Posttransplantation chronic hepatitis in fulminant hepatic failure

Role of Autoimmunity in Patients Transplanted for Acute Liver Failure of Unknown Origin: A Clinical and Graft Biopsy Analysis

The etiology and prognosis of acute liver failure (ALF) remains unknown in a significant proportion of cases. Signs of autoimmunity may be present, but no consistent pattern has been observed. We aimed to analyze if pretransplant immunological findings, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes, and clinical features among patients with an unknown etiology differ from those of autoimmune or other known etiologies. We also analyzed whether such signs impact posttransplant biopsy findings or complications. All adult ALF patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) in Finland during 1987-2015 were followed to 2016. Data were collected from the LT registry, pathology database, and patient records. A total of 124 patients were included in the analysis. Study subgroups were acute autoimmune hepatitis (AIH; n = 25), known non-AIH etiology (n = 54), and unknown etiology (n = 45). The unknown etiology group differed from the known non-AIH group with regard to the following pretransplant autoimmunity-associated features: positive perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (36% versus 8%; P = 0.02) and higher mean immunoglobulin A (IgA; 3.2 ± 1.7 versus 2.1 ± 1.4, P = 0.006) and immunoglobulin G (IgG; 12.7 ± 4.3 versus 8.5 ± 3.6, P = 0.001). AIH-associated HLA haplotypes B8, DR3, and B8DR3 were more common in the AIH group (40%, 44%, and 36%, respectively) and in the unknown group (29%, 33%, and 29%, respectively) than in the known non-AIH group (11%, 17%, and 11%, respectively) or in the Finnish general population (17%, 18%, and 8%, respectively). However, these findings had no association with protocol biopsies, extrahepatic autoimmune diseases, or survival. Patients with ≥ 1 rejection episode had higher pretransplant IgA (3.7 ± 2.3 versus 2.6 ± 1.2; P = 0.02) and IgG (16.4 ± 10.2 versus 12.4 ± 6.8; P = 0.03) than those without rejections. Autoimmunity-associated pretransplant laboratory findings and HLA haplotypes were common in ALF of unknown etiology, but they showed minimal predictive value for posttransplant biopsy findings, clinical complications, or survival.

Long-term outcome in patients with acute liver failure

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Acute liver failure patients who meet poor prognostic criteria have high early mortality without emergency liver transplantation. A recent study however, reported that patients that survive spontaneously have a poorer outcome compared with patients undergoing transplantation. In this single centre study, we aimed to confirm or refute this observation.

METHODS

Early survivors (acute liver failure patients who survived 90 days after the ICU admission) were assessed for long-term outcomes in four distinctive cohorts, incorporating aetiology (Acetaminophen overdose or non-Acetaminophen overdose), and management strategy (conservative or liver transplantation). Chi Squared or Fisher test were used to compare outcomes among the four cohorts (P < 0.05) and Kaplan-Meier curve (Log Rank test) to represent cumulative survival.

RESULTS

Two hundred consecutive acute liver failure patients between 1990 and 2014 were included; mean age 38.3, ±12.8, male 70, 35%. 124/200 (62%) early survivors were identified; 13/124 (10.5%) acetaminophen patients underwent transplantation and 48/124 (38.7%) survived spontaneously; 36/124 (29.0%) non-acetaminophen underwent transplantation and 27/124 (21.8%) survived spontaneously. A total of 11/124 (8.9%) died subsequently (median survival 5.3± IQR 9.1), three spontaneous survivors and eight transplanted patients (P = 0.025); of the eight transplanted patients, six died of transplant related complications and two of suicide.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that although liver transplantation is a life-saving procedure for acute liver failure patients, they have a worse long-term outcome compared with spontaneous survivors. Novel therapies to increase the percentage of spontaneous survivors are urgently needed.

C5aR, TNF-α, and FGL2 contribute to coagulation and complement activation in virus-induced fulminant hepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Viral fulminant hepatitis (FH) is a disease with a high mortality rate. Activation of the complement system correlates with the development of FH. However, the key factors mediating complement activation in FH remain elusive.

