Re-treatment with interferon alfa of patients with chronic hepatitis C

The pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and deadly malignancies worldwide. The multikinase inhibitor sorafenib still remains the only approved agent for advanced HCC. In most cases, HCC develops based on advanced liver cirrhosis, whereas the underlying risk factors can be identified in the vast majority of patients.

METHODS

Here, we summarise and review the pathomechanisms in dependence of the underlying disease, gene signatures and frequent mutations in HCC.

RESULTS

Worldwide, HCC is most commonly caused by viral hepatitis B and C. It is less frequently associated with chronic exposure to toxins or hereditary liver diseases. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is an emerging risk factor with increasing prevalence nowadays. Emerging innovative technologies including whole-genome or -exome analyses have been applied for molecular and prognostic classifications as well as therapeutic implications. Mutations leading to activation of the Wnt pathway and inactivation of p53 were most frequently identified in HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent advances have significantly improved our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of HCC and its complex genetic landscape. The emerging data will open the door towards novel and more effective targeted and personalized therapies in this devastating disease.

Pathogenic mechanisms in HBV- and HCV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a highly lethal cancer, with increasing worldwide incidence, that is mainly associated with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. There are few effective treatments partly because the cell- and molecular-based mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis of this tumour type are poorly understood. This Review outlines pathogenic mechanisms that seem to be common to both viruses and which suggest innovative approaches to the prevention and treatment of HCC.

Impact of peginterferon and ribavirin therapy on hepatocellular carcinoma: incidence and survival in hepatitis C patients with advanced fibrosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) currently represents the major cause of liver-related death in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis. We assessed the influence of combination therapy on the risk of HCC, liver-related complications (ascites, variceal bleeding), and liver-related death (or liver transplantation).

METHODS

Three hundred seven chronic hepatitis C patients with bridging fibrosis (n=127) or cirrhosis (n=180) were evaluated by Cox regression analysis. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as undetectable serum HCV RNA at 24 weeks after treatment.

RESULTS

SVR developed in 33% of patients. The SVR rates were not different between patients with bridging fibrosis (37%) and those with cirrhosis (30%), p=0.186. During a median follow-up of 3.5 years (range 1-18 years) after the last treatment, the incidence rates per 100 person-years of HCC, liver-related complications, and liver-related death, were 1.24, 0.62, and 0.61 among SVR patients, respectively, and 5.85, 4.16, and 3.76 among non-SVR patients, respectively (log-rank test, p<0.001). According to multivariate analysis, non-SVR was an independent predictor of HCC (HR 3.06; 95% CI=1.12-8.39), liver-related complications (HR 4.73; 95% CI: 1.09-20.57), and liver-related death (HR 3.71; 95% CI=1.05-13.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SVR is achieved in one-third of patients with HCV-related cirrhosis treated with peginterferon and ribavirin. SVR has a strong independent positive influence on the incidence of HCC and on the prognosis of these patients.

Old and emerging therapies in chronic hepatitis C: an update

The main goal of therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is to achieve a sustained virological response currently defined as undetectable HCV-RNA in peripheral blood determined with the most sensitive polymerase chain reaction technique 24 weeks after the end of treatment. This goal is practically equivalent with eradication of HCV infection and cure of the underlying HCV-induced liver disease. The current standard in hepatitis C treatment consists in combination regimens of pegylated interferon-alpha (Peg-INF-alpha) with Ribavirin (RBV). Such treatment schemes are quite successful in patients with HCV genotypes 2 and 3 infections achieving HCV eradication rates of 75-90%. However, they are much less effective in patients with genotypes 1 and 4 infections with eradication rates ranging between 45% and 52%. Moreover, they have several, and sometimes severe, adverse effects and contraindications, further limiting their efficacy and applicability in an appreciable number of patients with chronic HCV-induced liver disease. Therefore, the need for improvement of existing therapies and for development of new effective, safe and tolerable drugs is a matter of great clinical relevance and importance. In this article, recent improvements in the current standard of therapy with IFN-alpha and RBV in various subsets of patients with chronic hepatitis C and in the clinical development of new emerging drugs, particularly small molecules, will be reviewed and commented. The article is divided in two main parts: (i) improvements in the standard combination therapies and schemes of approved Peg-INF-alpha with RBV and expectations from new interferons, interferon inducers and alternatives to RBV; (ii) new drugs for HCV in clinical development focusing mostly on specific inhibitors of HCV and less so on other drugs including immune therapies.

