Outcome of patients older than 80 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) treated with “standard” immunochemotherapy: A large retrospective study from 4 institutions

Silencing Aurora-kinase-A (AURKA) reinforced the sensitivity of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) via suppressing β-Catenin and RAS-extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2) pathway

The therapeutic effects of standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) therapy for prevalent lymphoma diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBC, DLBCL) still require improvement. Cancer-related aurora-kinase-A (AURKA) may work as a target for DLBCL treatment and its effect on CHOP therapy was investigated in the present study. The Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 was applied to analyze AURKA expression in DLBC tumor tissues and normal lymphoid tissues. The DLBCL tissues and normal lymphoid tissues were obtained from the DLBCL patients and healthy volunteers. Clinic data of patients were recorded, and AURKA expression in tissues and cells was detected and analyzed using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry. After AURKA in DLBCL cells was silenced or overexpressed and treated with CHOP, viability and apoptosis were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and flow cytometry. Expressions of AURKA, β-Catenin, phosphorylated (p)-β-Catenin, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase (ERK1/2), p-ERK1/2 and RAS were detected using qRT-PCR and Western blot. AURKA was highly expressed in DLBCL tissues and cells. Silencing AURKA inhibited AURKA expression and viability, but promoted apoptosis of DLBCL cells. CHOP had no obvious effects on AURKA expression while reducing viability and promoting apoptosis of DLBCL cells. Silencing AURKA enhanced the effects of CHOP on cell apoptosis of DLBCL cells by inhibiting the expressions of RAS and β-Catenin as well as the ratio of p-ERK1/2/ERK1/2 and promoting the ratio of p-β-Catenin/β-Catenin. Silencing AURKA reinforced the therapeutic effects of CHOP on reducing viability and promoting apoptosis of DLBCL cell via repressing β-Catenin and RAS-ERK1/2 pathway.

Impact of therapeutic management and geriatric evaluation on patient of eighty years and older with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on survival: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an aggressive disease. The first-line treatment is well defined in young patients; however, in oldest old patients treatment remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of therapeutics management and geriatric evaluation on survival in aged patients with DLBCL.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed and COCHRANE databases of published report on elderly patients (median age 80 and above) with DLBCL, from January 2002 to January 2020.

RESULTS

We included 32 studies (6 prospective and 26 retrospective). Patients treated with anthracyclines-containing chemoimmunotherapy had a 2-year overall survival (OS) of 59%-74.3% in prospective studies and 48.1-64.6% in retrospective studies. With less intensive treatment without anthracyclines, 2-year OS was 28%-53%. Without specific treatment, median OS was 2 months. History of falls and severe comorbidities were associated with a decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoimmunotherapy with anthracyclines increases survival in selected very elderly patients in comparison with less intensive regimen. Geriatric assessment, in particular altered mobility disorders and severe comorbidities, is predictive of survival and should be associated with the therapeutic decision. More comparative studies are needed to guide the management of frailer patients.

Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma in Patients 80 Years and Older: Worse Survival After Treatment Without Increased Relapse Rates

BACKGROUND

Age is an adverse prognostic factor in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), but there are limited data on the outcomes of patients' ≥80 years, including those treated with dose reduced chemoimmunotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 542 patients, 85 (16%) were ≥80 years of age.

RESULTS

Although the very elderly group had more frequent comorbidities and decreased performance status, 89% received therapy. Four-year PFS was 42% vs. 61% (P < .001) in patients ≥80 years vs. younger patients, while 4-year OS was 42% vs. 72% (P < .0001), respectively. In patients treated with anthracycline-containing regimens (n = 416) 4-year cumulative incidence of relapse with death as competing risk was not different between age groups. Median survival for DLBCL patients ≥80 years treated with R-CHOP or R-miniCHOP was 4.5 years. Survival after first relapse was significantly different between age groups: 5 vs. 19 months (P = .002), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Very elderly DLBCL patients have worse OS and PFS compared with younger patients but can achieve long term disease control and potentially be cured with chemoimmunotherapy. Older DLBCL patients treated with effective regimens do not have increased rates of relapse, but outcomes after relapse remain poor.

Doxorubicin and subsequent risk of cardiovascular diseases among survivors of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in Hong Kong

Evidence regarding the dose-related impact of doxorubicin on subsequent cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) in Asian patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) without preexisting CVDs is lacking. From a territory-wide electronic database in Hong Kong, we identified adults who were diagnosed with DLBCL and treated with chemotherapy between 2000 and 2018. We evaluated the patients for incident CVDs (including ischemic heart disease, heart failure, and cardiomyopathy). We evaluated the cause-specific cumulative incidence (csCI) of CVD with levels of doxorubicin exposure by using flexible parametric competing risk analysis and adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, therapeutic exposure, cardiovascular risk factors, and lifestyle factors. Controls were age- and sex-matched to DLBCL patients. We analyzed 2600 patients and 13 000 controls. The adjusted cause-specific hazard ratio (HR) for CVD in patients treated with >500 mg doxorubicin compared with non-doxorubicin regimens was 2.65 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23-5.74; P = .013). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year csCIs were 8.2%, 11.3%, and 12.8% in patients vs 3.1%, 4.4%, and 5.2% in controls, respectively. Hypertension (HR, 6.20; 95% CI, 0.79-48.44; P = .082) and use of aspirin/angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/beta-blocker at baseline (HR, 2.13-4.63; P < .001 to .002) might confer a higher risk of subsequent CVDs. In this Hong Kong population-based study, doxorubicin exposure (absolute dose >500 mg), together with hypertension or baseline use of medication for cardiovascular risk factors, was found to be associated with an increase in csCIs of CVDs. Tailoring therapeutic strategies to underlying CVD risk factors and risk-adapted monitoring and follow-up of susceptible DLBCL patients are advisable.