METHODS

Liver tissues were isolated from FH patients infected by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and from mice infected with murine hepatitis virus strain 3 (MHV-3). Wild type mice were treated with or without antagonists of C5aR or TNF-α, and mice deficient for C5aR (C5aR(-/-)), Fgl2 (Fgl2(-/-)), and Tnfα (Tnfα(-/-)) mice were not treated with the antagonists. C5b-9, C5aR, FGL2, CD31, CD11b, fibrin, TNF-α, and complement C3 cleavage products were detected by immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, or ELISA. Sorted liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) or myeloid-derived (CD11b(+)) cells were stimulated with C5a, TNF-α or MHV-3 in vitro. The mRNA expressions levels of Fgl2 and Tnfα were determined by qRT-PCR analyses.

RESULTS

We observed that complement activation, coagulation and pro-inflammatory cytokine production were upregulated in the HBV(+) patients with FH. Similar observations were made in the murine FH models. Complement activation and coagulation were significantly reduced in MHV-3 infected mice in the absence of C5aR, Tnfα or Fgl2. The MHV-3 infected C5aR(-/-) mice exhibited reduced numbers of infiltrated inflammatory CD11b(+) cells and a reduced expression of TNF-α and FGL2. Moreover, C5a administration stimulated TNF-α production by CD11b(+) cells, which in turn promoted the expression of FGL2 in CD31(+) LSEC-like cells in vitro. Administration of antagonists against C5aR or TNF-α ameliorated MHV-3-induced FH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate that C5aR, TNF-α, and FGL2 form an integral network that contributes to coagulation and complement activation, and suggest that those are potential therapeutic targets in viral FH intervention.

Two-year outcomes in initial survivors with acute liver failure: results from a prospective, multicentre study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The long-term clinical outcomes in initial survivors with acute liver failure (ALF) are not well known. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the 2-year clinical outcomes among initial survivors and liver transplant (LT) recipients that were alive 3 weeks after enrolment in the Acute Liver Failure Study Group (ALFSG).

METHODS

Outcomes in adult ALFSG patients that were enrolled between 1998 and 2010 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Two-year patient survival was significantly higher in the 262 LT recipients (92.4%) compared to the 306 acetaminophen (APAP) spontaneous survivors (SS) (89.5%) and 200 non-APAP SS (75.5%) (P < 0.0001). The causes of death were similar in the three groups but the time to death was significantly longer in the LT recipients (P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of 2-year mortality in the APAP group were a high serum phosphate level and patient age (c-statistic = 0.65 (0.54, 0.76)), patient age and days from jaundice to ALF onset in the non-APAP group (c-statistic = 0.69 (0.60, 0.78)), and patient age, days from jaundice, and higher coma grade in the LT recipients (c-statistic = 0.74 (0.61, 0.87)). The LT recipients were significantly more likely to be employed and have a higher educational level (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Two-year outcomes in initial survivors of ALF are generally good but non-APAP patients have a significantly lower survival which may relate to pre-existing medical comorbidities. Spontaneous survivors with APAP overdose experience substantial morbidity during follow-up from ongoing psychiatric and substance abuse issues.

What is the long-term outcome of the liver allograft?

With improved long-term survival following liver transplantation (LT), issues relating to the assessment of the liver allograft in long-term survivors are becoming increasingly relevant. Histological abnormalities are commonly present in late post-transplant biopsies, including protocol biopsies from patients who appear to be well with good graft function. Recurrent disease is the commonest recognised cause of abnormal graft histology, but may be modified by the effects of immunosuppression or interactions with other graft complications, resulting in complex or atypical changes. Other abnormalities seen in late post-transplant biopsies include rejection (which often has different appearances to those seen in the post-transplant period), de novo disease, "idiopathic" post-transplant hepatitis (IPTH) and nodular regenerative hyperplasia. In many cases graft dysfunction has more than one cause and liver biopsy may help to identify the predominant cause of graft damage. Problems exist with the terminology used to describe less well understood patterns of graft injury, but there is emerging evidence to suggest that late rejection, de novo autoimmune hepatitis and IPTH may all be part of an overlapping spectrum of immune-mediated injury occurring in the late post-transplant liver allograft. Careful clinico-pathological correlation is very important and the wording of the biopsy report should take into account therapeutic implications, particularly whether changes in immunosuppression may be indicated. This article will provide an overview of the main histological changes occurring in long-term survivors post-LT, focusing on areas where the assessment of late post-transplant biopsies is most relevant clinically.

Late protocol liver biopsies in the liver allograft: a neglected investigation?