Treatment of Relapsers after Combination Therapy for Chronic Hepatitis C

Sustained virologic response rates are significantly higher in patients who have relapsed after a previous course of therapy compared with patients who did not respond. A meta-analysis of combination therapy in patients who failed IFN monotherapy reported SVR rates of 52% in relapsers to prior therapy and 16% in nonresponders. Similarly, relapsers after combination standard IFN and RBV therapy have higher SVR rates than combination of therapy nonresponders when treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. For this reason, patients who relapse after a previous course of therapy should be considered potential candidates for retreatment. Factors that have been associated with SVR in these patients include genotype non-I, low viral loads, and lesser degrees of fibrosis. The course of treatment in all patients who have relapsed after prior therapy should be reviewed to identify possible reasons for failure to achieve an SVR. In particular, optimal dosing of PEG IFN and RBV and the occurrence and timing of treatment dose reductions during prior therapy should be reviewed. The reasons for dose reduction should be addressed before initiating another course of therapy in an effort to optimize the chance for a SVR. Patients who had dose reduction for depression, anemia, or neutropenia, should be considered for antidepressants, erythropoietin, or, if neutropenia is severe, granulocyte colony stimulating factor therapy, respectively, during retreatment. Prolongation of therapy beyond 48 weeks in patients with relapse after a standard course of PEG IFN and RBV may offer a chance of SVR. Novel agents currently in development, including protease and polymerase inhibitors, may prove to be therapeutic options for these patients in the future.

Treatment of relapsers after combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C

A significant number of patients with chronic hepatitis C relapse after treatment. As therapy for CHC has improved over the last decade, the issue of retreating patients who did not achieve a sustained virologic response with previous treatment regimens frequently arises. Several studies have assessed the efficacy of pegylated interferon (IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) combination therapy in IFN and RBV therapy relapsers. Patients who have relapsed after therapy have significantly higher SVR rates than those who are nonresponders to therapy and should be considered candidates for retreatment. Predictors of a favorable response to therapy in naïve patients appear to also predict response to therapy in patients who have relapsed previously.

Chronic hepatitis C and no response to antiviral therapy: potential current and future therapeutic options

A significant proportion of chronic hepatitis C patients fails to achieve sustained virologic response even after treatment with the current, more potent, combination of pegylated interferon-alpha (IFNa) plus ribavirin. Such patients represent a rather heterogeneous group and may be divided initially into relapsers and nonresponders. Both the type of previous therapy and of previous response are very important factors for the indication and the type of re-treatment. The combination of pegylated IFNa and ribavirin seems to be a rational approach for patients who failed to respond to IFNa monotherapy. Pegylated IFNa-based regimens appear to induce sustained responses in 40-68% of relapsers but in only 11% of nonresponders to previous therapy with standard IFNa plus ribavirin. Thus, new therapeutic approaches are needed for the latter subgroup of patients as well as those who fail to respond to pegylated IFNa-based regimens. Such new approaches currently under evaluation include the triple combination of pegylated IFNa, ribavirin, and amantadine, alternative types of IFN, use of agents with ribavirin like activity but lesser degrees of side-effects, inhibitors of hepatitis C virus (HCV) replication, mainly inhibitors of NS3 protease or helicase, antisense oligonucleotides, and ribozymes, and several immunomodulators. Moreover, maintenance antifibrotic therapy, mostly with low doses of pegylated IFNa, are under evaluation in patients with advanced fibrosis. Thus, even in the current era of the potent pegylated IFNa-based regimens, the management of these difficult-to-treat patients represents an increasingly frequent problem and perhaps the most challenging therapeutic task in chronic hepatitis C.

Clinical comparison of high-dose interferon-alpha2b with or without ribavirin for treatment of interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Interferon a with ribavirin combination therapy is effective but still unsatisfactory in the treatment of patients with interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C.

