Double trouble: Synchronous and metachronous primaries confound ctHPVDNA monitoring

Addressing positive multi-cancer early detection tests in head and neck Surgery: Experience with head and neck work up for high-risk referrals

OBJECTIVES

Blood-based multi-cancer early detection (MCED) tests are now commercially available. However, there are currently no consensus guidelines available for head and neck cancer (HNC) providers to direct work up or surveillance for patients with a positive MCED test. We seek to describe cases of patients with positive MCED tests suggesting HNC and provide insights for their evaluation.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of patients referred to Otolaryngology with an MCED result suggesting HNC. Patients enrolled in prospective MCED clinical trials were excluded. Cancer diagnoses were confirmed via frozen-section pathology.

RESULTS

Five patients were included (mean age: 69.2 years, range 50-87; 4 male) with MCED-identified-high-risk for HNC or lymphoma. Only patient was symptomatic. After physical exam and follow-up head and neck imaging, circulating tumor HPV DNA testing, two patients were diagnosed with p16 + oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas and underwent appropriate therapy. A third patient had no evidence of head and neck cancer but was diagnosed with sarcoma of the thigh. The remaining two patients had no evidence of malignancy after in-depth workup.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, 2 of 5 patients referred to Otolaryngology with a positive MCED result were diagnosed with HPV + oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. We recommend that positive HNC MCED work up include thorough head and neck examination with flexible laryngoscopy and focused CT or MRI imaging. Given the potential for inaccurate MCED tissue of origin classification, PET/CT may be useful in specific situations. For a patient with no cancer identified, development of clear guidelines is warranted.

Comparing the Diagnostic Performance of Quantitative PCR, Digital Droplet PCR, and Next-Generation Sequencing Liquid Biopsies for Human Papillomavirus-Associated Cancers

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cancers, including oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV + OPSCC), cervical cancer, and squamous cell carcinoma of the anus (HPV + SCCA), release circulating tumor HPV DNA (ctHPVDNA) into the blood. The diagnostic performance of ctHPVDNA detection depends on the approaches used and the individual assay metrics. A comparison of these approaches has not been systematically performed to inform expected performance, which in turn affects clinical interpretation. A meta-analysis was performed using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science Core Collection databases to assess the diagnostic accuracy of ctHPVDNA detection across cancer anatomic sites, detection platforms, and blood components. The population included patients with HPV + OPSCC, HPV-associated cervical cancer, and HPV + SCCA with pretreatment samples analyzed by quantitative PCR (qPCR), digital droplet PCR (ddPCR), or next-generation sequencing (NGS). Thirty-six studies involving 2986 patients met the inclusion criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, and quality of each study were assessed and pooled for each analysis. The sensitivity of ctHPVDNA detection was greatest with NGS, followed by ddPCR and then qPCR when pooling all studies, whereas specificity was similar (sensitivity: ddPCR > qPCR, P < 0.001; NGS > ddPCR, P = 0.014). ctHPVDNA from OPSCC was more easily detected compared with cervical cancer and SCCA, overall (P = 0.044). In conclusion, detection platform, anatomic site of the cancer, and blood component used affects ctHPVDNA detection and must be considered when interpreting results. Plasma NGS-based testing may be the most sensitive approach for ctHPVDNA overall.