As outcomes from liver transplantation have improved, attention has focused on long-term outcomes: patient and graft survival is affected by many factors, including the consequences of both overimmunosuppression (eg, renal failure and cancer) and underimmunosuppression (eg, rejection). The use of protocol (rather than event-driven) biopsies of the liver allograft, except for those grafted for HCV infection, has been largely abandoned. The aim of this study was to determine if protocol biopsies can improve the management of liver allograft recipients. A retrospective analysis of liver allograft recipients who had undergone protocol liver biopsies between 2000 and 2006 was performed. One hundred seventy-eight patients with normal liver tests (alcoholic liver disease, 49; autoimmune hepatitis, 20; and primary biliary cirrhosis, 107) who had undergone 235 protocol biopsies were identified. No significant complication from the biopsy was recorded. Liver histology was reported as normal or nearly normal in only 57 (24%). Chronic hepatitis (not obviously related to disease recurrence) was present in 78 (33%). Interpreted in the light of the calculated creatinine clearance, the biopsy findings indicated that overall immunosuppression (IMS) should be maintained or increased with standard calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-based IMS in 25% of cases, that overall IMS should be reduced in 15% of cases, and that overall IMS should be maintained or increased by the substitution of non-nephrotoxic agents for CNIs in 9% of cases. The histological findings led to a documented change in IMS in 76 (32%) (increased IMS, 11; decreased IMS, 58; and switch from CNI, 7). In conclusion, protocol liver biopsy provides important histological information about graft function that is not available from standard liver tests and safely allows modification of IMS to ensure that long-term side effects of drug therapy (eg, renal failure) are minimized while graft function is sustained. Liver Transpl 15:931-938, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Chronic liver allograft dysfunction

Approximately 90% of liver transplant patients are alive after 1 year and 75% after 5 years with the majority leading full and near-normal lives. However, although early mortality rates after transplantation have fallen dramatically over the last 2 decades, the rates of late graft loss and patient death have remained constant. Thus, understanding of the causes of graft and patient failure is essential to improve long-term outcomes. In the early days after liver transplantation, ischemia and reperfusion injuries predominate, with acute cellular rejection relatively common in first 3 months. Thereafter, the causes of graft dysfunction are variable with disease recurrence as a major cause of graft loss. In this review, we discuss causes of graft dysfunction after 6 months.

Autoimmune liver diseases and recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation: what have we learned so far?

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) may all recur after liver transplant. Diagnosis of rPBC is defined by histology; rAIH by serology, biochemistry and histology; rPSC by histology and/or imaging of the biliary tree and exclusion of other causes of nonanastomotic biliary strictures. Criteria for recurrent disease (RD) may differ from those used in similar disease in the native liver: frequent use of immunosuppressive therapy changes the pattern and natural history of RD and can co-exist with other transplant-related causes of graft damage. RD may occur in the presence of normal liver tests; the reported incidence will depend on the way in which diagnostic tests (especially protocol biopsies) are applied. The risk of RD increases with time, but does not correlate with the rate of graft loss. Treatment is largely unproven: ursodeoxycholic acid will improve serology and may slow progression of rPSC and rPBC; introduction or increased dose of corticosteroids may reduce progression of rAIH. Risk factors for rPBC include use of tacrolimus compared with cyclosporine; for rPSC include absence of colon peri-transplantation and for rAIH possible associations with some HLA haplotypes have been suggested.

Acute liver failure: Summary of a workshop

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a rare but challenging clinical syndrome with multiple causes; a specific etiology cannot be identified in 15% of adult and 50% of pediatric cases. The course of ALF is variable and the mortality rate is high. Liver transplantation is the only therapy of proven benefit, but the rapidity of progression and the variable course of ALF limit its use. Currently in the United States, spontaneous survival occurs in approximately 45%, liver transplantation in 25%, and death without transplantation in 30% of adults with ALF. Higher rates of spontaneous recovery (56%) and transplantation (31%) with lower rates of death (13%) occur in children. The outcome of ALF varies by etiology, favorable prognoses being found with acetaminophen overdose, hepatitis A, and ischemia (approximately 60% spontaneous survival), and poor prognoses with drug-induced ALF, hepatitis B, and indeterminate cases (approximately 25% spontaneous survival). Excellent intensive care is critical in management of patients with ALF. Nonspecific therapies are of unproven benefit. Future possible therapeutic approaches include N-acetylcysteine, hypothermia, liver assist devices, and hepatocyte transplantation. Advances in stem cell research may allow provision of cells for bioartificial liver support. ALF presents many challenging opportunities in both clinical and basic research.