AIMS

To compare, in a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study, high-dose interferon-alpha2b with or without ribavirin in the treatment for interferon-relapsers.

PATIENTS

A total of 52 patients with interferon-relapsed chronic hepatitis C were randomly assigned to receive 24-week treatment with interferon-alpha2b (6 MU three times per week) combined with either ribavirin (1,000 to 1,200 mg per day) or a matched placebo and then followed for an additional 24 weeks.

METHODS

Hepatitis C virus RNA was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. For determining viral concentration, the commercial bDNA Quantiplex hepatitis C virus-RNA 2.0 assay was used. Genotyping was performed by reverse hybridization assay

RESULTS

At the end of treatment, no detectable hepatitis C virus RNA levels were observed in 92% (24/26) of patients on interferon alpha2b/ribavirin and 81% (21/26) of patients on interferon alpha2b/placebo. At the end of the follow-up, a higher sustained virological response rate was seen in patients treated with interferon alpha2b/ribavirin than those treated with interferon alpha2b/placebo (69% vs 23%, p < 0.001). Patients with either initially high levels of viral concentration or with genotype 1 responded poorly. Patients who received interferon-alpha2b/ribavirin treatment and in whom no hepatitis C virus RNA was detected at 4th week after treatment had 90% chance to achieve sustained virological response.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose interferon-alpha2b plus ribavirin treatment is highly effective in interferon-relapsed patients.

Interferon alfacon-1: a review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C

Interferon alfacon-1 (consensus interferon) is a non-naturally occurring, synthetic, type 1 interferon (IFN)alpha that is used for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The efficacy of subcutaneously administered interferon alfacon-1 has been demonstrated in clinical trials during the treatment of LFN-naive patients (interferon alfacon-1 9microg 3 times a week for 24 weeks) and retreatment of nonresponders and relapsers to previous interferon therapy (interferon alfacon1 15 microg 3 times a week for up to 48 weeks). Higher and more frequent interferon alfacon-1 dosages have also been investigated. Results from a pivotal double-blind randomised trial in 704 patients with chronic hepatitis C showed that interferon alfacon-19 microg 3 times a week achieved virological and biochemical response rates of 34.9 and 42.2%, respectively, at treatment end-point (week 24). Sustained virological and biochemical responses (week 48) were reported in 12.1 and 20.3% of the patients, respectively. In general, response rates in recipients of interferon alfacon-1 9 microg 3 times a week were similar to those achieved with IFN-alpha2b 3 MIU 3 times a week. However, interferon alfacon-1 was more effective in the subgroup of patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 at end-point (virological response, 24 vs 15%; p < 0.05) and post-treatment observation period (8 vs 4%) although the difference between treatment groups was statistically significant only at treatment end-point. The sustained virological response rate achieved in patients with high baseline levels of serum HCV RNA receiving interferon alfacon-1 was statistically superior to that exhibited in the IFN-alpha2b treatment group (7 vs 0%; p < Interferon alfacon-1 also showed efficacy during the retreatment of non-responders and relapsers to previous IFN therapy in a large nonblind multicentre trial. Sustained virological response (week 72) was observed among 13 and 58% of nonresponders and relapsers, respectively, after 48 weeks of treatment with interferon alfacon-1 15 microg 3 times a week. Interferon alfacon-1 has been generally well tolerated in clinical trials. As with other IFNs, adverse events were reported frequently but were usually considered of mild to moderate severity, decreased with time and caused a small percentage of patients to withdraw from the treatment. Fever, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia, headache and rigors were the most frequently reported adverse events. Psychiatric adverse events appeared to be dose-related and caused the majority of treatment withdrawals.

CONCLUSION

Interferon alfacon-1 is generally well tolerated and is an effective agent in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Comparative data from a pivotal randomised trial indicate that the drug has at least equivalent efficacy to IFNalpha-2b, and a statistically significant advantage was demonstrated at treatment end-point in patients infected with HCV genotype 1. A number of ongoing trials with interferon alfacon-1 are evaluating issues such as the optimal dosage regimen and duration of therapy in an effort to improve sustained virological response to therapy, a goal for IFNs in general.

