Chea V, Pleiner V, Schweizer V, Herzog B, Bode B, Tinguely M. Optimized workflow for digitalized FISH analysis in pathology.
Diagn Pathol 2021;
16:42. [PMID:
33975608 PMCID:
PMC8114497 DOI:
10.1186/s13000-021-01103-5]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Effective workflow management in a diagnostic pathology laboratory is critical to achieve rapid turnover while maintaining high quality. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis (FISH) is the preferred technique for detecting single chromosomal aberrations in diagnostic surgical pathology.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
FISH analysis applying a rapid hybridization protocol and using an automated whole-slide fluorescence scanning device (3DHISTECH, Sysmex, Switzerland) were implemented in our workflow. By analyzing 42 diagnostic cases, effects of two different scanning profiles on scanning time, and device memory usage were investigated. Manual signal counting (CaseViewer) and software based signal counting (FISHQuant) were compared.
RESULTS
The two scanning profiles, both including a Z-stack function, differed in their exposure time and digital gain. The "low profile" setting (LP) resulted in a significantly shorter scanning time and lower storage volume compared to the "high profile" (HP) setting, making the LP ideal for routine applications. Both signal counting methods (manual versus software based) provided similar cut-offs on a test-cohort of 13 samples.
CONCLUSION
Scanning FISH slides provides good picture quality, reduces the analysis time and allows easy picture archiving and facilitates remote diagnostics, allowing an effective workflow.
Collapse