Cirrhosis after orthotopic liver transplantation in the absence of primary disease recurrence

Liver allograft cirrhosis is a relatively uncommon complication of liver transplantation. Most cases can be attributed to disease recurrence, particularly recurrent hepatitis C. Little is known about the frequency, etiology, and natural history of liver allograft cirrhosis occurring without evidence of recurrent disease. The aim of the present study was to review the clinicopathological features in this group of patients. We retrospectively reviewed data from all adult patients who were transplanted between 1982 and 2002 and survived >12 months after orthotopic liver transplantation (n = 1,287). Cases of histologically proven cirrhosis were identified from histopathological data entered into the Liver Unit Database. A total of 48 patients (3.7%) developed cirrhosis. In 29 of them, cirrhosis could be attributed to recurrent disease (hepatitis C, 11; hepatitis B, 4; autoimmune hepatitis, 4; primary biliary cirrhosis, 2; primary sclerosing cholangitis, 3; nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, 4; alcoholic liver disease, 1). In 9 of the 19 patients without evidence of disease recurrence, another cause of cirrhosis could be identified (de novo autoimmune hepatitis, 4; biliary complications, 4; acquired hepatitis B, 1). In the remaining 10 cases, the cause of cirrhosis remained unknown; their previous biopsies had shown features of chronic hepatitis of uncertain etiology. Three patients in this group died, and the remaining 7 are alive with good graft function 3-12 years after cirrhosis was first diagnosed. The prevalence of "cryptogenic" posttransplant cirrhosis was significantly higher in patients initially transplanted for fulminant seronegative hepatitis (6%) than in those transplanted for other diseases (0.3%). In conclusion, posttransplant cirrhosis without disease recurrence is uncommon, but it is more frequent in patients transplanted for fulminant seronegative hepatitis. Chronic hepatitis is the most frequent underlying pathological process in cases where the cause of cirrhosis remains uncertain.

Natural history of unexplained chronic hepatitis after liver transplantation

Unexplained chronic hepatitis (CH) in the adult liver allograft recipient is not uncommon, but its natural history and clinical significance is unknown. A retrospective study was undertaken of adult liver allograft recipients to determine the frequency and natural history of unexplained CH. We evaluated only those patients who had undergone >or=2 liver biopsies after 6 months and were grafted for indications where recurrent disease could be confidently excluded (alcoholic liver disease [ALD] in those who remained abstinent and fulminant hepatic failure [FHF] from drug reactions). Of 288 patients who were transplanted for ALD or FHF, 30 fulfilled the above criteria. CH was first diagnosed at a median of 15.25 months after transplantation. A total of 24 patients showed mild necroinflammatory changes, and 12 had mild or moderate fibrosis. Liver tests did not reflect the presence or degree of inflammation or fibrosis. After a median of 4 years, necroinflammatory scores were increased in 5; new or progressive fibrosis was noted in 13%; 3 had developed cirrhosis; and 5 developed clinical evidence of portal hypertension. Progressive fibrosis was associated with a high titer of anti-nuclear antibodies (>1:1600) and a portal tract plasma cell infiltrate. There was a trend for correlation between necroinflammatory activity and fibrosis stage, but this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.06). Serum alkaline phosphatase (P = 0.012) and female gender of the donor (P = 0.033) were associated with progressive fibrosis. Unexplained CH is not uncommon in the liver allograft and may progress to established cirrhosis in a subgroup of patients transplanted for ALD or FHF. Standard liver tests do not reflect the extent of these changes, so protocol liver biopsies may be required to detect these changes. We recommend careful history and follow-up in these patients.