Retreatment with interferon for chronic hepatitis C after transient response

Approximately half of all patients with chronic hepatitis C show an initial biochemical response to interferon, but only 15% to 20% of patients achieve a sustained response. We studied the efficacy of retreatment with interferon for patients with chronic hepatitis C who showed transient biochemical responses to initial treatment. Thirty patients who relapsed were retreated 1 to 52 months (median 14) after the end of initial treatment, according to the previously used regimens. The responses were correlated with the pre-retreatment patient data. The liver histologic grades, compared with those found before the initial treatment, were better in eight (27%) patients but worse in six (20%), whereas the fibrosis stage was improved in five (17%) but worsened in eight (27%). All patients displayed end-of-retreatment biochemical responses. Of the 30 patients, 10 (33%) achieved sustained aminotransferase normalization and serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA clearance, but the remaining 20 patients showed relapse within 1 year after cessation of retreatment. Univariate analysis associated the sustained response with low pre-retreatment viral loads (0.8 +/- 0.7 MEq/mL vs. 9.1 +/- 6.5 MEq/mL; p = 0.006), short treatment intervals (13 +/- 13 months vs. 22 +/- 14 months; p = 0.031), and low histologic grades (1.3 +/- 0.7 vs. 1.9 +/- 0.7; p = 0.039). However, multivariate analysis indicated that only the pre-retreatment viral load was predictive of the sustained response (p = 0.049). These findings suggest that transient responders to interferon are likely to respond to retreatment but the achievement of a sustained response depends on the HCV viral load before retreatment.

Combined treatment of relapse of chronic hepatitis C with high-dose alpha2b interferon plus ribavirin for 6 or 12 months

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Retreatment of relapses of chronic hepatitis C with a standard regimen of interferon plus ribavirin for 6 months obtains a sustained response in a minority of patients with high viraemia and genotype 1b. We aimed to assess whether increasing the interferon dose and prolonging the time of combined treatment may enhance the effectiveness, and also to evaluate the tolerability, and to identify the determinants of sustained response.

METHODS

Fifty subjects with chronic hepatitis C who had relapsed after one or more courses of a-interferon monotherapy were randomised to receive alpha2b interferon (6 MU tiw) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg daily) for 6 or 12 months. ALT normalisation and serum HCV-RNA clearance at the end of treatment and 6 months after stopping therapy were used as markers for sustained response.

RESULTS

End-of-treatment response was achieved in 48 patients (96%) and 27 (54%) had a complete sustained response. Patients treated for 12 months had a higher rate of sustained response (18/25, 72%; 95% C.I. 0.54-0.89) than those treated for 6 months (9/25, 36%; 95% C.I. 0.17-0.55, p=0.01). Twelve months of therapy was significantly more effective for patients with genotype 1b and baseline serum HCV-RNA greater than 450 000 copies/ml (p=0.005). Seven subjects (14%) discontinued treatment because of side effects. Logistic regression analysis showed 12 months of therapy, young age and low pre-treatment serum HCV-RNA to be independent predictors of sustained response.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapsers with genotype 1b and high levels of HCV-RNA will benefit from a 12-month course of 6 MU tiw interferon plus ribavirin, while subjects with genotype 1b and low levels of serum HCV-RNA or with genotype other than 1b may be treated for 6 months.

Hepatitis C: retreatment and treatment of patients with renal failure

This paper addresses two difficult issues in the treatment of hepatitis C: patients who fail to achieve a sustained response after the first course of treatment, and those who simultaneously suffer from chronic renal failure. With the recent improvements in firstline treatment, retreatment is mainly applicable to those who have previously received 6-month of interferon monotherapy at 3 MU thrice weekly. For those who had an end-of-treatment response but relapsed, there is a choice between interferon monotherapy at increased dose and/or duration of treatment, or a 6-month course of combination therapy. Retreatment of non-responders is generally unsuccessful, but some patients may respond to interferon-alpha 3 MU and ribavirin 1.0-1.2 g/day. For patients with chronic renal failure and hepatitis C, combination treatment is not possible because ribavirin is contraindicated. Interferon given at a dose of 1.5 MU thrice weekly was reported to be fairly well tolerated by patients who were on dialysis and resulted in end-of-treatment and sustained biochemical and virological response in some cases. Interferon given in the usual doses may be associated with severe adverse effects in patients with renal failure, and can precipitate allograft rejection in patients who have undergone renal transplantation.

