Treosulfan-fludarabine-thiotepa conditioning before allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with advanced lympho-proliferative disease. A single centre study

Thiotepa-busulfan-fludarabine Compared to Treosulfan-based Conditioning for Haploidentical Transplant With Posttransplant Cyclophosphamide in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission: A Study From the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

We conducted a registry analysis including adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients in remission who had received thiotepa, busulfan, and fludarabine (TBF) or treosulfan-based (Treo) conditioning for haplo-hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) between 2010 and 2020. A total of 1123 patients met the inclusion criteria (968 received TBF and 155 received Treo). A 1:1 matched-pair analysis was performed on 142 TBF and 142 Treo patients. In the Treo group, 68% of patients received treosulfan at a dose ≥36 g/m2 and 54% of patients received a second alkylator (thiotepa or melphalan). We observed a trend toward increased incidence of grade II-IV acute (a) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at 180 days in the TBF group compared with Treo (29% versus 20%; P = 0.08), while incidence of grade III-IV aGVHD was not statistically different. Similarly, the incidence of chronic (c) GVHD was not statistically different in the 2 groups. Incidence of nonrelapse mortality at 2 years was 19% in TBF and 14% in Treo (P = 0.4). Relapse incidence at 2 years was not statistically different in the 2 groups (16% and 18% in TBF and Treo, respectively; P = 0.9). Leukemia-free survival, overall survival, and GVHD-free, relapse-free survival was 65% versus 68% (P = 0.6), 73% versus 76% (P = 0.5), and 54% versus 53% (P = 0.8) in TBF versus Treo, respectively. In conclusion, we did not find a significant difference between the 2 conditioning in the present study; Treo and TBF represent 2 valid alternative regimens for haplo-HSCT with PTCy for AML in remission.

Outcome of treosulfan-based reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens for HSCT in high-risk patients with primary immune deficiencies

INTRODUCTION

HSCT is the curative therapeutic option in PIDs. Due to the increase in survival rates, reduced-toxicity conditioning regimens with treosulfan have become another alternative. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze the outcome of treosulfan-based conditioning before HSCT for patients with PID.

METHOD

A total of 15 patients that received a treosulfan-based conditioning regimen for HSCT were recruited. Type of diagnosis, donor and stem cell source, pretransplant organ damage, infections, engraftment, chimerism, and transplant-related toxicities were analyzed.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 32 months, the overall survival was 86.7%. Following HSCT, 14 of 15 patients had engraftment, with 86.7% of the cohort having full-donor chimerism. The most common toxicity was seen on the skin (53.3%). Acute GVHD and chronic GVHD were documented in 53% and 20% of the study population, respectively. Although the cohort consisted of patients with pretransplant liver damage, SOS manifestations were documented in 20%.

CONCLUSION

Treosulfan-based conditioning regimens before HSCT are associated with lower toxicity compared to myeloablative regimens, are safe, and have high engraftment rates with full-donor chimerism in patients having PID, regardless of the specified genetic diagnosis and donor type.

Haploidentical transplantation outcomes for secondary acute myeloid leukemia: Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) study

Secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML) traditionally has inferior outcomes compared to de novo AML. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the sole potentially curative therapy. This study analyzes the outcomes for unmanipulated haploidentical HCT (haploHCT) for sAML using the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) registry of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT). We identified 154 patients with sAML who underwent haploHCT from 2006 to 2016. Median age at HCT was 60 years with time from diagnosis to HCT 5 months. At transplantation, 69 patients were in first CR and 85 had active disease. Fifty-seven (38.0%) patients underwent myeloablative conditioning and 97 (62.0%) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) conditioning. Multivariate analysis showed that there was no difference in RI, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), leukemia free survival (LFS), overall survival (OS), or GVHD-free/relapse free survival (GRFS) for conditioning intensity, age, performance status, or graft source. Active disease was associated with higher RI and inferior LFS, OS, and GRFS compared with patients in CR at time of transplant. T-cell depletion with anti-thymoglobulin resulted in higher NRM and inferior LFS, OS, and GRFS compared to post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) (HR 2.25, 2.01, 2.16, and 1.73, respectively with P values <.05). Our data shows that haploHCT is a feasible alternative for sAML when matched transplantation is unavailable.