Progressive histological damage in liver allografts following pediatric liver transplantation

The long-term histological outcome after pediatric liver transplantation (OLT) is not yet fully understood. De novo autoimmune hepatitis, consisting of histological chronic hepatitis associated with autoantibody formation and allograft dysfunction, is increasingly recognized as an important complication of liver transplantation, particularly in the pediatric population. In this study, 158 asymptomatic children with 5-year graft survival underwent protocol liver biopsies (113, 135, and 64 at 1, 5, and 10 years after OLT, respectively). Histological changes we re correlated with dinical,biochemical, and serological findings. All patients received cydosporine A as primary immunosuppression with withdrawal of corticosteroids at 3 months post OLT. Normal or near-normal histology was reported in 77 of 113 (68%), 61 of 135 (45%), and 20 of 64 (31%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively. The commonest histological abnormality was chronic hepatitis (CH), the incidence of which increased with time [25/113 (22%), 58/135 (43%), and 41/64 (64%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The incidence of fibrosis associatedwith CH increasedwith time [13/25 (52%), 47/58 (81%), and 37/41 (91%) at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001)]. The severity of fibrosis associated with CH also increased with time, such that by 10 years 15% had progressed to cirrhosis. Aspartate aminotransfemse (AST) levels were slightly elevated in children with CH (median levels 52 IU/L, 63 IU/L, and 48 IU/L at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively), but this did not reach statistical significance compared with those with normal histology. On multivariate analysis, the only factor predictive of chronic hepatitis was autoantibody positivity (present in 13% and 10% of children with normal biopsies at 5 and 10 years, respectively, and 72% and 80% of those with CH at 5 and 10 years, respectively) (P < .0001). Four children with CH and autoantibodies, who also had raised immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels and AST greater than 1.5 x normal fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for de novo autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Another two were found to be hepatitis C positive. No definite cause for CH could be identified in the other cases. In condusion, chronic hepatitis is a common finding in children after liver transplantation and is associated with a high risk of developing progressive fibrosis, leading to cirrhosis. Standard liver biochemical tests cannot be relied on either in the diagnosis or in the monitoring of progress of chronic allograft hepatitis. In contrast, the presence ofautoantibodies is strongly associated with the presence of CH. The cause of chronic hepatitis in transplanted allografts is uncertain but may be immune mediated, representing a hepatitic form of chronic rejection.

Chronic allograft dysfunction: diagnosis and management. Is it always progressive?

1. There are many causes of graft dysfunction post-liver transplant, but recurrent disease remains the most common cause. 2. Viral hepatitis, nonalcoholic and alcoholic steatohepatitis, and autoimmune diseases are the most common causes of recurrent disease. 3. Graft hepatitis occurs frequently and in many cases will not progress. 4. Cirrhosis in the absence of any identifiable cause develops in a minority. 5. Treatment is of the underlying cause but some, such as recurrent and de novo autoimmune hepatitis and recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis may not respond well, and regraft may be required.

Outcomes following liver transplantation for seronegative acute liver failure: experience during a 12-year period with more than 100 patients

Seronegative hepatitis is a common cause of acute liver failure (ALF) requiring liver transplantation. The primary aim of this study was to examine outcomes following transplantation in this group and to identify factors associated with early (<2 months) mortality. Patients studied were 110 consecutive cases of seronegative ALF transplanted at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, between January 1992 and January 2004. Univariate analysis of 44 pretransplantation recipient, donor, and operative variables was performed initially to identify factors associated with early posttransplantation mortality. Variables identified as significant or approaching significance were analyzed using stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis. Survival following transplantation for seronegative hepatitis was 83%, 81%, and 73% at 2, 12, and 60 months, respectively. The majority (71%) of deaths occurred within the 1st 2 months and sepsis / multiorgan dysfunction was the most common cause of early death. Univariate analysis revealed 9 variables predicting early death. Subsequent multivariate analysis identified high donor body mass index (BMI; a possible surrogate marker for hepatic steatosis) as the most important predictor of early death (P = .009; odds ratio, 1.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.3). Recipient age >50 (P = .015; odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-14.1) and non-Caucasian recipient ethnicity (P = .015; odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-19.2) were other variables associated with early death on multivariate analysis. This study specifically examined factors that determine the early outcome of transplanted seronegative ALF patients. In conclusion, we found that donor and recipient factors identify patients who have a high chance of early death after transplantation.