Methodological issues in papers on IFN therapy: time for reappraisal

We conducted an analytical review of 194 full papers on interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C to evaluate current methodology (i.e. study design, criteria for evaluating the efficacy of therapy and predictors of response). Of the papers evaluated, 64 were randomized controlled trials (RCT), 40 were non-randomized controlled trials (NRCT) and 90 were observational studies (OS). The methodological analysis was focused mainly on clinical trials. The number of patients enrolled in RCT was higher compared with the number enrolled in NRCT. Uniform enrolment criteria were used in less than 50% of the trials. Only 20% of RCT and 2.5% of NRCT used criteria for defining sample size. The response rate was calculated on an intention-to-treat basis in 36 of the RCT and in 14 of the NRCT. The outcome of treatment and the criteria employed to define the response to treatment were found to be far from standardized. In 51.5% of the RCT and 42.5% of the NRCT, normalization of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level at the end of follow-up was the only marker of response studied. Only 57.6% of the trials considered histological evidence as an important outcome. Among the clinical trials, 71.1% evaluated predictors of good response to IFN therapy. In 51% of the OS, ALT normalization by the end of follow-up was the only criterion for defining response. In conclusion, to ensure a high level of reliability in comparing or combining the results of different studies, some basic general requirements must be followed when planning trials on antiviral therapy.

Pathogenesis, diagnosis and management of hepatitis C

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. It is estimated that about 170 million people are chronically infected with HCV. Chronic hepatitis C is a major cause of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma and HCV-related end-stage liver disease is, in many countries, the first cause of liver transplantation. HCV infection is characterized by its propensity to chronicity. Because of its high genetic variability, HCV has the capability to escape the immune response of the host. HCV is not directly cytopathic and liver lesions are mainly related to immune-mediated mechanisms, which are characterized by a predominant type 1 helper cell response. Co-factors influencing the outcome of the disease including age, gender and alcohol consumption are poorly understood and other factors such as immunologic and genetic factors may play an important role. Recent studies have shown that the combination therapy with alpha interferon and ribavirin induces a sustained virological response in about 40% of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The sustained response rates are mainly dependent on the viral genotype (roughly 60% in genotype non-1 and 30% in genotype 1). Reliable diagnostic tools are now available and useful for detecting HCV infection, to quantify viral load and to determine the viral type. The assessment of the viral quasispecies and the characterization of viral sequences might be clinically relevant but standardized and simple techniques are needed. The lack of animal models and of in vitro culture systems hampers the understanding of the pathogenesis of chronic hepatitis C and the development of new antivirals. New therapeutic schedules with higher and/or daily doses of alpha interferon do not seem to improve the efficacy greatly. The conjugation with polyethylene glycol (PEG) improved the pharmacodynamics and the efficacy of alpha interferon. Emerging new therapies include inhibitors of viral enzymes (protease, helicase and polymerase), cytokines (IL-12 and IL-10), antisense oligonucleotides and ribozymes. The first candidate compounds should be available in the next few years. The development of an effective vaccine remains the most difficult and pressing challenge. Because of the high protein variability of HCV, protective vaccines could be extremely difficult to produce and therapeutic vaccines seem more realistic. Considerable progress has been made in the field of HCV since its discovery 10 years ago but a major effort needs to be made in the next decade to control HCV-related liver disease.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in nonresponders to interferon monotherapy

Sixty percent of patients fail to respond to interferon monotherapy. African-Americans with hepatitis C appear to respond less well to interferon monotherapy. Retreatment with a higher dose of consensus interferon for 48 weeks has led to a sustained virologic response rate of 13%. As a group, interferon nonresponders who breakthrough while on interferon monotherapy seem to have a more favorable response rate to a repeat course of treatment. Retreatment with interferon and ribavirin for 6 months in nonresponders led to a sustained virologic response rate of 21%. Preliminary results from two trials in the United States demonstrate similar treatment efficacy. There is now evidence that maintenance interferon therapy may also be beneficial in interferon monotherapy nonresponders.

