergroup covariates. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was employed to compare survival curves. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

After 1:1 PSM, 414 patients were identified (207 patients per group). Compared with CCRT, IC plus CCRT provided better survival (5-year PFS 88.4% vs. 78.6%, P = 0.01; overall survival [OS] 94.8% vs. 85.3%, P = 0.003; and distant metastasis-free survival [DMFS] 93.1% vs. 85.6%, P = 0.03). The IC beneficial effects on PFS were mainly present in patients with grade 2-3 ENE, elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH > 170U/L), and N2 disease. Patients with grade 2 CNN had comparable PFS benefits to those with grade 0-1 CNN. For patients with grade 0-1 ENE combined with LDH ≤ 170U/L, survival between the two groups was similar with 5-year PFS 93.6% vs. 90.4% (P = 0.50), OS 94.2% vs. 93.0% (P = 0.72), and DMFS 98.6% vs. 97.7% (P = 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Adding IC before CCRT improved survival in LN-positive stage III NPC patients. Additional IC did not provide better survival for patients with grade 0-1 ENE combined with LDH ≤ 170U/L and could be avoided in this population. CNN may not be a good risk factor for tailoring a personalized treatment plan.

Tumor volume reduction after induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus cisplatin in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the tumor volume reduction after induction chemotherapy (IC) with gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) and to build prediction models for tumor volume reduction in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS

NPC patients who received GP IC were retrospectively enrolled. The gross tumor volume of the nasopharynx and lymph nodes (GTVnx and GTVnd) were contoured before and after IC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify associated factors. Nomogram models were constructed to predict the possibility of tumor volume reduction.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients were enrolled. The mean relative volume reduction for GTVnx and GTVnd was 29.66% and 31.75%, respectively. The volume reduction of GTVnx and GTVnd had a weak association (r = 0.229, p < 0.001). For GTVnx volume reduction, pre-treatment neutrophil count (p = 0.043), lymphocyte count (p = 0.026), LDH level (p = 0.005), and BMI (p = 0.020) were independently associated factors. For GTVnd volume reduction, pre-treatment EBV-DNA (p = 0.029), GTVnd volume (p < 0.001), eosinophil count (p = 0.043), NLR (p = 0.039), LDH level (p = 0.026), and serum potassium level (p = 0.027) were independently associated factors. For the GTVnx nomogram model, areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) were 0.702 and 0.698 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. For the GTVnd nomogram model, the AUC was 0.872 and 0.758 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor volumes reduce significantly after GP induction chemotherapy. Nomogram models for predicting the possibility of tumor volume reduction are built.

Induction chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage IV non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: 11-Year Experience in a tertiary centre

INTRODUCTION

T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with close proximity to critical organs at risk (OARs) is usually underdosed during radiotherapy in order to respect radiation constraints. N3 disease has high risk of distant metastasis. Induction chemotherapy (IC) provides advantages of sparing of OARs during subsequent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) and early eradication of micrometastasis. However, factors predicting successes of IC in this patient group are not well-studied.

METHODS

104 T4 or N3 NPC patients were retrospectively reviewed during 2007-2018. They were planned for IC followed by CCRT using intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

RESULTS

In the whole group, five-year failure-free survival (FFS), locoregional failure-free survival (LRFS), distant failure-free survival (DFFS) and overall survival (OS) were 40.9%, 45.7%, 46.9% and 53.6% respectively. Isolated marginal failure rate was 5% (4/80) among patients with primary tumours located close to critical OARs. Pre-IC gross tumour volume primary (GTVp) total volume > 110 cm³ correlated with worse five-year LRFS (OR 6.37, P = 0.008), DFFS (OR 8.89, P = 0.003) and OS (OR 50.12, P < 0.001). In the T4 subgroup, IC improved D100% GTVp from 61.39 Gy to 64.71 Gy (P < 0.001) and V100% GTVp from 98.78% to 99.28% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated improved dosimetric parameters and low isolated marginal failure rate. It supported the use of IC and CCRT for tumours located close to critical OARs. Further research is warranted to compare predictive roles of pre- and post-IC tumour volumes. For high-risk patients being defined by pre-IC volume or other prognostic models, treatment escalation should be considered.