Carcinoma of the tonsil

Primary surgery versus chemoradiotherapy for advanced oropharyngeal cancers: a longitudinal population study

Background

Treatment for advanced stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) includes combined chemoradiation therapy or surgery followed by radiation therapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy. The goal of this study was to utilize available evidence to examine survival outcome differences in patients with advanced stage OPSCC treated with these different modalities.

Methods

Patients with advanced stage OPSCC were identified. Primary outcome measurements were disease specific and overall survival rates with differences examined via Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analysis.

Results

344 patients were enrolled. 94 patients underwent triple modality therapy inclusive of surgery followed by adjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (S-CRT). 131 had surgery and radiation therapy (S-RT), while 56 had chemoradiation (CRT) therapy as their primary treatment. A total of 63 patients had single modality radiation therapy and were excluded from analysis due to the large number of palliative patients.

Kaplan-Meier overall survival analysis showed that therapy with S-CRT had the highest disease specific survival at five years (71.1%). This is contrasted against S-RT and CRT, with five year survival rates at 53.9%, and 48.6%, respectively.

Cox regression showed that the comparison of S-CRT vs. S-RT, and CRT is associated with statistically significant increased hazard ratios of 1.974, and 2.785, indicating that both S-RT and CRT are associated with a reduced likelihood of survival at 5 years when compared to S-CRT.

Conclusions

In this population based cohort study S-CRT is associated with a 17–22% 5 year disease specific survival benefit compared to CRT or S-RT.

Radiation therapy for early-stage carcinoma of the oropharynx

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of radiation therapy treatment of patients with Stage I and II squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx and discover adverse prognostic factors that may help select a subgroup of patients for a different management approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A search of the database maintained by the Department of Radiation Oncology of The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center for patients with Stage I or II SCC of the oropharynx was performed. This search identified 175 patients treated between 1970 and 1998 who met the inclusion criteria for this retrospective study. Distribution of primary sites was: tonsillar fossa/pillar, 60 patients; soft palate, 55 patients; base of tongue, 40 patients; and pharyngeal wall, 20 patients. Twenty-five patients were stage T1, 124 were T2, and 26 were Tx. All patients were treated with fractionated radiation to a median dose of 66 Gy. Eighty-five patients were treated with conventionally fractionated radiation, 73 were treated with the concomitant boost fractionation schedule, and the remaining 17 were treated with other altered fractionation schedules or with intraoral or interstitial boosts.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for all patients was 76 months (range, 2-302 months). The actuarial 5-year local control (LC), regional control, locoregional control (LRC), and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85%, 93%, 81%, and 77%, respectively. Only 7 patients (5%) with LC developed nodal metastases, and 10 patients (7%) with LRC developed distant metastases. Eleven patients (32%) with locoregional recurrence were rendered without evidence of disease after a surgical salvage procedure, resulting in a 5- year ultimate LRC rate of 87%. T-stage classification was statistically significant (p = 0.03) in univariate analysis for actuarial 5-year LRC, 88% for Stage I vs. 72% for Stage II. The 5- and 10-year disease-specific survival rates were 85% and 79%, respectively, while the actuarial 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 70% and 43%, respectively. Fifty-one patients (29%) developed second primary tumors, 86% of which were cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract (UADT). Heavy alcohol consumption was associated with both an increased risk of disease recurrence and development of a second cancer of the UADT.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early-stage oropharynx cancer have high rates of disease control when treated with radiation. Lymphatic and hematogenous metastases are uncommon. Surgical salvage of disease recurrence is successful in approximately one-third of patients. As the majority of recurrences occur within the first 2 years from treatment, close observation during this time period is important. The development of second primary tumors of the UADT adversely impacts survival in these patients to as great a degree as the index cancer.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: surgery, radiation therapy, or both

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the oropharynx remains controversial. No randomized trial has addressed adequately the question of whether surgery (S), radiation therapy (RT), or combined treatment is most effective.

METHODS

Treatment results from North American academic institutions that used S with or without adjuvant RT (S +/- RT) or used RT alone or followed by neck dissection (RT +/- ND) for patients with SCC of the tonsillar region or the base of tongue were compiled through a MEDLINE search (from 1970 to August, 2000) and from the references cited in each report. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they contained direct, actuarial (life-table), or Kaplan-Meier calculations for the following end points: local control, local-regional control, 5-year absolute survival, 5-year cause specific survival, or severe or fatal treatment complications. Weighted average results, which took into account series size, were calculated for each end point for the purposes of treatment comparison. Results and conclusions were based on data from 51 reported series, representing the treatment of approximately 6400 patients from the United States and Canada.

RESULTS

The results for patients with SCC of the base of tongue who underwent S +/- RT versus RT +/- ND, respectively, were as follows: local control, 79% versus 76% (P = 0.087); local-regional control, 60% versus 69% (P = 0.009); 5-year survival, 49% versus 52% (P = 0.2); 5-year cause specific survival, 62% versus 63% (P = 0.4); severe complications, 32% versus 3.8% (P < 0.001); and fatal complications, 3.5% versus 0.4% (P < 0.001). The results for patients with SCC in the tonsillar region who underwent S +/- RT versus RT +/- ND, respectively, were as follows: local control, 70% versus 68% (P = 0.2); local-regional control, 65% versus 69% (P = 0.1); 5-year survival, 47% versus 43% (P = 0.2); 5-year cause specific survival, 57% versus 59% (P = 0.3); severe complications, 23% versus 6% (P < 0.001); and fatal complications, 3.2% versus 0.8% (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The information in this article provides a useful benchmark for evidence-based counseling of patients with SCC of the oropharynx. The rates of local control, local-regional control, 5-year survival, and 5-year cause specific survival were similar for patients who underwent S +/- RT or RT +/- ND, whereas the rates of severe or fatal complications were significantly greater for the S +/- RT group. Furthermore, available data on the functional consequences of treatment suggest the superiority of RT +/- ND. The authors conclude that RT +/- ND is preferable for the majority of patients with SCC of the oropharynx.