Frontline treatments in extremely elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a population-based study in Taiwan, 2010-2015

Background

The standard frontline therapy for patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is R-CHOP. However, patients older than 80 years are excluded from clinical trials. The importance of rituximab and anthracycline remains unknown in extremely elderly DLBCL patients. Here, we incorporated data from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database (TCRD), National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), and National Death Registry to evaluate the clinical benefits of rituximab and anthracycline in elderly patients. From the TCRD and NHIRD, we included DLBCL patients aged older than 60 years who received R-CHOP, R-CVP, CHOP, or CVP between 2010 and 2015.

Results

Of the 3228 eligible patients, 2559 were between 60 and 79 years (the 60–79 group), and 669 were older than 80 years (the 80+ group). The proportions of patients in the different Ann Arbor stages and the practice settings were similar in both groups. The male-to-female ratio and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores in the 80+ group were higher than those in the 60–79 group. Patients in the 60–79 group received R-CHOP more frequently than those in the 80+ group. In the 60–79 group, the median age of the patients receiving R-CVP or CVP was older than those receiving R-CHOP or CHOP. In the analysis of overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF), R-CHOP, female sex, younger age, lower Ann Arbor stage, lower CCI score, and care at a medical center predicted a favorable prognosis in the 60–79 group. However, only R-CHOP, younger age, and lower Ann Arbor stage remained independent favorable prognostic factors in the 80+ group.

Conclusions

Our population-based study demonstrated the clinical benefits of rituximab and anthracycline in extremely elderly Asian patients with DLBCL.

A real-world study of first-line therapy in 280 consecutive Swedish patients ≥80 years with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: very elderly (≥85 years) do well on curative intended therapy

This real-world study investigated outcome of first-line treatment in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). All (n = 292) new DLBCL patients ≥80 years diagnosed in the Stockholm region from 2000-2015 were included. Median age was 85 years, most had good performance status and low comorbidity score. CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) was used in 60/230 patients, R-CHOP in 170/230. Only 12% of patients aged 80-84 years and 6% of ≥85 years received full-dose chemotherapy. Infections (≥ grade III) occurred in 49% and 37% in the two age groups, respectively. Addition of rituximab resulted in a similar and significant improvement in both age subsets regarding complete remission, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Rituximab, performance status and stage, but not age, were significantly associated with PFS and OS by multivariate analysis. Strictly consecutive patients ≥85 years from a well-defined geographical region responded to and tolerated R-CHOP equally well as patients aged 80-84 years.

Treatment approaches for older and oldest patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma - Use of non-R-CHOP alternative therapies and impact of comorbidities on treatment choices and outcome: A Humedica database retrospective cohort analysis, 2007-2015

INTRODUCTION

We characterized real-world treatment patterns in older (65-74 years) and oldest (75-85 years) patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) receiving initial therapy (R-CHOP, non-R-CHOP regimens). Impact of comorbidities on treatment choice, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS) were assessed by age.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Humedica database, we identified 1436 newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL who received frontline therapy from 1/07-9/15. The 885 patients ≥65 years of age were further evaluated for baseline demographics, comorbidities, initial therapy, and PFS/OS.

RESULTS

Of 885 patients, 406 (45.9%) were age 65-74, and 479 (54.1%) age 75-85, years. First line therapy was R-CHOP (61.8%) or non-R-CHOP (38.2%). Although Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores were similar at baseline, congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction were more common in those receiving non-R-CHOP regimens. Survival outcomes were superior for those receiving initial R-CHOP, versus non-R-CHOP, therapy (median PFS 53.9 versus 27.8 months; two-year PFS 71.2% versus 51.6%, p < .0001; median OS not reached versus 45 months; two-year OS 81.3% versus 62.9%, p < .0001, respectively). Only 10.4% (R-CHOP) and 12.1% (non-R-CHOP) of patients received second line therapies. Two-year OS by age (65-74, 75-85 years) was 66.4% and 39.1%, respectively with R-CHOP (p = .0045), and 74.3% and 54.5%, respectively with non-R-CHOP (p = .004), therapy. Age ≥ 75 years and CCI of 2+ were associated with shorter OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified real-world first line treatment patterns for older patients with DLBCL. Our findings support the feasibility of administering standard R-CHOP therapy, even to oldest patients with DLBCL.

Curing diffuse large B-cell lymphomas in elderly patients

In older patients lymphoma is a frequent disease and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) represents >60% of all lymphomas. Elderly patients with DLBCL are a heterogeneous population and the definition of elderly varies within the literature. Even though the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicine, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) is considered standard therapy for DLBCL, management of elderly patients remains challenging. Accurate selection of patients able to tolerate proper immune-chemotherapy is crucial and the comprehensive geriatric assessment based on age, comorbidities and functional abilities of daily living, may help to discriminate among fit, unfit or frail patients. Unfit and frail patients need to be treated with chemotherapy at reduced intensity. Novel compounds with a favorable toxicity profile may represent a promising first-line therapeutic option in combination with standard immune-chemotherapy or as single agent in the relapse/refractory setting.