The effect of retreatment with interferon-alpha on the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Interferon (IFN) has been reported to have beneficial long term effects that reduce the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), even in patients who do not have complete responses to IFN. The authors evaluated the effect of retreatment with IFN-alpha on the long term prognoses of those with incomplete responses to their initial IFN-alpha treatment.

METHODS

Among 271 patients with incomplete responses to initial IFN-alpha treatment who had received sufficient dose and duration (a total dose of more than 350 megaunits administered over a period longer than 12 weeks) between October 1989 and September 1997, 63 patients received retreatment and 208 did not. The authors retrospectively compared the incidence of HCC between patients who received retreatment and those who did not.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between these two groups. The cumulative incidence of HCC was significantly lower among the patients who had retreatment, and retreatment with IFN-alpha was the only factor that correlated with the lower incidence of HCC in multivariate analysis. The results were similar when the 12 patients with complete responses to retreatment were excluded from the analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Retreatment with IFN-alpha appeared to have the additional effect of suppressing the development of HCC in patients who had incomplete responses to the initial treatment, even when the hepatitis C virus was not cleared (i.e., a complete response was not achieved) with retreatment. Further prospective study is required.

Overview of interferon therapy for chronic hepatitis C

The future therapy for chronic hepatitis C will probably include measures to decrease hepatocellular injury along with multidrug combinations, including inhibitors of the hepatitis C viral protease, helicase, or polymerase to reduce serum levels or eradicate HCV RNA. The results of recently concluded trials of IFN-alpha 2b plus ribavirin combination therapy have shown a twofold improvement in the biochemical and virologic response rates and superiority by other measures of efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. In view of these results, new guidelines for the management of chronic HCV infection are appropriate (Fig. 1).

Chronic hepatitis C: interferon retreatment of relapsers. A meta-analysis of individual patient data. European Concerted Action on Viral Hepatitis (EUROHEP)

Relapse after interferon (IFN) therapy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection occurs in 50% of patients after the initial response. The benefit of retreatment with IFN alone has not been assessed in large controlled studies. To assess the effectiveness and the tolerability of IFN retreatment and to identify the optimal second course regimen, we performed a meta-analysis of individual patient's data on a set of 549 patients (mean age 43.8 years; 12.2 SD, men: 65%) who had an end-of-treatment biochemical response to a first IFN course and then relapsed. Retreatment was started within 24 months after the end of the first course. Biochemical end-of-treatment responses (ETR) and sustained responses (SR) were observed in 405 of 549 (73.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.1-77.5) and in 124 of 549 (22.6%; CI 19.1-26.1) patients, respectively. One hundred seventy-five of 404 patients (43.3%; CI 38.6-48.2) developed an end-of-treatment, biochemical, and virological response when retreated. A biochemical and virological SR to retreatment occurred in 73 of 494 (14.8%; CI 11.7-18) patients. Thirty-two patients (5. 8%; CI 3.5-7.8) stopped retreatment for adverse effects. Biochemical and virological SR was predicted independently by logistic regression analysis using a negative HCV RNA at the end of the first cycle of IFN (P =.01) and by retreatment with a high IFN dose (P =. 03). Age, cirrhosis, genotype, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels before retreatment were not significant by multivariate analysis. The excellent tolerability of IFN monotherapy retreatment makes it an option for patients who transiently cleared HCV-RNA during their first IFN course. Patients should be retreated with a high IFN dose regardless of the strength of the dose received during the previous course of treatment.

Viral hepatitis

Viral hepatitis is still one of the most common causes of acute and chronic liver disease worldwide. Major advances have been made in our knowledge of these diseases, many during the past year. Molecular biology and clinical studies have improved our understanding of the mechanisms of antiviral drugs, as well as viral resistance to therapy. The risks of hepatitis A in patients with chronic liver disease have been confirmed, and the efficacy of hepatitis A vaccines in these patients has been proven. Aggressive combination therapy has emerged as a promising strategy for chronic hepatitis B and C, and techniques for immune prophylaxis for hepatitis B are being improved. Liver transplantation has become routine for end-stage hepatitis B virus liver disease, and new strategies to prevent and treat recurrence are being explored. This review discusses the recent advances in our knowledge of hepatitis viruses A through G, focusing on the literature of the past year.