Live donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure in children

The mortality rate among children with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) on the waiting list for cadaveric donor liver transplantation (CDLT) is high. Results of emergency CDLT in this situation often are unsatisfactory, and a long-term survival rate less than 30% has been reported. Live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for FHF in children has been advocated, but is reported rarely. We present our experience with LDLT in children with FHF. Between September 1993 and December 2002, primary LDLT was performed for 26 children; 8 of these children had FHF. Patient demographics, clinical and laboratory data, surgical details, complications, and graft and patient survival are reviewed. Four boys and four girls received left-lateral segment (n = 7) and full left-lobe (n = 1) grafts. Mean age was 2.9 +/- 1.2 years (range, 3 months to 11 years). Causes of FHF were drug induced in 2 patients and idiopathic in 6 patients. One child received a blood group-incompatible graft. Two patients died; 1 patient of cytomegalovirus infection at 8.6 months and 1 patient of recurrent hepatitis of unknown cause at 2.8 months after LDLT. The child who received a mismatched graft had refractory rejection and underwent a second LDLT with a blood group-compatible graft 19 days afterward. He eventually died of lymphoproliferative disease. Another patient developed graft failure related to venous outflow obstruction and survived after retransplantation with a cadaveric graft. With a median follow-up of 13.2 months (range, 2.8 to 60.3 months), actuarial graft and patient survival rates were 50% and 62.5%, respectively. Survival results appear inferior compared with those of 18 children who underwent LDLT for elective conditions during the same study period (graft survival, 89%; P =.051; patient survival, 89%; P =.281). Although survival outcomes are inferior to those in elective situations, LDLT is a timely and lifesaving procedure for children with FHF.

Recurrent autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation: diagnostic criteria, risk factors, and outcome

Approximately 20% to 30% of patients undergoing liver transplantation for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) develop features of recurrent disease. Diagnostic criteria for recurrent AIH are similar to those used in the nontransplanted liver and include, in varying combinations, biochemical, serological, and histological abnormalities and steroid dependency. However, these criteria are more difficult to apply in the liver allograft because of potential interactions between recurrent AIH and other complications of liver transplantation, particularly rejection, and the uncertain effects of long-term immunosuppression. In the absence of other reliable diagnostic markers, a number of studies have used the histological finding of chronic hepatitis as the main or sole criterion for diagnosing recurrent AIH. However, this also lacks diagnostic specificity because there are many other possible causes of chronic hepatitis in the liver allograft. In addition, approximately 20% to 40% of biopsies performed on patients as part of routine annual review have histological features of chronic hepatitis, for which no definite cause can be identified. Risk factors that have been associated with the development of recurrent AIH include suboptimal immunosuppression, HLA phenotype, disease type and severity in the native liver, and duration of follow up. In many cases in which recurrent AIH seems to be related to underimmunosuppression, biochemical and histological features rapidly resolve once adequate immunosuppression is restored. However, in other cases, recurrent AIH behaves more aggressively, with progression to cirrhosis and graft failure. Areas that require further study include developing uniform criteria for the diagnosis of recurrent AIH, identifying risk factors for severe recurrent disease, and determining optimal levels of immunosuppression that minimize the impact of disease recurrence without exposing patients to the risks of overimmunosuppression.

Clinicopathological analysis of liver allograft biopsies with late centrilobular necrosis: a comparative study in 54 patients

BACKGROUND

Centrilobular necrosis (CLN) in liver allografts can be a difficult lesion to interpret histologically. Although long recognized in association with developing chronic rejection, recent studies have described the lesion in association with a number of other disease processes. To clarify the histologic features that could allow a specific diagnosis to be made and to determine the outcome in different diagnostic groups, we assessed biopsies from 54 patients with CLN.

METHODS

Biopsies were classified as CLN with acute cellular rejection (ACR), CLN with hepatitis, CLN with developing chronic rejection (CR), and CLN of other etiology. Histologic features were assessed and then compared between groups, and clinical outcomes were noted.

RESULTS

Discriminating features for the different groups were as follows: CLN and ACR showed bile duct injury, endothelialitis, and acinar congestion. CLN and CR showed severe bile duct injury, bile duct loss, or centrilobular swelling. CLN and hepatitis was often a diagnosis of exclusion, although interface hepatitis was more common in this group. Cases of autoimmune hepatitis usually demonstrated plasma cell predominance in the portal and acinar inflammatory infiltrate. Significantly, there was considerable overlap in the histologic features between the groups, accounting for the diagnostic difficulty. Patients in whom the CLN was associated with CR or vascular complications generally required retransplantation or died, but in the groups with ACR and hepatitis, the outcome was more favorable.

CONCLUSIONS

With regard to most liver allograft biopsies showing late CLN, it is possible to make a specific diagnosis despite overlapping histologic features; this allows specific therapy to be instituted. Ultimately this is likely to contribute to improved graft survival.

Recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

The literature data on the recurrence of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLTX) is scanty.

METHODS

We analyzed the frequency of recurrent AIH in 47 patients who had been transplanted for AIH and survived at least 1 year after surgery. The following criteria were applied to diagnose recurrence: (1) positive autoantibodies in the titer> or =1:40; (2) hypertransaminasemia; (3) histological features of chronic hepatitis; (4) need of reintroduction or significant increase of steroids; and (5) lack of serum markers of viral hepatitis.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients (1 male/12 females) developed recurrent AIH after an interval of 6-63 months after OLTX (mean 29 months). Mean AST level at recurrence was 542+/-129 U/L. Three patients from this group needed regrafting. Mismatch of DR3+ recipient and DR3- donor was not more common in the recurrent disease group (37%) compared to the nonrecurrence group (31%) (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence of AIH after OLTX was diagnosed in a high proportion of patients and some of them required regrafting. DR3+ patients are not particularly prone to develop recurrence.

HGV/GBV-C infection in liver transplant recipients: antibodies to the viral E2 envelope glycoprotein protect from de novo infection

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Liver transplantation for endstage liver cirrhosis provides a useful model to investigate the pathogenetic role of hepatotropic viral agents. Recently, a new member of the Flaviviridae family, provisionally named HGV/GBV-C virus, has been associated with acute and chronic non A-E hepatitis. We studied 136 patients with cirrhosis consecutively transplanted at our institution for evidence of hepatitis G virus infection and correlation with the patients' clinical course.

METHODS

All patients survived for at least 6 months after transplantation (median follow-up 44 months) and underwent routine liver biopsies. Hepatitis G virus infection was studied using both direct viral RNA identification by RT-PCR and indirect detection of antibodies to the E2 glycoprotein.

RESULTS

There was a high frequency of the hepatitis G virus among patients undergoing liver transplantation, with HGV RNA and anti-E2 prevalence rates of 18.4% and 26.5%, respectively. HGV RNA prevalences significantly increased after transplantation (47.8%), with 47.3% rate of new infections in susceptible subjects. Anti-E2 antibodies were significantly more prevalent among patients transplanted for HCV-related cirrhosis and represented a strong protective factor against hepatitis G virus reinfection or recurrent infection. No correlation was found between HGV RNA or anti-E2 prevalences and survival after transplantation or rates of recurrent liver damage.

CONCLUSIONS

All available evidence suggests that, although liver transplant patients are heavily exposed to hepatitis G virus both before and after transplantation, hepatitis G virus does not induce liver disease in this setting. Most infections appear to be self-limited and induce a protective immunity which is marked by the presence of anti-E2 antibodies.

Chronic hepatitis in children after liver transplantation: role of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis G virus infections

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Chronic graft hepatitis occurs in 20-30% adults after liver transplantation but the prevalence and causes in children are not known. In adults, hepatitis C virus infection is prevalent prior to transplantation and recurrent infection is a frequent cause of graft dysfunction. The significance of the recently described hepatitis G virus infection remains unproven. The aim of this study was to examine the role of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis G virus infection in chronic graft hepatitis after paediatric liver transplantation.

METHODS

The prevalence of graft hepatitis and the role of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis G virus infections in 80 children after liver transplantation have been studied, with a median follow up of 4.4 years (range 0.4 to 10.7), and the persistence of hepatitis G infection in the presence of immunosuppression has been determined.

RESULTS

Chronic graft hepatitis was diagnosed in 19/80 (24%) children and was most frequently seen in children transplanted for cryptogenic cirrhosis (71%). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of chronic hepatitis in those transplanted before or after donor anti-HCV screening. Hepatitis C infection occurred in three children transplanted prior to donor screening but in only one was associated with chronic hepatitis. Hepatitis G infection was found in 22/79 (28%) transplant recipients but was not associated with graft hepatitis. In 17/21 children hepatitis G infection persisted for a median of 5.2 years after transplantation.

CONCLUSION

Chronic hepatitis occurred in 24% of children after liver transplantation, a similar prevalence to that in adults. Cryptogenic liver disease predisposed to graft hepatitis, but neither hepatitis C nor hepatitis G infection was associated. Hepatitis G virus caused a frequent and usually persistent infection after transplantation.