Treatment outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and transoral robotic surgery in locoregionally advanced laryngopharyngeal carcinoma

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and transoral robotic surgery in locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE

To analyze the oncological outcomes and patterns of recurrence of patients with locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) who underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) with subsequent transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study was performed, including 198 patients (mean age: 58.6, SD: 9.2). The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 26.5 months (IQR: 16.0-52.0). Estimated DFS rates (95 % CI) at 1 and 3 years were 86.6 % (81.9-91.7), and 81.4 % (75.7-87.6), respectively. Estimated DSS rates (95 % CI) at 1 and 3 years were 96.7 % (94.1-99.3), and 92.6 % (88.4-97.0), respectively. Estimated OS rates (95 % CI) at 1 and 3 years were 96.2 % (93.4-99.0), and 88.7 % (83.4-94.2), respectively. A total of 31 (15.6 %) patients showed a disease relapse after a median time of 8 months (IQR: 4.0-12.0), but only 12 (6 %) patients died of the disease during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that NCT and TORS can obtain excellent tumor control and survival in locoregionally advanced OPSCC. NCT might reduce the need for adjuvant treatments, and randomized clinical trials should be conducted to better define this aspect.

Prognostic role of surgical margins in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy

PURPOSE

To define if positive and close surgical margins are associated to worse prognosis in patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery (TORS) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was carried out at a tertiary referral center. The primary outcome was local-regional control (LRC), and the results were summarized with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients (median age: 62.0, IQR: 55.0-68.2) were included. Univariable analysis showed a significant reduced LRC for patients with positive margins (HR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.02-3.24). However, they were not associated with worse LRC after adjusting for adverse tumor variables (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.40-1.65). ROC analysis was performed on 123 patients with negative margins (AUC: 0.54) measuring an optimal threshold of 1.25 mm (sensitivity = 60.0%; specificity = 50.5%). Univariable analysis showed non-significant differences between close and wide negative margins (HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 0.59-3.54).

CONCLUSIONS

A positive surgical margin is not an independent predictor of tumor control and survival. A threshold of 1.25 mm was identified as the most appropriate to define close margins, but no difference was measured after distinguishing negative margins in close and wide margins.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with transoral robotic surgery for stage III and IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the oncological and functional outcomes of patients with stage III-IV laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with subsequent transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective cohort study included a total of 100 patients (median age of 67.0) affected by stage III-IV supraglottic or hypopharyngeal cancer. All patients underwent NAC followed by TORS and risk-adjusted adjuvant therapy. The primary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 24.0 months. Estimated 2-year (95% CI) OS, DSS, and RFS were 75% (66% - 85%), 84% (76% - 92%), and 65% (56% - 76%), respectively. Among the 11 patients who relapsed on the primary site, 3 underwent salvage total laryngectomy, 3 underwent salvage CRT, and the others receive palliation or supportive care. At 6 months from surgery, 17 patients were still tracheostomized or had a stoma retainer, while 15 were gastrostomy dependent. At the Cox multivariable analysis, the clinical stage at presentation, the number of NAC cycles, and the presence of LVI were found to be independently correlated with the RFS.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that NAC followed by TORS can obtain good tumor control, survival, and organ preservation rates in stage III-IV laryngo-hypopharyngeal cancer.