Long-term administration of interferon-alpha in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C: follow-up of liver fibrosis over 5 years

In chronic hepatitis C, previous data have shown that short-term treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) can reduce collagen deposition in the liver independently of the viral response. The aim of this work was to determine, in non-responder patients, the long-term effect of IFN-alpha on liver fibrosis according to the total administered dose and the fibrotic stage. Fibrosis was investigated on liver biopsies from 24 non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C retreated with successive courses of IFN-alpha. The degree of liver fibrosis was assessed on three successive biopsies, performed before IFN-alpha treatment and 1 and 5 years later, in 13 and 11 patients, respectively, treated for less (mean: 7.5 months, 313 MU) and more (mean: 21.8 months, 791 MU) than 1 year. For each biopsy, fibrosis was assessed using a histological semiquantitative fibrosis scoring system and by morphometry after picrosirius red staining. Regardless of the dose and duration of IFN-alpha therapy, a slight decrease of fibrosis was observed in patients 5 years after starting treatment. In cirrhotic patients, a short treatment induced an improvement followed by a relapse of fibrosis in 57%, and only 43% of patients showed constant collagen regression over the 5 years of follow-up. On the contrary, after prolonged therapy, a progressive and significant decrease occurred throughout the follow-up period in all patients (P = 0.045). Long-term treatment with IFN-alpha is therefore associated with regression of liver fibrosis, particularly in cirrhotic patients. These promising results need to be confirmed in a larger series of patients.

Better efficacy of a 12-month interferon alfa-2b retreatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C relapsing after a 6-month treatment: a multicenter, controlled, randomized trial. Le Groupe D'étude et De Traitement du Virus De L'hépatite C (Get.Vhc)

We studied the efficacy of three interferon alfa-2b (IFN-2b) regimens for the retreatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with prior complete response followed by relapse. Consecutive patients with CHC who had a complete biochemical response but relapse after a first course of 6 months of IFN with 3 million units (MU) given subcutaneously three times per week were enrolled in the study. Six to 24 months after the end of the first treatment, the patients were randomly assigned to receive IFN with either the same regimen (group 1), a regimen of 12 months with 3 MU (group 2), or a regimen of 6 months with 10 MU (group 3). Sustained biochemical response was defined as normal serum alanine transaminase (ALT) values during the follow-up and sustained virological response as a clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA from the serum at the end of follow-up (6 months' posttreatment). Histological improvement was defined as a decrease of 1 point in Metavir score between the first liver biopsy and a biopsy performed at 6 months' postretreatment. Two hundred forty-seven patients were randomized: 75 to group 1, 91 to group 2, and 81 to group 3. In an intent-to-treat analysis, 12%, 36.3%, and 18.5% of patients had a sustained biochemical response after retreatment in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P <.001); 13. 8%, 32.4%, and 17.2% of patients had a sustained virological response after retreatment in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P <. 05). A low viral load and patients in group 2 were independently associated with a sustained biochemical response. A low Knodell score index before treatment, patients with a high level of ALT before retreatment, genotype 3, low viral load, and patients in group 2 were independently associated with sustained virological response. Younger age, a high level of ALT, a low level of gamma-glutamyl transferase before retreatment, low viral load, and patients in group 2 were independently associated with sustained biochemical and virological response. Among the 80 patients with repeated liver biopsies, 47.6% had improved histological activity scores; this improvement was associated with a sustained biochemical and virological response. In patients with CHC initially treated with 3 MU of IFN given subcutaneously three times per week over a 6-month period, and who subsequently developed a relapse after a biochemical response, retreatment with a regimen of 3 MU of IFN given three times per week for 12 months produced better biochemical and virological sustained response rates than regimens involving a higher dose or a shorter duration of retreatment. The biochemical and virological sustained response was associated with histological improvement.